|
the only kind of testing that can actually be approached in a manageable way is unit testing. in order to achieve this, a unit test is so narrowly defined that it's useless. when i'm writing code, i want to test that my codes assumptions about the overall state of the program is correct. that's the unknown. i know what my code does, so why test it? what i want to be testing is how my code interacts with other code. well, guess what, that's impossible.
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 14:13 |
|
|
hmm. what if it was possible though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:12
|
|
|
Elder Postsman posted:hmm. what if it was possible though. it is its called QA
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:14
|
|
|
lol if your users are not your testers
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:14
|
|
|
mishaq posted:lol if your users are not your testers lol if your code doesnt test your users
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:17
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:lol if your code doesnt test your users
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:21
|
|
|
i dont write or test any code op i live a blessed existence
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:it is its called QA oh. that's what i do now. maybe i should know this stuff. idk.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:32
|
|
|
is ur code not passing wercker op
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:35
|
|
|
my bugs generally end up in two buckets, they either blow up immediately or are too subtle to be caught by any test.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:44
|
|
|
have you considered using strong typing
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 05:58
|
|
|
write a test, do a shot
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 07:03
|
|
|
lol if your not logging window.onerror to server
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 07:11
|
|
|
oh poo poo im a webdev 
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 07:12
|
|
|
testing is wonderful
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 07:46
|
|
|
lmao if youre not writing code to bubble exceptions into other peoples code so you dont have to bugfix anything
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 09:38
|
|
|
its not a bug unless the computer locks up entirely
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 12:54
|
|
|
code coverage numbers show that this 24+ hour test suite covers like 20% of everything, nice
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 13:31
|
|
|
Mr. Glass posted:have you considered using strong typing I hit the keys as hard as I can.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 13:38
|
|
|
i test all of my code, op, however i code for videogames, so its a pleasure
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2014 13:39
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:the only kind of testing that can actually be approached in a manageable way is unit testing. in order to achieve this, a unit test is so narrowly defined that it's useless. lol you're actually a retard, like in the most literal sense
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 12:17
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:my codes assumptions about the overall state of the program
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 12:31
|
|
|
how many mutable static fields you got there op
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 12:33
|
|
|
i was once involved in a project where somebody was obsessed with unit testing, but got it horribly wrong. according to them, unit testing was vital, but it meant that the entire project had to be based on mvc, because otherwise unit testing couldn't be done. all the code followed the mvc model, down to the lowest level it could. there wasn't just one model, one view, and one controller. every component of everything had a model, a view, and a controller, each in its own source file. imagine, if you will, a button on the screen. each component of that button and everything to do with that button had its own model, view, and controller. almost the worst poo poo that i have ever seen. i was asked to take a look at the code because i know a bit about flash/flex and they had performance problems. my professional opinion was: "lol"
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 13:34
|
|
|
testing is great, shut up and write tests for your code just don't be a dweeb about it, like talking about tdd, testing framework designs or some poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 13:34
|
|
|
all types of automated testing loving own
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 13:36
|
|
|
user acceptance testing it the only important testing because it's usually a trigger for payment.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 17:28
|
|
|
wish you would test your posts before puitting them into production
<a href="#" onClick="alert("lol");">lol</a>
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 17:29
|
|
|
also, stop being so loving precious, i hate reporting issues in testing when the dev is like a tortured artist about it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 17:29
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:wish you would test your posts before puitting them into production i throw my posts over the wall at you all and pray
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 17:30
|
|
|
other things i love: when the dev has interpreted the spec so literally it loops back around to being too obscure for the user to understand and actually use
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 17:32
|
|
|
Mr. Glass posted:have you considered using strong typing
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 17:46
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:I hit the keys as hard as I can.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 19:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 14:13 |
|
|
Mr. Glass posted:have you considered using strong typing i would but i like c++ too much
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2014 19:05
|
|