|
Mordiceius posted:We've made it a nightly routine to read a little bit of a book together every night. We've gone through the Hobbit and we're working through Lord of the Rings. Then we plan on going on to Harry Potter, Hitchhikers Guide, and more. It's a way to just relax after long days. Fair enough. Didn't mean to sound judgemental, just not my cup of tea. Godspeed.
|
# ? May 6, 2014 00:40 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 18:02 |
|
I don't think its unusual. I have a friend who took The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings with his family to national state parks, and they would read passages in between hikes. His favorite place to read to his wife was near a secluded waterfall. If that's unusual or weird, then it's really sad most people think that way.
|
# ? May 6, 2014 20:27 |
|
Gimmedaroot posted:I don't think its unusual. I have a friend who took The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings with his family to national state parks, and they would read passages in between hikes. His favorite place to read to his wife was near a secluded waterfall. If that's unusual or weird, then it's really sad most people think that way. It's bloody admirable, if you ask me.
|
# ? May 6, 2014 21:50 |
|
I printed out the 'better nate than lever' joke once, spent about 25 minutes reading it to my wife, and she almost had an aneurysm by the time I got to the punchline
|
# ? May 7, 2014 07:26 |
|
Reading to each-other is a fun and creative activity and was the primary form of family entertainment before radio. Conservatives read the bible and liberals read Charles Dickens. It owns and more people should do it.
|
# ? May 7, 2014 10:32 |
Yes. Well. When I was a kid I forcibly inducted my younger brother into my Tolkien mania by reading LotR to him, usually against his will, because he wouldn't do it on his own. I swear, the kind of denial-borne willpower you can develop through refusing to admit to yourself what a horrible idea something is ought to be harvestable as some kind of resource. It's all that kept me powering through when confronted with poo poo like "Farmer Maggot" and "Praise them with great praise". E: he made some great drawings of what his imagination put together from it though. Treebeard wearing a t-shirt that said "INFAN TREE", hurling a palantir at Saruman's head and yelling HOOM HOM Frodo carrying a ring with a giant diamond in it, running away from a Nazgűl, dressed like MC Hammer in that shirt made of belts from that one Grammys or whatever it was and going "caint touch this" Data Graham fucked around with this message at 13:34 on May 7, 2014 |
|
# ? May 7, 2014 13:26 |
|
Every night I read to my wife the Last Rites, but she always wakes up in the morning.
|
# ? May 11, 2014 00:16 |
|
Just wondering if anyone narrates fantasy stories into their wives' vaginas as foreplay, a bit like the guy who plays clarinet into his wife's vagina in the book Middlesex.
|
# ? May 11, 2014 01:37 |
|
Now I'm thinking about the mechanics of that. Would you memorize the stories?
|
# ? May 11, 2014 04:31 |
|
Niche use for Google Glass.
|
# ? May 11, 2014 10:05 |
|
For her to read along? Because I'm pretty sure you'd be hard to hear.
|
# ? May 11, 2014 10:21 |
|
Some interesting piece with Viggo Mortensen criticizing Peter Jackson, CGI & the Hobbit movies starting with his experience working with him on LOTR: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/10826867/Viggo-Mortensen-interview-Peter-Jackson-sacrificed-subtlety-for-CGI.html quote:“Anybody who says they knew it was going to be the success it was, I don’t think it’s really true,” he says. “They didn’t have an inkling until they showed 20 minutes in Cannes, in May of 2001. They were in a lot of trouble, and Peter had spent a lot. Officially, he could say that he was finished in December 2000 – he’d shot all three films in the trilogy – but really the second and third ones were a mess. It was very sloppy – it just wasn’t done at all. It needed massive reshoots, which we did, year after year. But he would have never been given the extra money to do those if the first one hadn’t been a huge success. The second and third ones would have been straight to video.” The whole thing in the link is worth reading, actually.
|
# ? May 25, 2014 18:20 |
|
Ungoal posted:Some interesting piece with Viggo Mortensen criticizing Peter Jackson, CGI & the Hobbit movies starting with his experience working with him on LOTR: It is worth noting that Viggo has said that he wasn't happy with the article, and that they conveniently left out the parts where he speaks positively about Jackson and the movies.
|
# ? May 25, 2014 18:39 |
|
Oasx posted:It is worth noting that Viggo has said that he wasn't happy with the article, and that they conveniently left out the parts where he speaks positively about Jackson and the movies. Link?
|
# ? May 25, 2014 19:51 |
|
hepatizon posted:Link? It probably won't do you much good since it is in Danish. Viggo is going to star in a Danish movie, he was at the Cannes film festival, and a newspaper asked him about the article. http://politiken.dk/kultur/filmogtv/cannes/ECE2292248/viggo-mortensen-taler-dansk-for-foerste-gang---paa-film/
|
# ? May 25, 2014 20:03 |
|
Oasx posted:It is worth noting that Viggo has said that he wasn't happy with the article, and that they conveniently left out the parts where he speaks positively about Jackson and the movies. That doesn't change anything. He says he owes PJ his career, but doesn't deny any of the other stuff, only that he didn't mean to single out PJ.
|
# ? May 25, 2014 21:39 |
|
Oasx posted:It probably won't do you much good since it is in Danish. Viggo is going to star in a Danish movie, he was at the Cannes film festival, and a newspaper asked him about the article. There's this thing called Google Translate now: http://translate.google.com/transla...%26channel%3Dsb quote:"They tell only half the story. Yes, I think there were too many special effects in the Lord of the Rings films. But I criticized not only Peter Jackson. I also said that I always do, that I am very grateful that he took me to the movies. I owe Peter Jackson everything. If he had not given me the chance, I probably could not have made all the movies I've been in. And I would not be sitting here today, "said Viggo Mortensen Politiken. That quote doesn't say anything positive about the movies Viggo correctly criticized.
|
# ? May 26, 2014 00:15 |
|
Viggo Mortinsen is cool and right.
|
# ? May 26, 2014 00:27 |
|
It's actually pretty clear from listening to the special edition commentaries on the Extended Edition DVDs how much of Two Towers and ROTK were filmed as re-shoots. Probably upwards of 50%, particularly for ROTK. And wow, I can't believe that Cannes premiere was 14 years ago - it feels like only a couple of years ago that I was frantically ing theonering.net for news and maybe a garbled description!
|
# ? May 26, 2014 05:04 |
|
Shouldn't there be a trailer around now? What's the next big Warner Bros movie that it could be possibly released alongside? edit: Could be perfect in front of Into The Storm next month, because that movie also stars Richard Armitage. edit 2: Actually it'll probably be at Comic-Con this month. Hedrigall fucked around with this message at 11:20 on Jul 3, 2014 |
# ? Jul 3, 2014 11:10 |
|
I'd love to have seen the original second and third movies before the re-shoots. Still, I'm glad Viggo agrees that the first movie is the best for reasons better articulated than mine ever are.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2014 12:37 |
|
Hedrigall posted:edit 2: Actually it'll probably be at Comic-Con this month. Probably. PJ just posted on FB that he finished the teaser yesterday and it's waiting approval from WB.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2014 01:08 |
|
|
# ? Jul 23, 2014 20:36 |
|
The true hero of The Hobbit, Bard.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2014 21:18 |
Bard is actually the hobbit.
|
|
# ? Jul 23, 2014 21:48 |
|
Gotta say I'm getting a real big anticipation boner from that poster.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2014 22:54 |
|
I still think it ought to have been called 'There and Back Again'.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2014 23:16 |
|
Hedrigall posted:Gotta say I'm getting a real big anticipation boner from that poster.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2014 23:17 |
|
Octy posted:I still think it ought to have been called 'There and Back Again'. I thought it was called that. When did it change?
|
# ? Jul 23, 2014 23:37 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:I thought it was called that. When did it change? Sometime this year. Executive meddling, and maybe from Peter watching an incomplete cut and realizing that naming a movie after an event that takes up 50% of it's runtime might be a better idea than a cutesy reference to a book that by now he's barely taking any more than the general situations from.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2014 23:44 |
|
Man. I actually like these movies more than most people I run into, but the advertising is trying its hardest to make me want to hate them.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2014 23:46 |
|
I don't mind the new title. It was still one of the possible movie titles floating around well before the first Hobbit movie was released. Movie wise, "There and Back Again" just reminds me too much of the bookends of The Lord of the Rings movies (despite the phrase's origins). It feels like it summarizes an epilogue rather than the entirety of the third act of a story. I highly doubt the general tone of this final Hobbit movie will be warm and fuzzy anyway.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2014 00:06 |
|
I don't know why they changed it from Battle of Five Armies
|
# ? Jul 24, 2014 00:07 |
|
I haven't read the books, but I had a question about the the events of Desolation of Smaug. I know that Tauriel is a character made-up explicitly for the movie. So, in the books: 1) Does Kili still get poisoned? How does he get healed? 2) Does Legolas still go to Lake-town and if so, what is his motivation to go there?
|
# ? Jul 24, 2014 00:10 |
|
Crows Turn Off posted:I haven't read the books, but I had a question about the the events of Desolation of Smaug. I know that Tauriel is a character made-up explicitly for the movie. So, in the books: No, no
|
# ? Jul 24, 2014 00:11 |
|
Crows Turn Off posted:I haven't read the books, but I had a question about the the events of Desolation of Smaug. I know that Tauriel is a character made-up explicitly for the movie. So, in the books: Neither of those events happen in the book. Legolas isn't even in it.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2014 00:12 |
|
sassassin posted:No, no Bongo Bill posted:Neither of those events happen in the book. Legolas isn't even in it.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2014 00:13 |
|
This trilogy is less an adaptation of The Hobbit and more an adaptation of the appendices of The Lord of the Rings, one of which describes all the things that were happening elsewhere at the time of Bilbo's adventure that he didn't know about because he was busy being afraid and uncomfortable in a succession of caves.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2014 00:17 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:This trilogy is less an adaptation of The Hobbit and more an adaptation of the appendices of The Lord of the Rings, one of which describes all the things that were happening elsewhere at the time of Bilbo's adventure that he didn't know about because he was busy being afraid and uncomfortable in a succession of caves. A metaphor for Tolkien's latent homosexuality.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2014 01:51 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 18:02 |
|
It's an old trend - Back Camera Poster Trend
|
# ? Jul 24, 2014 05:55 |