|
Helping up the picture content with a poor '89 Toyota Camry 3S-FE motor that didn't like to rev after ~260,000 miles. It lets you know this by going BANG. Edge smooshed out like a putty knife:
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 20:45 |
|
|
# ? Apr 23, 2024 08:56 |
|
GWBBQ posted:I remember, from my unfortunate time as a lube tech, the old Mercedes-Benz diesel engines had a small lever next to the intake manifold that had "STOP" printed on it. I can't find a picture, but I'm sure someone here knows what I'm talking about. To start it, you flick the lever so there's less resistance to work against while you spin the starter handle, then flick it closed when you've got a few rpm. You also have to have the front wheel (yes, singular, it's a 3-wheeler) on full lock so your knuckles don't hit it while you're cranking, and because the fuelling's out of whack, you use a piece of binder twine wrapped round your foot to pull on the throttle so she'll start. Seriously, no bastard's ever going to steal it. Even if by some miracle they started it, the pedal layout's set to the pre-war standard of centre throttle, right brake, and the gearbox is impossible to navigate even having driven Fiats for over a decade...
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 21:31 |
|
InitialDave posted:This is epic. However, someone's probably going to steal it now, given the detailed instructions you've provided. Do you think it could handle the tongue weight of a small car trailer with an integra type-R on it? Nevermind, if it's the same as this thing, its' so it boggles the mind. It could probably pull a house down, albeit at 5 mph.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 22:12 |
|
Skier posted:Helping up the picture content with a poor '89 Toyota Camry 3S-FE motor that didn't like to rev after ~260,000 miles. It lets you know this by going BANG.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 22:31 |
|
JointHorse posted:Differential in a Peugeot 405 decided to grenade itself. 250fwhp and a Mazda G-series FWD transmission; Goodbye 3rd gear and the diff.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 22:35 |
|
Sockington posted:250fwhp and a Mazda G-series FWD transmission; Holy gently caress, I always thought it was the case that busted on those G series trannies.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 22:38 |
|
ACEofsnett posted:This is epic. However, someone's probably going to steal it now, given the detailed instructions you've provided. Do you think it could handle the tongue weight of a small car trailer with an integra type-R on it? Yes, it would tow a trailer with a ton or so of Honda on it. No, it wouldn't go very fast, and God help you if you needed to stop. Single leading shoe, rod-activated drums on the rear axle...
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 22:45 |
|
You Am I posted:Wow, those Camry motors actually die? 3sfe's are fairly robust, but early model 5s-fe's where rod throwing mother fuckers if not built perfect or you didn't sacrifice a goat or romped on them hard.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 23:08 |
|
Godholio posted:Same thing with the F-15. Every modern fighter is inherently unstable. This improves maneuverability significantly. But it means the pilot's input doesn't directly affect the flight surfaces...the computer receives the input, decides how best to make it happen, and actually makes the adjustments. The computer was not designed to fly with one wing. McDonnell Douglas ran multiple simulations and were absolutely stunned the plane landed safely. The F-15 is not a fly-by-wire aircraft. It relies on aerodynamics for its stability, not computer corrections (like nearly every fighter made since the F-15).
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 23:16 |
|
scapulataf posted:Holy gently caress, I always thought it was the case that busted on those G series trannies. Not always Did this pulling a 2.2 60' in my 130whp Escort.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2009 23:29 |
|
Heads and pistons from my collection. The thing to note on the bottom head is the shim sitting on it. See the hole burnt throught it? Yeah. Did that in less than an hour, on more than one cylinder. Due to the domed piston pictured next to it. The top one, dropped intake valve seat, ate a piston.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 00:15 |
|
MrChips posted:The F-15 is not a fly-by-wire aircraft. It relies on aerodynamics for its stability, not computer corrections (like nearly every fighter made since the F-15). The initial run were not FBW, but the C model and everything since is. The F-15I should fall into this latter category. The F-15 IS flyable without it apparently, but unless it's disabled, the computer is still running the show. I don't know if there are still any F-15As in the inventory. The ANG had a few a year or two ago, but I don't know if they're still around.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 02:18 |
|
Godholio posted:The initial run were not FBW, but the C model and everything since is. The F-15I should fall into this latter category. The F-15 IS flyable without it apparently, but unless it's disabled, the computer is still running the show. I don't know if there are still any F-15As in the inventory. The ANG had a few a year or two ago, but I don't know if they're still around. It's not a true FBW system though, in which the computer communicates with the control surface servos via electrical cables (as opposed to a conventional hydromechanical system of linkages, cables and pushrods communicating with the servos). The F-15C and later models have what's known as a Control Augmentation System (CAS); basically, the control cables/pushrods have servos attached or spliced into them to allow a flight control computer to manipulate the controls - sort of like an autopilot, but with more authority to make control surface movements. It provides many of the benefits of FBW, but at the same time, it retains a physical connection between the control column and the control surfaces. The F-15 isn't the only aircraft to be fitted with a system like this - the F-14A+ and F-14D had a similar system installed as well.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 02:56 |
|
308whp through a k series tranny: ps: gently caress ring gears.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 03:00 |
|
Sockington posted:250fwhp and a Mazda G-series FWD transmission; The insides of damaged transmissions make me cringe. To be fair though, the insides of any transmission make me throw up a little from confusion.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 03:01 |
|
Sockington posted:250fwhp and a Mazda G-series FWD transmission; \/\/Sup, mazdaspeed buddy! \/\/ Fender Anarchist fucked around with this message at 07:23 on Nov 20, 2009 |
# ? Nov 19, 2009 03:44 |
|
Sockington posted:250fwhp and a Mazda G-series FWD transmission; I haven't torn mine apart yet. Edit: This is what i mean by "typical failure mode" Click here for the full 2048x1536 image. Over 120 broken, and counting. And that's just the count from the people that post on that forum... for a car that they only made 2500 of. peepsalot fucked around with this message at 04:25 on Nov 19, 2009 |
# ? Nov 19, 2009 03:53 |
|
If we're doing airplanes in here as well, I figure I'd contribute something from my industry: I am a reservoir, not a drilling engineer, but from what I recall they were drilling this well and they hit an unknown formation and took a "kick" of natural gas at a much higher pressure than they expected. A bubble of gas rose between the drill string and the borehole. The change in pressure of the drilling fluid was monitored and there are a series of rams on a device called a BOP or blow out preventer that can close tightly around or even cut through the drill string if it was really bad, near uncontrollable kick. One set of rams was known to be bad and was locked up, another set jammed up, and a third set didn't have the right tool in time as the "driller" didn't react in time. The rig ended up being evacuated before the drill pipe was ejected out of the ground and the bubble of gas reached surface and shot the drilling fluid completely out of the hole as the gas bubble caught on fire. This is pretty simplified, but I was trying to get the point across. If people are interested, I know I have a lot more pics of various oilfield disasters, but I'd have to check my work computer tomorrow.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 04:15 |
|
I like to think that it's been established so far in this thread that while it's extra cool if it's part of a vehicle gone , what we're all really here for is to see anything spectacularly broken. Anything. Please, do continue.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 04:38 |
|
Yeah that last post counts. Clip of NHRA crashes with lovely youtube music http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hf7qV4GiZeg
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 05:16 |
|
Crankcases are supposed to be see-through, right? Sleeves? We don't need no stinkin' sleeves. The engine was a CAT 3412E.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 05:29 |
|
MrChips posted:It's not a true FBW system though, in which the computer communicates with the control surface servos via electrical cables (as opposed to a conventional hydromechanical system of linkages, cables and pushrods communicating with the servos). The F-15C and later models have what's known as a Control Augmentation System (CAS); basically, the control cables/pushrods have servos attached or spliced into them to allow a flight control computer to manipulate the controls - sort of like an autopilot, but with more authority to make control surface movements. It provides many of the benefits of FBW, but at the same time, it retains a physical connection between the control column and the control surfaces. Yeah, the jives with how it was explained to me. What's your background in this, out of curiosity?
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 05:35 |
|
Oh, what? Oh, Becky and I are gonna cancel our weekend yoga class to take our H2's "rock climbing" with Dave and his wife. We even bought the rally lights off of the Hummer aftermarket site so that we'll be more visible. Can't wait!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvLzjzoxgfY
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 07:37 |
|
omgitstheinternet posted:The insides of damaged transmissions make me cringe. To be fair though, the insides of any transmission make me throw up a little from confusion.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 07:47 |
|
Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester posted:i've worked on trannies now from a couple vintage motorcycles, and i'm surprised that they don't look much different than that one here. i suppose the gears must be bigger, but you're still putting all your power through two little teeth there. or more than two if they're helical cut? anyway, 25-50hp? sure i can believe that? 250? i have a hard time understanding how that works. Helical gears, so you have a longer gear than the width. That and good metal.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 07:59 |
|
Ringo Star Get posted:Oh, what? Oh, Becky and I are gonna cancel our weekend yoga class to take our H2's "rock climbing" with Dave and his wife. We even bought the rally lights off of the Hummer aftermarket site so that we'll be more visible. Can't wait!!!! That H2 has seen more off road poo poo then most people have with their "hard core" rigs. Trust me. Guy goes by Alec W on pirate 4x4, hummer x and jk owners and few other forums. He took that H2 *EVERYWHERE* and beat the snot out of it, the only thing he broke on it was the tie rods in that one video which is pretty impressive. He's still amused at all the play time it's getting. I think he's running around with an H3 and a Jeep Rubicon these days. But I've seen pictures and videos of that thing all over the place, Moab, Fordyce/Rubicon and out in Colorado and Wyoming. Now if the H2 broke a tie rod in a mall parking lot.. that would be funny
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 08:20 |
|
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 08:33 |
|
thArf posted:Ebay JDM grounding kit?
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 08:38 |
|
MetaJew posted:Ebay JDM grounding kit? It's the premium ebay amp kit. Coupled with the top of the line ebay battery tie down kit.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 09:35 |
|
insta posted:Not always Did this pulling a 2.2 60' in my 130whp Escort. Since it was an escort doing a 2.2 60 ft. I'll assume it was an EGT w/ G series. Holy gently caress, perhaps they aren't as robust as I thought, though I was aware before that they weren't indestructible. Seeing the pics of the MSP diffs also jogged my memory. I seem to recall now, guys in P5s and MP3s having issues with the G series. THough alot of the people I've seen with a bpt swap in first gens don't seem to have the same issues. Maybe I've just forgotten. Baby Hitler posted:Helical gears, so you have a longer gear than the width. That and good metal. Agreed, steel is strong.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 13:30 |
|
The Dana 35 Break GALLERY. http://www.billhughes.com/dana35c/ with classics such as: Click here for the full 800x600 image. Tossed_Salad_Man fucked around with this message at 13:50 on Nov 19, 2009 |
# ? Nov 19, 2009 13:48 |
|
scapulataf posted:Since it was an escort doing a 2.2 60 ft. I'll assume it was an EGT w/ G series. G5M sedan ratios (taller than normal) in an Escort ZX2 with boltons. The 98 ZX2 trans was awesome for drags, nice short gears and as bulletproof as I've seen the G-series transaxles. But, I couldn't find a 98 trans ever at my pick-n-pull, so it was usually the one from the 4-door sedan. The only actual ZX2 trans I found was stuck in 3rd gear
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 17:08 |
|
scapulataf posted:Holy gently caress, perhaps they aren't as robust as I thought, though I was aware before that they weren't indestructible. So here's how they fail; 1. Diff pin fails a) To fix, weld diff pin and replace w/ a welded MSP diff or a mFactory one 2. Second or Third gear shreds to pieces (as pictured) a) To fix, replace w/ expensive aftermarket set or swap in a new gear box 3. The power causes the aluminium case to flex between shifts as power is re-applied (second to third usually) and the shafts destroy their mounting points inside the transmission. a)To fix this, a thick plate is machined to fit where the shafts meet the 1/4" aluminium mounting point on the transmission. Or to fix all of this, you simply replace the G-series with a Toyota E-series from a FWD Solara or a AWD Celica (if you have an AWD BG chassis car.) OH - and for all of you with ZX2s etc - there's a company producing new rear subframes that let you install a Toyota Celica rear diff/axle setup in a FWD Escort GT/ZX2 chassis. There's tons of info about the Toyota trans swap + this new AWD setup if anyone wants it. Mind you, the adapter plate that's currently out there (about $270usd) only works for the BP motor (which can be installed into a ZX2 easily).
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 17:17 |
|
Sockington posted:OH - and for all of you with ZX2s etc - there's a company producing new rear subframes that let you install a Toyota Celica rear diff/axle setup in a FWD Escort GT/ZX2 chassis. There's tons of info about the Toyota trans swap + this new AWD setup if anyone wants it. Holy crap AWD escort? I need this information yesterday.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 18:09 |
|
ab0z posted:Holy crap AWD escort? I need this information yesterday.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 19:44 |
|
Sockington posted:OH - and for all of you with ZX2s etc - there's a company producing new rear subframes that let you install a Toyota Celica rear diff/axle setup in a FWD Escort GT/ZX2 chassis. There's tons of info about the Toyota trans swap + this new AWD setup if anyone wants it. drat you. I'm working on my sister's ZX2 right now, if you missed the post in your project thread. Does the AWD rear preclude use of the ZX2 S/R discs (which I may be swapping in)? Either way, a full driveline and engine swap is probably out of the scope of what i'm looking to do.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 19:49 |
|
Godholio posted:Yeah, the jives with how it was explained to me. What's your background in this, out of curiosity? I work in the aviation industry. A while back, I spent some time talking with some Eagle drivers while we were all twiddling our fingers in the FBO, waiting for the weather to lift. I asked them a mountain of questions about their aircraft (some of them were pretty technical), nearly all of which they were happy to answer.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 20:31 |
|
Ringo Star Get posted:Oh, what? Oh, Becky and I are gonna cancel our weekend yoga class to take our H2's "rock climbing" with Dave and his wife. We even bought the rally lights off of the Hummer aftermarket site so that we'll be more visible. Can't wait!!!! It looks like its actually set up well, and judging by the other posters response, I don't think there is any reason to give this guy poo poo, that happens when your wheeling in a rock garden. Props to him for using his tussed up suburban properly.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 20:34 |
|
These potato chips taste funny not really, potato chips are much thicker than these bearing remnants hippynerd fucked around with this message at 21:00 on Nov 19, 2009 |
# ? Nov 19, 2009 20:42 |
|
|
# ? Apr 23, 2024 08:56 |
|
sw0cb posted:It looks like its actually set up well, and judging by the other posters response, I don't think there is any reason to give this guy poo poo, that happens when your wheeling in a rock garden. Props to him for using his tussed up suburban properly.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2009 21:25 |