|
Cechmanek posted:I don't if I just never noticed it before, but I love that Ronald has the McDonald's logo on his robes. Gotta keep promoting that brand. It would have been awesome if Ronald, while strangling Tails, had cackled out old McDonald's slogans ("KEEP A SMILE ON, TAILS! I'M LOVIN' IT! IT'S WHAT I EAT, IT'S WHAT I DO! HAHAHAHA!").
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2013 23:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 09:15 |
|
|
HarkToTheLoons posted:
Never thought I'd fall for one of these. Did anyone end up taking this?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 03:19
|
|
|
Manwithastick posted:Gruntilda!! Oh god yes. That could totally happen. Lazy has drawn Banjo doing a "Naruto sprint" before.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 03:31
|
|
|
MoreLikeTen posted:Never thought I'd fall for one of these. Did anyone end up taking this? I do believe it is yours.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 04:15
|
|
|
I, for one, would not mind if this became like some sort of One Piece or Beserk and went on for hundreds of chapters. Like we'd still be posting in this thread 5 years from now, talking about how much better the latest TGT page is than the latest Dominic Deegan epilogue page.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 06:13
|
|
|
Can you imagine how confusing TGT would get after 5 years? You'd have Stick Stickley being the head of the illuminati while the Ham Burglar infiltrates the New Slaiyers to assassinate Jerry Seinfeld, the cyborg.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 06:19
|
|
|
ThatPazuzu posted:Can you imagine how confusing TGT would get after 5 years? You'd have Stick Stickley being the head of the illuminati while the Ham Burglar infiltrates the New Slaiyers to assassinate Jerry Seinfeld, the cyborg. And I would be perfectly okay with that. Well, except for the Seinfeld thing. Doesn't really fit the setting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 06:22
|
|
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:Well, except for the Seinfeld thing. Doesn't really fit the setting. Have you not read this comic at all? Jerry Seinfeld could get introduced tomorrow as a wizard cyborg and I wouldn't spend a second wondering why
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 06:28
|
|
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:And I would be perfectly okay with that. Well, except for the Seinfeld thing. Doesn't really fit the setting. Did you seriously just say something doesn't "fit the setting" of TGT?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 06:35
|
|
|
Febreeze posted:Have you not read this comic at all? Jerry Seinfeld could get introduced tomorrow as a wizard cyborg and I wouldn't spend a second wondering why His special power is questioning the troll's every move. Also he cannot be killed (because he sacrificed his mortality which took the form of Larry David)
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 06:35
|
|
|
Breadallelogram posted:Did you seriously just say something doesn't "fit the setting" of TGT? I know, I'm an iconoclast, but the fact of the matter is this: No non-OC character has been introduced to TGT that is not either from a game, comic, or cartoon (with Football Guy being the exception that proves the rule). That and that alone is why Seinfeld doesn't fit the setting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 06:44
|
|
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:I know, I'm an iconoclast, but the fact of the matter is this: No non-OC character has been introduced to TGT that is not either from a game, comic, or cartoon (with Football Guy being the exception that proves the rule). That and that alone is why Seinfeld doesn't fit the setting. So Jerry Seinfeld in Bee Movie, then. E; Or better yet, Buntain Simpson FunkyAl fucked around with this message at 07:53 on Jan 23, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 07:49
|
|
|
HarkToTheLoons posted:
Sorry, it was bugging me. Fixed it for you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 07:52
|
|
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:I know, I'm an iconoclast, but the fact of the matter is this: No non-OC character has been introduced to TGT that is not either from a game, comic, or cartoon (with Football Guy being the exception that proves the rule). That and that alone is why Seinfeld doesn't fit the setting. Uh I don't want to be a stick in the mud, but Kermit is from a puppet show. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 09:39
|
|
|
If you're trying to claim Ronald McDonald is from a cartoon I'll tell you to go to hell. He'll always be the creepy statue in the play pen to me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 09:43
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:If you're trying to claim Ronald McDonald is from a cartoon I'll tell you to go to hell. He'll always be the creepy statue in the play pen to me. They all float down here, Georgie.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 09:48
|
|
|
Is this taken posted:Uh I don't want to be a stick in the mud, but Kermit is from a puppet show. Muppet Babies. Hellsau posted:If you're trying to claim Ronald McDonald is from a cartoon I'll tell you to go to hell. He'll always be the creepy statue in the play pen to me. What about "Ronald McDonald is from a comic?" But you obviously understand my point: they're all characters, not "human comedians".
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 15:16
|
|
|
Praddy posted:Sorry, it was bugging me. Fixed it for you. I can't believe I missed that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 16:47
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:08
|
|
|
If that MEAN WILE is a transition to Wile E. Coyote, it'll be the greatest thing ever.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:09
|
|
|
Hello Kitty's eyes.  Looking at them feels like staring into the abyss...
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:12
|
|
|
Look at Tails' reaction to being touched by a girl. He's such a goon.  Anyway, I hope Hello Kitty and Miles Prower will be a romance to last the ages.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:13
|
|
|
I love how the Mean While cuts to a blank wall.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:13
|
|
|
"Alright, I'm going to inform Pacman, Keep in eye out for Ronald Tails"
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:17
|
|
|
my dad posted:Hello Kitty's eyes. I swear to god they keep getting bigger.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:17
|
|
|
 incomingLazerbot posted:i do got 2 questions with you on the forum and I've been wondering about for some time. ok question one what is your obsession with grammar? i understand its important but when there's a part that theres instead of there's i don't see much of a relevance to mention that difference or act like you don't know what i was aiming for or to explain to everyone else what i was aiming for lol but non the less its humorous
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:24
|
|
question 2 what is with your obsession of assuming I'm tracing. even know i told you other wise.. i mean for months even longer then that every thing is grammar this and hes tracing that. I'm not angry i am just curious to your explanations for these things
|
edit: too slowLazerBot posted:words I'm sorry 
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:24
|
|
|
I love my lazyB but he has the grammar of a 10 year old who dropped out of school at 5 and grew up on the internet. Actually no that's not quite right, he honestly has some pretty special and unique spelling and grammar issues that don't fit into the typical mistakes and issues children raised by the internet often fall into. I've never seen anyone write quite like lazerbot.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:29
|
|
|
LB posted:your guys need to have all grammar perfect If this was the truth, I would have stopped reading the comic ages ago. Honestly the grammar/spelling mistakes in TGT are a huge part of the charm. Sure, we joke about it, but I don't think anyone in this thread is against these errors.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:34
|
|
|
Baronjutter posted:I love my lazyB but he has the grammar of a 10 year old who dropped out of school at 5 and grew up on the internet. Actually no that's not quite right, he honestly has some pretty special and unique spelling and grammar issues that don't fit into the typical mistakes and issues children raised by the internet often fall into. I've never seen anyone write quite like lazerbot. And honestly, that's part of his charm. There's time for good grammar and time for bad grammar, and with lazerbot, I'm willing to side with the latter. Same thing with the tracing. EDIT: Part of the charm of Tails Gets Trolled is lazerbot's wordplay, which fundamentally depends on the "wrongness" of his grammar and spelling. Whether it's deliberate or accidental on lazerbot's part is irrelevant; what matters is the result, and if that means accepting "bad grammar" then so be it. lazerbot's style would not be nearly as distinctive or notable without the quirks of his spelling and grammar, and the work would be impoverished without it. "Ironic like" doesn't even have to enter the picture to properly commend lazerbot's all-but-willing manipulation of the English language, and to dismiss the grammar as "irrelevant" to the work is to dismiss a fundamental aspect of lazerbot's writing. All writers have a style, and ignorance of what makes up one's style is to deny something of the writer's work itself. ComradeCosmobot fucked around with this message at 18:46 on Jan 23, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:35
|
|
|
There were some awful big facial closeups. I bet there are clues about someone being an illusion, they've definitely been infiltrated. Edit: Yes. Hello Kitty is an illusion. In the past, Hello Kitty has had 5 petals on her flower. . . . I can't believe I'm seriously looking back over these things to look for illusions. Lazerbot has achieved a truly immersive experience. Edit2: Kermit might also be an illusion, he has a second line under his lip that has never been there, but that might just be to show his emotion. Paramemetic fucked around with this message at 18:53 on Jan 23, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:39
|
|
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:And honestly, that's part of his charm. There's time for good grammar and time for bad grammar, and with lazerbot, I'm willing to side with the latter. Same thing with the tracing. Lazerbot has claimed from the beginning that he never traces anything. What he's asking in the second part is why people are so convinced that he does.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:40
|
|
|
If I had to guess, it'd be because he has improved so rapidly. I was honestly pretty amazed at how much better LazyB has become. I'm sure with a little more time his art will improve even further. That said, there are some areas where there is clearly work needed. Mainly with anatomy and shots of people running, but the first one can easily be written off because the story takes place in a world where cartoon characters are fighting each other over trolling, and the second one wouldn't take all that much to improve.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:46
|
|
|
I think the tracing accusations come from how the older characters used to be drawn very well and very consistently, versus, say, his rendition of Batman which kept changing shape. Are we sure he knows what tracing actually means, and doesn't just think we're accusing him of something completely different?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:52
|
|
|
Paramemetic posted:Edit: Yes. Hello Kitty is an illusion. In the past, Hello Kitty has had 5 petals on her flower. Not always.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 18:54
|
|
|
Haha, yeah, actually. Looks like she has 6 later, too. But they are always big and wide and not narrow. This could be the real deal.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 19:04
|
|
|
Paramemetic posted:Haha, yeah, actually. Looks like she has 6 later, too. But they are always big and wide and not narrow. This could be the real deal. But what if Hello Kitty never existed and was just an illusion all along? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 19:10
|
|
|
LazyB, nobody is against your grammar. If it mattered that much, we would have stopped reading. Just that some of your misspellings and such can make a person think about extra meanings (like "paste yourself") which just adds more to the comic. Other things make certain lines stick out, and thus stick in our memories ( "THOUGHS EYES"). Again, this adds something extra. I take it as a plus point. As for the tracing thing, I haven't seen it said much except way back when you first started to improve your art, and like one guy two pages ago bringing it up again. The bottom line is we love TGT, don't worry about things, keep it fresh, keep it real, keep it you, and we're all good under the hood.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 19:18
|
|
|
I love how Tails doesn't even hug back and keeps the conversation going.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 19:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 09:15 |
|
|
Considering the evidence so far, I'm inclined to believe the Defenders are all illusions created by someone who's not very sure of what Batman looks like.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2013 19:28
|
|
