The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Games > The Game Room [MAFIA]

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Traditional Games > The Game Room > The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Games > The Game Room [MAFIA]

«‹›3 »

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

gif Probst posted:

this is my first time ever runnin a mafia game. if u came here expecting good spel;ing and gramar, yuo came to da wrong place mother fucker

quote:

-dont be a dick.

I maje no promises

# ¿ Sep 1, 2017 23:47

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 12:46

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

chaoslord posted:

youre not my supervisor

how's your macrame?

# ¿ Sep 8, 2017 13:44

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

that's not twilight that's the hurricane blocking all light

# ¿ Sep 8, 2017 16:25

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

I think I'm supposed to be bored and barely participate at the start but pull it together when it matters

# ¿ Sep 8, 2017 19:22

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Well that's just poor planning.

# ¿ Sep 8, 2017 22:22

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Retro Futurist posted:

Content Game:

If a mad scientist were going to fuse you together into an unholy abomination comprised of you and another poster iit, who would it be and why?

Chaoslord and me are already combined as SPARKIMUS PRIME

# ¿ Sep 8, 2017 23:03

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Bifauxnen posted:

Just lol if you're trying

# ¿ Sep 8, 2017 23:04

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Bif if you're Anidav you should just play with Revolver

# ¿ Sep 9, 2017 00:38

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Bifauxnen posted:

Who's that, your waifu

Correct.

# ¿ Sep 9, 2017 04:14

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Kasumeat posted:

Why did that post make you think that?

Asking questions is scummy.

Kasumeat posted:

I think you're being unwillingly obtuse. The strikethrough is her real post, the rest is her assigned persona.

"Willingly obtuse"? "Assigned persona"?

This is overwrought and not very poque-like. ##vote Kasumeat

# ¿ Sep 9, 2017 12:25

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Having voted today I now have to go and do whatever it is I do in the worst city in America.

# ¿ Sep 9, 2017 14:30

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

The last game I saw Poque mash the :murder:

button pretty hard

# ¿ Sep 9, 2017 19:22

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Kasumeat with the omgus. That's helpful.

# ¿ Sep 10, 2017 05:22

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

King Burgundy posted:

What's weird about it?

(I ask this, even though it appears you have been asked this by others a couple times now and deliberately avoided answering it.)

Not insulty enough. Question the poster's ability to comprehend words.

# ¿ Sep 10, 2017 05:49

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Somberbrero posted:

Frankly ive just kind of given up on trying to get poo poo done today.

Typical.

# ¿ Sep 10, 2017 06:03

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Consider also that Kasu asked a lot of questions, which is a known scum tactic.

# ¿ Sep 10, 2017 06:03

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

b-minus1 posted:

Anyone who uses more than two question marks in a single post is confirmed scum

Seems kind of racist against spanish-speakers.

# ¿ Sep 10, 2017 12:44

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Hal Incandenza posted:

Hello friends I am excited to be here

this is a lie

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 04:05

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

My theory caught 8bux as scum last game and I see no reason to change now.

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 04:05

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Yawn

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 12:28

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Jonathan Fisk posted:

My posting is fine

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 22:33

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

In addition to Kasu I had a gut read of CLord being scum this game but just lol if you think I'm voting him.

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 22:34

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

SLASHER HAWKE posted:

gut

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 22:39

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

I was reread voteleaders RF and Somber and I'm leaning towards Somber based on this and his preceding posts

Somberbrero posted:

Because I was trying to move the game forward. Some part of that was hyperbole, but it was frustrating to feel like I had caught a thread and then realize that it was all goofs and spoofs.

That's the point, there's nothing else going on. Your goofy case is the most serious investment of effort so far. Is the idea here that I'm faking that reaction? That seems awfully familiar of you.

In a vacuum I would believe the sentiment, but Somber would have seen Bif and KB play together in some more recent games and I think someone who has been in those games with them would understand the stuff about spreadsheets. I think Somber was trying to move the game forward, but I don't think the content was genuine.

et voila ##vote Somber

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 22:48

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Bifauxnen posted:

Birb, what do you think about flerp?

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 22:49

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Hal Incandenza posted:

But why'd won't you vote your scum read CLord

I have an insurance policy which pays more if he gets NK'd, double dies on an underwater salvage mission.

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 22:50

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

YT: there's less than two hours till deadline, I know let's keep the vote split.

:thunk:

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 23:01

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Don't worry I also have an esoteric and somewhat arbitrary case on RF because of this post:

Retro Futurist posted:

Deadline's tomorrow so we really ought to kill someone. Bif and Somber are the only ones in my head right now but neither really looks bad there.

RF didn't mention Bif before and it's very odd that he would take this position given that Bif and Somber seemed to be on opposite sides of the argument.

I would feel justified voting on this but it seems less weird compared to previous games than Somber, and well poo poo I can't vote for both.

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 23:04

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

idk I'm around for like 50 minutes so splitting the vote didn't make sense to me

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 23:10

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

wait also isn't YT one of the "d1 lunches are bad" dumb brigade?

why even go out of you're way to vote except to fake anger

trapcard activate ##vote YT

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 23:12

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

SLASHER HAWKE posted:

wait also isn't YT one of the "d1 lunches are bad" dumb brigade?

why even go out of you're way to vote except to fake anger

trapcard activate ##vote YT

hAHA nice OMGUD bitcg

# ¿ Sep 11, 2017 23:13

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

hahaha

"binus"

# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 00:01

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

CCKeane posted:

I'll support you, friend Somber.

##vote b-minus1

mmm I think you'd have to unvote rather than negative vote

# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 00:14

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Kasumeat posted:

So you're concerned about my going after Hal for defending the lurkers, because you say imply that they're not a problem because of the lurker guns. Yet without skipping a beat, you're calling out Flerp for lurking. And somehow it's scummy for me to do it because I was casing people earlier, yet this is exactly what you've done. Your posts suggest that you're concerned about the lurkers, but you're pushing me because I am too? I'm not even advocating for a lurker lynch, I'm advocating for lynching Hal because he's a player who knows better than to suggest that pushing lurkers is scummy, and I think he just thinks he can get away with it because it's "too scummy to be scum."

paragraphs of this length are scummy imo

# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 00:24

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

it's like too self conscious so you write more

# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 00:24

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

guys (and gal& important flavour discussiom

I tbink RF will be scum falvour and Opop is Town character

# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 00:27

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

What specifically has RF done that's scummy?

# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 00:53

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Retro Futurist posted:

Well that's what I get for putting in a sliver of effort I guess

Hope you learn your lesson

# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 00:58

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

##vote YT trap card reactivity bixth

# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 21:44

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 12:46

SHALASHASKA HAWKE: Nov 10, 2016; No child soldier in poverty by 1990

Birdstrike posted:

e:

Stfu

I believe Fisk

# ¿ Sep 12, 2017 23:02

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Traditional Games > The Game Room > The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Games > The Game Room [MAFIA]

«‹›3 »