|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 18:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 05:23 |
|
|
whos the yosposter who works for a hdd manufacturer? proton?
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 18:59
|
|
|
graph posted:iscsi and lol no they each cost about as much as a midrange luxury vehicle kinda curious exactly what this is, because fusion drives usually mean they have a dependance on OS X which is pretty much the only difference of hybrids at work our video suite has this huge array of regular HD's in a cabinet. sometimes renders happen over night, and i think it would be a huge benefit to think about something faster
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 19:03
|
|
|
LP0 ON FIRE posted:ah that's sweet. i'm also thinking about a mirrored raid configuration. it would be amazing to do that with two 4TB's sounds cool, is seagate better than they used to be?
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 19:04
|
|
|
LP0 ON FIRE posted:kinda curious exactly what this is dell equallogic (because lol@ netapp's prices)
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 19:04
|
|
|
Uncle at Nintendo posted:sounds cool, is seagate better than they used to be? i guess so, or maybe just for that particular HD because of the good average 4/5 star rating
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 19:12
|
|
|
LP0 ON FIRE posted:kinda curious exactly what this is, because fusion drives usually mean they have a dependance on OS X which is pretty much the only difference of hybrids unless you're rendering fast enough to be limited by storage speed (this usually only happens when dumping something to disk or doing a stream copy) something faster really wont help much i mean obv seek time or whatever might be a little better and you might get like 3-4 fps better but meh
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 19:13
|
|
|
besides the way fusion drives work i dont think files being rendered would end up on the ssd anyway?
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 19:15
|
|
|
graph posted:dell equallogic (because lol@ netapp's prices) those things is pretty hardcore. 82 TB gawdamn
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
hybrid drives in general are garbage. apples fusion drive is good because it has a lot of flash (minimum 128gb) , seagate drives have a miniscule amount of flash (8gb) so basically just perform like faster harddrives. other solutions are usually fundamentally broken.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:unless you're rendering fast enough to be limited by storage speed (this usually only happens when dumping something to disk or doing a stream copy) something faster really wont help much yeah you're probably right Beeftweeter posted:besides the way fusion drives work i dont think files being rendered would end up on the ssd anyway? well my guess that's not how they work anyway. the ssd kind of just works as a temporary place for faster read/write and everything eventually ends up on the hd
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 19:19
|
|
|
ya let me get a moving disk op
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 22:52
|
|
|
Perplx posted:that's a nice poverty 4tb you have there someone send me a couple of these.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 23:18
|
|
|
$210 nzd for one. hmmmerytheadder posted:ya let me get a moving disk op *spends 4 grand upgrading 4tbs of storage to ssd* *watches a movie and gets the same amount of buffer underflows* (none)
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 23:20
|
|
|
CISADMIN PRIVILEGE posted:someone send me a couple of these. i couldn't find a price online.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 23:24
|
|
|
load me up with your files
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 23:25
|
|
|
LP0 ON FIRE posted:those things is pretty hardcore. 82 TB gawdamn i go thru that in a day
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 23:28
|
|
|
u got a problem
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 23:39
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:*spends 4 grand upgrading 4tbs of storage to ssd* i have v little data stored tbh
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 23:40
|
|
|
your opinion of massive storage is a piece of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2014 23:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 00:00
|
|
|
I'm all about large hard drives (my penis)
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 00:01
|
|
|
PCI-E SSDs are the future and both SAS and SATA are lovely standards for SSDs
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 00:06
|
|
|
Locker Room Zubaz posted:PCI-E SSDs are the future and both SAS and SATA are lovely standards for SSDs im intrigued. go on
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 00:12
|
|
|
agreed sata is so slow
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 00:17
|
|
|
its ok
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 00:27
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:its ok i dunno echopenis i dunno =/
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
its easy jus get a better opinion
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 00:36
|
|
|
everyone's different and some of us just need bigger file storage, and we all have a right to that. but remember never to store files abusively
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 01:26
|
|
|
I find having media on hand is great for great times etx love me some impractical jokers and being able to slap up any episode right when erv is golden
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 02:14
|
|
|
So whats a good 'prosumer' NAS to fill up with these lil cuties?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 02:21
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:also seagate is garbage i had to stop buying them because they would literally all fail on me within like 4 months It's pronounced "Maxtor" Seriously, Seagate rocked until their Maxtor acquisition and then all their drives went to crap. Also, every Maxtor drive I ever bought (not just for me) died a horrible death within 4 years.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 02:21
|
|
|
Perplx posted:that's a nice poverty 4tb you have there sometimes i just like to go to the datacenter and stare into the crash cart for hours so people think im working
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 02:57
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 02:58
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:im intrigued. go on SATA is capped at 6gbps and the consortium that makes the spec is saying the next version will only be 12gbps, meanwhile SSDs are projected to be at 20gbps in the next few years. There is also a lot of underlying things in the SATA and SAS spec that were designed around spinning discs and slow down SSDs a lot. Intel said gently caress you to SATA and is making PCI-E drives that are crazy fast now. if you actually care heres a picture and an article  http://www.anandtech.com/show/8104/intel-ssd-dc-p3700-review-the-pcie-ssd-transition-begins-with-nvme
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 02:59
|
|
|
thanks bud! i care. i mean im interested. its interesting that i care and i care that i am interesting now that i know
echinopsis fucked around with this message at 03:06 on Jul 26, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 03:04
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:thanks bud! i care. i mean im interested. its interesting that i care and i care that i am interesting now that i know are you like, being sarcastic
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 03:07
|
|
|
is this one of those things where i have to play a *mwop mwop* sound so people know its a joke im never sarcastic
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 03:14
|
|
|
Locker Room Zubaz posted:SATA is capped at 6gbps and the consortium that makes the spec is saying the next version will only be 12gbps, meanwhile SSDs are projected to be at 20gbps in the next few years. There is also a lot of underlying things in the SATA and SAS spec that were designed around spinning discs and slow down SSDs a lot. Intel said gently caress you to SATA and is making PCI-E drives that are crazy fast now. that's cool thx also NoneMoreNegative posted:So whats a good 'prosumer' NAS to fill up with these lil cuties?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 04:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 05:23 |
|
|
pram posted:are you like, being sarcastic i thought the same even with the edited version
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2014 05:02
|
|