Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Typo posted:

From what I understand TR's progrevism has being greatly overstated

the dude believed in social Darwinism and that applied to corporations, he basically believed that huge mega-corps were inevitable and that the president should basically be strongman "America's CEO" and just direct megacorps to do the bidding of american national interest

That was basically what "progressivism" meant in that time period. A strong nationalist state that tamps down on the excesses of the oligarchs, without giving too much power to the working class. It was largely a compromise ideology between socialists (who were largely fresh off the boat European immigrants) and the more conservative old money (who were largely yankee bluebloods)

Essentially the progressivism of Roosevelt was State Capitalism in it's purest form, he'd probably like the modern PRC, if only it was more environmentally friendly.

He also was a huge jingo, having made his bones in the Spanish/American War. Later he helped bring America into WW1. A descision he would later regret when his youngest son, Quentin was killed in action. He never got over it and would live the rest of his life in a state of depression, much like the rest of us lmao

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.

Dreddout posted:

Essentially the progressivism of Roosevelt was State Capitalism in it's purest form, he'd probably like the modern PRC, if only it was more environmentally friendly.

So there were a lot of state owned companies?

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

punk rebel ecks posted:

So there were a lot of state owned companies?

No, but I have a feeling that was the ideal they we're working towards. The ideology was influenced heavily by Henry George, with an ideal placed on equitable land management. Like the National Parks Service, which was created as a guarantee to conserve and manage state wildlands that the Federal government wasn't intending to privatize.

You have to take into account this was in response to The Gilded Age, where the rapidly industrializing American economy was dominated by massive natural resource and railroad monopolies.

Like typo said, the assumption was that corporations would remain massive, (which wasn't wrong) so you had to bring them under the heel of the federal government. Teddy campaigned on busting trusts, that is, breaking up monopolies. Which he largely succeeded at, given the fact that the anti-trust laws are still in affect today.

Much Ado was made about "nationalism" which in this context meant the Federal Government as the representative of The Nation should be the ultimate director of how the economy is run and governed. It was a very corporatist view of prosperity.

However the Progressive Coalition and the Republican Party grew steadily more conservative after Teddy, and further implementation of these ideals never solidified. By the end of WW1 the coalition was largely dead, finding it's successor in FDR's Democratic party.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
And of course, it goes without saying that a lot of the good ideas came from people to the left of the progressives. The Sewer Socialists of the Midwest had a huge impact on the era, and inarguably forced progressives further left

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

i guess that's also why Wilson called his progressive platform "New Nationalism." learning a lot itt

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

get that OUT of my face posted:

i guess that's also why Wilson called his progressive platform "New Nationalism." learning a lot itt

That's exactly it yeah

One early alternative to capitalism called itself "nationalism" and posited a society where the Nation functioned as the sole capitalist, wherein all the citizens of said nation would work directly for the government. The idea being that a nation would logically work towards prosperity for all it's citizens rather than a few capitalists. It never really took off outside of a few isolated communes, but you can see how it might have influenced the wider progressive movement.

Lawman 0
Aug 17, 2010

Dreddout posted:

That's exactly it yeah

One early alternative to capitalism called itself "nationalism" and posited a society where the Nation functioned as the sole capitalist, wherein all the citizens of said nation would work directly for the government. The idea being that a nation would logically work towards prosperity for all it's citizens rather than a few capitalists. It never really took off outside of a few isolated communes, but you can see how it might have influenced the wider progressive movement.

:psyboom:

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

Dreddout posted:

That's exactly it yeah

One early alternative to capitalism called itself "nationalism" and posited a society where the Nation functioned as the sole capitalist, wherein all the citizens of said nation would work directly for the government. The idea being that a nation would logically work towards prosperity for all it's citizens rather than a few capitalists.
something about this sounds familiar but i can't quite put my finger on it :thunk:

GoluboiOgon
Aug 19, 2017

by Nyc_Tattoo

get that OUT of my face posted:

i guess that's also why Wilson called his progressive platform "New Nationalism." learning a lot itt

it also had a fair amount to do with his support for the klan, and his hope to reforge the multi-ethnic US into a single anglo culture.

quote:

"Any man who carries a hyphen about with him, [ie, German-American] carries a dagger that he is ready to plunge into the vitals of this Republic whenever he gets ready."

especially during the WWI period, there was a crackdown on non-anglo white populations, especially german populations. people were forced to change their names to avoid harassment. sauerkraut became liberty cabbage.

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

GoluboiOgon posted:

especially during the WWI period, there was a crackdown on non-anglo white populations, especially german populations. people were forced to change their names to avoid harassment. sauerkraut became liberty cabbage.
dachshunds became "liberty hounds" and were regularly killed in public :(

MrOzzy
Nov 17, 2017
As a European it's interesting to read how current US politics came to be. Here in the EU (maube except fot he UK) we don't learn a lot about the detailed Anglo-Saxon history, unless you pick a specialised education.

We just learn about the European colonisation of America. About slave labour, racial segregation and the current political system.
This makes the American way of life quite hard to understand for a lot of Europeans.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
most europeans already live an american way of life, but with healthcare

MrOzzy
Nov 17, 2017

rudatron posted:

most europeans already live an american way of life, but with healthcare

I think the difference is much broader. Also social security is not the same as free or cheap health care. We have social security.

I don't want to derail the thread discussing this though.

Egg Moron
Jul 21, 2003

the dreams of the delighting void

Strom Thurmond is the only president that me and Joe Biden celebrate. Maybe he was the only president ever.

Nebakenezzer
Sep 13, 2005

The Mote in God's Eye

Dreddout posted:

And of course, it goes without saying that a lot of the good ideas came from people to the left of the progressives. The Sewer Socialists of the Midwest had a huge impact on the era, and inarguably forced progressives further left

I'm fascinated, what the hell is a sewer socialist

"we all float the same down here"

Feldegast42
Oct 29, 2011

COMMENCE THE RITE OF SHITPOSTING

MrOzzy posted:

As a European it's interesting to read how current US politics came to be. Here in the EU (maube except fot he UK) we don't learn a lot about the detailed Anglo-Saxon history, unless you pick a specialised education.

We just learn about the European colonisation of America. About slave labour, racial segregation and the current political system.
This makes the American way of life quite hard to understand for a lot of Europeans.

Study the civil war and its causes and effects and you know everything about past, present, and future america.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Nebakenezzer posted:

I'm fascinated, what the hell is a sewer socialist

"we all float the same down here"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewer_Socialism

In specific, it was a term of derision for the group of Democratic Socialists who governed the city of Milwaukee for the first half of the 20th century. (1910-1960). Ironically this term came from the revolutionary left, who weren't satisfied with their perception, that the reformist Milwaukee Socialists were too busy resting on the laurals of their excellent sewage system.

Back in the day, sewage and waste disposal in America was privatized. This was awful for many reasons, but primarily, uncoordinated sewer systems could and would be easily be miss managed by private companies. (Lmao Flint) The sewer socialists get their name from their socialization of the sewer and garbage systems at the municipal level. This mainly happened in the Rust Belt, where the socialist and trade unionist movement was at it's strongest in America.

Later, Progressive Democrats would co-opt this idea and spread it around the country. (This wouldn't stop the Milwaukee Democrats from working with the Republicans, by not running and backing the Republican candidate, in a successful effort to depose the then socialist mayor of Milwaukee) So if you have tap water free of lead in America, you ultimately have the sewer socialists to thank for that.


I should let you know, I learned a lot about the Sewer Socialists from Matt Christman's Solo Episode of Chapo Trap House "Sewer Surfin'". Even if you aren't a fan of the show, I suggest you check it out if you're interested. It's not particularly jokey or vulgar, and it's only 40 minutes long. However it's a premium episode, so you might need to 'acquire' it from some third party if you aren't a subscriber.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
Eugene Debs was the best President btw. His electoral loss was when the timeline diverged into hellworld

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Dreddout posted:


However the Progressive Coalition and the Republican Party grew steadily more conservative after Teddy, and further implementation of these ideals never solidified. By the end of WW1 the coalition was largely dead, finding it's successor in FDR's Democratic party.

Yeah basically the Republicans had a progressive wing and a conservative wing, the conservative wing won the internal party struggle after the 1910s (and the progressives defected to the 1912 bull moose ticket) and harding-coolidge-hoover trio mostly governed as pro-business laissez-faire republicans until 1929

Typo has issued a correction as of 22:31 on Jan 13, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Typo posted:

Yeah basically the Republicans had a progressive wing and a conservative wing, the conservative wing won the internal party struggle after the 1910s (and the progressives defected to the 1912 bull moose ticket) and harding-coolidge-hoover trio mostly governed as pro-business laissez-faire republicans until 1929

The same thing happened to the Dems, roughly concurrently, but in reverse. The progressive wing of the Dems were mainly localized in the North, with the conservative Dixiecrats in the South. Eventually the progressive faction overtook the conservative faction, even today there are still isolated remnants of the Dixiecrats in the South. The same isn't really true of the Progressive Republicans, they were basically extinct by the 50's

  • Locked thread