|
Jetsetlemming posted:I did that, but when I open Computer and double click on the disk, it still runs the default action (running the installer/opening the DVD in windows media center/etc) instead of opening the folder. Try this, paste it into a text file.reg and merge it to the registry code:
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 01:23 |
|
|
# ? Apr 23, 2024 14:22 |
|
I hate to ask this type of question, but can anyone recommend a better RSS reader than Google's? Preferably something similar to Reeder for OSX.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 20:15 |
|
Factor Mystic posted:Try this, paste it into a text file.reg and merge it to the registry Butt Savage posted:I hate to ask this type of question, but can anyone recommend a better RSS reader than Google's? Preferably something similar to Reeder for OSX. http://www.feedreader.com/ It's pretty good.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 21:09 |
|
Butt Savage posted:I hate to ask this type of question, but can anyone recommend a better RSS reader than Google's? Preferably something similar to Reeder for OSX. NewsFox for Firefox.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2011 22:06 |
|
Thanks, guys. I'll check them out.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 04:17 |
|
I've enjoyed feeddemon for a while now. Although it's just synched to my Google reader account, so maybe that's not exactly what you want.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2011 07:52 |
|
Ok I've tried google and I'm getting loads of conflicting information, but sorry if this is a common question. I wanna install 7 Ultimate 64 on a partition separate from my programs/games/documents. Is this still recommended (i.e. does Windows 7 handle programs in a way that'll cause problems if they're installed on a separate partition?) and if so what size should the partition be? Like I said I'm only gonna install windows and the various drivers for my system on the one partition, and everything else on the second (larger) partition.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2011 17:38 |
|
The Monarch posted:Ok I've tried google and I'm getting loads of conflicting information, but sorry if this is a common question. I wanna install 7 Ultimate 64 on a partition separate from my programs/games/documents. Is this still recommended (i.e. does Windows 7 handle programs in a way that'll cause problems if they're installed on a separate partition?) and if so what size should the partition be? Well, my Windows folder plus page file and hibernation file are about 40GB. Why put Program Files elsewhere, though? Programs with registry entries will have to be reinstalled if you reinstall Windows anyway.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2011 17:54 |
|
Well because programs (aka Steam) are my biggest space hogs anyway, so there's no point in doing a separate partition if I'm going to have both the OS as well as my programs on a single one.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2011 18:01 |
|
The Monarch posted:Well because programs (aka Steam) are my biggest space hogs anyway, so there's no point in doing a separate partition if I'm going to have both the OS as well as my programs on a single one. I assumed you wanted partitions so you could reinstall without messing with your documents. What are you trying to get out of partitioning?
|
# ? Sep 3, 2011 18:05 |
|
The Monarch posted:Well because programs (aka Steam) are my biggest space hogs anyway, so there's no point in doing a separate partition if I'm going to have both the OS as well as my programs on a single one. Partitioning a single hard drive has never really helped. Even when people thought they needed to reinstall Windows every 3 months, they were still better off just doing a "full" install off the setup disc which would wipe out the previous windows installation while leaving user files. Although I guess back when Windows wouldn't boot off a drive bigger than 2 GB (Windows 3.1) or 32 gb (95 through ME on many computers) it was a necessity if you had a large drive at the time. Windows 7 makes it easier than ever to just clean out the old stuff without worrying about losing your files, since now if you select a clean install and don't format, your old install gets shoved into a convenient WINDOWS.OLD folder where you can pull out any needed files.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2011 18:12 |
|
LifeSizePotato posted:I asked a similar question a page or two back and didn't get a response. The aero glass effects were a little heavy handed on the taskbar for my taste.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2011 20:29 |
|
Not really sure where else to post this so I'll give it a shot here. When accessing a share on my server from my desktop via windows explorer, if I copy a file from that share to another share on the same server, is there any way for the server to just copy the file on it's end instead of transferring the contents to my desktop and then back? Seems like such a waste of time if the operation is technically only occurring on the server. Is this just an SMB limitation?
|
# ? Sep 4, 2011 19:49 |
|
What is the best way to clean up a Windows 7 machine to sell on craigslist? I want to remove personal data, all extraneous software, etc. Is it best to just do a clean install of Windows 7? Are there other options -- I have an Office install that I don't know where the serial is, and I'd rather not have to try to track that down and reinstall, and I'd like to be able to sell it WITH Word/Excel on it.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2011 20:30 |
|
Rashomon posted:What is the best way to clean up a Windows 7 machine to sell on craigslist? I want to remove personal data, all extraneous software, etc. Is it best to just do a clean install of Windows 7? Are there other options -- I have an Office install that I don't know where the serial is, and I'd rather not have to try to track that down and reinstall, and I'd like to be able to sell it WITH Word/Excel on it. I'd use a keyfinder to get the Office key and do a clean install of Windows, personally. Overall, it's probably less effort that trying to make sure you've totally cleaned up an existing install. Edit: and use Ninite to cut down on setup time after the reinstall.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2011 20:51 |
|
Yeah I would dban it for sure, and then either reinstall or give the person an install disc.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2011 02:48 |
|
I've had a hosed up font file installed on like a gazillion PCs. Anybody happen to have a ready made batch file for deleting a specified font and then installing a new one?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2011 05:04 |
|
cre3d posted:Not really sure where else to post this so I'll give it a shot here. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's an SMB problem. It can't issue the move command because as far as it knows you're working on two file systems. You may be able to access the admin shares c$,d$,etc and then both shared folders would be on the same filesystem.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2011 16:40 |
|
LooKMaN posted:For FFMS2 you have to demux (extract) the .264 video file (or all streams/files, depending on what you need) from the .m2ts file using TSMuxer, then use MKVToolnix to mux it into a new MKV file. I got the FFMS2 plugin. As for TSMuxer and MKVToolnix, are these the programs you are talking about? http://www.videohelp.com/tools/tsMuxeR http://www.videohelp.com/tools/MKVtoolnix I'll give it a shot. I was hoping it would handle the .m2ts files natively because it would save me a TON of time on video processing (these are 1080p videos at 15-minutes each. Also there are 40 of them. Also also I have about 300 more 1080p videos that are about 3-minutes each). EDIT: It seems to work fine, and it takes less time to process than straight-up converting the video. Thanks! Any idea what was happening with the .m2ts file? EDIT 2: Looking back on it, I don't think I need it. I was using the DirectShowSource command instead of the DSS2 command that you suggested . Why would that make a difference? Mak0rz fucked around with this message at 19:15 on Sep 6, 2011 |
# ? Sep 6, 2011 18:31 |
|
cre3d posted:Not really sure where else to post this so I'll give it a shot here. The only way to do this is via remote desktop. I suppose you could setup telnet or SSH and do it that way, but it's essentially the same thing. SMB doesn't have any way to tell the remote computer to transfer the file internally. Edit: Admin shares won't make a difference. It just plain doesn't have a way to tell the computer to do the transfer locally. You can do a move command, but it's just a copy and then delete according to your client because it's a network source.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2011 03:46 |
|
So, why does WU in Windows 7 offer the option "Download, but let me choose when to install" for updates, then disregards that option and installs them anyway on shutdown?
|
# ? Sep 7, 2011 05:26 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:So, why does WU in Windows 7 offer the option "Download, but let me choose when to install" for updates, then disregards that option and installs them anyway on shutdown? Because you clicked the main "shutdown" link with the UAC badge on it in the start menu. That is normally standby (with no UAC) except when updates are pending. If you want to shutdown or restart with pending updates (why? the main annoyance for updates is that the computer sometimes reboots) you can always click the little arrow and select what you want to do. I know restart and I'm pretty sure shutdown both don't run the installer when you do this.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2011 15:27 |
|
LoKout posted:The only way to do this is via remote desktop. I suppose you could setup telnet or SSH and do it that way, but it's essentially the same thing. SMB doesn't have any way to tell the remote computer to transfer the file internally. Well this is less than exciting news.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2011 16:08 |
|
LoKout posted:The only way to do this is via remote desktop. I suppose you could setup telnet or SSH and do it that way, but it's essentially the same thing. SMB doesn't have any way to tell the remote computer to transfer the file internally. You can move stuff around on the same share, so if both shares are on the same physical drive, you could access that drive's root and do the move that way.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2011 17:42 |
|
marketingman posted:I've had a hosed up font file installed on like a gazillion PCs. Anybody happen to have a ready made batch file for deleting a specified font and then installing a new one? This sounds like a prime case for Powershell + the PSEXEC tool from sysinternals. Actually, for just deleting the corrupted file and replacing it with a good one, you wouldn't even need psexec. If you're in an AD environment you can use powershell to pull a list of the machine names by ou or whatever, and have it run whatever commands you need on all of them. Check out the "hey, scripting guy" blog from MS for some ready made examples on all of this stuff, it's pretty super.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2011 22:49 |
Are there any anti-virus programs MSE won't run well with/will run well with?
|
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 09:40 |
|
Anatharon posted:Are there any anti-virus programs MSE won't run well with/will run well with? MSE IS an anti-virus program, why do you need to run another program with it? It'll cause you nothing but grief.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 11:50 |
|
KomradeVirtunov posted:MSE IS an anti-virus program, why do you need to run another program with it? It'll cause you nothing but grief. Not only that, but MSE is hands-down the best one you can get for Windows, especially for its free price tag.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 17:11 |
|
From personal experience, trying to run Norton and MSE causes Norton to poo poo all over the place and make your computer unusable. Question time: at work we have a WDS server set up and I've been playing around with it using sysprep and whatnot. When I run sysprep and do /oobe /generalize, does this mean that it nukes all of the drivers off of the system for a "generalized" install? I ask this because I'm under the impression that I need to make an image for each time of machine we have (ex- Dell Desktop, Dell Laptop, HP desktop, HP laptop, etc). Am I a moron with eating up a bunch of space with images or can I just update one captured image and use that as the base install for ALL of the machines that come in?
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 17:29 |
|
Mak0rz posted:I got the FFMS2 plugin. As for TSMuxer and MKVToolnix, are these the programs you are talking about? DirectShowSource isn't frame accurate. DSS2 is.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 19:52 |
|
LooKMaN posted:DirectShowSource isn't frame accurate. DSS2 is. Good to know. Thanks for your help!
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 21:37 |
KomradeVirtunov posted:MSE IS an anti-virus program, why do you need to run another program with it? It'll cause you nothing but grief. I like having redundancy. Mak0rz posted:Not only that, but MSE is hands-down the best one you can get for Windows, especially for its free price tag. But if this is the case, I won't bother!
|
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 21:48 |
|
Anatharon posted:I like having redundancy. This is not a good idea with real-time AV.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 21:50 |
|
Does anyone know of an application that can take pictures from built in webcam? Doesn't need any crazy effects or features but a timer would be nice (if it waits 3 seconds before taking the actual picture).
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 22:08 |
|
^^^ What kind of webcam? Most come with some kind of software along these linesAnatharon posted:I like having redundancy. An antivirus is like hiring a ninja security guard to keep suspicious types out of your building. Running two antiviruses is like hiring two ninja security guards to look for suspicious types, and not telling them about each other
|
# ? Sep 8, 2011 23:11 |
|
Does anyone know why double clicking external filters in MPC doesn't do anything? I should be able to get settings but it doesn't do jack poo poo. :<
|
# ? Sep 9, 2011 01:03 |
|
Is there a program or method to batch convert the album art embedded in music files? My MP3 player won't display album art over 100kb and I don't really relish modifying 8 gigs of music by hand.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2011 04:45 |
|
baka kaba posted:^^^ What kind of webcam? Most come with some kind of software along these lines Er its just one built into the laptop , I think it's an Acer (its for someone else). Do you think if I download some logitech software it will work just the same?
|
# ? Sep 9, 2011 09:58 |
|
Mak0rz posted:Not only that, but MSE is hands-down the best one you can get for Windows, especially for its free price tag. I know I've said it before, but I have to say it again. MSE has fallen down since it came out and this is the truth. It's still great, especially for the price tag, but right now I'm finding Avast to be much better in terms of performance on all levels. The first 1.5 years of MSE were great, but virus authors really started to figure it out and that's where I started seeing MSE slipping regularly. For a while there though, I didn't have to worry about any of my clients with MSE.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2011 14:10 |
|
|
# ? Apr 23, 2024 14:22 |
|
If only there were a thorough study of different AV software packages so we didn't have to rely on different gut-feeling, anecdotal reports.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2011 15:52 |