|
I mean, is this really news? Judges all just interpret the constitution however the gently caress they want anyway. If they agree then it's all "oh the constitution is the foundation for law in our great society blah blah blah" and if not then it's "well the Founding FathersTM, great as they were, couldn't have forseen all of the problems of our modern society and so hurr hurr hurr" This dude sounds like he's just stating his personal bias, but it's not like the rest of 'em don't have their own, in one way or another.
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2016 04:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 16:56 |
|
|
Tectonis posted:Amendment 28: You have the inalienable right to suck my big 'ol Donkey dick, fuckman. I seem to have missed this before writing my rant, which I'm now retracting. From the text above it is clear that the Constitution is still a living document, and fundamental for the preservation of inalienable rights in our country.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
Prorat posted:When the OP quote starts with "And" then it's probably out of context. It's actually more or less in context, in that there's not much context for that quote in the rest of the op-ed. The first bit is him just complaining about law professors and teachers not having any actual practical experience lawing.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2016 05:29
|
|