|
WHOOPS posted:Let's not go crazy, here. That wasn't a minimum, it was an exact guess.
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 21:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 11:30 |
|
|
E: I am retarded and posted this in the wrong tab.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
The Eagles will be Real Bad and tempt me to drink heavily. edit: the Eagles win the NFC East at 6-10, Super Bowl is Bengals/Cardinals. The NFC East is disbanded for crimes against football. http://nflplayoffpredictor.com/?L=EwRm5NM0Irq2g5pVPeJbFZ6mZIgmbRKOHNLMS60822e-JhPU1lDi7u3mkQyFscTtTzwiQA AFC 1. Bengals (13-3) 2. Bills (12-4) 3. Colts (11-5) 4. Chiefs (9-7) 5. Pats (12-4) 6. Texans (11-5) NFC 1. Cardinals (13-3) 2. Panthers (12-4) 3. Packers (11-5) 4. Eagles (6-10)  5. Seahawks (12-4) 6. Lions (11-5) axeil fucked around with this message at 18:02 on Aug 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
axeil posted:NFC Should have had the Lions get the #5 seed so that the Eagles could win a playoff game.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
AFC 1. Steelers (14-2) (I don't know how this happened.) 2. Patriots (13-3) 3. Raiders (12-4) 4. Colts (10-6) 5. Ravens (13-3) 6. Broncos (12-4) NFC 1 Packers (16-0) (I don't know how this happened.) 2. Panthers (15-1) 3. Seahawks (13-3) 4. Giants (11-5) 5. Cardinals (13-3) 6. Vikings (11-5) Super Bowl: Panthers over Pats I'm obviously wrong, but that's what happened when I messed with the simulator.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
MrLogan posted:Should have had the Lions get the #5 seed so that the Eagles could win a playoff game. The 6-10 Eagles beating the Lions in the Wild Card would be pretty hilarious. More hilarious if we beat the Seahawks though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 19:46
|
|
|
Probably Magic posted:AFC
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 19:54
|
|
|
The Arizona Cardinals will win the Superbowl that is my prediction
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 19:55
|
|
|
aint no team in the NFCE winning 11 games lol
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
Lol Broncos at 12 wins? That defense is incredible but only 4 losses with that schedule hmmm
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
TBeats posted:aint no team in the NFCE winning 11 games lol Hey, if Romo stays healthy and Elliot is as good as advertised and the defense can crawl all the way up to below average, then they could maybe win 11 games! The NFC North has some stinker teams, and the Browns and maybe Ravens, and 49'ers/Buccaneers are both pretty beatable! Haha, oh wow does Washington get hosed by the same place finisher games this year: Washington: @Cardinals, Panthers Eagles: @Seahawks, Falcons Giants: @Rams, Saints, Cowboys: @49ers, Buccaneers
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 21:04
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Hey, if Romo stays healthy and Elliot is as good as advertised and the defense can crawl all the way up to below average, then they could maybe win 11 games! The NFC North has some stinker teams, and the Browns and maybe Ravens, and 49'ers/Buccaneers are both pretty beatable! I think if Eli can put some magic together the Giants have a good shot. They've got a decentish roster with a lot more depth than Washington or Dallas. I also like our chances but I'm a massive homer and it's probably way more likely we go 4-12 than get a playoff spot.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 21:12
|
|
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:Lol Broncos at 12 wins? That defense is incredible but only 4 losses with that schedule hmmm AFCW plays both south divisions. It wouldn't be surprising if all 4 AFCW teams end up at 8-8 or better.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 21:16
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Hey, if Romo stays healthy
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 21:24
|
|
|
MrLogan posted:AFCW plays both south divisions. It wouldn't be surprising if all 4 AFCW teams end up at 8-8 or better. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 21:29
|
|
|
MrLogan posted:AFCW plays both south divisions. It wouldn't be surprising if all 4 AFCW teams end up at 8-8 or better. I respect Denvers defense, they're great, but they're not as strong as last years (imo of course) and their quarterback play will be as dreadful or worse
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 21:35
|
|
|
In fairness, "dreadful or worse" was the QB situation last year. But that said, they were in a lot of games that could have gone the other way and Peyton was still as smart of a QB as always. Only 4 losses is a pretty tall order.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
He played 15, 15, 16 and 16 games the 4 seasons prior! Even if he's likely to destroy his neck and maybe die on the field this year, he's still pretty likely to play way more then 4 games!
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
Still need this as a gang tag.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
Probably Magic posted:Still need this as a gang tag.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
It's a beautiful piece of art and I will continue posting it
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
AFC South is easily the best division.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Kirios posted:AFC South is easily the best division.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 00:10
|
|
|
Kirios posted:AFC South is easily the best division. Why have NFCE clownball when you can have shitball instead.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
WHOOPS posted:In fairness, "dreadful or worse" was the QB situation last year. These are great points that need to be made whenever people think a Sanchez level QB can guide this team to 11 or 12 wins just because it happened the year before. Last year was the exception, not the rule. You can just point to the Brad Johnson-led Bucs and Dilfer-led Ravens that won SBs then became irrelevant teams even although they had great defenses. QB play is still vital. I also think the losses of Jackson and Trevathan can't be dismissed. This is KC's division to lose.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 20:10
|
|
|
KC is coming back as a weaker team this year as well, no Justin Houston or Sean Smith
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 20:12
|
|
|
The Browns will have the number one pick Because the eagles will be the worst team in the league! The Browns will also have the second pick.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 21:07
|
|
|
Where's Houston?
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
In Texas
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:Where's Houston? Had a significant off season knee surgery and will miss a good chunk of the season
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
Pron on VHS posted:KC is coming back as a weaker team this year as well, no Justin Houston or Sean Smith Houston is huge and I think Smith is significant but the Chiefs have continuity in the schemes going for them and a great running game. The Raiders-Chiefs match up is going to be all about the Raiders o-line v. Chiefs pass rush.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2016 02:15
|
|
|
And hopefully lots of beating each other up
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2016 04:39
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:And hopefully lots of beating each other up That part tended to happen even when both teams were poo poo or one team was goodish and the other wasn't.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2016 05:32
|
|
|
Probably Magic posted:1 Packers (16-0) (I don't know how this happened.) I know we won the lottery with the NFC East and AFC South this year but that's still not even happening. e: Actually, gently caress it I'll break down the schedule. Week 1 @ JAX: W - If the defense is as good as last year, otherwise PUSH Week 2 @ MIN: PUSH Week 3 v DET: W - That offense is going to struggle Week 4 - BYE: I loving hate that bye weeks can come this early. They shouldn't start until week 6. PUSH Week 5 v NYG: W - Giants only win in Lambeau in the playoffs Week 6 v DAL: W - Will Romo even live long enough to play in this game? Week 7 v CHI: W - That offense is going to struggle too Week 8 @ ATL: W - LOL Week 9 v IND: W - I'm rooting for Luck to improve on last year's struggles but not here, and wow that roster is bad Week 10 @ TEN: W - LOL Week 11 @ WAS: W - This one will be closer than it has any business being Week 12 @ PHI: W - Thanks NFL for giving the Pack a cupcake at the end of a 3-game road trip Week 13 v HOU: W - Man, this schedule is looking easy as hell Week 14 v SEA: PUSH - Or at least, it WAS looking easy as hell Week 15 @ CHI: PUSH - I mean, if no one important is injured at this point, and the Packers don't just drop this game because LOL Bears, uh Week 16 v MIN: PUSH - I really feel like we're gonna drop one to them Week 17 @ DET: W - I just don't think the Lions are going to be as good without Megatron poo poo, now that I look at it there's no outright loss here. The Jaguars could hang 40 easy if the defense isn't as solid as it was last year, but if the offense is back to 2014 form, Rodgers and company could turn around and hang 50 on the Jags D, so that's a total crapshoot. Either way, I think this is a dark horse candidate for Game Of The Year. Barring some kind of serious injury or a major collapse on defense (it's happened before - see 2011), I could honestly see 9-2 as the worst case scenario going into December. I don't think 16-0 is within reach but, gently caress, 14-2 is if we get 2014's offense back with 2015's defense. On the other hand, if those 5 pushes turn to losses and the Packers go 3-3 in the division again, this could easily evaporate to 9-7 and a tenuous grip on a wild card spot while the Vikings win the North again. Fenrir fucked around with this message at 16:45 on Aug 6, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2016 16:09
|
|
|
Wide receiver is probably the best unit on the Lions.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2016 16:57
|
|
|
Fenrir posted:
Maybe the 1st Vikes game gets dropped because it's their 1st home game in the new stadium and they'll be pumped, but Packers wont drop both games to Minnesota unless Fire Island gives Aaron Rodgers an unlimited free pass and he retires week 1.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2016 18:21
|
|
|
Giants going 12-4, sorry ya'll. OBJ wrecks that punk rear end Norman twice.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 11:39
|
|
|
The NFC East is a poo poo show http://nflplayoffpredictor.com/?L=EwRjvMQnueqLkhyoUa62k4z8WSdSfXE8sjVI4g0Is5BvJlG08gua9Jt3mmgAGUcKA AFC North 2 Cincinnati Bengals - 13-3 5 Pittsburgh Steelers - 12-4 Baltimore Ravens - 10-6 Cleveland Browns - 2-14 AFC South 1 Indianapolis Colts - 13-3 Houston Texans - 8-8 Jacksonville Jaguars - 7-9 Tennessee Titans - 5-11 AFC East 4 New England Patriots - 11-5 New York Jets - 7-9 Buffalo Bills - 6-10 Miami Dolphins - 6-10 AFC West 3 Denver Broncos - 11-5 6 Kansas City Chiefs - 11-5 Oakland Raiders - 9-7 San Diego Chargers - 5-11 NFC North 1 Green Bay Packers - 14-2 5 Minnesota Vikings - 9-7 Chicago Bears 6-10 Detroit Lions - 4-12 NFC South 2 Carolina Panthers - 13-3 New Orleans Saints - 6-10 Tampa Bay Buccaneers - 5-11 Atlanta Falcons - 4-12 NFC East 4 Washington Redskins - 8-8 Dallas Cowboys - 7-9 Philadelphia Eagles - 7-9 New York Giants - 5-11 NFC West 3 Arizona Cardinals - 11-5 6 Los Angeles Rams - 9-7 Seattle Seahawks - 9-7 San Francisco 49ers - 3-13 Playoffs: AFC Wild Card: Patriots over Steelers Broncos over Chiefs NFC Wild Card: Cardinals over Rams Vikings over Redskins AFC Divisionals: Colts over Patriots Broncos over Bengals NFC Divisionals: Packers over Vikings Panthers over Cardinals AFC Championship: Colts over Broncos NFC Championship: Packers over Panthers Super Bowl: Packers over Colts Draft Order: 1. Cleveland Browns 2. San Francisco 49ers 3. Detroit Lions 4. Atlanta Falcons 5. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 6. New York Giants 7. Tennessee Titans 8. San Diego Chargers 9. New Orleans Saints 10. Miami Dolphins 11. Chicago Bears 12. Buffalo Bills 13. Dallas Cowboys 14. Philadelphia Eagles 15. New York Jets 16. Jacksonville Jaguars 17. Houston Texans 18. Seattle Seahawks 19. Oakland Raiders 20. Baltimore Ravens 21. Washington Redskins 22. Los Angeles Rams 23. Kansas City Chiefs 24. Pittsburgh Steelers 25. Minnesota Vikings 26. Arizona Cardinals 27. New England Patriots 28. Cincinnati Bengals 29. Denver Broncos 30. Carolina Panthers 31. Indianapolis Colts 32. Green Bay Packers
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 14:59
|
|
|
Fenrir posted:Week 1 @ JAX: W - If the defense is as good as last year, otherwise PUSH Also I like that the Jaguars have a week 4 or 5 buy (I forget which) because week 4-5 is their midseason considering they started training camp and thr non-stop grinding that is the NFL at the end of July. Also with the Jaguars a buy that early gives them time to correct the defense after a couple games. AAAAA! Real Muenster fucked around with this message at 15:24 on Aug 7, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 15:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 11:30 |
|
|
Pron on VHS posted:KC is coming back as a weaker team this year as well, no Justin Houston or Sean Smith That's why I predict a 9-7 season at best. It's a repeat of 2014 all over again with really strong aspects to the team but with really bad glaring ones as well that cost games. They'll be competitive though, even in those losses.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 22:41
|
|
