|
i think i have time to play this
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2017 22:11 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 01:23 |
|
Jamuraan posted:Actual scum post, trying too hard to fit in Says the guy who just bombed the thread. Leaning qpq
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 01:46 |
|
I was going to apologize for not being able to post at all today but rereading the thread I think that was the best contribution so far. I think what skeeves me out about QPQ is that their pattern of posting looks like this: 1) shitpost 2) vague questioning of any serious posts 3) casual dismissal 4) more shitposting it's the token effort of content without any actual followthrough. ##vote quidproquo i am working almost constantly this week apparently but i will do my best to post during downtime. or maybe a truck will hit me and i'll die and i won't have to be alive anymore in which case i won't post anymore. we can only hope.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 06:28 |
|
gif Probst posted:somb is my friend here in this room. outside of this room though i would strike him with a rock at the same speed of the flit of a hummingbird's flap If you think the producers will let you kill America's fan favorite, you are sorely mistaken.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 07:26 |
|
PMush Perfect posted:Good thing I'm immortal. Were you in the last season of survivor? I can't quite remember.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 07:51 |
|
anyway, hey, vote qpq. or don't, but vote someone.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 08:20 |
|
the eternal question, scum or dumb
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 09:23 |
|
Pmush I never said the shitposring itself was scummy, reread that. Qpq 'why' is vague questioning, yes.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 21:00 |
|
Pmush i'm like 60% sure you're actually some kind of chatbot as that'd make more sense than your case. You weren't faking engagement when qpq was, you were just actively unhelpful. Totally different.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 22:54 |
|
Jamuraan posted:Then it's probably one or the other. Choose wisely. Nice chain lynch! You idiot! You fucker!
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 23:02 |
|
Asiina posted:How is that a chain lynch?? It's flipless. Wait really? I thought you hated flipless games.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 23:07 |
|
Deadline is right when I get off work so that's probably it for me. I'm vt good luck dummies.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 23:22 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:When people start making serious votes against other players, I generally find it helpful to understand the reasoning behind that because a.) it helps me understand the other player's train of thought; and b.) scum generally find it more difficult to create cases than a town player. It was a cursory effort at best with no follow through. Okay I have to actually work bye gl.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 23:24 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:Also, he seems like a dick Well even a broken clock is right sometimes.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2017 23:55 |
|
Qpq's notes are textually incorrect. At best you could say he has an argument for why my case is bad, but not why it is scummy.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2017 01:09 |
|
Also gif that is the gambler's fallacy.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2017 01:11 |
|
i'm finding it very difficult to ascertain a useful motivation in killing pmush so i'm not going to think about it too hard. honestly i'm a little puzzled that i wasn't hammered and that gif went so easy. i'm stuck for leads though. really i didn't even feel especially confident about qpq yesterday, it was just the only thing happening. something about flerp continually castigating herself for not being around at deadline feels insincere. i mean, we dunked. Tobbs Gnawed posted:I hope gif was scum. The way he checked out and threw a vote on Jam makes me think he was bad. this post seems to imply that tobbs knows jam is good, which is knowledge only scum would possess.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2017 19:46 |
|
between tobbs and qpq i think you can probably guess where i come down. tobbs had a good response to my earlier point too. i'm not super gung-ho to dunk qpq here though, it's not too hard to imagine that being a town/town discussion.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2017 05:52 |
|
##vote asiina something about asiina has been bugging me this game but i haven't had a good reason to go on so this works.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2017 20:19 |
|
alright, alright you convinced me ##vote jamuraan
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2017 20:34 |
|
this thread fell to page 2 for me and i missed it! yeah, i think asiina called it exactly, i wasn't under pressure d2 so i didn't care as much. also i was completely neglecting my job when i attempted to post at deadline d1 and i didn't want to do it again. this week has been nuts. my initial reaction is that, yeah, qpq is scum. that fits with my initial impression and it's easier to go along with the thread consensus. i typed up an asiina case here but i'm kind of talking myself out of it. will reread the day.
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2017 08:28 |
|
i meant tobbs re: who called it, not asiina sorry.
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2017 08:29 |
|
it feels likely to assume that we are at lylo but if we allow fear to inform our decisions we will probably make bad ones. either we've got at least one scum or the scum team is two of asiina/flerp/tobbs in which case we're hosed anyway because none of those will happen.
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2017 08:31 |
|
my #1 lynch pick is qpq, my #2 is asiina. can i get similar reads from those who haven't voiced their secondary picks?
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2017 08:32 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 01:23 |
|
##vote qpq sorry man
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2017 18:19 |