|
KOraithER posted:Thanks, SuperKlaus. I've been skipping their stupid argument after the first page or so, but it still bugs me. I-I-I j-just wanted to talk about Alignment, I'm sorry
|
# ? Jun 10, 2007 23:00 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 00:47 |
|
Ferrinus posted:She could always be blown directly into the Snarl's dimension and then come back out as some kind of Snarl-empowered godkiller thing. That's a silly thing to say and you're a silly person for having said it.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 00:39 |
|
Yeah, I mean, who'd expect discussion about D&D rules in the discussion thread for a comic based on lampooning D&D rules?
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 03:44 |
|
SuperKlaus posted:And what the hell, four or five people from the last few pages talking about OoTS starting to suck? I just have never liked the Azure City. I didn't like it in the beginning and I don't like it now. I want them to go back to wandering the countryside in search of adventure or at least random sidequests. Hopefully the next gate is like in a lost ruin or something where there won't be any NPCs around for miles aside from bandits.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 04:07 |
|
Cowcaster posted:That's a silly thing to say and you're a silly person for having said it. IT COULD HAPPEN. And her magic would probably be purple and red colored.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 04:07 |
|
She can't become a snarly death knight, I want her to wander off and re-appear by suprise as the leiutenant of elan's dad who may not ever even be mentioned again! Ferrinus, your idea is inferior to my own and I insist we debate our respective fanfiction predictions for the next ten pages.SuperKlaus posted:Maybe you should take it to another thread, Ferrinus and happyelf. Efreet saiid fucked around with this message at 09:21 on Jun 11, 2007 |
# ? Jun 11, 2007 09:18 |
|
I wonder what the Snarl would look like in the comic today should we see a bit of it? I always assumed it would just be the crayon scrawl, but the crayon indicated flashback, so I'm wondering it viewed in the comic proper it would be a mess of writhing solid lines.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 10:32 |
|
Efreet saiid posted:She can't become a snarly death knight, I want her to wander off and re-appear by suprise as the leiutenant of elan's dad who may not ever even be mentioned again! He's the guy who has Haley's dad imprisoned! Obviously!
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 14:20 |
Vicissitude posted:He's the guy who has Haley's dad imprisoned! Obviously! That might be true and would be a good twist, but I thought it was heavily implied Nale had killed his father or something similar. I could be way off, though.
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 14:29 |
|
How did Redcloak and Xykon escape is my question. They didn't even start moving till almost the same round Miko destroyed the crystal, and that was huge explosion. It's reminding me of one of those bad animes where they'll have the bad guy almost defeated andh e always escapes at the last minute. Or season 4 of 24.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 14:40 |
|
It was heavily implied that Nale and his father had a falling out, early in the strip when Elan and Nale fight for the first time. The whole reason Nale turns on Elan is because he doesn't take Elan rejecting him well, and says that "nobody rejects him, not Elan, not his father or anyone." I don't believe it says that Nale killed him though. Seeing as how he's dropped two fights to Elan now, it seems unlikely. More so, it seems less likely that Nale wouldn't take control of his father's empire/army in the event that he killed him. Also, it feels really silly to type Elan and Nale over and over. NutShellBill fucked around with this message at 19:09 on Jun 11, 2007 |
# ? Jun 11, 2007 14:42 |
|
greatn posted:How did Redcloak and Xykon escape is my question. They didn't even start moving till almost the same round Miko destroyed the crystal, and that was huge explosion. It's reminding me of one of those bad animes where they'll have the bad guy almost defeated andh e always escapes at the last minute. Or season 4 of 24. They were flying away. Shockwaves, much like falling, rely on impact with solid objects to harm you through sudden deceleration. If you're flying away from the blast however, all it's going to do is increase your flight speed. The Doppler effect on Xykon's evil cackling should be pretty rad though. Gyges fucked around with this message at 17:34 on Jun 11, 2007 |
# ? Jun 11, 2007 17:30 |
|
Gyges posted:They were flying away. Shockwaves, much like falling, rely on impact with solid objects to harm you through sudden deceleration. If you're flying away from the blast however, all it's going to do is increase your flight speed. The Doppler effect on Xykon's evil cackling should be pretty rad though. Which is why a big shockwave can kill, since the mass at the front of your body is accelerated against the rest of you, and the entire body gets fatally compressed.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 18:33 |
|
True enough, but this doesn't work so well against skeletal undead who are already flying away as fast as their overland flight spell will let them. Notice that Xykon is between Redcloak and the explosion, the better to protect a smash prone phylactery.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 19:11 |
|
Also it is technically a magical dimensional explosion which might have special non named character killing properties. I believe those are fairly common.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 19:28 |
|
Gyges posted:They were flying away. Shockwaves, much like falling, rely on impact with solid objects to harm you through sudden deceleration. If you're flying away from the blast however, all it's going to do is increase your flight speed. The Doppler effect on Xykon's evil cackling should be pretty rad though. Ferrinus posted:I-I-I j-just wanted to talk about Alignment, I'm sorry
|
# ? Jun 11, 2007 20:43 |
|
NutShellBill posted:Also, it feels really silly to type Elan and Nale over and over. You think you feel silly? I didn't get Nale = Elan in reverse until just this minute.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 00:12 |
|
Gyges posted:True enough, but this doesn't work so well against skeletal undead who are already flying away as fast as their overland flight spell will let them. Notice that Xykon is between Redcloak and the explosion, the better to protect a smash prone phylactery. Damage reduction doesn't count against impact damage of miscellaneous concussive force. A Lich who fell 20' would still take the D6 damage, even though the ground probably isn't magical.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 00:42 |
Vicissitude posted:Damage reduction doesn't count against impact damage of miscellaneous concussive force. A Lich who fell 20' would still take the D6 damage, even though the ground probably isn't magical. Uh, yes it does.
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 00:53 |
|
ConfusedUs posted:Uh, yes it does. What if the ground is magical but not blunt?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 01:17 |
|
RickoniX posted:What if the ground is magical but not blunt? What if you get knocked into an the branch of a magical tree, does that count as magical blunt damage?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 02:10 |
farraday posted:What if you get knocked into an the branch of a magical tree, does that count as magical blunt damage? Is magical part of its sub-type (such as magical beast) or does it strike as a magic weapon? If the former, no. If the latter, yes.
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 02:11 |
|
ConfusedUs posted:Is magical part of its sub-type (such as magical beast) or does it strike as a magic weapon? If the former, no. If the latter, yes. What if I swing a lich at an animated +1 club, who takes damage?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 02:25 |
|
RickoniX posted:What if the ground is magical but not blunt? Well, if the Lich falls into a pit trap with +1 spikes at the bottom, that's magical Piercing damage. He'd take damage from the fall, but not the spikes. farraday posted:What if you get knocked into an the branch of a magical tree, does that count as magical blunt damage? Technically yes, but the damage is from the impact rather than being struck by the tree. RickoniX posted:What if I swing a lich at an animated +1 club, who takes damage? Depends. Do you have Weapon Proficiency: Lich? If not, the Lich would take damage because you can't properly weild him. If so, you'd still have to be making Sunder attempts to damage a weapon.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 02:29 |
|
Vicissitude posted:Depends. Do you have Weapon Proficiency: Lich? If not, the Lich would take damage because you can't properly weild him. If so, you'd still have to be making Sunder attempts to damage a weapon. Oooh perfect. Get Weapon Proficiency: Phylactery then beat the Lich to death with his own soul. There is no way that doesn't work.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 02:33 |
|
farraday posted:Oooh perfect. Get Weapon Proficiency: Phylactery then beat the Lich to death with his own soul. But what do you beat his soul to death with, then?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 03:18 |
|
See, this is funny.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 03:43 |
|
Robot Bastard posted:Yeah, I mean, who'd expect discussion about D&D rules in the discussion thread for a comic based on lampooning D&D rules? Quiet, you. (no insult meant) I don't really mind talk about Miko's alignment (this thread was born of it) and now that I look at it a little more I see Ferrinus and happyelf were being quite civil and I thank them for it. I just saw one of those arguments straight out of D&D the forum where obviously nobody was convincing anybody. farraday posted:What if you get knocked into an the branch of a magical tree, does that count as magical blunt damage? If you get knocked into a magical cannabis plant it does.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 03:56 |
|
MikeJF posted:But what do you beat his soul to death with, then? Another soul. Duh. Since the soul is technically the essence of the creature itself, it has the same extraordinary abilities. Damage reduction is an (Ex) ability and creatures with Damage Reduction can bypass the same DR of other creatures (ie, A vampire with DR X/magic and silver has its natural attacks count as magic and silver for the purposes of bypassing DR). Since the Lich has DR 15/Magic and Bludgeoning, its soul would, too. This is all more or less moot because the phylactery is a magic item, thereby fullfilling the magic requirement, and most of them are blunt anyway. Even those that aren't usually have a flat surface. Vicissitude fucked around with this message at 04:32 on Jun 12, 2007 |
# ? Jun 12, 2007 04:28 |
|
Vicissitude posted:Another soul. Duh. Not only that but Phalactery's have a hardness of 20, that's the same as adamantine. Therefore Phylactery's are magical blunt adamantine weapons. Seriously why would you want to destroy it? Just kill the lich every week or so and use it to beat up things you run across for fun and profit.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 04:44 |
|
Hey guys, if like OOTS, you would probably enjoy the The Intercontinental Union of Disgusting Characters: http://home.netcom.com/~rogermw/ADnD/ Which basically is like OOTS but in 1st edition AD&D instead of 3.5. And without pictures. quote:Ringman rubbed his finger bones. "You've more than proven your strength to me, young lady. You'll make an excellent warrior."
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 04:45 |
|
New Comic gently caress YOU BURLEW! Hmm... Id eifnately saw it but now it's disappeared. If It comes up again I'll waffle images it quick.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 05:14 |
|
farraday posted:New Comic poo poo, someone get it up quick! I'm so pissed that I just missed it!
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 05:16 |
|
I could tell you what's in it but you'd slap me and I'd deserve it. success!
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 05:18 |
|
drat and I had my money on Miko becoming a blackguard and getting yelled at by Soon.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 05:33 |
|
I never thought I'd feel sorry for Miko.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 05:34 |
|
I'd just look at the site, but its down because of the new comic, has anyone received there book number -1 yet? Or is it not out yet?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 05:39 |
|
I got both of my wishes! And you suckers were yammering about monk evasion and poo poo. evilsake fucked around with this message at 05:48 on Jun 12, 2007 |
# ? Jun 12, 2007 05:40 |
|
If I were Rich Burlew I'd be closing my forums right about now.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 05:40 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 00:47 |
|
farraday posted:I could tell you what's in it but you'd slap me and I'd deserve it. OMG YES! Thanks man, it's like Christmas came early!
|
# ? Jun 12, 2007 05:42 |