|
Ghost of Reagan Past posted:It's just a bunch of garbage. It's basically "your life sucks because you assume people aren't terrible, so become terrible yourself!" It's stupid nerd poo poo that if you've been a nerd on the Internet you've seen a thousand times before. His style is terrible, too, and he sounds like a jackass. Apparently he's in his late 30s, which surprised me; the advice sounds like something someone would think is good when they're 20. I know, that kind of what I am trying to point out. It'd not "revalatory" to treat everyone as if they want something from you. Its either normal (in a corporate setting) or completly mental (in every other setting). What is it about every article with "harsh truths" that makes it so ungovernably rubbish and mental, is it some sort of code or something?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2013 18:02 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 17:35 |
|
Wales Grey posted:Fascism is reliant on worship of an idealized past state, something that is incompatible with deep knowledge of history and the application of critical thought. What can I do to get my own surge of abortion power? Eat a can of stem cells?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2013 18:49 |
|
Urban Space Cowboy posted:Yes yes go ahead. A better title for this one would be "The Naturalistic Fallacy."
|
# ? Jan 25, 2013 19:00 |
|
I though "John Dies At the End," and "This Book is Full of Spiders" were really funny and good takes on the horror genre. That said Wongs articles on Craked are the worst poo poo ever, I avoid them at all costs if cause of anything they are just soul crushingly depressing, just filled with a level of abject cynicism I just can't handle, (when he's not dealing in ) and I find myself being fairly cynical. I guess it sort of comes down to he just accepts this bullshit and then pushes it on his readers. Like hell even that title "The Hippies Were Wrong" pretty much all boils down to is don't question anything ever, if the worlds a dick to you be a dick right back.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2013 19:33 |
|
Jack Gladney posted:A better title for this one would be "The Naturalistic Fallacy." What the hell was even the point of that article? Like, I don't understand what those two pages were trying to get at. I mean, I've actually heard about the concept he's talking about, but it was just a general statistical observation about primates, it doesn't actually mean we have preset limits to our empathy. This guy seems like someone who states perfectly obvious conclusions as if he's imparting divine knowledge, like at the end of this one where he's basically just saying "reality is complex, humans tend to otherize the outgroup, and politicians are often not doing it out of a sense of duty to society" as if this was some sort of earth-shattering revelation. What a smug shitheel.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2013 22:06 |
|
Nevvy Z posted:I wonder how he feels about women who don't shave their armpits. Furikku posted:I wonder how he feels about men that can't grow facial hair. "The difference being?" -Andy Rutledge: Swordsman, Bonsai Artist , Capitalist, Grill Chef
|
# ? Jan 25, 2013 22:45 |
|
Cordyceps Headache posted:What the hell was even the point of that article? Like, I don't understand what those two pages were trying to get at. I mean, I've actually heard about the concept he's talking about, but it was just a general statistical observation about primates, it doesn't actually mean we have preset limits to our empathy. Jack Gladney posted:A better title for this one would be "The Naturalistic Fallacy." Strudel Man fucked around with this message at 22:55 on Jan 25, 2013 |
# ? Jan 25, 2013 22:47 |
|
Strudel Man posted:The point of the article is that there are preset (soft) limits to our empathy. You can disbelieve it, but I don't know how you can miss what is being said. But that's not a novel idea, and the reason society works the way it does, a rule based system of governance based on general moral precepts, is precisely because empathy isn't enough to direct human action to the greater social benefit. His explanations are reductive and stupid, and his piece ultimately has no point, it doesn't suggest anything beyond superficial platitudes.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2013 23:24 |
|
Strudel Man posted:The point of the article is that there are preset (soft) limits to our empathy. You can disbelieve it, but I don't know how you can miss what is being said. He's saying that it's useless to try to compensate for the deficit he describes because of our inescapable nature, that we should embrace cruel indifference because there's nothing we can do about it. It's Thomas Hobbes and Edmund Burke and your lovely Republican grandpa. It's sophomoric, nihilistic bullshit.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2013 23:31 |
|
Cordyceps Headache posted:But that's not a novel idea, and the reason society works the way it does, a rule based system of governance based on general moral precepts, is precisely because empathy isn't enough to direct human action to the greater social benefit. His explanations are reductive and stupid, and his piece ultimately has no point, it doesn't suggest anything beyond superficial platitudes. Jack Gladney posted:He's saying that it's useless to try to compensate for the deficit he describes because of our inescapable nature, that we should embrace cruel indifference because there's nothing we can do about it. Strudel Man fucked around with this message at 23:33 on Jan 25, 2013 |
# ? Jan 25, 2013 23:31 |
|
Yeah, I kinda have the exact opposite interpretation of the Monkeysphere article. Less "It's useless to try to compensate for the deficit he describes because of our inescapable nature, that we should embrace cruel indifference because there's nothing we can do about it" and more, "Hey, this is A Thing that affects how you perceive others and it can lead to some real shitheadedness so be aware of it and try not to fall into it". Like, that's the entire last section of the article, no?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2013 00:18 |
|
The Crotch posted:Like, that's the entire last section of the article, no?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2013 00:24 |
|
Van Kraken posted:Today I learned that an article from my school newspaper made the The Atlantic Wire's 50 Worst Columns of 2012: Anyone can buy OCP stock, and own a piece of our city. What could be more democratic than that?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2013 03:41 |
|
Found another terrible website commentary, only this one is activly calling for the removal of the rule of law and equality. Seriously just read the whole drat thing and not feel your blood pressure rising and you are a better human being than I am. If I ever have to think that social justice warriors or communists are going too far all I am going to have to do is re-read this article and realise that eating the rich and making rivers run red may actually be a drat good idea. Here it is, it's terrible
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 02:29 |
Josef bugman posted:Found another terrible website commentary, only this one is activly calling for the removal of the rule of law and equality. Seriously just read the whole drat thing and not feel your blood pressure rising and you are a better human being than I am. If I ever have to think that social justice warriors or communists are going too far all I am going to have to do is re-read this article and realise that eating the rich and making rivers run red may actually be a drat good idea. On that same blog you can find articles about how wearing a fedora will tune you into your inner man. It's the same sort of "let's go back to the idealized 40's and act like our grandparents" poo poo that pops up whenever you have a bunch of dorks trying to shed their inadequacies.
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 02:37 |
|
IAMKOREA posted:On that same blog you can find articles about how wearing a fedora will tune you into your inner man. It's the same sort of "let's go back to the idealized 40's and act like our grandparents" poo poo that pops up whenever you have a bunch of dorks trying to shed their inadequacies. What is it about nerds and having the most terrible opinions. And if anyone wants to do a run down of all the ways in which the article is wrong (I realise this may take some time) could they please do so, I would love to be able to put in on my wall and just define myself to be the exact opposite of nigh on everything these people profess to adore.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 02:48 |
Josef bugman posted:What is it about nerds and having the most terrible opinions. And if anyone wants to do a run down of all the ways in which the article is wrong (I realise this may take some time) could they please do so, I would love to be able to put in on my wall and just define myself to be the exact opposite of nigh on everything these people profess to adore. You know that magazine ad from the 50's that always pops up about how to be a good wife? That's what they literally want, and they think that wearing poorly fitting suits to casual social events is how they will get it. There's no way in hell I'm reading that incredibly boring article, but I find a lot of the "this is how to be a man!" articles on that blog amusing.
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 02:55 |
|
IAMKOREA posted:There's no way in hell I'm reading that incredibly boring article, but I find a lot of the "this is how to be a man!" articles on that blog amusing. It's fair enough, I probably wouldn't have if I'd have known how far up it'd send my blood pressure, but I just find this style of thinking utterly unfathomable.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 02:58 |
|
This here is a thread. http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/arabs-offended-by-coca-cola-commercial-grow-up-or-understandable/question-3496823/ quote:
quote:Islamist extreamists protest & threaten against America and Europe = Free Speech. quote:Jackie G - Poker Playing Patriot quote:Racist Schmacist....I AM SO SICK OF THIS!!!!!!! quote:Hmm... Actually Arabs are the racists, also they use genocides against other races & ethnicities, have slave trade, etc. If you want to overload on "but THEY are the real racists" and "I don't see what's wrong with >stereotype<" and "you can't be racist against a race that lovely," with an extra helping of "they're not a race, so it isn't racist" come join the fun.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 13:08 |
|
VideoTapir posted:If you want to overload on "but THEY are the real racists" and "I don't see what's wrong with >stereotype<" and "you can't be racist against a race that lovely," with an extra helping of "they're not a race, so it isn't racist" come join the fun. I hate when people use genocides. Mr. Funny Pants fucked around with this message at 01:07 on Feb 3, 2013 |
# ? Feb 3, 2013 01:03 |
|
quote:Tucson City Court arrogantly asserts the power of Prior Restraint Amidst a bunch of letters babbling about how Obama is a tyrant because of his executive orders I found this.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 03:36 |
|
My father is friends with that guy No, I've never met him, but holy loving poo poo.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 03:40 |
|
"Use Non Appealable Conditions of Release Orders of Prior Restraint to Silence the Voice of Those Who Challenge Local "Open Border Policy."" Why is this capitalized as if it's the title of something? Is this a bunch of paranoid rambling or am I missing something?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 04:03 |
|
Finally, my love of small town papers pays off! Check out this gem, posted on an article about a local representative's response to the proposed immigration reform.quote:WE HAVE BEEN BETRAYED ONCE AGAIN?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 05:33 |
|
Brennanite posted:Finally, my love of small town papers pays off! Check out this gem, posted on an article about a local representative's response to the proposed immigration reform. Exhibit 4503 supporting the, "FREQUENCY OF ALL CAPS WORDS CORRELATES WITH IDIOCY" hypothesis.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 05:43 |
|
In which David Brooks notices that the world contains "data" and "facts".quote:If you asked me to describe the rising philosophy of the day, I’d say it is data-ism. We now have the ability to gather huge amounts of data. This ability seems to carry with it certain cultural assumptions — that everything that can be measured should be measured; that data is a transparent and reliable lens that allows us to filter out emotionalism and ideology; that data will help us do remarkable things — like foretell the future. Well, gee Dave, only a few more years and maybe you'll be at a place where you can use this "data" in your columns!
|
# ? Feb 5, 2013 13:36 |
|
Joementum posted:In which David Brooks notices that the world contains "data" and "facts". Of course David Brooks would take umbrage at the idea that reality should play a role in our assessment of reality.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2013 13:55 |
|
Pope Guilty posted:Of course David Brooks would take umbrage at the idea that reality should play a role in our assessment of reality. He ends up just talking about all the cool things data can show us though.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2013 17:40 |
|
Here's an old letter to the editor from my local paper: http://articles.herald-mail.com/2005-03-21/news/25014498_1_hiv-infection-hiv-tattoo-solution Neil Parrott posted:According to reports, 238 Washington County residents have been diagnosed with HIV infection. This threefold increase in the county since 1997 requires a compassionate and serious response to this epidemic. Standard conservative stupidity from a literal moron. Why is this letter at all relevent over seven years later? Neil Parrott was elected to the MD House of Delegates during the tea wave election in '10, and won despite this letter being brought up during the election. He's also the asshat who gamed the ballot referendum system in that state and got many of the measures on this last time around, including the gay marriage one. So this is the human filth who managed to deny gays equal rights for almost a year. Truly a man of the people. rkajdi fucked around with this message at 20:56 on Feb 5, 2013 |
# ? Feb 5, 2013 20:48 |
|
rkajdi posted:Here's an old letter to the editor from my local paper: I...I don't. You know maybe it is just bias because this is the most recent, but this is the most reprehensible thing I have seen in this thread in ages. There has been stuff that is stupider but this? Tattoo Aids victims so that everytime they look in the mirror they are reminded of their shame and emminant deat- er, so they won't have unprotected sex! And then lets teach abstinence only, because that has been proven time and time again to work nowhere, never at preventing diseases. The fact that people have elected this loving monster to a public office sickens me to my bones, especially when this letter is public knowledge. Edit: This is the best facebook website I have ever seen however, and I am happy to know that Neil Parrott believes the grandmothers still need loving. Caros fucked around with this message at 06:46 on Feb 6, 2013 |
# ? Feb 6, 2013 06:00 |
|
Maybe it's something simple, not even a design really, just, and this is just spit balling here, maybe a string of numbers?
|
# ? Feb 6, 2013 06:23 |
|
How does he plan to identify those in need of a tattoo if he doesn't want widespread testing? No one's going to get tested at all until they KNOW they're sick, in that case, in which case it's too late, and they've probably infected someone.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2013 06:37 |
|
VideoTapir posted:How does he plan to identify those in need of a tattoo if he doesn't want widespread testing? No one's going to get tested at all until they KNOW they're sick, in that case, in which case it's too late, and they've probably infected someone. Who knows. The guys is a hardcore teatard, so I doubt he thought the consequences or logistics through. He just need to hate on someone, especially those who have sex or do drugs. EDIT: Missed the grandmother thing. Considering how much of his constituency is hill filth, this is not surprising. Cousin marriage is already legal, so I guess he just wants to keep it in the family a bit more. rkajdi fucked around with this message at 13:47 on Feb 6, 2013 |
# ? Feb 6, 2013 13:40 |
|
He seems like someone who reads Scarlet Letter and think yes that is a good idea and women should be required to wear one.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2013 14:22 |
|
An Ohio woman has noticed an instance of flagrant government waste: road signs.quote:Signs that read “Deer Crossing” and the like are going to continue to pop up throughout our country including Avon Lake, but who are these signs for? Deer cannot read, do not obey the law and probably will cross where they wish. Although adorable companions, it is hard to remember the last time that the news reported an animal talking, thinking or providing significant input for the benefit of society. Yet, these signs cost taxpayers like so much of government. Thanks, Obama
|
# ? Feb 18, 2013 17:43 |
|
quote:Yes, people dress them, buy them extravagant blinge and do other strange things with them; however, animals are not human. This cannot be real. EDIT: She just loving hates deer: http://avon-oh.patch.com/blog_posts/council-get-er-done-please quote:This week Jan.4 more than 10 deer stopped traffic walking across Walker Roads from the apple orchard on the south of Walker Road to the American Legion directly across the street on the north by Giant Eagle. It was with much distress that these deer walked across the road rather than scatter to cars and hurt or kill drivers who were stopped waiting for these idiot animals to get off the road. If only there were some way to alert motorists to the presence of deer. I AM GRANDO fucked around with this message at 18:10 on Feb 18, 2013 |
# ? Feb 18, 2013 18:01 |
|
Small town skating rink is selling energy drinks. Parents react. This is pretty much Iowa.txt, and the funny thing is it goes from rational, to the owner commenting, to someone flat out refusing to sell energy drinks at the convenience store she works at. Although the store doesn't have that policy she feels that its in the kids best interest.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2013 18:19 |
|
I would love to see what kind of diets those hysterical idiots feed their kids, or themselves for that matter. I'm sure that they're such paragons of pristine health and nutrition that energy drinks being offered in their presence warrants this sort of attention.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2013 21:06 |
|
MaxxBot posted:I would love to see what kind of diets those hysterical idiots feed their kids, or themselves for that matter. I'm sure that they're such paragons of pristine health and nutrition that energy drinks being offered in their presence warrants this sort of attention. Energy drinks are loving terrible for you, in fairness. It's not unreasonable to worry about your kids guzzling that poo poo.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2013 22:18 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 17:35 |
|
Gourd of Taste posted:Energy drinks are loving terrible for you, in fairness. It's not unreasonable to worry about your kids guzzling that poo poo. They're only as terrible as soda, and none of those people are bitching about soda.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2013 22:24 |