My bet is that it's an early mix. The radio station says "the official version will be out tomorrow." We'll see if that's true.
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 18:39 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 20:58 |
|
I agree with it being a pre-master mix, the volume of the track seems to be all over the place.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 18:44 |
|
That file is also only 128 kbps. It's going to sound muted and poorly mixed.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 18:44 |
|
Big Mean Jerk posted:That file is also only 128 kbps. It's going to sound muted and poorly mixed. 128kbps isn't going to make the track volume be all over the place though.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 18:46 |
And now the radio station website just has a youtube link to a fan remix (http://www.sonic1029.com/2013/04/17/getting-lucky/). I think this is the biggest confirmation yet. They're trying to cover their asses.
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 18:50 |
|
the black husserl posted:Human After All was the opposite of a safe album, you gotta be high to think it was the obvious choice. Yeah, I did not expect a Videodrome-esque vibe from a Daft Punk video. Though my excitement for this album is still high. I made this in anticipation:
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:06 |
|
A thread ago people were listening to a ten hour edit of a 16 second loop.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:10 |
|
Photex posted:128kbps isn't going to make the track volume be all over the place though. On the SNL clip the mix sounds really nice so I'm sure it's just not the final version. the black husserl posted:I swear to god I said this verbatim about "robot rock" 8 years ago. Here's a version that goes somewhere for ya. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVVfZAZdIUs
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:14 |
|
The best part of the album so far is the film stock they used for the "Get Lucky" visuals
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:21 |
|
I used to open sets on 80s night by fading "raining blood" into this track, big thanks to daft punk for introducing me to it.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:26 |
|
JSnake posted:And now the radio station website just has a youtube link to a fan remix (http://www.sonic1029.com/2013/04/17/getting-lucky/). I think this is the biggest confirmation yet. They're trying to cover their asses. As I stated in the OP, any 'leak' is almost definitely fake. I'm not going to trust any source unless Daft Punk and/or Columbia Records puts it on their respective pages.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:30 |
|
CaptainYesterday posted:As I stated in the OP, any 'leak' is almost definitely fake. I'm not going to trust any source unless Daft Punk and/or Columbia Records puts it on their respective pages. How the hell do you fake completely new verses by Pharrel? I guess they could've gotten an incredibly good impersonator but it's pretty far fetched.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:32 |
|
Oh, wait. Nevermind. I thought it was a fake track, and the radio station rescinded it.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:35 |
|
JSnake posted:So either someone has a perfect Pharrell impersonation, came up with lyrics that perfectly go along with the song and added new song elements on top of that or... this is a radio edit leak of Get Lucky. http://pmd.sonic1029.com/audio/downloads/rick_lee/daftpunk_getlucky.mp3 File not found Anyone have a mirror or would that be considered ?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:46 |
|
quadratic posted:File not found This showed up in my Facebook feed just now. It's streamed, so hopefully it's not considered filesharing. http://www.thissongslaps.com/2013/04/daft-punk-get-lucky-leaked/
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 19:50 |
CaptainYesterday posted:As I stated in the OP, any 'leak' is almost definitely fake. I'm not going to trust any source unless Daft Punk and/or Columbia Records puts it on their respective pages. This might be like the fourth leak in Daft history. Discovery demos leaked, HAA leaked, this unfinished but legit track leaked, and I think tour dates for the 07 tour leaked a bit before they were officially announced. Beyond that the OP is completely correct.
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 20:25 |
|
Muck and Mire posted:This might be like the fourth leak in Daft history. Discovery demos leaked, HAA leaked, this unfinished but legit track leaked, and I think tour dates for the 07 tour leaked a bit before they were officially announced. Beyond that the OP is completely correct. How different are the Discovery demos from the album versions?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 20:39 |
|
I thought the Discovery "demos" were just fan made deconstructions/remixes of the songs from Discovery with one or two original tracks because you get famous by not having your name on your original works/remixes, I guess
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 20:41 |
I don't actually know myself, I just recall that in the history of Daft Leaks some tracks from Discovery were among them. I can't find anything googling (the album came out in 2001, remember) but if I remember correctly they were very close to the album versions?
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 20:42 |
|
Welp, it's on beatport now: http://news.beatport.com/blog/2013/04/17/daft-punk-stream-get-lucky-featuring-pharrell-williams-and-nile-rodgers-in-full/
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 21:59 |
|
The vocal bridge is the telltale sign here - this track is legitimate. I definitely think it's a premaster - it's barely compressed and there are a lot of weird peaks, but yeah, this is the song. Kinda wish "THE ROBOTS" were in it a little more.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:02 |
|
If this is a fake they did it in no time. Doesn't pharrell l make a phonix refence in the video? Also it has those pharrell space refences.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:05 |
|
If it isn't real then the fakers have synthesized a pharell, which is a much more impressive achievement than faking a daft punk song.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:06 |
|
A Pharrell Hologram. Pharrellologram.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:10 |
|
Arguing that it's fake is stupid, but I think it's pretty clearly not the final mix.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:11 |
|
How would some random radio station get such a lovely version of this song? It didn't even have some of the guitar parts we have heard in the interviews.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:35 |
|
Yeah, this honestly seems pretty fake to me.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:38 |
|
It's probably compiled from the clips we've heard so far and maybe some that haven't yet made their way to the general public.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:46 |
|
I'm a huge closet Daft Punk fan, to the point when I started sharing it with my friends they were surprised. I love the dance-beat feeling of their songs, especially all of Discovery, I can listen to that whole album over and over. Surprised there hasn't been any Daft Punk avatars made from the clip from Random Access Memories. If I was any bit of skilled I'd do it myself Can anyone make an avatar of the drum hands at :14 and the guitar finger bit at :17? I'll worship you!
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:47 |
|
priznat posted:A Pharrell Hologram. Pharrellologram. In the shape of a Pharrelelogram.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 22:53 |
|
Am I the only one that doesnt think it even sounds like Pharrell in this "leak"? The volume jumps between the verses and the chorus, and the accent sounds different.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:07 |
|
I honestly don't see how anyone can think this 'leak' is real. A good Pharrell impression, yes, but to me it doesn't sound like Pharrell, poor mix/quality aside. Of course, like everyone else I am just speculating and could be wrong, but this smacks of fake to me. If anything the similarities between the lyrics and Pharrell's comments from the Collaborators video make it even more obviously fake to me. AND WHAT'S MORE I doubt that the song just abruptly starts with the groove like that. I'll be damned if it isn't a good fake, and fun to talk about, though!
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:11 |
|
I think what makes it obvious it's fake is that the vocals in the verse and the chorus sound like 2 completely different recordings. Compare the sound, accent, etc. It's not the same person. It's very well made though aside from those glaring flaws.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:16 |
|
Ringo Star Get posted:Surprised there hasn't been any Daft Punk avatars made from the clip from Random Access Memories. If I was any bit of skilled I'd do it myself Can anyone make an avatar of the drum hands at :14 and the guitar finger bit at :17? I'll worship you! I both love those parts. I'd take a nile rogers avatar just smiling and swaying back and forth.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:18 |
|
So who wants to avatar-toxx themselves on whether this is fake or not edit: actually that's a terrible idea, let's just say if you're convinced it's fake, you can toxx over it het fucked around with this message at 23:28 on Apr 17, 2013 |
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:25 |
Who cares if its fake or not, the quality is kinda rough, but it's a good edit if it is, and it's a far sight better than the fan remixes I've heard so far. I can appreciate Daft Punk fandom, as I think they deserve it, but I can't enjoy most of these fan remixes. If this is fake, it's the best one I've heard musically. Apparent sound/editing issues aside. I think it has a lot to do with the fact that Daft Punk has apparently gone out of their way to use live sound, and it totally defeats the purpose and destroys the feel of it when some wanna-be DJ looking for 15 minutes of fame starts sampling it and turning it into another cliche dance track.
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:37 |
|
Looks like it's real... http://www.amazon.com/Get-Lucky/dp/B00CEIGXN4/ref=sr_shvl_album_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1366235686&sr=301-1
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:38 |
|
Fake or not, I love it, and I've had it on repeat for the last 30 minutes. Thinking about repeating it all night, staying awake to see if I get lucky. Already preordered the album, can't wait for 21st of May. I'll put it on my turntable, turn it on, lean back and anjoy. It'll be a great afternoon.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:40 |
|
lol at people thinking the new Pharrell vocals are faked
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:47 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 20:58 |
|
http://soundisstyle.com/2013/04/daft-punk-get-lucky-feat-pharrell-nile-rodgers.html This sounds like the final mix
|
# ? Apr 17, 2013 23:55 |