|
elf is pretty poo poo without its rares anyway honestly like even with ancient elf and tia, you still need liza, rhinoceroach, cynthia, wind god, altered fate (depending on the list you're running), etc
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 23:36 |
|
|
Last reroll for the day for me, how does look? Lots of cards but they're kinda spread out 3x Odin 2x Dark Angel Olivia Bloody Mary Moon Al-mi'raj Gabriel Lord of Flies Alexander Zirnitra Pluto Lord Atomy Sea Queen Otohime
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
holy crap
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
Jesus loving Christ
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:11
|
|
|
I take it I should keep this roll
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
Sophism posted:I personally wouldn't liquefy any cards. The game might be generous, sure, but it's generous in the long-term, not necessarily the short-term. Holding onto a million semi-functional cards just for the sake of having them is fine, but if you could eliminate even two deck types you aren't interested in using and liquify any golds/legendaries from those decks, you could net yourself a fully-viable competitive deck or two, as opposed to just playing amalgamations of whatever you happen to have on-hand. And after playing maybe ten games of ranked, eight with decks that I happened to have cards for and getting my rear end handed to me and then a full sword deck (non-banner) I completed with two bloodcraft legendaries worth of vials, the difference is night and day. I mean, you say you built a couple meta decks over the course of months? I started yesterday and am two legendaries short of the Mid-control sword deck, and the two games I've played with this deck so far haven't even lasted long enough to build enough play points for me to even use a 9* legendary. Plus, I can just slap my spare Olivia and Odin in there in place of them. In a game where people have been collecting cards for months and have been getting better at the game for months, if you present me with the option to make any top-tier sword deck at the cost of throwing away three of my nine legendaries for decks I'm not interested in playing, that sounds like a dope trade to me. Nemesis Of Moles posted:Last reroll for the day for me, how does look? Lots of cards but they're kinda spread out Honestly not sure if you do better even if you rerolled for the rest of your life. Keep that poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:20
|
|
|
Nemesis Of Moles posted:Last reroll for the day for me, how does look? Lots of cards but they're kinda spread out Congrats, that's somehow less likely than winning the actual lottery?
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:28
|
|
|
iunno anything about this game but bitch with the countdown tigers and falcons and poo poo is OP
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
RazzleDazzleHour posted:The game might be generous, sure, but it's generous in the long-term, not necessarily the short-term. Holding onto a million semi-functional cards just for the sake of having them is fine, but if you could eliminate even two deck types you aren't interested in using and liquify any golds/legendaries from those decks, you could net yourself a fully-viable competitive deck or two, as opposed to just playing amalgamations of whatever you happen to have on-hand. And after playing maybe ten games of ranked, eight with decks that I happened to have cards for and getting my rear end handed to me and then a full sword deck (non-banner) I completed with two bloodcraft legendaries worth of vials, the difference is night and day. I mean, you say you built a couple meta decks over the course of months? I started yesterday and am two legendaries short of the Mid-control sword deck, and the two games I've played with this deck so far haven't even lasted long enough to build enough play points for me to even use a 9* legendary. Plus, I can just slap my spare Olivia and Odin in there in place of them. There are at least three competitive face decks that require very little investment, and only the Dragon one uses legendaries. (And it can sub in Seabrand Dragon or Genesis Dragon in place of Forte and do completely fine until A+ rank.) I didn't build 'a couple' of decks. I built multiple. I had Ramp Satan Dragon, Satan Haven, Aggro Shadow, Midrange Shadow and Dimension Shift Rune (This last one with only one Merlin and two Spectral Wizards subbing in for it.) before the expansion hit. After the expansion I have Garuda Haven, Aggro Blood, Aggro Dragon, Royal Banner Sword and with the parts of other decks I currently own, I have enough vials left to finish Dimension Shift Rune and Elana/Lapis Hybrid Haven, or Control Sword or Control Blood. And the rewards for short term are actually incredibly inflated due to campaign, elite AI, achievements and score rewards. So the likelihood of you getting the cards you just crafted from the mass of packs you'll be netting after the initial 40 or so is really high.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
Super No Vacancy posted:iunno anything about this game but bitch with the countdown tigers and falcons and poo poo is OP Just played against someone who airdropped a tiger and falcon in the same turn, I only managed to win because she spent like three turns setting that up while I played actual units and killed her on the turn they arrived. It seems like not many decks have ways to kill the countdown amulets, my suggestion is to just spend those turns wailing on her HP and ignoring the probably lovely filler units she puts down so you can either make a break for her HP bar when the countdowns end, or hold onto a spell card/unit that can instakill an enemy once the summon happens
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
you don't really want to kill the countdown amulets, since that triggers their last word. you'd want to banish them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 22:57
|
|
|
Zoness posted:you don't really want to kill the countdown amulets, since that triggers their last word. It took me abit to wrap that around my head when I got used to that neutral spell for removing amulets. And the 2nd player advantage feels too real here. Drakes fucked around with this message at 23:20 on Oct 30, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 23:05
|
|
|
Nemesis Of Moles posted:Last reroll for the day for me, how does look? Lots of cards but they're kinda spread out I got more cards from linking my account and now I also have Ancient Elf, Merlin and Aurelia Regal Saber
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Not a good draw with no Cerberus. Better re-roll again
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
 Hahaaaaaa, get hosed countdown timers. This is basically how all my sword v haven games end up
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
whats the score under your flair on the matchup screen?
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2016 23:33
|
|
|
I don't need three Fortes in my opening hand! Let me just mulligan all three and... ...oh. gently caress. Still won.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 00:38
|
|
|
your opponent appears to be a boob mousepad
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
Chair In A Basket posted:your opponent appears to be a boob mousepad She stole all the other leaders' cup sizes, except Urias'.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 01:29
|
|
|
Any tips for Take Two? I was infinite/near infinite in Hearthstone but right now I'm 2-8. I feel like Sword and Forest probably have the most going on at common but not sure if that's accurate. Went 0-5 when I had the choice of Dragon, Shadow, and Haven. I went with Dragon thinking that they're all pretty synergy-dependent but at least having Huge Dudes is like a built in form of card advantage. Got my poo poo stomped 5 straight games.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
Nehru the Damaja posted:Any tips for Take Two? I was infinite/near infinite in Hearthstone but right now I'm 2-8. I feel like Sword and Forest probably have the most going on at common but not sure if that's accurate. Went 0-5 when I had the choice of Dragon, Shadow, and Haven. I went with Dragon thinking that they're all pretty synergy-dependent but at least having Huge Dudes is like a built in form of card advantage. Got my poo poo stomped 5 straight games. It seems like Swords is the class of choice based on what I've faced so far. Lacking that, I'd go Haven, then Forest.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
I just picked up this game and god drat I am so pleased that white weenies is a viable archetype, something that was sorely missing from Hearthstone What are the must-haves for sword aggro? I ended up crafting Cursed General (3/3 gives officers haste) since that seemed pretty darn important.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
My current reroll: Merlin - S Bloody Mary - S Pluto - B Dark Angel Olivia - S Sun Oracle Pascale - B Lucifer - A Enstatued Seraph - A Best I've gotten so far. Think I should keep rerolling? I've seen some folks here get a lot better, but I'd also like to play this game sometime. El Generico fucked around with this message at 04:31 on Oct 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 04:28
|
|
|
Nehru the Damaja posted:Any tips for Take Two? I was infinite/near infinite in Hearthstone but right now I'm 2-8. I feel like Sword and Forest probably have the most going on at common but not sure if that's accurate. Went 0-5 when I had the choice of Dragon, Shadow, and Haven. I went with Dragon thinking that they're all pretty synergy-dependent but at least having Huge Dudes is like a built in form of card advantage. Got my poo poo stomped 5 straight games. The current leader of the Take Two leaderboard tweeted that he chooses classes in this order: Sword > Forest > Blood > Rune > everything else
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 04:55
|
|
|
Well, after playing Main Story a little and getting two more packs, each pack came with another Legendary. So, this is my account now. I'm really enjoying this. It seems all the reasons I stopped playing Hearthstone have been fixed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
Packs feel way faster than Hearthstone between 3 dailies a day and the login bonus. Only downside is the lack of ability to grind rupi which is replaced by getting your score in ranked up for packs/rupi/sleeves/avatars?
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 05:13
|
|
|
inthesto posted:I just picked up this game and god drat I am so pleased that white weenies is a viable archetype, something that was sorely missing from Hearthstone Any cards that are in both of these decks https://shadowverse.gamepress.gg/deck/face-swordcraft https://shadowverse.gamepress.gg/deck/royal-banner-swordcraft
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 05:15
|
|
|
inthesto posted:What are the must-haves for sword aggro? I ended up crafting Cursed General (3/3 gives officers haste) since that seemed pretty darn important. Vanilla Mint Ice posted:Any cards that are in both of these decks Worth noting that the facerush swordcraft deck has a lot of components of the top-tier deck, so it's a great one to aim for. They both have similar playstyles where you wanna flood the board with low-cost units, so if you end up liking facerush sword you might consider eventually investing in the gold/legendary cards
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
I'm 5 and 0 on the ladder with Havencraft. I get that this is the bottom of the ladder and most players are also playing babby's first random pile, but I did play against a Runecraft deck that seemed loaded with giant assholes and just ran them outta gas with my tigers n' poo poo. It's also what I used to beat up the elites in practice. Surprised to see they've got some fast beatdown deck going. I may have to try to build to that and then acquire stuff for control later for funsies. That Enstatued Seraph looks hilarious. Edit: Also I'm running a Satan since I figure at my low level if I ever resolve it I just win. Is homeboy in the meta right now? Nehru the Damaja fucked around with this message at 07:16 on Oct 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 07:13
|
|
|
I'm also currently 6-0 on the ladder and consistently winning on turn 6 or 7. I nearly had a turn 5 win, but I forgot to attack with my raging goblin once. Gosh, I just love aggro decks 
inthesto fucked around with this message at 08:04 on Oct 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 07:22
|
|
|
Should I buy standard packs, DE packs or something else for my rupies?
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 07:32
|
|
|
BoldFace posted:The current leader of the Take Two leaderboard tweeted that he chooses classes in this order: I looked into it but I think overall it has to do with playstyle. Two different jp sites offer different rankings too: Appmedia currently ranks Shadow = Sword > Forest = Rune = Blood > Dragon = Haven. Gamewith ranks Shadow = Sword > Haven > Dragon = Blood = Rune > Forest. I'd say given a choice pick shadow or sword, whichever you prefer (sword usually leans aggressive, shadow is on the midrange-control side). I've never picked Forest, Blood or Rune but Rune decks at 3-0 are usually strong because they put together a good ratio of earth rite cards and amulet makers (spell boost is like almost impossible to put together in arena afaik). I don't think I've ever lost to a blood deck and the one forest deck I've lost to played two Tia's. Blood feels really risky given how quickly sword and shadow can close out 10 points of health from a near-empty board. The rankings also could have to do with goals. It's almost impossible to get below 3 wins if you play shadow correctly but shadow's lack of 2-drops make it hard to have explosive starts and I get way more 4-1's than any other record when playing shadow.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 07:54
|
|
|
I personally love Haven in Take Two. Sometimes, it just works.  e: 
Terper fucked around with this message at 08:22 on Oct 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 08:16
|
|
|
to be fair if Luna has Call of the Void or several combinations of two cards in the second image she can stabilize  Thats one of the reasons I really like playing Shadowcraft.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 08:27
|
|
|
Terper posted:I personally love Haven in Take Two. Sometimes, it just works. Doesn't look like it worked out for 1 Havencraft player though!!!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 08:56
|
|
|
BoldFace posted:The current leader of the Take Two leaderboard tweeted that he chooses classes in this order: Turns out this guy streams his runs, and he's live right now! http://live.nicovideo.jp/watch/co2860165
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
I really like Kaguya. Cost-effective statwise (6 for 5/6), and punishes your opponent hard for killing her. I didn't try rerolling but going through the Haven story and some Take Two, this is where I stand Legendary-wise: Rune: Sun Oracle Pascale Sword: Tsubaki Haven: Skullfane, Jeanne d'Arc, Enstatued Seraph Blood: Beast Dominator, Queen Vampire Neutral: Dark Angel Olivia, Prince of Darkness Dragon: Fafnir I like both Forest and Haven styles, but it looks like RNG has decided that Haven is the one for me. I also drew three Elana's so Elana-Seraph is going to be my Ranked deck.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 17:27
|
|
|
Kaguya was one of the first cards I opened and I thought she was great but after thinking about it more and seeing her in action, she's... not particularly great. For one thing you have to Evolve her to get her effect, then she must die, and then for two turns (three if you kill her off on your turn), a random opponent has its attack set to 1, at the end of your turn. When you don't want the enemy to have any cards, preferably. Wooo...
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 17:38
|
|
|
Terper posted:Kaguya was one of the first cards I opened and I thought she was great but after thinking about it more and seeing her in action, she's... not particularly great. For one thing you have to Evolve her to get her effect, then she must die, and then for two turns (three if you kill her off on your turn), a random opponent has its attack set to 1, at the end of your turn. When you don't want the enemy to have any cards, preferably. Wooo... it doesn't help that her ability often does nothing against sword or shadow in take two. dumps on dragons though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 17:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 23:36 |
|
|
I wish I had known how fun Dshift is so I could try rerolling into some Merlins, but the budget version from the op is still super loving fun. I love playing cancer combo decks, reminds me of playing yugioh. Also I'm apparently poo poo at card evaluation because I am not great at take two.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2016 21:06
|
|
