|
Ker-ching! Edit: Holy poo poo evidence is amazing. quote:Jim Old @SkyFixerJim 3m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 2m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 3m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 1m Plavski fucked around with this message at 16:52 on Jan 27, 2014 |
# ? Jan 27, 2014 16:25 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 03:32 |
|
So is this coulson dead in the water? And thus by extension Mrs Brooks?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 18:27 |
|
Will anybody be done for perjury during Leveson based on evidence that comes out in the trial? Because if people get away with lying during that enquiry then what was the point of having an oath?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 20:33 |
|
drat excited for the continuation of Dan Evans' evidence today. Nuts to work, I'll be F5'ing like mad.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 11:23 |
|
thehustler posted:Will anybody be done for perjury during Leveson based on evidence that comes out in the trial? You generally don't bother with perjury as a separate charge when someone lies in their own defence, the judge will just take it into account during sentencing.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 11:53 |
|
Plavski posted:drat excited for the continuation of Dan Evans' evidence today. Nuts to work, I'll be F5'ing like mad. Keep us posted, this is very interesting! I want to see these fuckers get their comeuppance
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:03 |
|
quote:@Fhamiltontimes Rolf Harris was among celebs that Evans attempted to hack but didn't succeed #hacking There's a counterfactual to think about.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:07 |
|
Alchenar posted:You generally don't bother with perjury as a separate charge when someone lies in their own defence, the judge will just take it into account during sentencing. Even though the trial and the inquiry are different events? I'm not talking about the people on trial now, I'm talking about people like Piers Morgan. If some evidence comes out in this trial that shows that what he said was untrue, could the CPS decide to bring perjury charges? So many people lied during Leveson and I'm really angry about it.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:15 |
|
Demiurge4 posted:Keep us posted, this is very interesting! I want to see these fuckers get their comeuppance Highlights so far: quote:Robin Brant @robindbrant 16m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 14m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 13m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 12m quote:Robin Brant @robindbrant 10m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 7m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 5m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 4m quote:Jim Old @SkyFixerJim 4m quote:lisa o'carroll @lisaocarroll 1m quote:Dominic Casciani @BBCDomC 1m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 2m
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:21 |
|
Evans has fingered Coulson directly for the "operation" using the Daniel Craig hack. I wonder who XXXX is though? e: beaten
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:22 |
|
thehustler posted:Even though the trial and the inquiry are different events? Fairly certain nobody other than those hacks already done for it actually admitted to knowing about hacking at Leveson (or in front of the DCMS committee for that matter), rather that they didn't recall any such activities going on.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:30 |
|
quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 6m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 6m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 4m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 2m quote:Jim Old @SkyFixerJim 2m So that's phone hacking, from hack, to gossip, to confirmation, to covering-of-arses, to publishing. quote:Jim Old @SkyFixerJim 6m
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:33 |
|
Plavski posted:So that's phone hacking, from hack, to gossip, to confirmation, to covering-of-arses, to publishing. With the slight removal of the fact someone got fitted up for an affair he didn't have because he had his voicemail hacked. But that's not a sexy story, is it.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:37 |
|
ewe2 posted:With the slight removal of the fact someone got fitted up for an affair he didn't have because he had his voicemail hacked. But that's not a sexy story, is it. The actual article that came out went to three pages: quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 3m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 7m It's pretty sickening. "You're a company man now".
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:39 |
|
Plavski posted:It's pretty sickening. "You're a company man now". Yeah, and the clear collusion of Laws publicist is pathetic too. In for a win, eh?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 12:43 |
|
quote:Dominic Casciani @BBCDomC 1m quote:Martin Hickman @martin_hickman 1m
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 13:11 |
|
After a brief talk about his past problems with drugs, Dan Evans' main evidence is done. He's up for cross-examination now. This is being delayed till 14:15 as there is new documentation that's just arrived which needs to be examined. The Graun has put up a brief bit about the Craig/Miller hacking.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 13:38 |
|
Guardian story about Jude Laws evidence to the trial which seems a little unconvincing to me given that he apparently suspected all around him.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 14:00 |
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:Fairly certain nobody other than those hacks already done for it actually admitted to knowing about hacking at Leveson (or in front of the DCMS committee for that matter), rather that they didn't recall any such activities going on. Right but if, say, some emails come out which prove Morgan knew, then he would have been proved to have lied.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 14:57 |
|
Peter Jukes has achieved his funding goal, yay! Lots more trialtweeting for everyone.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 15:11 |
|
Once I get paid I'll stick in £100 for the Post trial discussion. There's way more stuff going on in the background of this than can be written about at the moment, so those are good place to share.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 15:34 |
|
Trial adjourned until tomorrow. The documents arrived at half one and "with the best will in the world, they can't be assimilated today." They'll resume at 10am.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 15:45 |
|
thehustler posted:Right but if, say, some emails come out which prove Morgan knew, then he would have been proved to have lied. Not really - he just didn't recall it when asked about it. Any half-decent lawyer would absolutely tear to shreds any prosecution that tried to push the issue. It's easy to prove someone was *told* about something, but absent a real smoking gun like Piers (or any of the defendants in the trial) saying in an email "Yes please hack the voicemails of these people immediately" then there's no way at all of proving that they understood that information, at least not to the extent that would require a prosecution. gently caress it, Morgan dedicated some journalism award for a story to Vodafone's security in a speech widely reported even at the time and even that's not enough to convict him.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 19:23 |
|
loving bollocks
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 20:54 |
|
Dan Evans' cross-examination starts this morning at 10. I'll post any of the interesting titbits for those who can't keep twitter open at work.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 10:19 |
|
Plavski posted:Dan Evans' cross-examination starts this morning at 10. I'll post any of the interesting titbits for those who can't keep twitter open at work. What ended up being in the new papers they recessed for yesterday?
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 10:52 |
|
Demiurge4 posted:What ended up being in the new papers they recessed for yesterday? I haven't seen anything about them yet. We'll probably find out during today's examination.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 10:55 |
|
When Coulson said "Brilliant!" when listening to the Miller tape, Evans was paraphrasing.quote:Robin Brant @robindbrant 35s quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 28s quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 1m quote:Dominic Casciani @BBCDomC 1m Plavski fucked around with this message at 11:21 on Jan 29, 2014 |
# ? Jan 29, 2014 11:15 |
|
Seems pretty desperate.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 11:31 |
|
quote:Jim Old @SkyFixerJim 13m quote:Dominic Casciani @BBCDomC 13m quote:Jim Old @SkyFixerJim 12m quote:Dominic Casciani @BBCDomC 10m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 9m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 4m quote:Jim Old @SkyFixerJim 2m quote:Robin Brant @robindbrant 1m Plavski fucked around with this message at 11:48 on Jan 29, 2014 |
# ? Jan 29, 2014 11:46 |
|
What's he referring to when he mentions the PM?
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 11:47 |
|
mfcrocker posted:What's he referring to when he mentions the PM? Operation Weeting and the huge pressures coming down from above. Here's a telegraph piece about his arrest in 2011: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...th-hacking.html Plavski fucked around with this message at 11:52 on Jan 29, 2014 |
# ? Jan 29, 2014 11:49 |
|
quote:Dominic Casciani @BBCDomC 2m quote:Jim Old @SkyFixerJim 1m quote:Robin Brant @robindbrant 1m quote:Fiona Hamilton @Fhamiltontimes 1m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 2m quote:lisa o'carroll @lisaocarroll 1m Plavski fucked around with this message at 12:33 on Jan 29, 2014 |
# ? Jan 29, 2014 11:58 |
|
quote:Robin Brant @robindbrant 1m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 2m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 2m quote:Fiona Hamilton @Fhamiltontimes 55s quote:Fiona Hamilton @Fhamiltontimes 3m Plavski fucked around with this message at 13:20 on Jan 29, 2014 |
# ? Jan 29, 2014 13:05 |
|
Accusing a notw journo of making 'sweeping generalisations'? Hmm.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 14:47 |
|
It's interesting to watch this. It's plain to everyone who wasn't born yesterday that NOTW was rife with this stuff, but proving it in a legal sense is another matter.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 14:52 |
|
Most of the examination today has been going over the circumstances of Evans' arrest, the statements he made and the attempts to get immunity. It's vital stuff, but not particularly explosive.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 15:04 |
|
Zephro posted:It's interesting to watch this. It's plain to everyone who wasn't born yesterday that NOTW was rife with this stuff, but proving it in a legal sense is another matter. That's the key here. Andy Coulson was either implicit or incompetent (neither of which reflect well on Cameron's choice to hire him.) He either knew and approved of the methods (likely) or didn't question where these magic stories came from which, as an editor, he kind of has to. At best, he intentionally made himself ignorant of any goings on, but one would have to go through such efforts to do so that you would have to know or suspect there was something you didn't want to know. Hopefully the evidence will be strong enough to seal it.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 15:12 |
|
quote:True Crime Inc @wensleyclarkson 27m Dan Evans' long past with drink and drugs - he 'self-medicated' to deal with the misery of working at the Sunday Mirror - is being raked over now. quote:Fiona Hamilton @Fhamiltontimes 42s quote:Jim Old @SkyFixerJim 1m
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 15:33 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 03:32 |
|
Dan Evans is tired and testy.quote:Andy Davies @adavies4 3m quote:Tom Symonds @tomsymonds 6m quote:Peter Jukes @peterjukes 4m quote:Andy Davies @adavies4 1m
|
# ? Jan 29, 2014 16:13 |