|
triple sulk posted:it's scala for llvm scala is bad so this makes sense
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 16:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 18:52 |
|
|
Shaggar posted:scala is bad so this makes sense agreed op
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 16:59
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:I wonder if the Unity3D people will adopt Swift/LLVM or if they'll keep on using C# and developing their weird C#->IR->C++ compiler. why would they do this
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 17:01
|
|
|
does it still let you use emojis for variables
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 17:05
|
|
|
Phoenixan posted:can't wait until apple acquires ibm out of the blue introducing zOS X
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 17:29
|
|
|
As a Millennial I posted:why would they do this I was just thinking out loud. With Unity3D you use C# and/or JavaScript to implement your game logic. Well, oops, turns out that's terrible for speed, especially on mobile devices. And since mobile games are Unity's bread and butter, they're spending a lot of time and effort on a C# IL -> C++ compiler so Unity games can have the performance of native, compiled apps. Seems like LLVM would be a better choice, with Swift replacing C# in Unity since it has a lot of the same advantages that C# has over C++, while having the speed of a compiled language. Of course, Swift isn't compatible with C++, and Unity itself is written in C++, so never mind.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 23:41
|
|
|
But C# rules and swift is terrible.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 23:57
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:it's scala for llvm
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
worlds most advanced programming language
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 18:52 |
|
|
Captain Pike posted:But C# rules and swift is terrible. why do you think swift is terrible? whether or not C# is good is irrelevant when
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2015 01:10
|
|