|
Tomn posted:Oh, yeah, just had a thought. Reposting this, think dio may have missed it.
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 20:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 15:11 |
|
quote:Snarls, what's your name for Danal? The cub. Smells like Pack.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:16
|
|
|
What names does snarls have for Azzael, Ishamal, Aron, Chait, Lullaya, pretty much anyone we've spent any significant time with, do any of them smell not like pack?
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:26
|
|
|
I kinda want Enkidel to make a compilation of Snarls' name for people and things, maybe write a book. Seriously.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:30
|
|
|
Snarl's ability to 'make a face' that causes food to spontaneously drop is as good as any Vayahi Orring we have done. He might be a sorcerer.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:35
|
|
jazzyhattrick posted:What names does snarls have for Azzael, Ishamal, Aron, Chait, Lullaya, pretty much anyone we've spent any significant time with, do any of them smell not like pack?
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:37
|
|
|
I'll vote the ultimate list of Snarls names.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:39
|
|
|
Names as we meet people. Let's keep that story moving.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:39
|
|
|
jazzyhattrick posted:Names as we meet people. Let's keep that story moving. Seconded.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:41
|
|
|
jazzyhattrick posted:Names as we meet people. Let's keep that story moving. Hell yes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:43
|
|
|
For my two cents, I think it would probably be more entertaining to spread it out, as well as more useful to know the smell when you deal with people, but I do not get a vote.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:43
|
|
|
My notion was to build it as we go. Maybe give Snarl's a standing job of letting us know if people smell funny or he feels bad about them. Iirc he told us Azz looked funny, but smelled good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:45
|
|
|
I swear we need a wiki or something just to keep track of all this poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:47
|
|
|
Diogines posted:but I do not get a vote. Why not? Casting vote in the event of a tie, just like the vice president. It feels like a more satisfying solution than next vote gets to decide. I vote that we give Diogines the vote. Universal suffrage beeatch!
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:50
|
|
|
I have been attempting before the introduction of "The World According to Snarls Barkley". I might add a section to the Book of Names.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 21:52
|
|
|
jazzyhattrick posted:Why not? Casting vote in the event of a tie, just like the vice president. It feels like a more satisfying solution than next vote gets to decide. Seconded!
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 22:07
|
|
|
Spread the names out.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 22:07
|
|
jazzyhattrick posted:Why not? Casting vote in the event of a tie, just like the vice president. It feels like a more satisfying solution than next vote gets to decide. Vetoed.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 22:11
|
|
|
A veto? This is unprecedented! Do we have the 2/3rds majority necessary to overturn a veto?
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 22:19
|
|
|
Probably, but then the inevitable lawsuit will take it to the Supreme Court, and I don't think Chief Justice Diogines is going to let it go without being struck down.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 22:37
|
|
|
Diogines posted:For my two cents, I think it would probably be more entertaining to spread it out, as well as more useful to know the smell when you deal with people, but I do not get a vote. Voting for Plan Diogenes
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 22:40
|
|
|
the_steve posted:No matter which way you slice it, logical reason or no, we DID break her heart, and I doubt she was able to get any closure over it since it's not like she could really talk to anybody about it. I don't know if splitting up with a teenage fling of a few months is really the life-altering, ego-shattering, existential-angsting calamity you're making it out to be  I'm sure she was sad, but people get over breakups, particularly when there's an obviously good reason. We may have 'broken her heart' in a temporary and time-heals-all-wounds sort of way, but were we wrong to do so? It had to be done, I'm not sure it's the sort of thing we should be prepared to do a massive amount of apologizing over, nor that she ought to be expecting us to.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 22:46
|
|
|
I'm sorry, are you implying it's possible for a woman to fully recover after being near our 28-pearl, dulce de leche self? Because I'd have to disagree.  Honestly, we're just lucky to entire city of Zepath hasn't exploded yet from our sheer goony charisma. (Also voting for an update instead of the names) FoxTerrier fucked around with this message at 23:05 on Nov 5, 2013 |
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 23:02
|
|
|
Theglavwen posted:I don't know if splitting up with a teenage fling of a few months is really the life-altering, ego-shattering, existential-angsting calamity you're making it out to be Yes, I'm sure the Bronze Age teenager is looking back on heartbreak with a level head and thinks about the whole thing rationally. You're not wrong, but you ain't right either. Update instead of names
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 23:13
|
|
|
An update is more preferable to a list of names.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 23:14
|
|
|
If anyone wants to do a count, it will save me time tonight.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 23:16
|
|
|
paragon1 posted:Yes, I'm sure the Bronze Age teenager is looking back on heartbreak with a level head and thinks about the whole thing rationally. Eh, I don't think it's so much a case of her requiring a perfectly robotic beep-boop logical outlook on the thing, and more that even people who feel legitimately sad and wish things had gone the other way are still, on the whole, reasonable people. You can simultaneously feel sadness and regrey yet still acknowledge the reasons why things happened, particularly with years of distance between yourself and the event; at the very least, I don't think she'd still be holding grudges, set to derail the emotional rollercoaster unless we come grovelling and recanting all our past rationale. I'd hope, if anything, she'd be happy that things have changed, like, presumably, we are. I suppose we'll see when we meet her though. Also voting for update I guess.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 23:47
|
|
|
Diogines posted:Yes! Mates? Lots of food! Good time! Pack grows stronger! Will watch the cubs and teach them to hunt the-food-place-where-the-meat-falls and how to make the face to make it fall! Well, you heard the dog, folks. Time to get married.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 00:54
|
|
|
I am counting votes. Question 1 is: 1. Why are you going to go see Naomi? A. Just to say hi. B. To show off a bit about my glorious conquest and rise in stature, in a way meant to impress. C. To show off a bit about my glorious conquest and rise in stature, but not to impress. D. To find out if she still cares for me, but I do not outright ask. E. To find out if she still cares for me, I do outright ask. F. To apologize for rejecting her. G. Something else. Fill in. Question 1 is currently sitting at: (12 votes) AD-8 D-4 versus (11 votes) EF-10 E-1 Excluding a handful of other votes for other options. It is not a tie, but the voting is close enough. I will keep voting open for another 20 minutes. New votes fire away. Anyone who wants to change their votes, go ahead, but please post what your old vote was. AD is to say hello and to find out if she still cares for you, but you do not ask. EF is to ask her if she still ares for you and to apologize for rejecting her. All other questions are closed. Diogines fucked around with this message at 01:37 on Nov 6, 2013 |
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:34
|
|
|
EF
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:35
|
|
|
oh wait I think I already voted on these
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:38
|
|
|
You voted BDH, which I lumped into the D grouping.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:41
|
|
|
Diogines posted:Question 1 is currently sitting at: Just curious, how is that tallied? Would that end up with a D - 12, E - 11, F - 10, A - 8 sort of thing, or are the D's in AD considered separately from the solo D's, etc? Still think rejecting is a pretty strange word. Wasn't a case of rejecting her advances or interest, really, was a case of feeling we couldn't proceed because of our respective situations, without hurting us both. *shrug*.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:41
|
|
|
Diogines posted:You voted BDH, which I lumped into the D grouping. Switching to EF on that one. Thanks!
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:42
|
|
|
I'll go with A.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:44
|
|
|
AD
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:44
|
|
Theglavwen posted:Just curious, how is that tallied? Would that end up with a D - 12, E - 11, F - 10, A - 8 sort of thing, or are the D's in AD considered separately from the solo D's, etc? When people lump voted together, I count them together, where it makes sense. An "AB" vote is not counted as a "vote for A" and a "vote for B" but for "AB", which may as well be a new option. If we counted them separate, people select extra options would have their votes count for more. Sometimes they get split up, or similar options get grouped, depending on the question, sometimes one of the multiple elements of a vote is the "big" factor and the rest is window dressing. It varies vote to vote. As of right now we are at: (13) AD-9 D-4 versus (14) E-1 EF-13 With 5 other votes which fall outside of the "ask her or do not" dynamic, which is the real difference between D and EF. A-3 B-1 AGF-1 Diogines fucked around with this message at 01:54 on Nov 6, 2013 |
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:50
|
|
|
An interesting coincidence that we should have a discussion about giving Diog tie-breaking powers just before what might be the closest vote we've had so far.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:54
|
|
|
We have had multiple ties for votes with more options before. People feel strongly about this one though, so I wanted to point out the closeness of the voting. Should we leave it open till the morning?
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 15:11 |
|
|
Going with EF.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 01:57
|
|