|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:Who's doing the torture? ISIS.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 00:47 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 18:29 |
|
There's enough poo poo in motion to despair over so I'm choosing to read that poll as "Majority of Australians still against torturing our own citizens, even if they belong to a specific group."
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 00:49 |
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:Who's doing the torture? We are apparently; "A new study conducted by the Australian Red Cross found 57% believed torturing an Australian soldier for information should not be allowed and 23% were undecided. But 21% thought it was OK." https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/dec/06/torturing-our-soldiers-ok-in-some-circumstances-21-of-australians-say also, "An increasing number of people are resigned to civilian deaths as an inevitable part of warfare, especially those from nations not affected by conflict, such as the UK, France, Russia, China and US."
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 00:51 |
|
name a war in the entirety of human history that didn't have civilian deaths, of course people are resigned to it I despise it too and think there needs to be as much done as possible to avoid them but most people just don't think
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 01:15 |
|
The Great Emu War
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 01:17 |
|
QUACKTASTIC posted:The Great Emu War touche
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 01:17 |
|
The Toyota War, though it's probably safe to assume there were civilian casualties given Libyan involvement.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 01:20 |
|
Haven't seen it reported here: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-01/australia-at-risk-of-negative-gdp-after-business-investment-fall/8083250 quote:Australia at risk of negative GDP after business investment fall By business reporter Michael Janda Updated Thu at 2:18pm This is typical Tory rule. Slam the opposition on economic management while comprehensively failing to properly run the economy. Everyone involved will do their utmost to massage the final figure so it looks as good as possible so I won't be surprised to see the GDP number on the line but in rounding error territory. Jounalists should be loading both barrels for MYEFO (Laughs bitterly through gritted teeth). -/- Vanstone *yawn* The DT was complaining about government money going to the ACF who are now protesting against the government. Do these muppets not understand representative government as a concept? At the moment the Turdball government has the approval of less than half the public. They still (in theory) rule for everyone. Only giving patronage to your mates is called corruption. Thank You for advocating corruption on your front page DT. -/- Muslim isn't a race! I'm not a racist BUT: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-06/chinese-australians-racist-discrimination-asian-mandarin-vietnam/8092926 quote:Racial discrimination in Australia: A third of young people report race-based mistreatment By Mazoe Ford and Raveen Hunjan Updated about 4 hours ago
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 01:25 |
18C defendant TOTALLY not racist A Facebook account using the name “Calum Thwaites” and also bearing the image of the student at the centre of a national racial discrimination controversy has been used to post a comment in a secret anti-Aboriginal Facebook group, suggesting someone use the word “niggers”. Phoneposting, so won't c&p the lot
|
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 01:50 |
|
TheMightyHandful posted:18C defendant TOTALLY not racist Oh good, still witch hunting a guy after a court had to waste its time on something without merit
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:05 |
|
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson says she can no longer work with her Senate colleague Rod Culleton, portraying him as an egomaniac obsessed with publicity and incapable of teamwork in an extraordinary outburst on live radio. lmaoo
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:08 |
|
Byolante posted:Oh good, still witch hunting a guy after a court had to waste its time on something without merit He's currently suing a federal MP for defamation, so I don't know why it's not relevant.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:12 |
|
Synthbuttrange posted:One Nation leader Pauline Hanson says she can no longer work with her Senate colleague Rod Culleton, portraying him as an egomaniac obsessed with publicity and incapable of teamwork in an extraordinary outburst on live radio. split split split split
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:13 |
|
Synthbuttrange posted:One Nation leader Pauline Hanson says she can no longer work with her Senate colleague Rod Culleton, portraying him as an egomaniac obsessed with publicity and incapable of teamwork in an extraordinary outburst on live radio. How long did it take for Lambie to split from Palmer? We might have a new record here.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:15 |
|
Took a year.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:21 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:He's currently suing a federal MP for defamation, so I don't know why it's not relevant. Because the MP allegedly called him a racist and tried to witch hunt him after a court had decided on the case then doubled down and may have exploited parliamentary privileged to possibly influence an ongoing legal case.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:21 |
|
SPLIIIIIITTTTSSS
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:21 |
|
As if he didn't loving perjure himself.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:22 |
|
Byolante posted:Because the MP allegedly called him a racist and tried to witch hunt him after a court had decided on the case then doubled down and may have exploited parliamentary privileged to possibly influence an ongoing legal case. that guy is you isn't it
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:27 |
|
Dick Smith has come out in support of Pauline Hanson because he's a racist.The Arse posted:Mr Smith said while he didn’t agree with Ms Hanson on a number of issues — climate change, for example — population growth was a key issue facing Australia.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:27 |
|
Byolante posted:Because the MP allegedly called him a racist and tried to witch hunt him after a court had decided on the case then doubled down and may have exploited parliamentary privileged to possibly influence an ongoing legal case. What the gently caress are you talking about?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:30 |
|
Believing we should reduce immigration to replacement levels is perfectly reasonable. Supporting Pauline Hanson because she believes the same thing is not at all reasonable. I just want to ask him if he's maybe using that issue as a justification for supporting her and hear his answer. And then we could explore his motivations in all sorts of ways. Or better yet have a media who is willing to really dig into people's motivations instead of asking surface level poo poo. "Are you racist?" he asked the racist. "No," said the racist. And that's the story ladies and gentlemen, and I am a journalist. Futuresight fucked around with this message at 02:50 on Dec 6, 2016 |
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:43 |
|
quote:
Is this gibberish?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:43 |
|
SMILLENNIALSMILLEN posted:Is this gibberish? It's like poetry, it rhymes.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:46 |
|
Dick Smith: I agree, with Pauline Hanson. Not the most heinous poo poo she says - but I'm happy to ignore that and say that I support her.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:46 |
|
Translation: he agrees with her on immigration numbers more than he disagrees with her racism. With means he isn't very opposed to racist poo poo.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:53 |
|
Higsian posted:Believing we should reduce immigration to replacement levels is perfectly reasonable. I can see the sense in this argument if it's applied globally, but it's pretty rare to see people advocating for increased aid for family planning and the education of girls in developing countries. People who make it seem to be under the impression that they can just pretend the world beyond Australia's borders doesn't exist.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 02:54 |
|
I can see it from an infrastructure and housing angle as well. Although I don't support replacement levels because our economic system literally requires growth in order to not impale itself on rising debt. So yeah, we're kinda stuck with having a constant influx of workers and consumers regardless of impact to environment and infrastructure. Ironic that the right supports the economic system that requires immigration while also being racists, but they'll never understand the irony so it's not as delicious as it should be.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:04 |
|
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:06 |
|
Why is it the immigration level and not the birth rate? People staying in their own country, or coming here isn't going to affect global emissions (further than a change in lifestyle might see them emit in line with the rest of us.) Like it seems only useful in making sure we look like we emit less, rather than actually solving the problem of how much we emit per capita.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:07 |
|
Australia is (or at least should be) better placed to provide additional infrastructure than most places. It's our hopeless politicians not our immigrants that cause the problems.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:08 |
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:Why is it the immigration level and not the birth rate? People staying in their own country, or coming here isn't going to affect global emissions (further than a change in lifestyle might see them emit in line with the rest of us.) Like it seems only useful in making sure we look like we emit less, rather than actually solving the problem of how much we emit per capita. Our birth rate is well below replacement.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:10 |
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:Why is it the immigration level and not the birth rate? People staying in their own country, or coming here isn't going to affect global emissions (further than a change in lifestyle might see them emit in line with the rest of us.) Like it seems only useful in making sure we look like we emit less, rather than actually solving the problem of how much we emit per capita. because he's racist
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:09 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:Our birth rate is well below replacement. Not zero though.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:10 |
|
more like dick... poo poo
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:12 |
|
more like Dick head Smith
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:13 |
|
open24hours posted:Australia is (or at least should be) better placed to provide additional infrastructure than most places. It's our hopeless politicians not our immigrants that cause the problems. Yeah for sure, but I can see an argument like "lets reduce immigration so we no longer have a moving target, then concentrate on fixing our problems with housing etc, then we can raise immigration again when we're on top of it." It's not compelling to me because the 2nd part would never happen, and most people wanting a reduction in immigration would not let the 3rd to happen even if the 2nd did. But I can see someone thinking it's a good idea without necessarily being a racist or racism apologist. That comes in when the person says "Therefore I support Pauline Hanson."
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:15 |
|
quote:How do you solve climate change if we take the population from 7 to 12 billion? Climate change is real guys, but it's brown/asian people's fault. I'm wondering if this is the new narrative pivot. It's certainly a conducive argument for white Australians and their precious privilege. We'll get to your climate change but for now we have to stop the browns.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:26 |
|
ewe2 posted:Climate change is real guys, but it's brown/asian people's fault. I'm wondering if this is the new narrative pivot. It's certainly a conducive argument for white Australians and their precious privilege. We'll get to your climate change but for now we have to stop the browns. Remember that exporting coal is morally good because it helps developing countries improve their economy.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:30 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 18:29 |
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 03:40 |