|
+2 Bearserker +3 Squirrel Acrobat (bard kit from Song&Silence, you should really modify it's DEX though) Really curious how mod-infested Baldur's Gate is going to be.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2012 22:33 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 03:44 |
|
Choronzons son posted:+2 Bearserker I believe that it registers a healthy 0.6 on the Copper Coronet scale.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2012 23:29 |
|
Melinoe posted:+1 Imoen I've already cast my vote and don't plan to confuse Vorgen by editing it now, but I just want to say that this is a great idea. Also: Trin Tragula posted:There's a Shar-Teel in my Party This is amazing and needs to go in
|
# ? Oct 8, 2012 23:38 |
|
Just think, if we didn't have such an amazingly bad character like Shar-Teel, we wouldn't have such fun times with Dr. Notsuess.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2012 23:44 |
|
Choronzons son posted:Squirrel Acrobat (bard kit from Song&Silence, you should really modify it's DEX though) I am in some agreement here as to possibly modifying the squirrel; I am not saying make it insanely good, but perhaps make some rolls with 3 d6 dice and apply them to stats or something, just like if you were rolling for table top dnd? Or even do 2 3d6 rolls, 2 2d6 rolls, and 2 d6 rolls since it IS a squirrel and all so it's stats would be worse then usual.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 00:59 |
|
ShiningForceHero posted:I am in some agreement here as to possibly modifying the squirrel; I am not saying make it insanely good, but perhaps make some rolls with 3 d6 dice and apply them to stats or something, just like if you were rolling for table top dnd? Or even do 2 3d6 rolls, 2 2d6 rolls, and 2 d6 rolls since it IS a squirrel and all so it's stats would be worse then usual. You know, that might be an interesting way to run an LP in the future. Leave character classes alone, but reroll their stats when you get them and use the editor to change them. This would result is some very different dynamics on class roles.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 01:02 |
|
ShiningForceHero posted:I am in some agreement here as to possibly modifying the squirrel; I am not saying make it insanely good, but perhaps make some rolls with 3 d6 dice and apply them to stats or something, just like if you were rolling for table top dnd? Or even do 2 3d6 rolls, 2 2d6 rolls, and 2 d6 rolls since it IS a squirrel and all so it's stats would be worse then usual. Because, you know, it's a squirrel.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 01:02 |
|
+5 Edwin He's awesome.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 01:11 |
|
Daring to be different, +5 Khalid He's just so polite!
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 01:27 |
|
Melinoe posted:+1 Imoen +5 Minsc Don't much care for Minsc and wasn't planning to vote this round. but I like this idea. Vorgen, Since Bear doesn't or shouldn't have any lines in the game itself I wouldn't mind If you ad-libbed it's contributions to inter party dialogue.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 01:31 |
|
E. Revenant posted:Vorgen, Since Bear doesn't or shouldn't have any lines in the game itself I wouldn't mind If you ad-libbed it's contributions to inter party dialogue. This would be pretty great, even if it's just "RAUUUURGHH".
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 01:58 |
|
+1 Bear +4 Minsc (and Boo(Boo?)) Just need a pick-a-nick basket and we're good to go.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 02:01 |
Let us level some wizards that used to be fighters (or vice versa) that are maybe wizard-fighter things now? I have no idea, but I wanna see where these kits go. +3 Xan +2 Khalid
|
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 02:13 |
|
JT Jag posted:This might not be a bad idea, but strength and intelligence should be capped at 8 maximum no matter what. I would yell at you for insinuating that squirrels are dumb at best, then I remembered their love for darting out in front of my car every chance they get. So yeah, this cap makes sense.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 02:51 |
|
I could see a squirrel thief working. They can be quick and really sneaky. I think a re-roll with capped strength would be kind of interesting.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 03:08 |
|
+3 Black Bear Winnie the Pooh needs to make the party +2 Kagain Because I like him for some reason.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 03:11 |
|
ShiningForceHero posted:I am in some agreement here as to possibly modifying the squirrel; I am not saying make it insanely good, but perhaps make some rolls with 3 d6 dice and apply them to stats or something, just like if you were rolling for table top dnd? Or even do 2 3d6 rolls, 2 2d6 rolls, and 2 d6 rolls since it IS a squirrel and all so it's stats would be worse then usual. I like that idea. Another option would be to have the squirrel wear the Robe of Dh'arlo'me (sets Intelligence and Wisdom to 19) and give it some spellcasting class. Sorceror seems appropriate. RODENT FURY In any case squirrel +5
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 03:16 |
|
Presumably this squirrel is more like a mage's familiar than a garden-variety squirrel at this point. It's fair to give it better stats than a normal one, having taken on some of your godlike essence. +1 to the first 5 level-1 players listed, or at least first three + squirrel + bear. Newbie Squad Assemble!
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 04:37 |
|
Minsc -5 Minsc is tired and is in everyone's game. No thanks.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 04:41 |
Tax Refund posted:I've already cast my vote and don't plan to confuse Vorgen by editing it now, but I just want to say that this is a great idea. You can edit it, voting is still going on. Also, I don't really have a place for fanart contributions right now, do you think I should? E. Revenant posted:Vorgen, Since Bear doesn't or shouldn't have any lines in the game itself I wouldn't mind If you ad-libbed it's contributions to inter party dialogue. Vorgen fucked around with this message at 18:06 on Oct 9, 2012 |
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 06:30 |
|
I just figure... it might be really hard to see content for all these drat NPCs if we're roping in random animals and such. We may want to at the least leave animals out of party when we're in cities?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 06:48 |
Midnight Voyager posted:I just figure... it might be really hard to see content for all these drat NPCs if we're roping in random animals and such. We may want to at the least leave animals out of party when we're in cities? code:
Vorgen fucked around with this message at 17:59 on Oct 9, 2012 |
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 07:32 |
|
It probably won't amount to much, but Bear -3 Squirrel -2 Not super interested in having a wildlife party, but at this point it looks inevitable. I can only hope the novelty wears off.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 07:42 |
JT Jag posted:This might not be a bad idea, but strength and intelligence should be capped at 8 maximum no matter what. I'd be willing to adjust the squirrel stats if you can find some DnD documentation to show what their stats should be. Like a 2nd edition monster manual entry for squirrel or something. Edit: like this: carnivorous flying squirrel Vorgen fucked around with this message at 08:36 on Oct 9, 2012 |
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 08:31 |
|
Midnight Voyager posted:I just figure... it might be really hard to see content for all these drat NPCs if we're roping in random animals and such. We may want to at the least leave animals out of party when we're in cities? That way we can still be ridiculous with psionic moose and invisibears, but there's still plenty of room left to showcase mod content. Edit: Vorgen posted:I'd be willing to adjust the squirrel stats if you can find some DnD documentation to show what their stats should be. Like a 2nd edition monster manual entry for squirrel or something. The 3rd ed stats for rats would be the next best step, as they'd be a close equivalent. That's where I'd start. Sejs Cube fucked around with this message at 08:45 on Oct 9, 2012 |
# ? Oct 9, 2012 08:34 |
|
Vorgen posted:I'd be willing to adjust the squirrel stats if you can find some DnD documentation to show what their stats should be. Like a 2nd edition monster manual entry for squirrel or something. It's not a squirrel, but there does exist a sheet for rats. Closest i've found so far. EDIT: Or a Carnivorous flying squirrel
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 08:36 |
|
There's a fan-made 3.5 squirrel.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 08:38 |
|
+2 Kivan +2 Yeslick -1 Minsc Could you use some sort of online form to simplify voting, Vorgen?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 08:45 |
ZealousQ posted:Could you use some sort of online form to simplify voting, Vorgen? I could I guess, but I think it would take away from the experience. I like waking up to 20+ new posts in the thread . Here are the averages for those three animals: code:
Vorgen fucked around with this message at 18:01 on Oct 9, 2012 |
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 10:24 |
|
-5 Squirrel One is enough, and it should be the bear.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 11:44 |
|
+1 Minsc -4 Edwin
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 13:17 |
|
+5 Khalid, let's do this t... th... thing.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 13:20 |
|
Vorgen posted:Here are the averages for those three animals: I think this is pretty fair.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 13:35 |
Might I suggest that all characters at levels 1 and 2 be bumped up to level 3? (You can formalise it as "six levels behind Syvishtar") Because at this point of the game, the low level characters will be pretty much chunked right away in battle. This may be great for padding the roll of the dead, but it won't be much good for the story unless you want Syvishtar to end up being an antisocial hermit who refuses to invite people along because they always get permadeadded. Also, because I would be sad if the Squirrel got chunked right off the bat. We need chittering murder. edited repeatedly because I kept forgetting what level Syvishtar was Pickled Tink fucked around with this message at 14:27 on Oct 9, 2012 |
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 14:12 |
|
KKKLIP ART posted:I think this is pretty fair. I don't think stats can be less than 3, however. A one point bump in strength and intelligence isn't too bad, though.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 14:37 |
|
The Iron Rose posted:I don't think stats can be less than 3, however. A one point bump in strength and intelligence isn't too bad, though. If you use Shadowkeeper they can be whatever you want. Edit:Let me be more specific. Animals, by definition, have 2 intelligence or less. 3 intelligence is the minimum to be a sentient being, which is why the game won't let you roll any lower. But this isn't a sentient being. It's a loving squirrel. It's a tiny creature. It doesn't have to obey humanoid stat rules. sweet geek swag fucked around with this message at 14:56 on Oct 9, 2012 |
# ? Oct 9, 2012 14:52 |
|
caleramaen posted:If you use Shadowkeeper they can be whatever you want. Are you trying to tell me there aren't any humans less intelligent than squirrels? 'Cause man I just don't buy that.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 14:58 |
|
caleramaen posted:If you use Shadowkeeper they can be whatever you want. Can we pretend that it is a Giant Miniature Space Squirrel?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 15:43 |
|
Dmaonk posted:Can we pretend that it is a Giant Miniature Space Squirrel? Minsc actually has a point with Boo - Giant Space Hamsters and Miniature Giant Space Hamsters are in fact a thing in DnD. Blame Spelljammer, and specifically the tinker gnomes.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 16:00 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 03:44 |
|
Sejs Cube posted:Valid point - how about we just limit it to only one animalbro in the active party at a time? I am on board with this! I do approve of invisibears and psionic moose.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2012 17:41 |