|
You wanna see tropers own themselves?Podcast/The F-Plus posted:Crowning Moment of Funny: The fact that this podcast made fun of TV Tropes for having dumb nonsensical tropes such as "crowning moment of funny" and yet some tropers still decided to add it to the podcast's TV Tropes page.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 02:59 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 01:28 |
|
Oh boy! This is the problem with the troper view of worldbuilding. It's never something you weave into a plot, providing a solid, but flexible framework for the story to be built upon. Nope, it's something you drop into a book like big turds of exposition, made by some announcer/text crawl/NPC.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 03:07 |
|
Djeser posted:A massive load of crap. You know, I hate a lot of my own writing, but it warms my heart to know that there will always be someone worse. Much, much worse.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 03:44 |
|
The lesbianchat is the obvious highlight, but my favorite part has to be the "worldbuilding". It's like a lovely, low-effort toyline backstory, but in a goddamn novel whose author actually takes it seriously. I know that it's a thread cliché that Tropers have no imagination and just copy whatever pulpy juvenilia strikes their fancy, but of all the things to emulate.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 04:01 |
Saint Drogo posted:They don't have work to improve. Most of them don't produce anything beyond what they write to take part in forum games. TVtropes isn't a writer's community, or even a community with a higher number of wannabe-writers in it than anywhere else geeks congregate. That's why ninjaxenomorph's "attacking our creativity??" was so funny - not counting the occasional internet tip of the hat from creators who are vaguely aware of the site, the biggest creative successes from the TVTropes community are a Neon Genesis Evangelion/Warhammer 40k crossover fanfic, a rewrite of the first Harry Potter book by a maniac who wishes he was autistic and the line "the dickgirls opened fire". There was apparently some evidence that Community creator Dan Harmon is/was a Troper (Abed definitely is). I like the show, but that wouldn't really challenge the idea of Tropers as thin-skinned and emotionally immature.
|
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 04:28 |
|
What evidence is there for Harmon/Abed?
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 05:03 |
|
Flesnolk posted:What evidence is there for Harmon/Abed? For Harmon, the fact that he's apparently a thin-skinned babyman who self-diagnosed with Aspergers and CANNOT take any criticism.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 05:16 |
Calaveron posted:For Harmon, the fact that he's apparently a thin-skinned babyman who self-diagnosed with Aspergers and CANNOT take any criticism. I think he mentioned TVT on one of his podcasts or blogs or interviews. Abed, who sees everything through the lens of media and pop culture, just seems like a Troper. The best possible Troper, one you'd actually want to spend time with, but still a guy who predicted the events of one episode in the episode by making a list of college movie tropes on the study group's whiteboard. With all the overlap between mainstream creators and the Internet I find it hard to believe that guys like Charles Stross or every comic book writer who constantly posts on his message boards (Warren Ellis, John Byrne) wouldn't at least know about the site.
|
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 05:35 |
|
The troper novel from the last page read like it was written by a guy who has read too much Terry Pratchett and watched too much anime, but doesn't know the first thing about how either of these work. Terry Pratchett can go off on tangents where the writing sounds "quirky" because the guy is a master of wordplay. It's hard to write puns and give characters inflections, but the guy has had over forty books to perfect his style. The troper believes that it is just a matter of going "look at how witty my writing is! Aren't I self aware? Irony!" rather than an actual effort being put in.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 05:52 |
|
Calaveron posted:For Harmon, the fact that he's apparently a thin-skinned babyman who self-diagnosed with Aspergers and CANNOT take any criticism. The last part of that is somewhat inaccurate; Harmon's really self-critical and will generally be the first person to say what could have been done better. He also routinely admits when something he writes/says is offensive, which is often because he has basically no filter. He's certainly a manbaby (by his own admission, even), though, and he really shouldn't be the troper ideal of "Hey! One of us is successful!"
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 05:57 |
|
quote:“‘Course not. I should actually tell this when my mind’s more clear, but, some barbarians are born that way, they can’t be, like, stealthy class thingies and stuff, you get what I’m saying. You know they’re born that way because they sometimes go into berserker mode. Now, when they’re in berserker mode, they like to kill and murder things. The only way to stop them is to, you know, distract them. Or ‘distract’ them.” Bolding to highlight something Tropers do that pisses me off to no end. They literally think of fiction in terms of an RPG. It was best illustrated by the guy who completely stopped his story because his hero "took too much damage and doesn't have enough healing potions". They cannot distinguish between playing a game and writing a story. Roman the Amazing isn't a master of illusions that's renowned for his ability to change his appearance. He's a level 8 Wizard that took Spell Focus: Illusion and prepares Masterful Disguise as a 3rd level spell. Tad Swolington can't just be the greatest brawler in the land and have the strength of ten men. He has to have an 18 Strength which means his punch inflicts x+n-q Newtons of force which means
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 08:07 |
|
Razorwired posted:Bolding to highlight something Tropers do that pisses me off to no end. They literally think of fiction in terms of an RPG. It was best illustrated by the guy who completely stopped his story because his hero "took too much damage and doesn't have enough healing potions". They cannot distinguish between playing a game and writing a story. Roman the Amazing isn't a master of illusions that's renowned for his ability to change his appearance. He's a level 8 Wizard that took Spell Focus: Illusion and prepares Masterful Disguise as a 3rd level spell. Tad Swolington can't just be the greatest brawler in the land and have the strength of ten men. He has to have an 18 Strength which means his punch inflicts x+n-q Newtons of force which means That one was especially baffling to me, because even if you wanted to be really technical and specific in how your fantasy magic and medicine work (and some readers eat that stuff up, so I can't say it's specifically a Troper thing), that still doesn't pose a problem because you can go back and add things to the story you wrote. Either have the guy pull one out that he was "saving for when he needed it" or just go back to chapter two, have the dude find a potion or something, and then have him use it. But no, gotta keep going forwards, can't go back to the beginning ever.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 08:12 |
|
crowfeathers posted:That one was especially baffling to me, because even if you wanted to be really technical and specific in how your fantasy magic and medicine work (and some readers eat that stuff up, so I can't say it's specifically a Troper thing), that still doesn't pose a problem because you can go back and add things to the story you wrote. Either have the guy pull one out that he was "saving for when he needed it" or just go back to chapter two, have the dude find a potion or something, and then have him use it. But no, gotta keep going forwards, can't go back to the beginning ever. I think some tropers believe that a story should simply set up its premises and then follow them steadily to the end. This is why authors are blameless when a story is racist or sexist, it's just the inevitable and unpredictable outcome of the initial conditions.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 08:46 |
|
Count Chocula posted:There was apparently some evidence that Community creator Dan Harmon is/was a Troper (Abed definitely is). I like the show, but that wouldn't really challenge the idea of Tropers as thin-skinned and emotionally immature. I've heard that Jim Butcher dropped by the site once or twice and might have posted in their forum.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 10:44 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOVa5UvSC_A Dozerfleet guy really reminds me of Haggis McCrablice, I mean, he has that same LIEBRULS grudge and those same stalkerish tendencies over girls who rejected him.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 10:44 |
Metal Loaf posted:I've heard that Jim Butcher dropped by the site once or twice and might have posted in their forum. From what I've read of Dresden Files, that makes so much sense.
|
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 11:34 |
|
So far Google's turned up nothing on the subject except TVT's actual Jim Butcher pages, but I've heard the books are really... troper-y for lack of a better word? Plus they practically worship his stuff so I wouldn't be surprised.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 11:52 |
|
Flesnolk posted:So far Google's turned up nothing on the subject except TVT's actual Jim Butcher pages, but I've heard the books are really... troper-y for lack of a better word? Plus they practically worship his stuff so I wouldn't be surprised. I read one and a half of the Dresden Files books, and they read like fanfic. Dresden feels like a blatant self-insert, and there are omg! zany things that are presented with what I'm sure Butcher thought was dry wit when writing, but it just comes off as smug. Also the wizard-detective main character wears an ill-fitting trenchcoat, and might as well wear a fedora.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 13:48 |
|
Funny thing is, I thought Harry Dresden was supposed to come off as a dopey loser and overall mook.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 14:11 |
|
I've only read the first book, but that's the impression I got. It was kinda shakily written, but a fun read overall, and I definitely thought Harry was supposed to be a loser.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 14:33 |
|
Well *I* have read all of the Dresden Files books and while they are enjoyable, they are goony as hell. You definitely get the sense that Harry has a character class (white wizard), and that he levels up after every book. The thing is, Butcher is a somewhat competent writer, so he never writes about Harry's hit points or him running out of mana, or anything stupid like that. Because of how Butcher plots things out I definitely get the sense that he at least partly conceives of things as part of an RPG campaign, but he at least knows that books and games have different conventions and aren't the same thing. Also I'm pretty sure Harry is supposed to come across as a cool as hell, hardboiled detective hero but I don't think Butcher achieved that for non-Troper readers.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 15:14 |
|
Seoinin posted:Funny thing is, I thought Harry Dresden was supposed to come off as a dopey loser and overall mook. In one of the short stories written from the perspective of another character (a friend of Harry's) she basically describes him as looking like this big gawky autistic kid most of the time.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 18:17 |
|
Flesnolk posted:So far Google's turned up nothing on the subject except TVT's actual Jim Butcher pages, but I've heard the books are really... troper-y for lack of a better word? Plus they practically worship his stuff so I wouldn't be surprised. The Dresden books are trashy fantasy in a similar way to Laurell K Hamilton's stuff, kind of fun to read if you don't want anything mentally taxing but you'd want to avoid the hardcore fans.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 19:31 |
|
Geokinesis posted:The Dresden books are trashy fantasy in a similar way to Laurell K Hamilton's stuff, kind of fun to read if you don't want anything mentally taxing but you'd want to avoid the hardcore fans. Let's not say things we can't take back. Butcher can be an idiot (giant parking lot at Wrigley Field?) but I've never seen the level of sloppiness in his stuff that is routine in Hamilton's last dozen books.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 19:39 |
|
AlbieQuirky posted:Let's not say things we can't take back. Butcher can be an idiot (giant parking lot at Wrigley Field?) but I've never seen the level of sloppiness in his stuff that is routine in Hamilton's last dozen books. Though the 'hardcore fans' don't appear to be tropers. Their 'literature page' has the air of being written by someone relatively articulate and thoroughly cynical: quote:Once upon a time, there was a necromancer/animator/vampire executioner living in The Unmasqued World. She was a Chaste Hero who moved among the various vampires, werewolves, fairies, other were-animals, etc. in her world, solving crimes and kicking rear end. Though she repeatedly said "I don't date vampires, I kill them" (well, vampires who are getting up to terribly bad things, anyway), she ended up being blackmailed into dating one, as well as a werewolf, leading to an infamous Love Triangle. First she slept with one. Then the other. Then she took some time off to think about things. Okay, they're kind of creepy about Hamilton's personal life, though not to Jay O levels... quote:The Anita Blake series is another famous example of this. Unlike the Merry Gentry series (which pretty much started off as porn), the Blake series initially started as the adventures of a professional necromancer who alternatively hunted and enjoyed sexual tension with the creatures of the night. Then around book six, the sexy times got ramped up to the point where they devoured the book, leaving little space for the actual plot. Many consider the breaking point to be author Laurel K. Hamilton's divorce from her husband. ... but on the whole, it doesn't sound like she's well liked there. I suspect she made the unforgivable mistake of 'disrespecting the fans' by failing to deliver what they expected and telling them to stuff it when they complained. (I also suspect that the hardcore fans are already getting their rationalised porn and don't need to hang around on TVTropes. Or maybe it's just that they're mostly women and all the boys' club doesn't appeal to them.)
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 20:03 |
|
Apple Tree posted:(I also suspect that the hardcore fans are already getting their rationalised porn and don't need to hang around on TVTropes. Or maybe it's just that they're mostly women and all the boys' club doesn't appeal to them.) You've nailed it, all of my money says that TVTropes doesn't like her because her poorly-written dumb sex fantasy is aimed at women instead of men.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 20:11 |
Or maybe it's just atrocious. (spoilers: her poo poo is atrocious)
|
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 20:39 |
|
SALT CURES HAM posted:Or maybe it's just atrocious. (spoilers: her poo poo is atrocious) Tropers like any number of atrocious things, I thought we'd covered that. It's just interesting to note which atrocious things command a horde of sycophants around there and which ones don't.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 20:41 |
I hang around fantasy neckbeards of all genders and not one has admitted to liking her stuff. There are Wild Cards fans that I know and yet nobody will touch her poo poo with a fifty foot pole.
|
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 20:55 |
|
SALT CURES HAM posted:I hang around fantasy neckbeards of all genders and not one has admitted to liking her stuff. There are Wild Cards fans that I know and yet nobody will touch her poo poo with a fifty foot pole. Good job not liking a thing! Anyone got any content?
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 21:35 |
|
Apple Tree posted:Anyone got any content? The last thing I posted was the Dozerfleet link. I can't top that, so I won't try. You can check this out, though. Text wall incoming. quote:This Troper would like to say that, as a fan of the Dark Age, it makes me feel EXTREMELY alienated and frankly angry to hear everyone constantly ragging on it. Personal history: I grew up in the 90s, and my first comics were Youngblood, X-Force, Wetworks etc. I loved early 90s Image and Marvel stuff—and you know what, I liked Rob Liefeld and I even like "bad girl" art. Yeah, I said it, I prefer Liefeld and Jim Lee and Todd Mc Farland and the like to some of the "classics" like Perez or Kirby. And yes I read it—and read it—for the tits and guns and action, I don't feel "stupider" for admitting that nor should I. Frankly, it strikes me as childish and myopic to talk of overt sex, sexualization, violence, etc as things we should just pretend don't exist in "polite company". There is nothing wrong with a healthy sex drive or wanting a visceral thrill. The Silver Age was fun FOR KIDS but unless you're completely dishonest it was incredibly sterile, myopic, filled with racism and misogyny and to be quite honest it was disturbing in many, many cases. Maybe the covers lied a lot, but the fact that many of them featured CHILDREN in compromising positions with adults (eg, skinny dipping with Batman and Superman, sitting spread eagle on a battleship cannon like it was their penis, etc) and for all the talk of "too much sex" in the Dark Age it had none of that. I can TOTALLY understand people liking the campy and yes Narmy aspects of the Silver Age and Golden Age, but why should people like this Troper and his friends have to feel like outcasts because we enjoy some T and A, or watching people with big guns shoot aliens or whatever? I never understood why we get so much grief. I'll admit all of the "excesses" (though I don't consider them excessive per se) of the 90s, but my question is, so what? It's the same argument I would make about Dead or Alive or Gears of War today: yes it's very sexualized, yes its all about tits and gore...so? What right does anyone have to be discriminatory? What right do you have to judge me? I guess my question is, who died and made you God? The fact the entire Dark Age page reads like a treatise by Linkara on why he hates Image comics is a perfect example of what I mean.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 21:41 |
|
Flesnolk posted:So far Google's turned up nothing on the subject except TVT's actual Jim Butcher pages, but I've heard the books are really... troper-y for lack of a better word? Plus they practically worship his stuff so I wouldn't be surprised. From what I hear the entire Dresden Files series started because Butcher took a bet from his Creative Writing prof. Butcher claimed that he could write the most formulaic, predictable fantasy drek he could think of and sell it. And yeah when I read the first book I remember Harry is described as wearing sweats with a canvas duster and he straight up says, "Well, not beer, he makes ale. " when talking about the wizard bartender guy. I'm not ready to believe that Butcher wants the audience to think Harry is cool.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 23:05 |
|
quote:This Troper would like to say that, as a fan of the Dark Age, it makes me feel EXTREMELY alienated and frankly angry to hear everyone constantly ragging on it. quote:Personal history: I grew up in the 90s, and my first comics were Youngblood, X-Force, Wetworks etc. I loved early 90s Image and Marvel stuff quote:—and you know what, I liked Rob Liefeld and I even like "bad girl" art. Yeah, I said it, I prefer Liefeld
|
# ? Nov 13, 2013 23:07 |
|
Yyyeah, the 90's. Just last night I was reminiscing with some people on another board about when we bowed out of X-Men. For me, it started when they wrecked Excalibur by getting rid of Phoenix and replacing her with... well.. The 90's, everybody. Because Captain Britain wasn't extreme enough.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2013 00:00 |
|
a travelling HEGEL posted:Cool, another person who realizes that the period after the fall of the Western Roman Empire wasn't just a barbarian wasteland, but instead saw many unique and interesting cultures, which That Troper went from being a potentially tolerable history nerd to an unsalvageable, paragraph-break-hating, badly-in-need-of-a-wedgie dweeb in the blink of an eye. I wish I could actually read that diatribe because of how stupid it is, but some kind of survival instinct kicks in within the first two lines and I can't even look directly at the text to parse it after that.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2013 00:48 |
|
TV Tropes is like radiation. You think it'll give you superpowers but it'll actually give you cancer.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2013 01:00 |
|
Djeser posted:Almost two weeks into November and we've hardly talked about tropers' novels-in-progress? For shame. All the "world-building" of a second-rate NES game with all the subtlety of the worst fantasy fan-fiction.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2013 01:07 |
|
By "world building" we mean "throw in random stuff that looks cool and totally wasn't stolen from the game I played/book I read/movie I watched/history I learned".
|
# ? Nov 14, 2013 01:13 |
|
It's me, I am the real bully.Dozerfleet posted:Protest of DeviantArt’s “Spirit Day”: Who are the REAL Bullies??? The real bully was Mr Green in the study with the lead pipe.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2013 01:14 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 01:28 |
|
You know, with some of the stuff you can at least guess where it comes from and how he came up with it, but how the hell did he come up with the Sadeans? The rest is just some really dumb bastardization of history, but all that Marquis de Sade stuff comes completely out of the left field, even for him.
e X fucked around with this message at 01:43 on Nov 14, 2013 |
# ? Nov 14, 2013 01:27 |