|
Ah yes pm I'm actually godfather you've CRACKED THE CODE
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 03:57 |
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Ah yes pm I'm actually godfather you've CRACKED THE CODE
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:29
|
|
|
Really though, I was making a joke based off of those two statements. Even if I'm scum and my scumbuddies all vote for Lamp the dude is in no danger of being lynched. Let me go over the day when I get home and I'll get back to you. ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:cpig claimed he rb'ed pmush n2 and pmush acknowledged that, nobody else seems to be able to account for any weird swappings that night soooooooooo
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
Lampsacus posted:So people are voting EP based on strong gut whereas op/me is more of a 50/50?
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
I'm literally voting myself All I'm doing is pointing out things that cannot be logically assumed at this point
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:33
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:I'm literally voting myself
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:35
|
|
|
gently caress it, fakeclaiming makes no sense ##vote Opop but happy to vote EP like I have for days now.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:39
|
|
|
To be clear, I'll gladly vote either Opop or EP, because I think at this point, they're both equally likely to have something screwy happen, but they're both also based on investigation results. Opop is just more directly.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:43
|
|
|
Crocker, did your results say TT targets Magnus, or was it only "Magnus"
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:43
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:To be clear, I'll gladly vote either Opop or EP, because I think at this point, they're both equally likely to have something screwy happen, but they're both also based on investigation results. Opop is just more directly. EP isn't based on results, it's based on a counterclaim. One of pig or EP must be scum, it is illogical to vote anyone else if you're gunning for scum
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:EP isn't based on results, it's based on a counterclaim. One of pig or EP must be scum, it is illogical to vote anyone else if you're gunning for scum
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Crocker, did your results say TT targets Magnus, or was it only "Magnus" Specifically mentioned that you targetted
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
Crocker is probably lying, bus driver don't do dat It's not illogical for me to vote myself considering I am a) not town and b) trying to show I am who I say I am
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:47
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Crocker is probably lying, bus driver don't do dat I thought we were pretty clear my result was hosed with on N1? Noone has said I was affected by bus driving
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:50
|
|
|
There is no role in the op that would do that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:52
|
|
|
Unless you were a watcher lol
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:53
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:There is no role in the op that would do that. As our jailor pointed out, framers affect trackers. You're not doing a very good job here.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:56
|
|
|
It says "guilty results" I don't buy that at all
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 00:59
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:It says "guilty results" Hey, that's what I thought too when our jailor said it, but here we are where they jailed you and I got a result of you targeting someone.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 01:05
|
|
|
mfcrocker posted:Hey, that's what I thought too when our jailor said it, but here we are where they jailed you and I got a result of you targeting someone. the difference is that you were lying to get someone lynched and the jailor was not
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 01:07
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:the difference is that you were lying to get someone lynched and the jailor was not Haha yeah there's a lot of sense in making up this elaborate lie to vote for someone who was -2 rather than just dropping a vote and keeping my mouth shut I've claimed tracker, noone has counterclaimed and me lying doesn't make any sense at all unless I'm really poo poo scum
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 01:14
|
|
|
mfcrocker posted:Haha yeah there's a lot of sense in making up this elaborate lie to vote for someone who was -2 rather than just dropping a vote and keeping my mouth shut people itt are calling me nuts and useless but guess what, if I'm scum I'm coasting to endgame good scum and poo poo scum are in how you manage the same moves
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 01:16
|
|
|
"Oh, boy, 15 posts, what ha- oh". I think next time I'm in a game with TTaste, I'll run an experiment and never read a single one of his posts, see what happens.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 01:18
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:"Oh, boy, 15 posts, what ha- oh". the way you read the rest of the game it probably wouldn't change anything
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 01:23
|
|
|
Ugh can we just lynch Opop and EP already
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 01:28
|
|
|
Currently I think that TT is some kind of neutral role we honestly don't need to worry about - his posting style has made it pretty clear that he's disconnected from the game. CPig has counter-claimed me, which I of course find inherently suspicious having claimed the same role previously. So far I've got these players, in order of most-lynchable to least-lynchable: 1. CPig 2. TT CPig claims night 2 that he was "completely ineffectual", shortly after PMush says she was roleblocked. I've already stated I roleblocked mfcrocker that night (although it was afterwards). His posting has been pretty lackluster all game but I assume he's doing it from his phone (look at those periods) or busy or some poo poo, so that's a non-issue. The only time he's really dug into somebody was with Magnus, though - but we appeared to be pretty much all in agreement at that point. I was suspicious of CPig the previous night but didn't have much to back it up at the time. PMush, I think you're either telling the truth and you're the bus driver, or it's (less) likely you're the Witch. However, you've not done a whole lot with your day phase - you mostly appear to be fighting with TT instead of doing anything particularly useful. Having you around as a bus driver is useful though; as we've not gotten any scum yet, even if you're just randomly swapping people you're getting more likely to nail scum (assuming scum don't do something ridiculous like target one of themselves on the off-chance you randomly select a scum). So: 1. CPig 2. PMush 3. TT Lampsacus seems to be coasting by on having claimed sheriff despite a wide variety of interesting posts! Lampsacus posted:##vote no lynch This is the exact same poo poo I've been slammed for previously. Similarly: Lampsacus posted:I don't understand agreeing that Mag is a town role AND voting to lynch them. This was after the reasons for lynching Magnus Gallant were pretty clearly stated. This is the same thing Teashed got lynched for (at least partially, in my opinion). Ras stated it more clearly than me with: Rascyc posted:I don't want these posts to vanish into the ether. There is something really wrong with this sequence. It goes from an over-explanation of strategies to "Is lynch all liars a thing on SA Mafia?" to "I misread Magnus" to "Lynch all liars". Also TT brought up the interesting gambit possibility, which I'm not sure if I buy but I'm definitely thinking about it. So now we stand at: 1. CPig 2. PMush / Lampsacus 3. TT I've already stated how I feel about Opop: 1. CPig 2. Opop 3. PMush / Lampsacus 4. TT mfcrocker's actions appear to contradict TT's, and I don't think TT has any real reason to lie about his role/his posting is a pretty clear tell for his role. He also claims to have used his night action on TT twice under belief that he was the jailor. Moreover, he states that TT interacted with Magnus that night, which doesn't mesh with the roles TT could feasibly be. So: 1. CPig 2. Opop 3. mfcrocker 4. PMush / Lampsacus 5. TT Finally Ras's posting doesn't have anything particular pointing out, other than disagreeing with me on CPig, which isn't really anything to build a case on. But still more likely to be scum than TT. So basically my list, after rereading the entire thread several times and confusing myself more than once is: 1. CPig 2. Opop 3. mfcrocker 4. PMush / Lampsacus 5. Ras 5. TT ##vote Capitalist Pig and I won't be changing that unless something compelling comes up. This is about all I can wring out with my limited experience. Feel free to ask me questions or call me a huge scumlord, whichever
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 03:52
|
|
|
Ahaahahahahaahhh So anyone not voting ep should be after that ridiculous post
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 04:46
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:Lampsacus seems to be coasting by on having claimed sheriff despite a wide variety of interesting posts! Epsilon Plus posted:Also TT brought up the interesting gambit possibility, which I'm not sure if I buy but I'm definitely thinking about it. I'd love to hear some more analysis of my interesting posts btw. EP the only reason I'm voting Opop and not you is that I have hard evidence Opop is evil. Once again, today guys, you either vote with me on Opop or you say I'm lying. We *need* to kill scum today right? So I need you guys to vote with me. I wish I had some supplementary evidence outside of my claim of the result. With the doc dead this is the last good I can do town. If you lynch EP today and he is scum, lynch Opop tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 05:25
|
|
|
I don't think either of you have been making bad posts
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 05:29
|
|
|
That is an admirable effort at a fake effort port. Bonus points for including four lumpen lists in one post.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:I don't think either of you have been making bad posts On the plus side, this looks like my first game where I'm not a vanilla town who posts so weird he gets himself lynched. So I guess we're just going to sit around and wait for the other players to vote in. Looks like it'll be EP or Opop. Worst case scenario (from my POV) we vote EP and he's scum. Actually, worse still: Opop and he's a 3p and its egg on my face.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 05:35
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:That is an admirable effort at a fake effort port. I sure wish I knew what that meant.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 06:06
|
|
|
Kill Op today, kill EP tomorrow
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 07:41
|
|
|
mfcrocker posted:Kill Op today, kill EP tomorrow
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 08:07
|
|
|
Jesus loving Christ, I'm so turned around right now I think I'm going to vote me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 13:06
|
|
|
mfcrocker posted:Kill Op today, kill EP tomorrow No please reverse this. Ep needs to go. He is 100% scum. Opop is likely scum, but not 100%
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 16:00
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:No please reverse this. If it's a choice between someone who has read scum all game (why is he still alive again?) or someone with a literal positive cop reading I'm going with the copper.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 16:13
|
|
|
Yeah but here's the thing, there could be framers and all kinds of fuckery. Ep is claiming my role so he is 100% undoubtedly scum. Opop could still not be due to actions.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 17:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 03:57 |
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Yeah but here's the thing, there could be framers and all kinds of fuckery. truth, voting anyone except ep or pig is bad and scummy
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2014 17:34
|
|