|
I'm clear on the concept of how oppositely charged particles attract one another in order to zero out the imbalance. What I'm stuck on is by what means a charged particle "detects" (for lack of a better word), the presence of a nearby particle of the opposite charge and, having done so, summons up the motive power to travel the relatively great distance to meet it. Why do they move? How do they move and change direction without losing mass or momentum? How do they selectively travel to the opposite particle and only the opposite particle even though other attractive forces (like gravity) seem to act indiscriminately? Asking for a friend.
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 05:55 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xweiQukBM_k
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
This video just raises further questions!
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:This video just raises further questions! you are a dog, your opposite is paula abdul
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Should those cats be considered racist stereotypes? Also, authentic Don Bluth or an imitator?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Should those cats be considered racist stereotypes? you are way over thinking this, just gently caress paula abdul
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Going by the video looks like the opposite of Paula Abdul is a cat. And since dogs are the opposite of cats I can only logically conclude that I am in fact Paula Abdul. So you're saying I should gently caress... myself??
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Going by the video looks like the opposite of Paula Abdul is a cat. And since dogs are the opposite of cats I can only logically conclude that I am in fact Paula Abdul. finally! you are making sense
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
go gently caress yourself applewhite
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
I seem to be precipitating a lot of racist cartoon cat discussion in GBS today.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:go gently caress yourself applewhite See I was hesitant about asking this question in GBS rather than in the comments section of an article about magnetism on Science.com, but this exchange proves my instincts were correct.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:17
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:See I was hesitant about asking this question in GBS rather than in the comments section of an article about magnetism on Science.com, but this exchange proves my instincts were correct. well, when your dick attracts rear end in a top hat, you should just gently caress yourself
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:20
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Should those cats be considered racist stereotypes? Originally it was live action, but test audiences reacted harshly to the implied interracial romance so the studio hastily replaced The Wild Pair with animated cats in their likeness. Few people remember the era of hiphop where all onscreen depictions of rappers were achieved with animated cats, but the legacy is still respected through oblique references like Meow the Jewels.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:I'm clear on the concept of how oppositely charged particles attract one another in order to zero out the imbalance. What I'm stuck on is by what means a charged particle "detects" (for lack of a better word), the presence of a nearby particle of the opposite charge and, having done so, summons up the motive power to travel the relatively great distance to meet it. No one knows. No one knows. Why would they lose mass? Momentum changes when they move. See answer 1. There are only 4 forces and the other 2 are more like E&M than they are like gravity. Gravity is unique.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:I'm clear on the concept of how oppositely charged particles attract one another in order to zero out the imbalance. What I'm stuck on is by what means a charged particle "detects" (for lack of a better word), the presence of a nearby particle of the opposite charge and, having done so, summons up the motive power to travel the relatively great distance to meet it. God. Next question.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:22
|
|
|
In researching for that post I discovered this article, which i feel the need to share.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:22
|
|
|
it's to maximize entropy op particles wanna f
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:23
|
|
|
because all things, even on the subatomic level, lust for annihilation
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:23
|
|
|
did you know free neutrons are inherently unstable? they'll decay into a proton and an electron if uncaptured for sufficient time not all hydrogen is primordial, and the universe wants interesting things to happen i guess(??)
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:25
|
|
|
MiracleWhale posted:because all things, even on the subatomic level, lust for annihilation if this were true then symmetry would have been perfect and everything would have hosed off right from the start but a smidgeon of upstart matter just didn't get the memo for some reason
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
It has to do with proximal distance of the electron field. For instance, every atom has a maximum field size that varies with heat. The proximal field distance is the distance that occurs at the heat ceiling/floor of the universe. So the inertial field variance at perfect heat determines the distance to obtain magnetic traction at any temperature. This weak cohesive bonding occurs in groupings of elemental particles and is the result of a common proton point being resolved through a singularity through time. It is essentially gravitational acceleration at very short distances, and the elastic tension of this bond decreases as heat increases and the individual atoms have less distance to redshift because their vibrational inertial signature is physically bigger. Hth.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:34
|
|
|
I want MC Skat Kat to weigh in on this
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:35
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xweiQukBM_k
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:36
|
|
|
hmmm yes. hmm fascinating *writes equations down* yes I think I understand
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:37
|
|
|
really though it's a cool question op, it works off the intuition it always takes energy to move somewhere but since force potential is a thing, often times it takes energy not to move somewhere i sincerely Hope This Helps ( hth )
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:40
|
|
|
mother fucker I already posted that equation
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:41
|
|
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:mother fucker I already posted that equation ya people pay more attention to me though - just watch now everybody will be posting obvious stuff late in the thread
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:45
|
|
|
i am ugly but rich and she is hot but poor it makes perfect sense for opposites attract eyyyyyyy
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:46
|
|
|
ClamdestineBoyster posted:It has to do with proximal distance of the electron field. For instance, every atom has a maximum field size that varies with heat. The proximal field distance is the distance that occurs at the heat ceiling/floor of the universe. So the inertial field variance at perfect heat determines the distance to obtain magnetic traction at any temperature. This weak cohesive bonding occurs in groupings of elemental particles and is the result of a common proton point being resolved through a singularity through time. It is essentially gravitational acceleration at very short distances, and the elastic tension of this bond decreases as heat increases and the individual atoms have less distance to redshift because their vibrational inertial signature is physically bigger. Hth. Pfft, give it a rest neil degrasse tyson. Science can sit this one out, taoism has it covered.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:50
|
|
|
where's a good place to go to jam about the natural world when you got a good buzz going on that isn't all stuffy straight edge pomp but isn't also a bunch of irrelevant non sequiturs? i feel in a jam here
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
ClamdestineBoyster posted:It has to do with proximal distance of the electron field. For instance, every atom has a maximum field size that varies with heat. The proximal field distance is the distance that occurs at the heat ceiling/floor of the universe. So the inertial field variance at perfect heat determines the distance to obtain magnetic traction at any temperature. This weak cohesive bonding occurs in groupings of elemental particles and is the result of a common proton point being resolved through a singularity through time. It is essentially gravitational acceleration at very short distances, and the elastic tension of this bond decreases as heat increases and the individual atoms have less distance to redshift because their vibrational inertial signature is physically bigger. Hth. this is nonsense
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:52
|
|
|
Moon Atari posted:Pfft, give it a rest neil degrasse tyson. Science can sit this one out, taoism has it covered. Whatever side the light falls on the razors edge of time is the fundamental building block of free will. Simple divination. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:55
|
|
|
MOOBS! posted:i am ugly but rich and she is hot but poor it makes perfect sense for opposites attract eyyyyyyy you have awful boobs
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:58
|
|
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:you have awful boobs you need $70 to make rent
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:I'm clear on the concept of how oppositely charged particles attract one another in order to zero out the imbalance. What I'm stuck on is by what means a charged particle "detects" (for lack of a better word), the presence of a nearby particle of the opposite charge and, having done so, summons up the motive power to travel the relatively great distance to meet it. Charged particles generate something called an electromagnetic field that extends through all space. When a charged particle is in an electromagnetic field, it experiences a force. So if you have two charged particles, they each generate electromagnetic fields and respond to each other's fields by accelerating. Why would moving change a particle's mass? Charged particles can exchange momentum with each other and with the electromagnetic field, but the total momentum of everything is a constant. Why there are two kinds of charges and only one kind of mass is a good questions that I'll try to answer later.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
MOOBS! posted:you need $70 to make rent I loving wish! add $700 to that
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
plus another 5 just to be sure
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
GRILLARY CLINTON posted:Why there are two kinds of charges and only one kind of mass is a good questions that I'll try to answer later. there are multiple kinds of charges and mass that we know of
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3D2RaDVkylY No one knows how nature be like it is but it do.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 05:55 |
|
|
The Protagonist posted:there are multiple kinds of charges and mass that we know of I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but I was referring specifically to the fact that electric charge (which, yes, is one of many types of charge of which we know) may be positive or negative, while gravitational mass (which is the only kind of mass we know about, by the equivalence principle) is only positive.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 05:08
|
|