wesley snypes posted:

Emptyquoter posted:

quote:

Florida Man Poses as Santa and Bath Salts

Florida Man Poses as Busty Female Friend, Actually Picks Up Dominos Delivery Man Shoves Drugs Gave Him at IHOP; Demands NSA Phone Taped to Check Status of Chicken Statue Hitched To Be a Warrant, So He Could Steal Nikes, Says Privacy is Not Before Being Invaded Because Mean Neighbors With Pole Made Out at Neighbors Home, Removes Clothes, Starts Shouting 5,6,7,8

Florida Man On 75-Year-Old

(Part 1/3) Florida Man Caught Peeping Into Strangers Home Dressed As He Drives Through Tornado

Florida Man Smuggles 13 Bottles of Setting Himself To Stop

Florida Man Assaults Brother With Florida Man Says Privacy is Not Charge Him Abnormally Strong"

Florida Man Assaults Brother With Bag

Florida Man Arrested For Not Looking Enough Like Britney Spears

Florida Woman Who Wouldnt Bring Him In Crashed by Iron Man, Batman, Jimmy Hart, and Pees

Florida Man Accused Of Throwing Taco Bell Burrito At Son For Florida Man Caught on Kitchen Counter During Hour-Long Crime Spree

Florida Man Rode Stolen Meat Hidden in Front Of Woman Found With Blue Paint and Lobster Poisoned Him

Florida Man Tells Police Wife Has A Place To Steal Condoms And Kill Walmart While High On Deputys Golf Cart Shoots Co-Workers Mouth

Florida Man Squats In Dumpster Before Punching Police After Cops In Air While Babysitting 3-Year-Old

Florida Man Wants to Sell Jesus Christs Toenails on Pants

Luigi Thirty posted:

i fed the floridaman twitter account into a markov chain generator

Luigi Thirty posted:

i fed the floridaman twitter account into a markov chain generator

802.11weed posted:

Florida Man Arrested For Not Looking Enough Like Britney Spears

quote:

Florida Man Poses as Busty Female Friend, Actually Picks Up Dominos Delivery Man Shoves Drugs Gave Him at IHOP; Demands NSA Phone Taped to Check Status of Chicken Statue Hitched To Be a Warrant, So He Could Steal Nikes, Says Privacy is Not Before Being Invaded Because Mean Neighbors With Pole Made Out at Neighbors Home, Removes Clothes, Starts Shouting 5,6,7,8

Mr SuperAwesome posted:

i'm writing my own operating system inspired purely by theoretical physics

its pretty cool, hilariously math and metamath, programming and meta-programming heavy but i think its gonna own bones

Mr SuperAwesome posted:

baiscally the idea is i am a lazy programmer and a lazy physicist and i don't like working but i do like thinking.

apply this to programming and u lean towards best practices instead of doing a bunch of hacking - SOLID, GRASP, the unix philosophy
apply this to sysadmining and u lean towards full automation, ansible for all ur linux janitoring needs
apply this to webs and u just use pre-built frameworks

apply this to web apps and you get MVC

apply this to getting poo poo done and you get: buy a loving mac and iphone and ur life is easy

apply this to physics, and you get fundamental lazy but hard math like lagrangian mechanics (study of evolving systems - powerful because it only considers external constraints, state, and a set of rules), and also quantum mechanics (very fundamental, very powerful, also loving weird and hard to explain) - remember feynmann said if u can't explain something to a freshman undergraduate, we don't understand it yet, this is true

so ok you've got all this poo poo and you wanna build a physics thing in the cloud.

so u janitor up ur servers and poo poo and sperg the gently caress out with git and because you've done it all right it's really well documented, really nicely organised in separate chunks (different sets of things, buckets, repos, u get the idea), along with states (git hashes, hashes), or crypto functions (essentially using a one time pad of a certain state - whether its fartboners ur lazy password from when u signed up for some porn site or w/e or a full spergy SSH key thing, its just a complicated hash of a one time pad and given enough time you could rainbow tables it (hence salts and why we laff @ adobe and r scared by the nsa).

since uve gone to all this effort to get the stack and poo poo easily replaceable and scaffoldable, bootstrappble (scaffoldable: list of routines, boostrappable, quickly adding an extra config or setup or template thing) it seems a shame to waste it all on the physics

so start off with data "measurements" "observables" as input and other poo poo as output and steal a few things from functional programming (its math after all) - if you want something to be realiable as a data input function its gotta be able to handle malformed input, so a pro way of doing this is with a monad

then you've gotta try figure out how the underlying stuff all fits together. thats all just math functions basically. just lots and lots of equations. nothing but equations. loving hell that's boring its a good thing our friend stephen wolfram of wolfram mathematica fame (which saved my first year of my degree because i could just push butan get answer instead of doing a physics [it also explains it which helps]).... has written a book about "a new kind of science" using just number patterns.

seriously check out that book it owns bones and has some scary as gently caress pictures in - just generated from weird patterns of iterative sequences... and they do some interesting things.

sometimes these iterative patterns converge and do a thing, sometimes they go loving crazy, but most of the time they're pretty boring.... kinda like physics dont u think

F = ma, linear boring, rocks falling about, who gives a gently caress thats old news.

quantum mechanics and nanoscale poo poo howerer, thats cool as gently caress - gimme some fuckin 10 vars + consts shcroedinger equation to scare the poo poo out of me and generate cool results (neverwet, computers, etc)

but the ultimate _building blocks_ - which is what we look for as a programmer, after all, programs is legos on steroids - in math are much more fundamental which is basically what stephen woflram is hinting at.

equations modelling dynamic systems aren't ACTUALLY true to be honest. most of the time they are spherical cow approximations and in real life its gonna be weird because there something u haven't accounted for. but in the simplest case it'll still work as exepected.

but given that they're all made up of legos, and any physics thing is just a pretty thing made out of math latex shaped legos, then math must be building blocks too

so how about we write an object oriented math?

well this takes you down into the annals of ZFC set theory, godel's incompleteness theorem, hilbert's fundamental questions, manifolds, topology, complex analysis, blargh. its all loving hard poo poo. but the basic takeaway point is its all just one big matrix. its all just nested arrays, and each of things in arrays are a bitmask for a specific constant or variable in the equation. manifolds defines what the vars are, topology defines how they fit together, and the order of the algo for that situation (be it simple like adding, or complicated like doing a schroedinger state evolution thing. but either way it can be formulated in terms of operators, observables, measurement outcomes, projection spaces and poo poo like that.

but given it's all matrices and just a weird rear end arangement of them with some numbers, if u know the theory, u can generalise that to ur situation just like we've been going for the general lazy option before.

so how do we represent math objects? this is set theory. a thing is just a set of sets, each with stuff in them (or not). think like a binary tree with pointers. it doesn't matter what you actually point to or how big it is or what it does, jsut that it is.

also all our operators/equations/functionals/whatever are again just iterated steps. even x^n, ln n, e^n, sin(x), e^{ix}, different versions of similar poo poo (like E = 1/2 mv^2 and E = mc^2) but each is contextualised and without context of the state ur using it in (and what ur doing with it) it makes no loving sense other than just a pretty latex picture. there's continued fraction representations of most of these too, or other iterative approximations... see where we're going here?

so regardless of how complicated your equation, it's just iterated steps on an input - lambda calculus, sw8 this is easy

so we go back to the model idea, what input do we start with for our functions? well, numbers, sure butwhat types of numbers? well even numbers themselves are sets. the number {0} is the empty set which is the only thing required by axiomatic set theory other than the axiom of choice - think the choice like turing's instruction head on the halting tape machine
]
e: gently caress this is getting long i better post before i accidnetlaly cmd-q

ee: wc
52 1117 6350

lol

Mr SuperAwesome posted:

baiscally the idea is i am a lazy programmer and a lazy physicist and i don't like working but i do like thinking.

apply this to programming and u lean towards best practices instead of doing a bunch of hacking - SOLID, GRASP, the unix philosophy
apply this to sysadmining and u lean towards full automation, ansible for all ur linux janitoring needs
apply this to webs and u just use pre-built frameworks

apply this to web apps and you get MVC

apply this to getting poo poo done and you get: buy a loving mac and iphone and ur life is easy

apply this to physics, and you get fundamental lazy but hard math like lagrangian mechanics (study of evolving systems - powerful because it only considers external constraints, state, and a set of rules), and also quantum mechanics (very fundamental, very powerful, also loving weird and hard to explain) - remember feynmann said if u can't explain something to a freshman undergraduate, we don't understand it yet, this is true

so ok you've got all this poo poo and you wanna build a physics thing in the cloud.

so u janitor up ur servers and poo poo and sperg the gently caress out with git and because you've done it all right it's really well documented, really nicely organised in separate chunks (different sets of things, buckets, repos, u get the idea), along with states (git hashes, hashes), or crypto functions (essentially using a one time pad of a certain state - whether its fartboners ur lazy password from when u signed up for some porn site or w/e or a full spergy SSH key thing, its just a complicated hash of a one time pad and given enough time you could rainbow tables it (hence salts and why we laff @ adobe and r scared by the nsa).

since uve gone to all this effort to get the stack and poo poo easily replaceable and scaffoldable, bootstrappble (scaffoldable: list of routines, boostrappable, quickly adding an extra config or setup or template thing) it seems a shame to waste it all on the physics

so start off with data "measurements" "observables" as input and other poo poo as output and steal a few things from functional programming (its math after all) - if you want something to be realiable as a data input function its gotta be able to handle malformed input, so a pro way of doing this is with a monad

then you've gotta try figure out how the underlying stuff all fits together. thats all just math functions basically. just lots and lots of equations. nothing but equations. loving hell that's boring its a good thing our friend stephen wolfram of wolfram mathematica fame (which saved my first year of my degree because i could just push butan get answer instead of doing a physics [it also explains it which helps]).... has written a book about "a new kind of science" using just number patterns.

seriously check out that book it owns bones and has some scary as gently caress pictures in - just generated from weird patterns of iterative sequences... and they do some interesting things.

sometimes these iterative patterns converge and do a thing, sometimes they go loving crazy, but most of the time they're pretty boring.... kinda like physics dont u think

F = ma, linear boring, rocks falling about, who gives a gently caress thats old news.

quantum mechanics and nanoscale poo poo howerer, thats cool as gently caress - gimme some fuckin 10 vars + consts shcroedinger equation to scare the poo poo out of me and generate cool results (neverwet, computers, etc)

but the ultimate _building blocks_ - which is what we look for as a programmer, after all, programs is legos on steroids - in math are much more fundamental which is basically what stephen woflram is hinting at.

equations modelling dynamic systems aren't ACTUALLY true to be honest. most of the time they are spherical cow approximations and in real life its gonna be weird because there something u haven't accounted for. but in the simplest case it'll still work as exepected.

but given that they're all made up of legos, and any physics thing is just a pretty thing made out of math latex shaped legos, then math must be building blocks too

so how about we write an object oriented math?

well this takes you down into the annals of ZFC set theory, godel's incompleteness theorem, hilbert's fundamental questions, manifolds, topology, complex analysis, blargh. its all loving hard poo poo. but the basic takeaway point is its all just one big matrix. its all just nested arrays, and each of things in arrays are a bitmask for a specific constant or variable in the equation. manifolds defines what the vars are, topology defines how they fit together, and the order of the algo for that situation (be it simple like adding, or complicated like doing a schroedinger state evolution thing. but either way it can be formulated in terms of operators, observables, measurement outcomes, projection spaces and poo poo like that.

but given it's all matrices and just a weird rear end arangement of them with some numbers, if u know the theory, u can generalise that to ur situation just like we've been going for the general lazy option before.

so how do we represent math objects? this is set theory. a thing is just a set of sets, each with stuff in them (or not). think like a binary tree with pointers. it doesn't matter what you actually point to or how big it is or what it does, jsut that it is.

also all our operators/equations/functionals/whatever are again just iterated steps. even x^n, ln n, e^n, sin(x), e^{ix}, different versions of similar poo poo (like E = 1/2 mv^2 and E = mc^2) but each is contextualised and without context of the state ur using it in (and what ur doing with it) it makes no loving sense other than just a pretty latex picture. there's continued fraction representations of most of these too, or other iterative approximations... see where we're going here?

so regardless of how complicated your equation, it's just iterated steps on an input - lambda calculus, sw8 this is easy

so we go back to the model idea, what input do we start with for our functions? well, numbers, sure butwhat types of numbers? well even numbers themselves are sets. the number {0} is the empty set which is the only thing required by axiomatic set theory other than the axiom of choice - think the choice like turing's instruction head on the halting tape machine
]
e: gently caress this is getting long i better post before i accidnetlaly cmd-q

ee: wc
52 1117 6350

lol

wikipedia posted:

Srinivasa Ramanujan (22 December 1887 – 26 April 1920) was an Indian mathematician and autodidact who, with almost no formal training in pure mathematics, made extraordinary contributions to mathematical analysis, number theory, infinite series, and continued fractions.

Nelson MandEULA posted:

5ing this thread before it gets sent tot he goldmine

Mr SuperAwesome posted:

i think this is actually really simple. it's just a turing machine that takes 0, 1, ? as the symbols on the tape, the key is the ternary as opposed to binary view. the 0 and 1 represent truth, the ? represents inherent uncertainty, at a QM level this is H bar, otherwise its the uncertainty in your measurement. (systematic error + random)

so taking reality as the Model, View, Controller architecture

Views: of LINQ lambda functions of number theory, physical, real observables. these are a projection on the controllers percieved state of the "universe" space, given the context of the "self" mainspace

controller: simple turing machine, defined by operations on 0, 1, and ? (if it doesn't know what to do next it looks for a new instruction then halts)

model: its just numbers man, just number theory, functional programing of pure numbers starting with euler's formula

uncertainty is infinitely recursive as well, and this is important

this whole arch is all derived entirely from first principles, too

Mr SuperAwesome posted:

...and hed been figuring out that as long as you have a one time pad - which can be as simple as flipping a coin - you can have perfect information securty (without quantum encryption)...

Bloody posted:

otps are super secure

Bloody posted:

otps are super secure

Nelson MandEULA posted:

losethos 8.1 lookin' good

Mr SuperAwesome posted:

i did just come up with this all while yosposting stoned and reading wikipedia so it could all be complete trash, but i'm like 3 hours away from getting a mathematica from steroids together purely on metaprogrammng (it'll also be fast as gently caress because it's working with pure types - no floats needed, chars, literally everything is a pointer. this might be like c++ but i have no idea gently caress learning c++

it'll also self-compile i think and be parallel from the get go