|
1. i have a disk with 2% used space 2. i want to shrink the partition a bit to add a smaller disk as a mirror 3. i can't because zfs is poop from a butt 4. loving garbage even fat32 would have been better
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 13:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 18:00 |
|
|
code:
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
i am truely sorry for your lots
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
zfs is actually the only good filesystem if you care about your data Create a new pool on the smaller disk, zfs send everything over, destroy old pool, rename new pool to old pool, add larger disk as mirror Don't use mirrors though, mirrors are susceptible to double failures. To store all your porn at home use a large number of disks in raidz2 or raidz3
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 14:34
|
|
|
lmao op, "I don't know how to use thing, thing bad" when you really should be saying "I'm a freaking gbs-tier moron that can't understand the basics of anything"
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 14:55
|
|
|
code:
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 15:07
|
|
|
uh ntfs for life, op
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 15:09
|
|
|
try hfs, op
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 15:48
|
|
|
r u ready to WALK posted:zfs is actually the only good filesystem if you care about your data I have no data worth caring about
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 15:48
|
|
|
all of zfs shortcomings can be solved by buying more drives
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 16:10
|
|
|
i just keep all my data on the hard drive
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 16:15
|
|
|
I like whatever filesystem netapp uses I think its called waffles
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 16:24
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:I have no data worth caring about
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 16:29
|
|
|
I'd like to build my own Isilon, that seems like the neatest storage thing Why haven't the linux nerds cloned that distributed robust erasure coding file system yet
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 17:57
|
|
|
at least it doesn't kill its wife op
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
lol if you think zfs cares about the fact you don't have a second SAS enclosure hanging around. Just lmao. Go back to your scrub filesystem built for floppy drives or let reiser kill your wife or something and think before you make your volume next time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 18:16
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:at least it doesn't kill its wife op
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 19:18
|
|
|
i've never once used an os and thought to myself "hey, this file system is pretty bad/good" like, as long as I click "file -> save" and it works then whatever!
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
akadajet posted:i've never once used an os and thought to myself "hey, this file system is pretty bad/good" snapshots sound neat. i guess if you are coming from btrfs then the file system actually working is good too
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
fart32
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
if you're resizing filesystems your doing it wrong op.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
rebuilt redeploy
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 22:46
|
|
|
OWLS! posted:if you're resizing filesystems your doing it wrong op. At my first lovely job there were a lot of old dudes. More than once I'd have to hear about some old white brag about all the partitions he would make for his compy. Partition for data, partition for windows 98, partition for widows xp, partitions for games, partition for data, and so on and so forth. i bet they resize partitions all the time using their partition magic or whatever. Same dudes would also talk about running ccleaner and registry cleaners and other bullshit lol.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
ccleaner is decent software. windows still leaves a bunch of installer garbage all over the system and you can recover a couple gigs now and then with it
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
i just ran it and recovered 2 gigs, including 800 megs of google chrome cache and 900 megs of system memory dumps and temp files
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 23:18
|
|
|
akadajet posted:i bet they resize partitions all the time using their partition magic or whatever. heh, more like partition tragic, am i right?? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 00:29
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:ccleaner is decent software. windows still leaves a bunch of installer garbage all over the system and you can recover a couple gigs now and then with it yea same hit it every few months
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:heh, more like partition tragic, am i right?? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
agreed op, the z/os file system is bad
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
suffix posted:poop from a butt imagine typing this and thinking it was cool or funny or whatever. that's some twisted poo poo. really highlights the polymorphism of humanity
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 05:25
|
|
|
))<>((
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:lmao op, "I don't know how to use thing, thing bad" when you really should be saying "I'm a freaking gbs-tier moron that can't understand the basics of anything" dont deconstruct every argument on the 'pos
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 05:42
|
|
|
suffix posted:2. i want to shrink the partition I think I found your problem, op. its u, you are a scrub
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
thx OP i forgot that partiitioning physical disks was a thing people still did also running BSD
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 05:56
|
|
|
j/k i killed some time at work last week installing freebsd and openbsd. lol that they ship with a vi that dumps raw directory data
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
Butter fs
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
zfs is actually good, op.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
At my workplace all the old physical win2003 servers had their internal disks configured in a RAID1 mirror with a 8gb logical volume for C:\ and the rest for D:\, the argument being that all the applications would be installed on D: and it was better to partition so that windows wouldn't crash when the drive ran out of space  It worked fine for a couple of years I guess, until we ran out of space for windows updates, and it was impossible to expand the boot volume because the data volume was in the way and since it was done on the raid controller the volume had to be one contiguous area on the disk. At least it was a good argument for P2V-ing everything.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 06:21
|
|
|
i use btrfs on my laptop 
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 08:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 18:00 |
|
|
btrfs is fine as long as you keep away from raid56 i really hope they fix that sometime, i actually got a system with btrfs raid6 running.. it works, but i guess that's only because the disks haven't gone bad yet 
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 10:17
|
|
