|
C. Everett Koop posted:Do you think that Harambe was murdered? Do you believe that Hillary Clinton is responsible for the death of Harambe?
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 05:22 |
|
|
Do you agree that President Obama was right in ordering the execution of Harambe?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 23:43
|
|
|
Who is the real mastermind behind ISIS? 1 - Barack Obama 2 - Hillary Clinton 3 - Harambe 4 - Barry Soetoro
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 04:39
|
|
|
C. Everett Koop posted:Who is the real mastermind behind ISIS? everyone knows that it is George Soros but yeah, I got  to throw at thise: iospace posted:another potential national level question: "Do you believe the election will be rigged?" I really like this question TeenageArchipelago fucked around with this message at 12:57 on Aug 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 12:46
|
|
|
Will American police forces be able to kill enough black men in time to give the Republicans a chance to win the election?
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 14:02
|
|
|
ColdPie posted:I think the hypothetical between Clinton and a non-cheeto candidate (Rubio?) would be best, since it won't be polluted by Dems who would not have voted in a hypothetical Republican primary re-do. This. Hillary vs Rubio Way more embarrassing for Trump than Hillary vs Johnson, because Rubio is actually a Republican, and thus wayyy more likely to be doing better than Trump. Johnson has super low name recognition, and I expect we'd see something like 55/25/20 Hillary/Johnson/neither+don't know I wouldn't contribute to a poll that asked questions like "how many "s"s in Mississippi?" - is it our goal to make people look stupid? Respondents will know that the question is designed to embarrass them. I doubt there'd even be much of an interesting partisan split given how poor the educational system in MS is. The goal here should be to embarrass TRUMP, not the people in one of the poorest states  e: also, I bet the Hillary vs Rubio question would get more media attention than the gimmick questions, given the fascination w Trump potentially dropping out thethreeman fucked around with this message at 23:07 on Aug 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
For useful crosstabs, you need to spend three questions on race, gender, and party affiliation. If you want both two-way and a four-way presidential questions, there's all five of your slots filled. e: Oh snap, it looks like PPP includes the crosstab-making questions in their package, as "plus demographics". Ok, disregard the above. How about two, four, statewide race, Would you prefer Obama or Hillary fill Scalia's seat? and Which of the first ten amendments is the worst? Squizzle fucked around with this message at 22:49 on Aug 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
My vote goes to Two-way, three-way, state election of some sort, Hillary v Rubio and "Do you think the election will be rigged?" It's a good combination of interesting questions that will be notable to us and potentially to pundits, and questions that will just give us more information about whatever state (and also make Jill Stein fans mad).
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
"Squizzle" [/quote posted:p Would you prefer Obama or Hillary fill Scalia's seat? This
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 04:46
|
|
|
"Do you believe that Trump is being influenced by Russia?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 05:04
|
|
|
My vote's for:
And, for the record, the NAMBLA and Puerto Rico questions are hilarious.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 05:11
|
|
|
If we do Lousiana, I really want a 3 way senate question with the leading Dem, Rep, and David Duke
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 05:28
|
|
|
Do you believe that Donald Trump would pursue a romantic relationship with his eldest daughter Ivanka if social mores were more lenient regarding incest? A) Yes B) No C) Not Sure D) Yes, but Donald Trump Jr. instead
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
Grrr stupid site won't let me upload an image to the campaign and won't let me launch it without.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 15:44
|
|
|
I kind of like the Who Do You Think Will Win question better than Do You Think The Election Will Be Rigged.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 16:04
|
|
|
Drop your ducats here https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/sa-mississippi-poll#/
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:What about something like "In a four way race, if your vote was the only one that counted, which candidate would you choose?" I like this a lot
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 17:14
|
|
|
C. Everett Koop posted:Do you think that Harambe was murdered?  Somehow have this smily be any option you can pick in the poll.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 19:23
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:Drop your ducats here Put my money where my mouth is, now we just need 99 more people to do the same!
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 20:05
|
|
|
We're off to a pretty solid start. But we'll probably need more than just ourselves. Probably can't hurt to spread the link around. I mailed it to the MS Democratic Party, figured there might be at least a few people around their office that are curious enough to throw in.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
Put in my ducats.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 20:10
|
|
|
given.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 22:19
|
|
|
Are the questions finalized?
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
I put in my cash. :edit: ReidRansom posted:We're off to a pretty solid start. But we'll probably need more than just ourselves. Probably can't hurt to spread the link around. I mailed it to the MS Democratic Party, figured there might be at least a few people around their office that are curious enough to throw in. We might want to expand some of our details then. What the survey will ask and more explanation on how PPP does the surveys may help get more people. Does PPP help us write the questions to prevent push-polling, or do we have to develop the phrasing ourselves? If it's the latter, some kind of google doc would be useful to determine the final wording. Brute Squad fucked around with this message at 00:00 on Aug 16, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
A concern. If this hits the funding, the money won't be released until thirty days from now. You probably won't get it until mid-September.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
kelvron posted:I put in my cash. They said they can help us develop the questions. And I'm down for giving someone else a set of keys to the page to help edit/expand it. Was thinking id do that anyway. A mod or someone else well-known and trusted around here. Teddybear posted:A concern. If this hits the funding, the money won't be released until thirty days from now. You probably won't get it until mid-September. 1 month was just sort of arbitrary. I was under the impression it could be shut down immediately once it's fully funded. And then maybe a week or two out from there. Worst case, I could pay for the thing and be reimbursed from the campaign if the timing drags out. I could be out that a few weeks without missing it. Though I'd like to avoid that for lots of reasons.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
I donated my share earlier this afternoon, I hope we get some good stuff out of this
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
Donated my  . Pretty excited to see the results overblown in the news.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 00:50
|
|
|
Hard to finalize questions. 24 hours ago no one would have asked anything about Manafort. I do think you could get prelim questions for 4 of 5 with a big caveat for any events that may necessitate a change.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
Even if they aren't finalized, a sample of 6-7 potential questions in rough draft form would go a long way toward selling this to outsiders (even just goons outside this thread). In particular, it would make it clear this is actually about politics and real questions rather than just internet memes. And yeah, given this last weekend, a Manafort question could be good.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
If the South woulda won would we have had it made? answers: 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAFjBSPUQJk 2. No
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 02:55
|
|
|
Donated. Also, I noticed that poll aggregaters cite the organization that commissioned the poll. So I want the only poll for Mississippi to be by A Bunch of Goons. I'm also curious about how the flag thing polls now. Also for a funny/troll question, ask how much you agree with this phrase: "Thank God for Mississippi."
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 03:00
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:My vote goes to Two-way, three-way, state election of some sort, Hillary v Rubio and "Do you think the election will be rigged?" I like this too
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 03:05
|
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:If the South woulda won would we have had it made? A genuine preference question about the Confederacy would be amazing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
Threw in $50. Hail Satan.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 03:28
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:A genuine preference question about the Confederacy would be amazing. Eh, 5% of people will give an insane answer and the other 95% (not to mention everyone who reads about the poll) will correctly see it as an attempt to troll them. The only way the results are worthwhile is if, say, 30% of people are pro-Confederacy, which is a huge stretch. I think the question about the confederate flag on the state flag taps into the same issue and potentially generates a similar holy poo poo response, but it's a more honest question that will give a more interesting and meaningful answer. I've been thinking about this more, and in my opinion the best questions to ask are: 1) 2/3 way Presidential (Clinton vs. Trump vs. Undecided/Johnson) 2) Who do you think will win (this will probably reflect beliefs about whether it will be rigged, but that's a question a ton of other polls can ask as a follow-up if this gets traction) 3) Clinton vs. Cruz (I think this is better than Rubio. Rubio never made a huge impact; people just expected him to. Cruz has the Bible Belt credentials and all the anti-establishment pros of Trump without as much baggage, plus Trump hates his guts and would despise losing to him in a post-RNC poll) 4) Would you be more or less likely to vote for a Representative who endorsed Trump? / Which party will you vote for in the House election? (There aren't any big statewide elections, so this would be the closest equivalent) 5) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Despite the fact that many citizens associate the confederate flag with racism and hate, it should remain on the state flag as a symbol of our history and heritage. (Or something like this. Basically trying to make sure the wording offers fair context but also provides a fig leaf, so people see it as an honest attempt to get an answer rather than a push poll). But ultimately I still think Reid should decide the questions, and then we can work out the specific wording in the thread and with PPP.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 03:48
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:Worst case, I could pay for the thing and be reimbursed from the campaign if the timing drags out. I could be out that a few weeks without missing it. Though I'd like to avoid that for lots of reasons. Semi-related, if I get a new job in time I'll donate also.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 03:53
|
|
|
Love this, in for Quovak posted:Eh, 5% of people will give an insane answer and the other 95% (not to mention everyone who reads about the poll) will correctly see it as an attempt to troll them. The only way the results are worthwhile is if, say, 30% of people are pro-Confederacy, which is a huge stretch. I think the question about the confederate flag on the state flag taps into the same issue and potentially generates a similar holy poo poo response, but it's a more honest question that will give a more interesting and meaningful answer.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
Quovak posted:1) 3 way Presidential (Clinton vs. Trump vs. Johnson) Trillary Flinton fucked around with this message at 04:57 on Aug 16, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 05:22 |
|
|
Quovak posted:3) Clinton vs. Cruz (I think this is better than Rubio. Rubio never made a huge impact; people just expected him to. Cruz has the Bible Belt credentials and all the anti-establishment pros of Trump without as much baggage, plus Trump hates his guts and would despise losing to him in a post-RNC poll) Conversely, I think Rubio is a better choice because he didn't do as well as expected in the primary melee. If he'd been one of two or maybe three, and made it to the end, he'd have been Standard Republican Candidate #n+1, which makes him useful as a stand-in for "If the Republican candidate weren't a self-igniting dumpster fire, would you still vote for Hillary?" Same kind of thing as your 4), really, but 4) also measures Trump potentially wrecking other Republicans.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2016 04:46
|
|
