|
Xguard86 posted:European Also put down ten bucks on noted bad fighter Rob Kimmons without watching any of his or his opponents fights by virtue of the other dude training in Asia. I'm a degenerate gambler.
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2011 22:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 00:09 |
|
|
Pelleas posted:Anyone think Cb Dollaway would be a good bet against Mark Munoz? I don't know the line, but I would never bet against Dollaway. His lip might be infuriating, but hes a better fighter than people give him credit for
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2011 22:43
|
|
|
attackmole posted:Also put down ten bucks on noted bad fighter Rob Kimmons without watching any of his or his opponents fights by virtue of the other dude training in Asia. actually, Sound logic on that one.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2011 22:47
|
|
|
Pelleas posted:Anyone think Cb Dollaway would be a good bet against Mark Munoz? i wouldn't bet on this fight. unless one guy owns the wrestling, it's going to be sloppy wrestleboxer hell and between two guys with lovely striking and bad defense, its really hard to say that one guy has an advantage. although if CB's performance against doerksen is indicative of him becoming a super dangerous grappler, he'll probably supergrapple his way to a win in this fight too. but i wouldn't bet on it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2011 22:52
|
|
|
munoz almost lost to kendall grove, no man like that should ever be a clear favorite for some reason I read that sakara was the favorite and was about to bet the bank on weidman...im dum
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2011 23:10
|
|
|
I been impressed with Dollaway too and Munoz always seems to get sloppy and gasses out later in the fight. Dollaway does seem like a bit of a dumbass and as we know dumb fighters do dumb things in the cage.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2011 23:18
|
|
|
It's unclear who would win the wrestling in Dolloway/Munoz, Dolloway has a good guillotine/peruvian necktie combo that could end the fight at any time and Munoz has GnP punching power that could end the fight at any time, so I don't think anybody has a real clear idea of how that one's gonna go.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2011 23:45
|
|
|
fatherdog posted:It's unclear who would win the wrestling in Dolloway/Munoz, Dolloway has a good guillotine/peruvian necktie combo that could end the fight at any time and Munoz has GnP punching power that could end the fight at any time, so I don't think anybody has a real clear idea of how that one's gonna go. Munoz also seemed ok when working out of the submissions that Grove put him in, and while Kendall Grove is a Bad Fighter that is fairly impressive.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2011 00:26
|
|
|
I dunno if I'd call that looking OK. I remember him getting styled on in the first round grappling wise, even if nothing ever got locked in. But it's also been a while since I've seen that fight, and I think he might have been half-unconcious while he was defending submissions so there's that too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2011 00:39
|
|
|
I'm going to bet on wrestlers and brazilians and see how I do
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 00:28
|
|
|
the asian guy won. goddamnit. that wasn't supposed to happen. E: Aight, Shane Roller's got my back. E2: Oh poo poo those are probably spoilers. CRISPYBABY fucked around with this message at 02:00 on Mar 4, 2011 |
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 01:06
|
|
|
Big Bob Pataki posted:I'm going to bet on wrestlers and brazilians and see how I do 3-1 Always bet on MMA
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 05:21
|
|
|
PARLAYS 4EVA
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 05:30
|
|
|
pelleas, did you end up betting on munoz/dolloway?
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 05:45
|
|
|
fawker posted:PARLAYS 4EVA ahahaha. Munoz, Wiedman, Sanchez. Bet on MMA, y'all. e: these are my 3 bets red19fire fucked around with this message at 06:09 on Mar 4, 2011 |
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 05:52
|
|
|
red19fire posted:ahahaha. when your parlays depend on total robberies you should probably rethink the idea that you're good at betting on mma
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 05:53
|
|
|
 I should really start betting real money.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 15:28
|
|
|
Bundt Cake posted:pelleas, did you end up betting on munoz/dolloway? No i never did, i didnt trust dollaway to keep it together. I took fatherdogs advice as well and decided to avoid this one.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 17:07
|
|
|
henkman posted:
Except the real line on Weidman was never even close to that. Pissed I didn't throw Sanchez in on my parlays, but can't feel that bad because he didn't really win. Although, those are some of the most satisfying bets to win. It helps reinforce my belief that the fights are actually judged by geriatrics with glaucoma, and also allows me to keep on riding the Leonard Garcia gravy train.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 17:26
|
|
|
Fatherdog I need the inside Jersey scoop on Catone vs. Miller. Catone is a huge underdog on MMAPlayground right now and I want to know if I should make a play.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 22:34
|
|
|
Elmo Oxygen posted:Fatherdog I need the inside Jersey scoop on Catone vs. Miller. Catone is a huge underdog on MMAPlayground right now and I want to know if I should make a play. Nick is a better wrestler, Miller is probably better on the ground, I dunno who has better striking and you should know better than to ask me to objectively analyze fights involving Renzo/RABJJ fighters
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2011 22:39
|
|
|
I was heading out to go place my bets on shogun today and noticed that Jake Shields is at +375. I immediately put money on Jake Shields.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2011 23:19
|
|
|
OG KUSH BLUNTS posted:I was heading out to go place my bets on shogun today and noticed that Jake Shields is at +375. I immediately put money on Jake Shields. You'd have probably gotten more fun out of that money by lighting it on fire.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2011 23:24
|
|
|
I actually think Shields has a better chance than most people give him credit for but I can't root against GSP because I really want to see GSP-Silva.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2011 23:39
|
|
|
DO YALL WANT A BOXC posted:I actually think Shields has a better chance than most people give him credit for but I can't root against GSP because I really want to see GSP-Silva. Bet on shields then, that way whatever happens you win
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2011 23:42
|
|
|
For you people picking Sheilds just put the money on Lil Nog. It's a better bet and the Human Triangle should not be such a favorite.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2011 00:00
|
|
|
Yes, a D1 wrestler should not be a favorite when fighting someone who just got wrestled on.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2011 00:08
|
|
|
you should bet on jake shields because he is going to win. it seems pretty simple.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2011 01:28
|
|
|
henkman posted:Yes, a D1 wrestler should not be a favorite when fighting someone who just got wrestled on. Lil Nog got robbed. Anyways so far Bader's striking is better than Phil's and he still got lit up.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2011 01:48
|
|
|
tesilential posted:Lil Nog got robbed. Just because you keep saying this doesn't make it remotely true. tesilential posted:Anyways so far Bader's striking is better than Phil's and he still got lit up. This too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2011 01:58
|
|
|
jeffersonlives posted:Just because you keep saying this doesn't make it remotely true. Punching someone for more than half the round > lay and praying someone less than half the round. One takedown shouldn't guarantee you a round (the third). Rd 1 was Baders, but 2 was close with Rogerio controlling the pace and fight for longer. Either way, the thing you should have taken away from that fight was Bader is overrated and stood precisely ZERO chance against bones.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2011 06:17
|
|
|
Except Rogerio only won the standing slightly and he really wasn't controlling the fight. I'm not even sure he wins under Diaz Rules. If your takeaway from that fight is that Little Nog won't have a problem with a wrestler who is considerably better than Bader after Bader outpointed him with only mildly effective wrestling, you're just seeing what you want to see. And I'm sure you'll complain about this decision too when Davis blankets Nog.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2011 08:03
|
|
|
eh, I just did a bad thing This is just a fun thing that I do on top of my other bets... you can all make fun of me when this falls through.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2011 22:43
|
|
|
ive been looking everywhere for a prop bet that Anthony Johnson will miss weight
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2011 05:50
|
|
|
Nog and Hardy are almost three to one underdogs most places. Temptin but I'm sure wrestling will ruin everything.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2011 23:20
|
|
|
When was the last time Anthony Johnson wrestled (I'm serious I don't know I thought he pretty much kickboxed even though he has a wrestling background)?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2011 23:34
|
|
|
henkman posted:When was the last time Anthony Johnson wrestled (I'm serious I don't know I thought he pretty much kickboxed even though he has a wrestling background)? Talking mostly about Bader but Dan Hardy is British which means anyone that can shoot a double will put him in trouble. I would be shocked if fatty rumble didn't put that in his gameplan.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2011 23:42
|
|
|
Bader's not fighting.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2011 23:50
|
|
|
henkman posted:Bader's not fighting. Sorry my brain turned off for a minute and I can neither read nor write.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2011 00:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 00:09 |
|
|
henkman posted:When was the last time Anthony Johnson wrestled (I'm serious I don't know I thought he pretty much kickboxed even though he has a wrestling background)? He was blanketing Kevin Burns in their second match up until the headkick, and got the worst of it on the feet for most of both of those matches
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2011 01:52
|
|