|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:wait what doe sthis do when youtube was still using flash you could set the quality of the video using that iirc it went from 360p standard to 480p or summat
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2018 15:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 01:04 |
|
|
The Management posted:people still care about what Monty has to say? why wouldn't they?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2018 16:16
|
|
|
has anyone said codick
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2018 16:15
|
|
|
The Management posted:people still care about what Monty has to say?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2018 00:01
|
|
|
The 2018 MSU codec comparison is out with H.264, H.265, VP9, and AV1. Mr.Radar fucked around with this message at 22:36 on Apr 17, 2018 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2018 22:26
|
|
|
Wheany posted:"Founding Members include Amazon, Apple, Arm, Cisco, Facebook, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Mozilla, Netflix, and NVIDIA. " I'm not seeing the free software Foundation 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2018 22:29
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:when youtube was still using flash you could set the quality of the video using that yeah it was this, back when they were just starting to roll out "high quality" videos (480p) you could "force" it to play 480p instead of the default 320p by adding that get parameter
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2018 22:35
|
|
|
codec chat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEdqN22vaWs
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2018 06:10
|
|
|
u know what, i'm going to crosspost this here because i have opinions this is the original comparison between the itunes hd version and the blu-ray version  i tried recreating the look in the blu-ray screenshot using the itunes screenshot:  even using surface blur is an improvement
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 07:47
|
|
|
in alice in wonderland they decided that gray should be purple for some reason, and colors in general should be super saturated, but other than that, the blu-ray version looks way better than with sword in the stone. i don't mind the noise reduction that much, tbh, since they seem to have been able to retain the details in the linework and the painted background. the left image is apparently a 35mm film scan, the right image is a screenshot from the blu-ray 
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 07:57
|
|
|
gently caress:
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 08:05
|
|
|
what?
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 08:07
|
|
|
Disney likes to "restore" their Blu Ray releases but they give the job to the colorblind intern who watched a YouTubetutorial on after effects.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 08:28
|
|
|
digital noise reduction for stuff shot on film needs to die already also film grain isn’t noise
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 15:29
|
|
|
film grain doesn’t compress because it is essentially random static. the right thing to do is to take it out and replace it with temporal blue noise dither.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 15:49
|
|
|
nah, just use a decent bitrate. especially for something like bluray, which is supposed to be a high end format, where there is plenty of space and none of the issues with streaming exist.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 15:54
|
|
|
Wheany posted:gently caress: it looks terrible to us, the galaxy brain computer nerds, but consider that the people watching disney cartoons on blu-ray are either (1) lunatic disney moms who love the look of digital vibrance and motion interpolation, or (2) small children. disney knows their market, and you are not it.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 19:29
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:it looks terrible to us, the galaxy brain computer nerds, but consider that the people watching disney cartoons on blu-ray are either (1) lunatic disney moms who love the look of digital vibrance and motion interpolation, or (2) small children. b-b-but the color accuracy!
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 21:55
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:it looks terrible to us, the galaxy brain computer nerds, but consider that the people watching disney cartoons on blu-ray are either (1) lunatic disney moms who love the look of digital vibrance and motion interpolation, or (2) small children. if that was truly their market then why go to the trouble of rotoscoping the foreground and recompositing it with the background. you can please lunatic disney moms with bicubic scaling.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:00
|
|
|
Wheany posted:if that was truly their market then why go to the trouble of rotoscoping the foreground and recompositing it with the background. are you sure they did this
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 00:05
|
|
|
maybe the long con is to wait until enough nerds get mad about it and then release special editions with a grimy film transfer but in 8K
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 00:14
|
|
|
Wheany posted:gently caress: 
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 00:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 01:04 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2018 06:51
|
|