|
I'll be out of town and available sporadically this weekend, but if that's cool I'll jump in.
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2018 19:31
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 18:41 |
|
|
##vote CCKeane
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2018 20:11
|
|
|
Dick Bastardly posted:Got my role. Yeah, seems to be a lot of setup spec going on. It all follows pretty logically from the OP. Mord has years' worth of modded games tracked on votefinder and none of them appear to include language about shifting alignments, so that's probably significant. Cults are the standard way to switch alignments, and most likely in a game described as very light on roles. There is at least one nightkill, and no other night actions, which means that anything that switches alignments does so in a way other than a night action. Could also be a red herring and it's just votes and nightkills, but there's nothing that seems out of place in the train of thought.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2018 01:47
|
|
|
Keane, on the other hand, has a very guilty look about him. We should vote for him.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2018 01:49
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Mostly the first one AA's vote is dumb, but I'd vote for DB's post immediately following it. I don't like the way he takes the vote and softly me-toos it, and it tries to play up the "incredible lack of information" in a way that sounds fake. Retro's follow-up is also bad, but more easily played off as a joke. All three are worth keeping in mind, really.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2018 05:41
|
|
|
I R SMART LIKE ROCK posted:Hey, can you explain this a bit? At the point in time that you had voted for CCKean. They had only made this post. Which I thought was a joke post: After thoughtful consideration, he said he has the most powerful town role, and only a doofus would want to lynch a powerful town role. ##unvote ##vote Dick Bastardly
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2018 16:57
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I appreciate your thoughtfulness. It's a terrible vote, but I was kind of expecting retro to run with the vote for a while, and then say it was a joke and move on, and I would have believed that based on the timing and the content, and voted him after Dick or AA. He says the terrible vote was actually serious, so there's that. Votefinder tells me retro is Opop with glasses and a fake nose, and I could see opop running with the vote based on nothing, or holding a grudge for who knows what. The terribleness of the vote doesn't change, though he's still not my first choice.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2018 17:08
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I could be swayed, what's the argument? DB is trying for the same angle that Retro tried for, and their posts are suspicious for some of the same reasons: attacks on Krell after he made some odd (but harmless) speculation that probably looked easy to capitalize on. AA starts the discussion about setup spec, and I don't necessarily see a scum strategy in the way that he opens the discussion, and then pretty much immediately goes "gotcha" to one of the first responses to him. Strikes me as over-eagerness more than a trap sprung. Once the lifting is done, though, DB and Retro both try to slide into place behind him. Unlike Retro's post, DB feels around for momentum in a very non-committal way, so that he can remain suspicious of Krell, or (if that doesn't work) the people attacking Krell, and end up pointing whichever way the wind blows. DB posted:I see what you guys mean about IRSLR grasping to shade krell. Krell was (obviously, I think) stating that he/she values set-up spec posts over no posts, and would rather do the former versus the latter. But IRSLR somehow tries to twist that against krell by making it look like a lurker call out. DB posted:I'm suss of krell for the oddly specific set-up spec, IRSLR for his twisting of krell's response (could be bussing, who knows) and now this guy/gal: The rest of it is asking people if they're scum and helpfully pointing that out the power role claims are jokes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2018 06:45
|
|
|
some anything
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2018 19:25
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Straight White Shark was pursuing them early, straight white shark seems to be an unusual kill and that seems sensible. Rock struck me as very, very new on d1, which doesn't preclude him being scum, but he certainly didn't sound like he was getting advice from anyone, either. Shark may have just been because of that weird case formatting thing he tried doing.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2018 19:26
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I have information to share. Do you think AS would have known about this before he died?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2018 19:58
|
|
|
It sounds like the same thing that killed AS, but AS never mentions it.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2018 19:59
|
|
|
Assuming you die, what do you think you'll flip?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2018 20:08
|
|
|
Any indication of what your win condition would be if you infected somebody?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2018 20:11
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:these two points ping me because they were nowhere near the front of my mind. this seems very directed and almost transparently rolefishy. can you speak more on why you made these posts and what you hoped to accomplish zzyzx? To a) figure out if AA is given any indication that his flip would be obscured via airlocking like Atomic's was, or if his role had been changed; and b) identify exactly what the third-party win condition would be. At the moment I'm mostly curious about whether Atomic was an origin or an initial target; and if an initial target (which is where I'm leaning), what role he started with.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2018 07:19
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 18:41 |
|
|
I'd be okay voting Retro and wouldn't fight against AA very hard. Retro's going to vote Krell again tomorrow, and then again the day after that, and generally use it as an excuse not to do much else. I'd prefer this one. I don't disbelieve AA's claim, but it sounds like (if true) he's going to die anyway. Lynching him may keep an extra player alive, guarantee a flip that's not obscured, and prevent any potential shenanigans with the claim we don't know about.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2018 18:14
|
|