|
keep snyping; you dont have to report back
|
# ? Aug 26, 2010 19:18 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 03:07 |
Jonny 290 posted:keep snyping; you dont have to report back
|
|
# ? Aug 26, 2010 19:22 |
|
Nanami Madobe posted:nooooooooooo what happened to ur av
|
# ? Aug 26, 2010 21:46 |
|
Just read this entire thread in one sitting wikipedia is hilariously awful (mlmp) and is now my favorite site After reading about the fictional bears then seeing the seagull making GBS threads I was crying
|
# ? Aug 26, 2010 21:54 |
|
The Wonder Weapon posted:Just read this entire thread in one sitting thanks for this post
|
# ? Aug 26, 2010 21:59 |
|
Starbucks' melusine I have corrected the former confusing text about the "siren" in the Starbucks logo, which elicited a query at my Talkpage. It now reads as follows: Though technically the heraldic charge employed as Starbucks' logo is a melusine displayed, crowned or, in 2006, Valerie O'Neil, a Starbucks spokeswoman, said that the logo is an image of a "twin-tailed siren",[1] the sirens of Greek mythology having developed aquatic characteristics during the Middle Ages, and cognates of siren have come to denote mermaids in several European languages. The image was more correctly identified as a melusine by Ann Rippin the following year.[2] Notes 1. ^ "The Insider: Principal roasts Starbucks over steamy retro logo". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. September 11, 2006. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/284533_theinsider11.html. Retrieved May 23, 2007. 2. ^ Rippin, Ann (2007). "Space, place and the colonies: re-reading the Starbucks' story". Critical perspectives on international business (Emerald Group Publishing) 3 (2): 136-149. ISSN 1742-2043. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/2900030202.html. We have an editor who, without actually knowing anything about sirens, mermaids or melusines, just prefers the confusing version. I think we needn't be bullied about this: "if Starbucks call it a siren, we call it a siren" etc etc. Wikipedia is a readers' service. Intentionally retaining misleading text is a disservice. I struggle every day with scribblers and others who undermine Wikipedia's credibility, so perhaps I am intolerant. The text above is fully supported by references, here and at Siren, Mermaid and Melusine. I am willing to provide additional references for any statement. --Wetman (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC) My argument that we "call it a siren because Starbucks calls it a siren" is neither bullying nor misleading. I've always said that we have to call it a siren in the absence of any sources identifying it as anything else. I'd probably edit your addition to remove the stuff about the heraldic charge (since that's not supported by a source), but leave in the bit about it's being a melusine, assuming that final source is useful in that regard (haven't had a chance to read it yet). Esrever (klaT) 11:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC) Actually, as I look at it, I'd probably cut almost all of that stuff, since it has nothing to do with Starbucks and is a relatively minor point about the logo. In 2006, Valerie O'Neil, a Starbucks spokeswoman said that the logo is an image of a "twin-tailed siren".[1] The image was more correctly identified as a melusine by Ann Rippin the following year.[2] And as I re-read that, I notice that it seems to sound an awful lot like what's already in the article, so I'd probably have reverted you, too. Esrever (klaT) 11:39, 28 August 2009 (UTC) "The image was more correctly identified as a melusine by Ann Rippin the following year". Total opinion. Also, Wetman, mind your insults. I bloody well do know what a melusine is, and a siren, and a mermaid, but I also know what WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH is, and I know that Wikipedia is verifiable and not WP:THETRUTH. So before you start characterising other editors as "scribblers", perhaps you should get off your high horse and stick to using reliable sources. The version as it stood was entirely factual and based on sources, and was not at all confusing. It might not satisfy your insistence that the logo really is of a melusine, but that's Wikipedia for you. You'll notice above that I've sourced the book the woodcut was copied from, but without a reliable source telling us that it's original research. Fences&Windows 03:35, 29 August 2009 (UTC) As for confusing, this wording is far too complex for a reader who wants to know about the logo of a coffee company: "Though technically the heraldic charge employed as Starbucks' logo is a melusine displayed, crowned or...". "Heraldic charge"? "displayed, crowned or"? "Employed as"? We're writing a general encyclopedia here; give the poor reader a chance. None of that information is relevant. The current text includes the magic word "melusine", which I added a couple of months ago after sourcing that article by Ann Rippin. Fences&Windows 03:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC) Has someone any info about the new starbucks in Tiranne?Villick (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
|
# ? Aug 26, 2010 22:00 |
Rufo posted:nooooooooooo what happened to ur av theres still my sig Cheers, 50 Foot Ant, for giving me the fat Nanami avatar.
|
|
# ? Aug 26, 2010 23:58 |
|
which you inexplicably have to enable each time??? whats the thinking there
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 00:08 |
|
ajghf
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 00:08 |
|
tripwire what happen why can't you fyad anymore :/
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 00:42 |
|
Otto Skorzeny posted:tripwire what happen why can't you fyad anymore :/ if you post in ycs or lf or byob a certain threshold of post per unknown period of time, you get "forum cancer" unless u donate 7bucks to lowtax alimony fund you can't post in fyad and every time you click on a thread in any forum thats not ycs/lf/byob it randomly redirects you to an annoying loud flash page
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 00:51 |
|
o i didnt know the cancer poo poo stopped you from fyading radiums kind of a fag
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 01:38 |
tripwire posted:ajghf is that by hernando? it's cool and trippy
|
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 01:41 |
|
tripwire posted:if you post in ycs or lf or byob a certain threshold of post per unknown period of time, you get "forum cancer" unless u donate 7bucks to lowtax alimony fund why'd they get divorced anyway. was his wife driving him up the wall? well hopefully she wasn't actually driving...
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 01:48 |
|
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 02:04 |
dorsh posted:
|
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 02:07 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:keep snyping; you dont have to report back Yes! Nice.
|
# ? Aug 27, 2010 08:18 |
|
you know what wikipedia really, really needs? a list of criticisms often directed at Strawberry Shortcake Wikipedia posted:General inconsistencies that's only half, there's still some very in-depth, bizarre spergin' about the Strawberry Shortcake television show Wikipedia posted:Some people were disappointed with the absence of The Purple Pie Man in the TV series. However, others applauded the removal of villains from the series and were disappointed with the reintroduction of the Pie Man in the Sweet Dreams Movie, preferring that the series be kept in its current format: an educational, slice-of-life program similar to Arthur or Caillou. Two camps clearly exist on this issue: There are fans (adults and children alike) that love the inclusion of antagonists such as Purple Pie Man, Sour Grapes and Licorice Whip. These fans would like these to continue, and to see more of them in movies, books, and toys. However, there are others who feel that the inclusion (or re-inclusion) of villains in the show takes away from the primary focus on Strawberry and her friends, as well as eroding the educational content of the show, and would prefer the show and franchise be kept villain-free[8][9].
|
# ? Sep 7, 2010 03:47 |
|
If you use the words "canon" and "retcon" you might be greasy nerd.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2010 03:49 |
|
qirex posted:If you use the words "canon" and "retcon" you might be greasy nerd.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2010 04:06 |
|
There are fans (adults and children alike)
|
# ? Sep 7, 2010 04:26 |
Otto Skorzeny posted:o i didnt know the cancer poo poo stopped you from fyading Yeah, well, it's not like weird random 'purges' are anything new here. Sultan of Swing posted:why'd they get divorced anyway. was his wife driving him up the wall? -> don't speculate on Dear Richard's personal life, -> don't ask how the forums are run Coffee Jones fucked around with this message at 04:38 on Sep 7, 2010 |
|
# ? Sep 7, 2010 04:31 |
|
maniacdevnull posted:There are fans (adults and children alike) "Dad, this cartoon lacks a primary antagonist!" - a child
|
# ? Sep 7, 2010 04:51 |
|
the Strawberry Shortcake talk page is a hotbed of dissent and discussionWikipedia posted:Removal of Ginger Snaps Ethnicity Wikipedia posted:Watch out for corporate plant! Sperglord posted:Mixing fact and fiction zetamind2000 fucked around with this message at 06:15 on Sep 7, 2010 |
# ? Sep 7, 2010 06:12 |
|
qirex posted:If you use the words "canon" and "retcon" you might be greasy nerd. Tell that to the dorkroom guys
|
# ? Sep 7, 2010 08:19 |
|
RZApublican posted:the Strawberry Shortcake talk page is a hotbed of dissent and discussion thank god someone is including alexandria-based elementary school rumors into our Compendium of Human Knol
|
# ? Sep 7, 2010 18:29 |
|
This edit [1] by user Kyereh Mireku [2] removed the "History" section -- which happens to be the single most informative and relevant part of the article! - Stormwatch 23:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC) you cant delete the history section YOU WILL REGRET THIS
|
# ? Sep 7, 2010 23:39 |
|
Tokyo Mew Mew is a Japanese shōjo manga series written by Reiko Yoshida and illustrated by Mia Ikumi.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2010 23:08 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_joke literally just a list of math jokes that some wikipedians were funny with super terse explanations of each for the neurotypicals i just wish i could copy everything on that page and paste it here
|
# ? Sep 10, 2010 22:34 |
|
The Harvard Comma posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_joke complete with an animated gif someone created specifically to explain one of them
|
# ? Sep 10, 2010 22:38 |
|
and the talk page is just more awful jokes
|
# ? Sep 10, 2010 22:38 |
|
explaining jokes is the only non-subjective way to convey humor, the more detailed the more clear you are about how humorous it is
|
# ? Sep 10, 2010 22:39 |
|
.
Phenwah fucked around with this message at 22:37 on May 5, 2023 |
# ? Sep 11, 2010 00:50 |
|
|
# ? Sep 15, 2010 00:29 |
|
I'm pretty sure that picture is worth something for its educational value in teaching what homeomorphism means
|
# ? Sep 15, 2010 00:51 |
|
http://booksllc.net/ ok its not on wikipedia but they basically make books out of wikipedia articles and sell them on amazon and other places
|
# ? Sep 15, 2010 01:32 |
|
tripwire posted:I'm pretty sure that picture is worth something for its educational value in teaching what homeomorphism means it was on the maths joke page on the wiki i found to reference to it in the text
|
# ? Sep 15, 2010 01:44 |
|
File:Chaos magic ritual involving videoconferencing.JPG
|
# ? Sep 23, 2010 05:54 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:File:Chaos magic ritual involving videoconferencing.JPG i guess the dark lord must be loving facetime
|
# ? Sep 23, 2010 07:39 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 03:07 |
|
File:Zig-Zag Papers & The Chronic.jpg
|
# ? Sep 23, 2010 09:52 |