|
you posting amazon links isnt getting my sub made any faster
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 06:18 |
|
|
criscodisco posted:Fun fact: equal human rights don't include the right to smoke a bowl. "Fun fact: equal human rights don't include rights for perverts" -- someone in 1963
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:11
|
|
|
there's proportional representation of noble self-intoxicating normal people within the subset of people who choose the lifestyle of choosing homosexual impulse, meaning the effects stack and even out, therefore actually being gay is harder, op. qed
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:12
|
|
|
Cubone posted:there's proportional representation of noble self-intoxicating normal people within the subset of people who choose the lifestyle of choosing homosexual impulse, meaning the effects stack and even out, therefore actually being gay is harder, op. qed It's a matter of calculating total suffering. More people suffer in the USA because of cannabis prohibition than because of anti-gay bias. That's because there are a lot of cannabis smokers compared to gay people, and we arrest people for cannabis related activities and not for gay related ones.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:15
|
|
|
lol the sandwich artist here got banned for this garbage in DnD good job lovely subforum you did one thing right
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:17
|
|
|
im gaye posted:lol the sandwich artist here got banned for this garbage in DnD ...he spluttered. lol *wins thread*
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:21
|
|
|
You said "the subway". That's an actual thing for people who live in real cities. "Subway" is where you go to eat alone.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:23
|
|
|
schmitty9800 posted:You said "the subway". That's an actual thing for people who live in real cities. "Subway" is where you go to eat alone. i call it "the sube"
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:26
|
|
|
objects in mirror posted:It's a matter of calculating total suffering. More people suffer in the USA because of cannabis prohibition than because of anti-gay bias. That's because there are a lot of cannabis smokers compared to gay people, and we arrest people for cannabis related activities and not for gay related ones.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:28
|
|
|
Cubone posted:you're conflating absolute and relative numbers to apply a utilitarian ethical distinction caeteris paribus to affirm a disjunct If society totally ignored gay issues but instead addressed marijuana prohibition, more total societal suffering could have been prevented as a greater number of people were targeted/arrested/killed cause of weed prohibition than cause of being gay (in the usa). You cannot argue with this logic.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:39
|
|
|
let's say you take 3 lengths of toilet paper of 6 squares each, folded upon themselves and slightly moistened with tap water, to adequately wipe all the poo off your butt. hypothetically, if you could know the result of choosing to do that before you sat down to poop, could you use the same amount and type of toilet paper to clean your butt more efficiently by wiping and pooing at the same time, OR, do you contend that each bit of poo to come out of your butt would sully your posterior anew, and would not that, sir, would not that suggest that we've merely to poo ALL of our poo, ALL of our poo, at once, and wipe too but once, to clean the pooy buttholes of the fece what ails them?
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:40
|
|
|
objects in mirror posted:If society totally ignored gay issues but instead addressed marijuana prohibition, more total societal suffering could have been prevented as a greater number of people were targeted/arrested/killed cause of weed prohibition than cause of being gay (in the usa). You cannot argue with this logic. yes i can, you're conflating absolute and relative numbers to apply a utilitarian ethical distinction caeteris paribus to affirm a disjunct
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:41
|
|
|
john barrowman was right to block you, disjunct affirming assed bitch
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:42
|
|
|
objects in mirror posted:If society totally ignored gay issues but instead addressed marijuana prohibition, more total societal suffering could have been prevented as a greater number of people were targeted/arrested/killed cause of weed prohibition than cause of being gay (in the usa). You cannot argue with this logic. Counterpoint: Like it or not, it's impossible to argue that the spread of AIDS wasn't driven primarily because of the casual sex mentality of gay men. If it weren't for this unprecedented spread, it wouldn't have become the clause du jour. Nor would it have gotten the research that it received. While there is still no cure, the speed of advances in medicine for a disease in the time frame they were made in have never been matched in medical history. Consequently, testing for the disease wouldn't be so prevalent, allowing for the infection of many, many more people. Without the aforementioned medical advances, it would still be a death sentence. Edit: before anyone says that AIDS research isn't a gay rights issue, they're ignorant of the societal attitude towards the disease throughout the 80's. criscodisco fucked around with this message at 08:52 on Jul 19, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:44
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:46
|
|
|
Cubone posted:yes i can, you're conflating absolute and relative numbers to apply a utilitarian ethical distinction caeteris paribus to affirm a disjunct There is no conflation as the total numbers of victims of each type of prejudice (anti-gay, anti-weed user) contribute different quantity of suffering to society, with one contributing greater quantity of suffering than the other, but the lesser one being prioritized by liberals because it's the one that elites prefer to stand up against. In short, liberals have stood up for gay rights for the same reason they have largely been silent on the suffering of Palestinians: Because it's what elites want. And by "liberal" I mean "Liberal establishment" not all liberals.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:47
|
|
|
objects in mirror posted:There is no conflation as the total numbers of victims of each type of prejudice (anti-gay, anti-weed user) contribute different quantity of suffering to society,
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:55
|
|
|
that's not how you neg a gay republican, op
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 08:59
|
|
|
stop talking about grapefruits and get those giant oranges away from me
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 09:02
|
|
|
Cubone posted:lmao holy poo poo *wins argument*
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 09:17
|
|
|
somebody mentioned it already I see and it is just rumor but you should probly prep for the DEA rescheduling it to 2 so as to shove their iron fist up the legal states asses and making it defacto in the useless hands of big pharma because this is sadistic hell reality and you need to get your head around that
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 09:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 06:18 |
|
|
yay you're the winner! *gives u a lil weedman hat* now josh brolin has to unblock you and we all have to think it was cool and funny for you to post about it
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2016 09:27
|
|