Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
dex_sda
Oct 11, 2012


steinrokkan posted:

Uh

European soccer teams usually have one town where they are popular. Sometimes even less, like there's one traditional city district where all their real fans live. Moving the team would be in effect the same as dissolving it and starting a completely different team somewhere else.

In comparison this is what the distribution of football fans looks like in the us



A bit more leeway, isn't there

that's a bit bollocks, many clubs have huge followings that overshadow a huge portion of an entire country except for small fringe clubs. What you speak of is really only the case in England.

That said it's true that most clubs have the rabid following concentrated at a spot so :shrug:. But I bet the same is true of american football clubs.

dex_sda fucked around with this message at 10:11 on Sep 27, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

dex_sda
Oct 11, 2012


Hambilderberglar, steinrokkan basically responded to your question. I would pin it at 40-50 clubs in Europe who could relocate on a similar 'popularity' basis. There's 5300 clubs in England alone. So a small percentage, but a solid number nevertheless.

It just doesn't happen because it's a mental concept. It requires stifled competition, because otherwise (even if you're Barcelona) a move would make you lose fans, which will make you lose money, which will make you underperform, which will lose you fans. Remember, you can get relegated into nothingness in soccer. It's happened to Premier League winners who made huge missteps with treating their club, like Aston Villa. It's happening to Wisła Kraków - arguably the most known club in Poland - right now.

dex_sda fucked around with this message at 11:21 on Sep 27, 2016

dex_sda
Oct 11, 2012


ShaneMacGowansTeeth posted:

I could tear this apart and say how wrong it is, but I'll just point at Jamie Vardy whenever anyone says lower league football is rubbish.

The MK Dons story is really all that needs to be said. It was an actual attempt at relocation, with an attempt at appropriation of the history of Wimbledon FC. Supporters would have none of it and literally formed a new football team instantly. It had to start from the bottom, the 9th tier, without the finances or any players.

Fast forward 13 years, AFC Wimbledon (the supporter's club) climbed up to the third tier, an unprecedented rise. In the same time, MK Dons, due to loss of fans and revenue making them unable to compete, fell to the third tier. Guess which club has a better time filling up a stadium.

The community aspect of soccer is the primary reason to watch the sport for most people. I've personally went to more Polish 6th tier games than to the games of the biggest club in Poland, simply because my dad cheered for that 6th tier team as he represented it in a different discipline, one where they were actually good. In a hosed way, the ultras/hools culture underscores just how big a deal it is. "Of all the unimportant things, football is the most important."

dex_sda fucked around with this message at 00:10 on Sep 29, 2016

dex_sda
Oct 11, 2012


Simplex posted:

People say this a lot, and it's become kind of an urban legend at this point where nobody bothers to check if it's actually true. So I looked at average league attendances of the teams, and here's the results. I included Brentford as a comparison as they are a team of similar stature to MK Dons and is located geographically close to Wimbledon:
code:
Season Ending	Wimbledon FC	MK DONS	AFC Wimbledon	Brentford
1997		14416					5832
1998		16156					5029
1999		18207					5445
2000		17156					5742
2001		7901			
2002		6958					6713
2003		2697				3003	5759
2004		4750				2606	5541
2005				4667		2858	6081
2006				5446		2706	6774
2007				5876		2512	5599
2008				9176		2603	4469
2009				10121		3219	5707
2010				9323		3535	6017
2011				8112		3486	5172
2012				8846		4295	5643
2013				8837		4060	6460
2014				8474		4135	7715
2015				9460		4073	10822
2016				13112		4138	10310
2017				8520		3799	9862
I'm sure there are a lot of benefits to going to a lower league game. I imagine the lower level clubs offer a lot more fan access to the team for one.

That said Premier League attendance is much higher than lower league attendance, not just in raw numbers, but in percent of stadium capacity as well. I can't find numbers, but I'm guessing if you included things like cup matches and European games, attendance for Premier League teams might be higher than all other professional leagues combined.

That's interesting, I thought MK Dons' numbers would be lower (but it bears mentioning that AFC Wimbledon's stadium has only 4850 capacity, with 2250 seats)

  • Locked thread