|
She does seem like a massive bastard. I mean, that's to be expected of a presidential candidate but she doesn't hide it super well like most of them do.
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2016 00:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 18:37 |
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:what candidate should I vote for then In before "None and start the revolution" E: ^ gently caress, too late.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
Accelerationism is a great idea.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2016 00:54
|
|
|
He thinks socialism in one country is a good idea that will work. He's not really that good at the internationalist requirements.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
HorseLord posted:I know you like to be Fig. 1 of what Michael Parenti was talking about when he described Pure Socialists but you could at least try some internal consistency - using "socialism in one country" as a cudgel against me won't work when you need to talk about the spread of "stalinist" satellite states that were controlled by moscow or w/e later. tho i would like to see your reconciliation of what you imply "socialism in one country" means with socialism then showing up all over eurasia, south america and africa, while "permanent revolution" lead to no revolutions. I'd suggest that it also led to the cold war which did wonders to further entrench capitalism in the rest of the world, and most socialist countries have now integrated quite a lot of capitalism into their societies as well, which is a key contributing factor to why they are no longer as ostracised. The issue with tacking that kind of radical ideological change to geographjcal borders is that it provokes an equally powerful reaction.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
I'm not entirely comfortable with dialectics + nuclear weapons, especially when it didn't work last time.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 18:37 |
|
|
Love you too, babe.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2016 01:32
|
|