|
criscodisco posted:Not many folks have been beaten or killed for blazing up. i actually beat a pothead to death but i wasn't convicted because i said he asked me if i wanted to smoke my big secret: he did not ask me that
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 07:15 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 12:20 |
|
mdm posted:also like 95% of gay people don't think there's an "alternative," and the "lifestyle" of a gay person is also nebulous so it's a retarded phrase left over from the 90s it's a way for big turds to find each other without people who have love in hearts noticing. bit like cruising tbh.
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 07:25 |
|
Iron Prince posted:what r u doin later pm me baby
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 08:00 |
|
there's proportional representation of noble self-intoxicating normal people within the subset of people who choose the lifestyle of choosing homosexual impulse, meaning the effects stack and even out, therefore actually being gay is harder, op. qed
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 08:12 |
|
objects in mirror posted:It's a matter of calculating total suffering. More people suffer in the USA because of cannabis prohibition than because of anti-gay bias. That's because there are a lot of cannabis smokers compared to gay people, and we arrest people for cannabis related activities and not for gay related ones.
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 08:28 |
|
let's say you take 3 lengths of toilet paper of 6 squares each, folded upon themselves and slightly moistened with tap water, to adequately wipe all the poo off your butt. hypothetically, if you could know the result of choosing to do that before you sat down to poop, could you use the same amount and type of toilet paper to clean your butt more efficiently by wiping and pooing at the same time, OR, do you contend that each bit of poo to come out of your butt would sully your posterior anew, and would not that, sir, would not that suggest that we've merely to poo ALL of our poo, ALL of our poo, at once, and wipe too but once, to clean the pooy buttholes of the fece what ails them?
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 08:40 |
|
objects in mirror posted:If society totally ignored gay issues but instead addressed marijuana prohibition, more total societal suffering could have been prevented as a greater number of people were targeted/arrested/killed cause of weed prohibition than cause of being gay (in the usa). You cannot argue with this logic. yes i can, you're conflating absolute and relative numbers to apply a utilitarian ethical distinction caeteris paribus to affirm a disjunct
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 08:41 |
|
john barrowman was right to block you, disjunct affirming assed bitch
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 08:42 |
|
objects in mirror posted:There is no conflation as the total numbers of victims of each type of prejudice (anti-gay, anti-weed user) contribute different quantity of suffering to society,
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 08:55 |
|
stop talking about grapefruits and get those giant oranges away from me
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 09:02 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 12:20 |
|
yay you're the winner! *gives u a lil weedman hat* now josh brolin has to unblock you and we all have to think it was cool and funny for you to post about it
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 09:27 |