|
Giving away Genius secrets ITT
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 15:07 |
|
|
RIP Meinberg.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:26
|
|
|
It's okay, he's gone to a better place. The viewer's vista.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:28
|
|
|
poo poo is going down in the other thread btw.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:28
|
|
|
Btw I have a date on Friday so I need to die Tuesday or not be in the death match on Friday. Pass it along.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:29
|
|
|
Fast Luck since Nexal is dead will you be my new Genius love line?
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
I don't control that poo poo, talk to your fellow competitors.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
Fast Luck posted:Btw I have a date on Friday so I need to die Tuesday or not be in the death match on Friday. Pass it along. oh my god the same thing happened to me last friday, fast luck our love line is destined
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I don't control that poo poo, talk to your fellow competitors. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:31
|
|
|
Hey, hey, no alliance making while the thread is closed you nerds.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:31
|
|
|
Asiina make sure the viewers vista gets this I want to be on the Special Features section of Awful Genius Season 1 DVD
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:31
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Hey, hey, no alliance making while the thread is closed you nerds. Alliances =/= Love Lines
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:32
|
|
|
I am excited for tomorrow's game. I have no doubt you'll all break it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:34
|
|
|
Anyway, I here there's a mafia game in here. Let's kill Rarity the scum so she'll have more time to spend co-modding genius game.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:34
|
|
|
My quest for screen time is never ending.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:34
|
|
|
MMM why did you throw?
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:52
|
|
|
I wish this thread was more interesting so I didn't have to talk to the other thread all the time.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:56
|
|
|
The other thread is way better. Too bad I have to kill one of the Other Thread MVPs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 05:57
|
|
|
Aww, thanks MMM.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 06:06
|
|
|
Everyone cool is over there, so why didn't I get out there too
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 06:11
|
|
|
Magnus Gallant posted:I totally almost killed diqnol but something held me back Yeah, sorry for casing you on that. Pinterest Mom posted:Your argument requires Yes, and when Asiina brought up some of the same points I admitted that there were holes I hadn't considered.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 12:54
|
|
|
CapnAndy posted:Christ, do I actually have to defend myself, I thought that case was self-evidently silly It's kinda hard to accept a defense of ignorance in a 73 page (at the time of this post) game, even this one. Especially when the case was that you treated me and Poque differently, and the defense would suggest you had no idea of anything Poque was saying. Look at the Post Counts, Poque and I are first and second respectively; if you know anything about anyone in this game, it should probably be us two just from sheer volume. Puntification posted:The OP doesn't specify what sort of lynch we are using maybe majority at the deadline got poque lynched? (mods feel free to clarify this). If true poque flipped goon so she should be without any abilities no? I don't like anything about this post. Reseting the game is something scum would want to do, not town. Andy and Punt are both using the mature of the game to try and excuse Andy's actions, which is a blanket defense that could conceivably be used to excuse any action taken up until Saturday. I reject the idea that there isn't valuable information in the game up until the thread split, or that we should excuse prior play due to not paying attention. Lurking, maybe, but I'm pointing out something specific in Andy's post history.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 13:05
|
|
|
Fast Luck posted:i have a weird role that seemingly allows me to post in both threads. Did i touch a nerve with my lazy case on Pmach? Hey, why didn't I get a prize for writing Chapter 1? The PM said I got something good if I did it, something bad if I didn't. uranus posted:i dont trust vampoires. kill buyers Why wouldn't you vote me here?
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 13:10
|
|
|
Rarity posted:Remember the other half of my power is I hide the role of the person who was lynched. Poque's role flipped. Just role, or alignment as well? Rarity posted:Guys, why did you all leave as soon as I show up? Saturday night is drink-y time. Sunday is recovery.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 13:13
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I wish this thread was more interesting so I didn't have to talk to the other thread all the time.  Asiina posted:Anyway, I here there's a mafia game in here. I'd vote Rarity, but I feel Andy and Punt more. They're scummy in my eyes for actual content in their history, Rarity is scummy due to a lack of usual content, if that makes sense.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 13:26
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:It's kinda hard to accept a defense of ignorance in a 73 page (at the time of this post) game, even this one. Especially when the case was that you treated me and Poque differently, and the defense would suggest you had no idea of anything Poque was saying. Look at the Post Counts, Poque and I are first and second respectively; if you know anything about anyone in this game, it should probably be us two just from sheer volume. I want people to care about the game if "resetting" it could achieve that then it's worth suggesting it; I think merk's given up, ernie's AWOL, rarity's emoti-posting, capps says he's barely read the game, opop says he's got nothing, YPM says he has no clue what is happening, asiina is openly pining to be in the other thread... People are jumping on my suggestion because of the "scummy" implication but if there really is useful information in the 73 pages preceding us it doesn't seem like anyone's motivated enough to find it and I'd rather risk appearing scummy to make a change in a game that I feel is stalling than do nothing. The fact that people have jumped on it also runs against your point you're calling me scummy based on post-schism content. The defence of Andy is tangential to my opinion your case was weak, you point out two things and talk about what it "means" but you can't actually demonstrate your opinions as fact so it's pure speculation and it's de-contextualised from the facts that second time around people will have less patience for someone scum-claiming when the first person to do it actually flipped scum and when dealing with a smaller group size it's less intimidating to speak your mind/follow the thread. Also you talk about the sheer volume of posts as a reason to have been paying attention to poque, I think it could equally be a reason to have started ignoring his posts.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 14:14
|
|
|
Puntification posted:I want people to care about the game if "resetting" it could achieve that then it's worth suggesting it; I think merk's given up, ernie's AWOL, rarity's emoti-posting, capps says he's barely read the game, opop says he's got nothing, YPM says he has no clue what is happening, asiina is openly pining to be in the other thread... People are jumping on my suggestion because of the "scummy" implication but if there really is useful information in the 73 pages preceding us it doesn't seem like anyone's motivated enough to find it and I'd rather risk appearing scummy to make a change in a game that I feel is stalling than do nothing. The fact that people have jumped on it also runs against your point you're calling me scummy based on post-schism content. Started ignoring implies he wasn't at first, and Poque was literally scumclaiming and self-voting from the beginning. You're defending Andy by saying things are "facts" that aren't; the fact is that Andy ignored Poque's claiming and self-votes and immediately voted for me when I did the same thing. There's a difference in approach between those two things, and the reason behind it will always be speculative. Your reasons are speculative, my reasons are speculative, the point is to make the best interpretation you can and present that to the thread. I've done so, you're trying to undermine that by labeling my case speculation and the defense as totally factual. As for the first paragraph, I've read it twice and I literally don't know what you're trying to say at the end of it. It seems like you're saying you didn't really believe we should ignore the rest of the game, but made the suggestion to get the town moving. You made a similar statement when you pushed sos early in the game, that it was just to force content or change. I let the sos comment go because I could see that as a town move; I do not see how your suggestion is a town move, as it allows scum to excuse anything scummy they've done since the game started.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 14:27
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:As for the first paragraph, I've read it twice and I literally don't know what you're trying to say at the end of it. It seems like you're saying you didn't really believe we should ignore the rest of the game, but made the suggestion to get the town moving. You made a similar statement when you pushed sos early in the game, that it was just to force content or change. I let the sos comment go because I could see that as a town move; I do not see how your suggestion is a town move, as it allows scum to excuse anything scummy they've done since the game started. This thread has a lot of baggage and not a lot of useful content, if having a fresh start would motivate players to be active it was worth suggesting, but not only was it a suggestion, it was qualified as to not actually suggest I thought people had to ignore things they didn't want to. Byers2142 posted:Started ignoring implies he wasn't at first, and Poque was literally scumclaiming and self-voting from the beginning. You're defending Andy by saying things are "facts" that aren't; the fact is that Andy ignored Poque's claiming and self-votes and immediately voted for me when I did the same thing. There's a difference in approach between those two things, and the reason behind it will always be speculative. Your reasons are speculative, my reasons are speculative, the point is to make the best interpretation you can and present that to the thread. I've done so, you're trying to undermine that by labeling my case speculation and the defense as totally factual. That's a fair point, they are how I feel about the situations and so are factual from my perspective but it is misleading of me to have portrayed it that way. Andy's relative activity within the thread pre and post-schism does make me think that your argument is reaching for meaning on something that could be mere coincidence, to be clear I'm not actually calling him town I just don't find the argument convincing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 15:00
|
|
|
it would be cool to have a link in the op to the post where the other thread got split off.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 16:03
|
|
|
Can we please get a votecount? I don't even know if I can vote.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 16:12
|
|
|
I need a votecount posted from votefinder so I know that the mods had an opportunity to alter it if I can't vote.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 16:13
|
|
|
I get Punt's frustration at the lack of content and doing whatever he can to get people involved. He seems to be really against lurkers who are fine being lurkers, which annoys me too. You know that you aren't going to make the cutoff and apparently are okay with that? gently caress that. Why would scum care so much to try to get the thread moving when there is such apathy to coast off of? I don't really understand the case against Andy. He treated Poque and Byers scum claims differently is what I gather the crux of it is. Let me re-read Andy and see if I see it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 17:17
|
|
|
Hi MMM, doing fine. Catching up on all my threads since I woke up pretty late.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 17:21
|
|
|
hi, whats up. has anyone even read the other thread
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 17:30
|
|
|
I'm always excited (and nervous). This one I'm particularly excited for though since it was one of the ones I struggled with for a long time and I think it's in good shape now. They'll probably still break it, but that's alright. Also free time is for nerds. All the cool kids spend every evening playing internet forum games.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 17:31
|
|
|
uranus posted:hi, whats up. has anyone even read the other thread I'm reading the other thread. MMM is going to die by vig tomorrow for losing a death match and fv just made a pretty great case on yuming.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 17:32
|
|
|
sounds more interesting than this one
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 17:40
|
|
|
Okay I re-read Andy. It didn't take much because he posted almost nothing and what little he did post is both useless and infuriating. He did vote Poque right at the beginning of D1 CapnAndy posted:Let's find out? Then the only posts he makes between then and the thread splitting are posts saying he hasn't been reading the thread and has no intention to. CapnAndy posted:Jesus Christ I cannot keep up with over 200 new posts every time I check this thread CapnAndy posted:Are we at any point gonna play mafia I'm just checking CapnAndy posted:Okay I'm posting, has anything of value happened because I'm not reading all the bullshit I skipped, I was skipping it for a reason And having no issues with being modkilled CapnAndy posted:Have I really because that's cool if so, but I don't see a TT/Hurt post about it. And this bullshit post which makes me mad at him. Don't loving sign up if you aren't going to play. That is a lovely rear end thing to do and I wish you were modkilled for it and not allowed to play again. CapnAndy posted:Hey I was happy just lurking, I didn't make me post Then the thread gets split and he actually starts participating. CapnAndy posted:Okay this seems a bit more interesting! Let's play mafia At which point he votes for Byers and wants me to use my vig on Byers. CapnAndy posted:I don't really "get" this game, Byers are you really scumclaiming CapnAndy posted:##vote byers because he's scum? I guess? CapnAndy posted:Please shoot byers And that's pretty much it, other than calling Byer's case stupid. Let me put my thoughts in another post, this is gonna be long with all the quotes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 17:47
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:Asiina have you considered that PMach is scum? Pmach has not posted an actual thought this whole game, wow. ##vote pm
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 17:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 15:07 |
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Pmach has not posted an actual thought this whole game, wow. You might want to redo that vote, since right now it's for you. Asiina, I'm letting you finish your thoughts so that I'm not responding in error to where I think you're going.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2014 17:57
|
|