|
We can kill us, but the earth will go on. Nature has been created to destroy us, friends. Today we're so confortable thinking that we're killing earth, but its the opposite. We're controlling her and using it to serve our needs, that's why the past 300 years were full of richness, progress and right now we're not being doomed to starve to death just like "mother" earth wants.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 01:47 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 19:23 |
|
The planet's dyin Cloud
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 01:48 |
|
Hm... Earth... the only enemy I've yet to vanquish. Heh. *draws hanzo steel* Let's do this.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 01:49 |
|
as long as shareholder value is created whatever i guess
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 01:50 |
|
The advantage in letting all the wimpy wild animals die off and most of the enviornment destroyed it would shut the enviornmentalists. We could move on without the crying and lamentations of limp wristed enviornmentalists, liberalati, and supposed communists.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 01:56 |
|
bradzilla posted:The planet's dyin Cloud
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 01:57 |
|
squid loving love the new oceans don't be anti-squid
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 01:58 |
|
The true purpose of elon musks boring company is to strategically place nuclear weapons throughout the earths crust in an effort to rend the planet asunder
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 01:59 |
|
we still have a chance if we try a little harder
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 01:59 |
|
VikingSkull posted:squid loving love the new oceans
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:04 |
|
create a giant electro-magnet, aim it at the asteroid belt, wait a few years.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:06 |
|
People like George Carlin and others never understood the basic idea of "saving the planet." It never referred to the rock. It always referred to the thin biosphere. Yeah sure, life would probably go on after we went extinct and the biosphere "recovered." But we and most other species could and probably will bite it once the biosphere is fully hosed. The idea that environmentalists and greens meant saving the rock or even all life was, at best, a dodge.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:09 |
|
Love Rat posted:People like George Carlin and others never understood the basic idea of "saving the planet." It never referred to the rock. It always referred to the thin biosphere. Yeah sure, life would probably go on after we went extinct and the biosphere "recovered." The idea that environmentalists and green meant the rock was, at best, a dodge.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:11 |
|
Love Rat posted:People like George Carlin and others never understood the basic idea of "saving the planet." It never referred to the rock. It always referred to the thin biosphere. Yeah sure, life would probably go on after we went extinct and the biosphere "recovered." The idea that environmentalists and green meant the rock was, at best, a dodge. counterpoint: George Carlin didn't give a poo poo
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:11 |
|
looting and polluting is not the way
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:15 |
|
We can't kill the planet, but the planet will kill us to save itself.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:15 |
|
VikingSkull posted:counterpoint: George Carlin didn't give a poo poo True, but he engaged in a lot of the pedantry he hated. I still think he was incredibly funny and on point 90 percent of the time.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:15 |
|
I hope the planet wins
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:16 |
|
The earth made us into the self interested little shits we are it can hardly complain that we're gonna reduce the genetic biodiversity down to only what can live off blood garbage or sewage.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:16 |
|
Planet of the Apes was a documentary. Plus, well, we're apes too. So I guess it's already Planet of the Apes up in here.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:20 |
|
reignofevil posted:The earth made us into the self interested little shits we are it can hardly complain that we're gonna reduce the genetic biodiversity down to only what can live off blood garbage or sewage.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:20 |
|
*does "suck it" crotch-chop to globe* payback time bitch
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:22 |
|
Love Rat posted:People like George Carlin and others never understood the basic idea of "saving the planet." It never referred to the rock. It always referred to the thin biosphere. Yeah sure, life would probably go on after we went extinct and the biosphere "recovered." But we and most other species could and probably will bite it once the biosphere is fully hosed. The idea that environmentalists and greens meant saving the rock or even all life was, at best, a dodge. I always took the joke as why do we feel the need to personify the planet earth as a creature to be saved. Why did we pick "save the planet" instead of "save the biosphere"? Because people like having a grand illusion that they can have an impact on something as big as earth. Carlin takes that personification and says, well maybe earth needed more plastic, and wants everything else dead.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:22 |
|
Nude posted:I always took the joke as why do we feel the need to personify the planet earth as a creature to be saved. Why did we pick "save the planet" instead of "save the biosphere"? Because people like having a grand illusion that they can have an impact on something as big as earth. Carlin takes that personification and says, well maybe earth needed more plastic, and wants everything else dead. Yeah, the more I remember the bit, the more I realize I was off base.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:23 |
|
Theoretically we could make a nuclear reactor, have it melt down, and drive a uranium spike all the way to the mantle, causing artificial volcanoes and screw up the tectonic plates or something as well.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:26 |
|
Oh come on OP, I bet if we could if we were really trying. We're a plucky little species.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:27 |
|
Lime Tonics posted:Theoretically we could make a nuclear reactor, have it melt down, and drive a uranium spike all the way to the mantle, causing artificial volcanoes and screw up the tectonic plates or something as well.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:29 |
|
Love Rat posted:Yeah, the more I remember the bit, the more I realize I was off base. All good I like discussing it either way.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:30 |
|
a hole-y ghost posted:we should figure out a way to make a black hole massive enough to be self sustaining. completely destroy the earth, no information at all about its previous state except total mass recoverable large hadrons on that, but there are ethics/ old men running the world.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:31 |
|
Lime Tonics posted:large hadrons on that, but there are ethics/ old men running the world.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:33 |
|
a hole-y ghost posted:Large Hadron Collider's been running for years but it's a particle accelerator for little bitch men and doesn't have nearly enough power to make a runaway black hole. Then make a bigger one. but that's scary.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:34 |
|
A particle collider that runs the entire circumference of the globe
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:34 |
|
Pitdragon posted:A particle collider that runs the entire circumference of the globe no joke, that might alter orbit/gravity/would cost too much.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:35 |
|
a hole-y ghost posted:Large Hadron Collider's been running for years but it's a particle accelerator for little bitch men and doesn't have nearly enough power to make a runaway black hole. NEED MORE FUNDING
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:36 |
|
we need bezos to go blofeld
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 02:37 |
|
We cannot kill the planet, it is killing us—THAT is the point.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 03:36 |
|
Good I lust for death
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 03:36 |
|
it seems alot of people dont want the planet to die. maybe if we gave them and incentive? like 10% off ?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 03:39 |
|
What is the meaning of life? PLASTIC, rear end in a top hat!
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 07:34 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 19:23 |
|
*sees that the planet can no longer support human life* "omg the planet is dying." no it's not rear end in a top hat. you just suck at adapting to your own environment.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2018 07:38 |