|
Season tickets, though. How are they counted in match day income?
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2011 12:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 22:19 |
|
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:Season tickets, though. How are they counted in match day income? I'm pretty sure they aren't counted in those figures. And the figure is 3.5 mil, so even if it is counted, it shows how much money the executive seats bring in compared to normal ones. edit: Okay, it is included. Here was a projection before the stadium was built, which given full attendances and constantly rising match day incomes wasn't far wrong. http://www.arsenal-world.co.uk/feat/edz6/future_matchday_revenues__some_astonishing_figures_231849/index.shtml Looking through the figures normal seats make up just over half our match day income, club level and boxes a third, with programs and pies the rest. Either way cutting normal seats (the ones that are less likely to fill) for the less popular games won't have a huge affect on that game's matchday income. Cutting 20% off the ticket prices cuts around 10% off the matchday income. If you then assume fans that get in cheaper spend a little more in the stadium during the match (as they are generally the guys who don't get to go often, and thus make the most out of the occasion) it's possible that it'll only result in a 5% loss in income compared to a full price sellout, if that. Masonity fucked around with this message at 14:26 on Apr 16, 2011 |
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2011 14:21
|
|
|
Masonity posted:Most matchday income is from corporate boxes. 30% of matchday income at the emirates is club level and corporate
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2011 09:09
|
|
|
Did Arsenal really predict constantly rising matchday income? Because at some point you can't really charge more money, inflation apart.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2011 10:41
|
|
|
delicious beef posted:Did Arsenal really predict constantly rising matchday income? Because at some point you can't really charge more money, inflation apart. Hey man people will pay crazy money to see that fancy dan tippy tappy football.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2011 15:49
|
|
|
Ninpo posted:Hey man people will pay crazy money to see that fancy dan tippy tappy football. £100 is crazy money, but at some point you price out even the middle class plastics. Commercial and broadcasting revenue are the growth areas these days, you get a boost in matchday when you move grounds but you can't raise prices forever.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2011 17:16
|
|
|
How much can you charge consistently to force someone into changing the club they support? In my mind Arsenal can charge as much as theyd like and its up to fans to reward other clubs who use more practical pricing structures with their patronage.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 04:15
|
|
|
I won't change the club I support but I'd probably count as middle class and Chelsea have priced me out. I won't go elsewhere, I just won't go. Until this year it's been Carling and Fa Cup matches, CL Group stages and at least one league match. Next year it'll most likely be the first 2 and maybe one CL Group game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 12:07
|
|
|
MoPZiG posted:How much can you charge consistently to force someone into changing the club they support? In my mind Arsenal can charge as much as theyd like and its up to fans to reward other clubs who use more practical pricing structures with their patronage. Given that even West Ham happily charge £50 a time for decent games and still fill their stadium, I doubt Arsenal are close to hitting the limit yet.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 12:32
|
|
|
peanut- posted:Given that even West Ham happily charge £50 a time for decent games and still fill their stadium, I doubt Arsenal are close to hitting the limit yet. You will still fill a stadium but it won't be full of people who genuinely give a poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 14:31
|
|
|
this is why I think terraces need to come back. There has to be still a working-class element to the game and honestly I come from a working-class background, though I may be way better off now it absolutely pisses me off to pay a metric poo poo ton of money just to see a game.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 14:37
|
|
|
ESPN just put up an interesting chart stating who is the highest paid athlete country by country. Makes a good read. Man City truly is a king maker.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 17:52
|
|
|
MoPZiG posted:ESPN just put up an interesting chart stating who is the highest paid athlete country by country. Im surprised to see Massa on top of the Brazil standings considering the football players they ahve, although after seeing Hamilton, Alonso and Vale Rossi all on top of theirs it makes more sense. Also Kimi's salary  e: I guess this has to do with his age, but it's amazing that Dirk Nowitzki makes more than Vettel considering all of the other F1 drivers on there. e2: Man, Inter's got quite a few as well, though obviously not as high paying as the City players. Gigi Galli fucked around with this message at 18:05 on Apr 20, 2011 |
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 18:00
|
|
|
Huh, didn't expect Kompany to make that much. I'd thought Clijsters made more
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 18:03
|
|
|
MoPZiG posted:ESPN just put up an interesting chart stating who is the highest paid athlete country by country. More stats: Pay by sport Best paying teams Barcelona and Real are going to go bankrupt lol.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 18:10
|
|
|
GravityDaemon posted:e: I guess this has to do with his age, but it's amazing that Dirk Nowitzki makes more than Vettel considering all of the other F1 drivers on there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 18:10
|
|
|
MoPZiG posted:More stats: Pay by team still has Portsmouth making way more than Spurs. They should have probably updated these figures.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 18:22
|
|
|
MoPZiG posted:ESPN just put up an interesting chart stating who is the highest paid athlete country by country. A bit misleading going with salary (Golf and Tennis is non-salaried) and their sums are a bit off (MSD makes a fuckload more than $1.8M in the IPL) Still, I think it's safe to say a)Man City are hosed if these UEFA Fair Play rules are real b)Kimi Raikkonen has the best agent in the world.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 18:27
|
|
|
Cuban Chowder Factory posted:Pay by team still has Portsmouth making way more than Spurs. They should have probably updated these figures. Torino and Siena, who are in Serie B are still on that chart too, and listed as Serie A. They must be using data from last season, not this one. DickEmery posted:b)Kimi Raikkonen has the best agent in the world. If you look at the other links, 12.7 million is from Ferrari for breaking his contract...nice little payout his agent worked there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 18:27
|
|
|
MoPZiG posted:ESPN just put up an interesting chart stating who is the highest paid athlete country by country. John O'Shea makes $6,800,000 a year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 18:35
|
|
|
MoPZiG posted:ESPN just put up an interesting chart stating who is the highest paid athlete country by country. quote:"Annual Salary" represents only base salary from the most recently completed season or calendar year from each sport, and excludes any other source of compensation All of their Formula 1 figures are grossly inflated, those are most assuredly not base salaries they have listed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 18:38
|
|
|
Philippine boxer Manny Pacquiao made $32M for two fights in 2010. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 19:15
|
|
|
pik_d posted:Philippine boxer Manny Pacquiao made $32M for two fights in 2010. He could have made more than that just by fighting Mayweather. But that's a whole other thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 19:17
|
|
|
w00bi posted:He could have made more than that just by fighting Mayweather. But that's a whole other thread. Eh, you could just include it in the Messi thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 19:18
|
|
|
Outrespective posted:Eh, you could just include it in the Messi thread. Could Floyd do it on a wet thursday evening in the Lotto Arena?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 19:24
|
|
|
Ya know David Haye could have made upwards of £5 by signing to Stoke in 2007
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 19:26
|
|
|
loving hell, income per capita in norway is about 80,000 dollars? can euroboy confirm this
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:24
|
|
|
Homura posted:loving hell, income per capita in norway is about 80,000 dollars? can euroboy confirm this yeah pretty much
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:25
|
|
|
Homura posted:loving hell, income per capita in norway is about 80,000 dollars? can euroboy confirm this beer costs $7
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:28
|
|
|
Why do F1 drivers get paid so much?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:35
|
|
|
ibroxmassive posted:beer costs $7 It's very nice going abroad though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:36
|
|
|
TomSellek posted:Why do F1 drivers get paid so much? Because they make taking a hairpin turn at 60mph look like it's nothing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:38
|
|
|
TomSellek posted:Why do F1 drivers get paid so much? Dangerous and very highly skilled.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:38
|
|
|
TomSellek posted:Why do F1 drivers get paid so much? Prestige sport for wealthy people and enormous sponsorships.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:41
|
|
|
Homura posted:loving hell, income per capita in norway is about 80,000 dollars? can euroboy confirm this That's nothing. You think the $978,800 Liechtenstein's Martin Stocklasa makes is a lot until you compare it to the $134,392 per capita income and realize he'll probably actually have less total earnings over his lifetime than the average person there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:44
|
|
|
TomSellek posted:Why do F1 drivers get paid so much? Because theres a good chance they can end up dead.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:44
|
|
|
Bhyo posted:Because theres a good chance they can end up dead. This isn't why they get paid so much though I think euroboy is more correct.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 20:49
|
|
|
TomSellek posted:Why do F1 drivers get paid so much? Like I said, that article is incredible misleading. They probably make that much after endorsements, but ESPN claims that's all base salary (i.e. only the money they get from the teams) and that's not true.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 22:32
|
|
|
It would account for Vettel not being on there, as Red Bull pay low salaries and high bonuses.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 22:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 22:19 |
|
|
wicka posted:Like I said, that article is incredible misleading. They probably make that much after endorsements, but ESPN claims that's all base salary (i.e. only the money they get from the teams) and that's not true. I dont believe for a second that Tevez is on 19 million dollars a year. I know 'lol city' but that has to be all of his bonuses thrown on top too. Hamilton iirc is only on 10m a year too, the rest would be his vodafone and other sponsorships.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2011 22:49
|
|