|
Zhentar posted:That sounds exactly like an enterprise feature to me. Consumer applications are extremely slow to uptake new processor features, because it generally isn't easy to support the new feature without breaking compatibility with old processor revisions. That's the thing, though, only libraries need to be updated, and those libraries will have automatic backwards compatibility. GCC 4.8, the latest Visual Studio 2012 update, and Intel's own compiler all have that TSX support and development done. The only thing an app developer needs to do is link to a sufficiently new version of the library.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2013 23:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 23:21 |
|
Zhentar posted:This cuts both ways, though - Ivy Bridge benefits in yields (and thus headroom) from the lessons learned from Sandy Bridge, while the new architecture has new critical paths that aren't yet optimized (this is the beauty of the Tick/Tock cadence).
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 01:27 |
|
Ughh, I don't want to wait for Broadwell to build a new PC so I'll probably just pick up a Haswell later this year. Broadwell will use the same socket as Haswell right?
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 02:20 |
|
Those virtualization improvements are giving me a nerd boner. Next thing they'll add is GPU virtualization extensions with Broadwell beating nVidia to the punch and I'd have a small nerdgasm.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 03:18 |
|
necrobobsledder posted:Those virtualization improvements are giving me a nerd boner. Next thing they'll add is GPU virtualization extensions with Broadwell beating nVidia to the punch and I'd have a small nerdgasm. I just want this so I could run OS X in a VM In other news, I just want to see the mobile performance of Haswell. I'm due for a new laptop this year and my C2D is simply too old
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 07:46 |
|
Endymion FRS MK1 posted:New benchmarks of Haswell from Tom's Hardware Nice! Now to build my imaginary compile-farm.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 17:15 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Broadwell will use the same socket as Haswell right? I wouldn't count on it.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 18:32 |
|
canyoneer posted:I wouldn't count on it. Isn't Broadwell meant to be moving exlusively to BGA... ie no more sockets, soldered straight onto motherboards? Or was that Skylarke or whatever its called?
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 18:40 |
|
Shanakin posted:Isn't Broadwell meant to be moving exlusively to BGA... ie no more sockets, soldered straight onto motherboards? Or was that Skylarke or whatever its called? That was a bunch of bullshit canyoneer posted:I wouldn't count on it. It's supposed to be Fatal fucked around with this message at 19:12 on Mar 20, 2013 |
# ? Mar 20, 2013 19:08 |
|
Fatal posted:That was a bunch of bullshit
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 20:29 |
|
Tab8715 posted:I just want this so I could run OS X in a VM
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 20:39 |
|
Alereon posted:While there will be limited numbers of enthusiast Broadwell CPUs available in LGA, most models (including desktop models) will be BGA-only. Sounds more to me like they want to move into the space the amd Hudson stuff is occupying but keep their existing setup for system builders.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2013 20:41 |
|
Alereon posted:While there will be limited numbers of enthusiast Broadwell CPUs available in LGA, most models (including desktop models) will be BGA-only. The source you posted claims the opposite of what you've said. "Low-end" CPUs != most models. Tech Report posted:...select Broadwell chips will indeed come soldered onto desktop motherboards. Lower-end models might not be available in socketed configurations at all, it seems. Our source did, however, reaffirm Intel's position that socketed CPUs aren't being dropped completely.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2013 12:06 |
|
ijyt posted:The source you posted claims the opposite of what you've said. "Low-end" CPUs != most models.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2013 14:05 |
|
Alereon posted:You've got the enthusiast LGA-2011 and successor platform that remains exclusively socketed, high-end desktop models like the K-series and probably the i5/i7 5000-series will be available socketed, and it looks like everything else remains exclusively BGA. So anyone who desires to build/upgrade a gaming PC is all set.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2013 03:38 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:So anyone who desires to build/upgrade a gaming PC is all set. I don't think that many gamer machines are Sandy Bridge E.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2013 04:29 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:I don't think that many gamer machines are Sandy Bridge E. What? The article implies that "low end" chips will be soldered. Gaming PCs are generally not low end chips. Either way, there is no solid information out there and Intel went out of their way to quash the BGA thing once already. So I'd think we should probably wait and see.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2013 00:38 |
|
Will it be worth upgrading to Haswell from a i5-2500K chip for gaming? I would only have to upgrade the CPU and motherboard and keep everything else right?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2013 18:51 |
|
I doubt it. Depends on the game, I figure, whether the game is CPU heavy or not. I'm personally only upgrading from my i7-2600 due to the virtualization stuff. I'd figure the ~15% plus in IPC, improved hyperthreading and faster VM stuff will be noticeable in my scenario.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2013 19:00 |
|
spasticColon posted:Will it be worth upgrading to Haswell from a i5-2500K chip for gaming? I would only have to upgrade the CPU and motherboard and keep everything else right? I wouldn't. I'm on a 3570K and I don't plan to upgrade until Skylake/Skymont at the earliest.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2013 21:26 |
|
spasticColon posted:Will it be worth upgrading to Haswell from a i5-2500K chip for gaming? I would only have to upgrade the CPU and motherboard and keep everything else right? I was under the impression you could count the cpu-bound games on a i5-2500k chip on one hand.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 00:10 |
|
- Dwarf Fortress - Late-game Civ 5 - ???
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 00:24 |
|
Planetside 2 maybe.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 00:25 |
|
I think for most games, even a Nehalem quad will be more than enough, especially if overclocked. And for general purpose work/Internet machines, that + 8GB of RAM is plenty. Really the big improvements as we all know will be mobile; CPU performance boost with an iGPU that may preclude the need for a discrete chip And improved battery life? Yes please. e: One big thing I forgot though, is the upcoming HEVC (successor to H.264 / AVC). That coupled with 4K resolutions could be rough for older hardware that either don't have GPUs/similar hardware to decode assist, or can't be upgraded to have it (i.e. older laptops). Current-gen tablets / portables are of course completely hosed unless their ASICs secretly have the flexibility or IP to handle it. movax fucked around with this message at 00:52 on Mar 24, 2013 |
# ? Mar 24, 2013 00:34 |
|
Has there been any more news about the integrated wifi chip on the cpu? I'm guessing from the lack of info it won't be coming out this year. Seems it'd be a major boost to mobile battery life.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 01:10 |
|
movax posted:I think for most games, even a Nehalem quad will be more than enough, especially if overclocked. And for general purpose work/Internet machines, that + 8GB of RAM is plenty. Hevc content basically doesn't exist so it'll be a few years before we see it being used even internally. Avc took a while to take off after it was ratified so by the time it becomes relevant people will have the hardware
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 03:32 |
|
AllanGordon posted:Has there been any more news about the integrated wifi chip on the cpu? I'm guessing from the lack of info it won't be coming out this year. Seems it'd be a major boost to mobile battery life. I thought intel were just being ultra-picky about which parts they make OEM use to get their "certification" rather than making it more SOC like. Certainly on the haswell front. Could be wrong, though
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 13:54 |
|
Fruit Smoothies posted:I thought intel were just being ultra-picky about which parts they make OEM use to get their "certification" rather than making it more SOC like. Certainly on the haswell front. Could be wrong, though He's talking about Rosepoint.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 14:39 |
|
spasticColon posted:Will it be worth upgrading to Haswell from a i5-2500K chip for gaming? I would only have to upgrade the CPU and motherboard and keep everything else right? I'm pretty certain a 2500k with a healthy overclock is not going to be out of date any time soon. However, once the new consoles arrive, we can expect things to move in terms of requirements as a knock on effect.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 14:57 |
|
movax posted:e: One big thing I forgot though, is the upcoming HEVC (successor to H.264 / AVC). That coupled with 4K resolutions could be rough for older hardware that either don't have GPUs/similar hardware to decode assist, or can't be upgraded to have it (i.e. older laptops). Current-gen tablets / portables are of course completely hosed unless their ASICs secretly have the flexibility or IP to handle it. Just want to add, I don't really care about 4K resolution until I can buy a 4K monitor for my workstation. The way next gen consoles are speced, we're probably not going to be gaming at 4K until the next-next generation, i.e. whatever is after the PS4/XBox 720. Considering Sony & Microsoft are trying to get 10 years out of the console, that is not going to be anytime soon (albeit I would not put money on the PS4/720 actually hitting the 10 year mark).
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 20:11 |
|
4K on consoles would either be interpolated, like 1080p on current ones, or they'll be trading polygons for resolution. At 4K resolution, games can however drop all antialiasing, making up a little performance there.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 20:41 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:4K on consoles would either be interpolated, like 1080p on current ones, or they'll be trading polygons for resolution. At 4K resolution, games can however drop all antialiasing, making up a little performance there.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2013 21:58 |
|
Rumors abound on the GPU configurations for mobile Haswell. As review:
GT3e will be HD 5200, and will be implemented in high-performance, high-TDP quad-core chips with the suffix -HQ. So far, two such SKUs are revealed, the i7-4850HQ (2.3-3.5 GHz, 3.3 GHz max 4C turbo) and the i7-4950HQ (2.4-3.6 GHz, 3.4 GHz max 4C turbo), both 47W TDP parts. The max IGP clock will be 1300 MHz on both parts. The other SKUs will apparently be binned based on clocks. GT3 will be HD 5000 and HD 5100 in Ultrabook SKUs only. GT2 will be HD 4200 and HD 4400 in Ultrabook SKUs and HD 4600 in higher-TDP, higher-clock SKUs. Different names based on clocks/TDP isn't a terrible thing. Though HD 4000 is hardware-identical on ULV i7s and high-TDP performance quad-core i7s, the real-world performance is very different due to TDP limits and clock throttling. The new names will be a bit clearer to consumers who aren't turbogeeks.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2013 10:17 |
|
I really, really want that 5200 in a macbook air.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2013 10:45 |
|
That's not bad at all, but I wonder what ATI or nVidia will bring to the table...
|
# ? Mar 27, 2013 10:46 |
|
Tab8715 posted:That's not bad at all, but I wonder what ATI or nVidia will bring to the table... Not that it should be taken with any credulity, but didn't that Tom's Hardware "preview" kinda show the GT2 as pretty well below Richland? I'm wondering what Kaveri brings to the table, at least just in terms of graphics
|
# ? Mar 27, 2013 16:04 |
|
incoherent posted:I really, really want that 5200 in a macbook air.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2013 20:51 |
|
The first OEM that puts the HD 5200 in a 13" ultrabook with a 2560x1600 screen will have my money faster than I've ever spent it on anything ever.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2013 21:28 |
|
They'll also probably win a Nobel prize for physics, what with figuring out room-temperature superconductors to cool a 47W chip in a form factor that normally struggles with a third of that.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2013 21:31 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 23:21 |
|
Pffft, as if I came here for mundane things like "facts." I will continue to dream of an ultraportable gaming notebook with good battery life.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2013 21:36 |