|
Gonna throw my vote on the ##vote Ixt pile primarily because I want to see if we can stop this from a No-lynch. But at the same time it seems like nobody is here.
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 09:19 |
|
|
Over a third of the game has fewer posts than the mod, there are 5 votes on people who can't be lynched, and I'm the voteleader in what is almost definitely going to be a no-cuddle. I'm considering self-voting and going off to play Valkyria Chronicles on steam just so we might actually have a cuddling.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:08
|
|
|
I'll claim right now, I'm VT. ##vote Ix If it's a no-lynch I'll see you dudes tomorrow. And I'll expect an apology from you Dr. Hurt because I apologized to you when you got lynched on a stupid merk case in our first game together and I lazily voted you.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:12
|
|
|
I'll apologize in case you actually get cuddled but I am 99 percent sure that it ain't gonna happen. Enjoy your game Ixt. I'm going to bed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:14
|
|
|
##vote Ixt I will check in periodically before deadline, but I doubt it'll matter. I still think Ecco is scum though.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:16
|
|
|
I am going to bed as well [/b]##vote ixt[/b]
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:22
|
|
|
##vote IXT
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:35
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I am going to bed as well [/b]##vote ixt[/b] If we end up no lynching at -1 because of this, I swear to god opop.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:37
|
|
|
##vote Ixt
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:38
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  Ixtlilton (9): merk, Somberbrero, Ernie., Puntification (2): EXAKT Science, Meinberg (2): Tremendous Taste, AtrociousToaster Ernie. (1): EccoRaven, The Science of Suck, fiery_valkyrie, bowmore, HiipFire (1): Puntification, Dugong, Poison Mushroom (1): AtrociousToaster, Poison Mushroom, EccoRaven (1): Asiina, Ernie., fiery_valkyrie, Opopanax (1): Mad Rancher Somberbrero (0): Puntification, Dr. Hurt (0): merk, EccoRaven, EXAKT Science (0): Puntification, Poison Mushroom, Motley (0): Dr. Hurt, AtrociousToaster (0): Puntification, Not Voting (4): HiipFire, Meinberg, Monathin, MotleyWith 22 alive, it's 12 votes to lynch. The current deadline is November 17th, 2014 at midnight EST -- that's in about 14 minutes. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:46
|
|
|
Hey Cpig will you count opop's misformatted vote?
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:48
|
|
|
I guess it doesn't matter either way now.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 05:58
|
|
|
November 17, 20XX, The Desert Zone of Monster Island A small tumbleweed rolls across the ground. There is nothing to stop it as it just rolls and rolls and rolls and rolls and rolls and... IT is at peace, happily rolling like nothing else would ever bother it. All this blank empty space, shoulda sent a poet but they just sent a single solitary tumbleweed. Yup  Seven monsters travel up to stop the volcano. What will happen will be discovered after night is done. Send CPig all your actions if you have them!
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 06:08
|
|
|
Just a reminder. Nights are open. Get those actions in.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 20:48
|
|
|
the game irl:  "b-b-b-but we can't scumhunt, it's all hopeless............" ^^^ u right now u big babbys
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 21:35
|
|
|
I started to write another Terrordon post but I got a text a family member passed. I dunno what my posting will be like this week but I'll keep up my commitment if you all have some patience. Despite telling people to just listen to merk, I don't want to vote Dr. Hurt. He might be scum but whatever. I'll vote JJ for being around near deadline but contributing a useless vote. I need to look at Ixtlilton again so I'm not sure yet on whether I'd continue to vote him. I will vote Ecco because I don't think he's being honest. EccoRaven posted:Ok jokevoting is now over. EccoRaven posted:The second quote you posted bothered me when I first read it, since I don't think anyone was actually arguing Met being a shitheel actually makes him scum in this game; it felt like Ixt was just browsing the thread very casually and wanted to appear helpful. I confess though that I am disinclined vote for him day 1 since he helped me out in a pinch back in September without complaining once. So, it's been reasonably established that Ecco doesn't want to vote Ixtlilton for meta reasons. That is fine. However, then Ecco starts talking about the strength of the case on Ixtlilton as to why he's not voting. That's a horribly constructed sentence, sorry. EccoRaven posted:Nah I'm ignoring Ixt because I don't find the case that persuasive, and I like my feeling on Ernie, and Ernie is in the lead, so, I have no reason to sabotage it. EccoRaven posted:I said it was an ok case but I was disinclined to vote for him because of the extra-game stuff. EccoRaven posted:
I'm sure Ecco is going to argue that he can dislike a case for multiple reasons. I'd bet he's going to argue that it doesn't really matter why he was reluctant to vote Ixlilton. I'd guess he's going to make some good arguments I can't preempt because I can't anticipate them. I don't really care either way, no offense intended towards Ecco but I do not have the gumption present to fight him through all of day two. Someone else can pick this up if they want, I think there's a lot of scummy content to be found if you can put yourself in an Ecco mindset. I noticed a few times that he was making very vague arguments, saying that something was bad without giving any reason as to why. That caught my attention as uncharacteristic behavior.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 21:47
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I started to write another Terrordon post but I got a text a family member passed. I dunno what my posting will be like this week but I'll keep up my commitment if you all have some patience.  Ernie. posted:i'll full-claim now because i am going to bed: i am a recharger, i get to recharge people's X-Shot abilities by 1 every time i target them
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 22:06
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I will vote Ecco because I don't think he's being honest. I was being very honest the entire time. Merk came out with an Ixt case. I said it was ok, but I was disinclined to vote for him for meta reasons. The Ernie stuff happened, I liked it, and I voted for it. Other people said I should vote for Ixt instead, but I said "it wasn't that persuasive," as in, "it's not so good that it's enough to get me off Ernie." That's the Ecco Mindset: I didn't really want to vote for Ixt both because of meta reasons, but also because it wasn't as good, to me, as the Ernie case. I think you're conflating the initial meta reasons as still being primarily why I was reluctant to vote for Ixt, and I think that's a misreading of my posts. Additionally, I question to what extent the things you've listed are scummy. What benefit would I have, as scum, from not voting for Ixt early day 1, unless I suspect he is actually scum with me and I was trying to protect him? But how could anyone figure out in the first few posts of Day 1 who was scummy and who wasn't? And it certainly doesn't jive well with my later vote on Ixt, making him unambiguously the only reasonable vote candidate. I just don't think this is a good post, Somber; I think it's a lot of words to trump up a whole lot of nothing. Sorry about your loss.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 00:47
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:It's not a 100% solid case, it's maybe a B- Day 1 case, and honestly I'm willing to table it to later (especially if Meinberg actually does get an extra daykill). EccoRaven posted:But how could anyone figure out in the first few posts of Day 1 who was scummy and who wasn't? I don't know Ecco, how did you come up with your solid B- case on Ernie based on his first couple of posts?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 01:36
|
|
|
I have two confessions to make. First, I have barely been reading the thread, because of complicated real life bullshit that have got me avoiding anything too complex or straining. (This is also why I haven't updated my games yet.) So, I skimmed, and I'm going on gut reads, because that's all I've got. Second, I already put in my night action. I said I can punch monsters, and I told the truth. I punched Ernie.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 01:41
|
|
|
Why Mush?? Now Ernie won't be able to let Meinberg be our gun of justice!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 01:49
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:I have two confessions to make. Why choose Ernie?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 01:50
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Why choose Ernie? 1. Because his lovely non-case (which was one of the few things I did take the time to read) about everyone acting scummy is incredibly bad, and I don't know town Ernie to mishandle variant games that badly. That seems more like a Somberbrero thing to do. 2. Because me vigging him because I think he was scummy is internally consistent with his lovely non-case, and I am a sucker for dramatic irony.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 01:57
|
|
|
Hell, it's not even a non-case. It's an anti-case. Or a dumb gambit. I dunno. Whatever it is, it's stupid.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 01:57
|
|
|
So you didn't believe his claim/thought he could be scum with that power anyway?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 02:00
|
|
|
It's plausible, but it could be a scum ability, or a fake claim. I don't put much stock into unproven claims. Like, ever.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 02:02
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:It will take 7 Monsters/Robots to stop the volcano from erupting! CapitalistPig posted:Seven monsters travel up to stop the volcano. What will happen will be discovered after night is done. Send CPig all your actions if you have them! Should we take this to mean that all 7 of those who went are monsters or was that just an unintentional classifying of everyone as a monster? Poison Mushroom posted:Second, I already put in my night action. I said I can punch monsters, and I told the truth. Does your power specifically say you can only punch monsters? I can do something that specifically involves robots, which is why I asked about his flavor. Recharger sounds like a role a robot would have in my opinion. idunno maybe I'm putting too much importance into this flavor stuff.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 02:37
|
|
|
AtrociousToaster posted:Should we take this to mean that all 7 of those who went are monsters or was that just an unintentional classifying of everyone as a monster? In this case "monster" was used as a generic term for all giant things - there may have been some robots or giant people included as well. Or maybe they were all monsters? Who can tell?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 02:50
|
|
|
Alright, that's what I figured, just wanted to confirm.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 02:54
|
|
|
I'm a robot!
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 03:02
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I'm a robot! We know you are, but we are talking about flavour in this game. Thank you folks, I'll be here all week.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 03:30
|
|
|
Beep boop
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 03:37
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Beep boop boop beep boop boop beep 
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 03:42
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:I don't know Ecco, how did you come up with your solid B- case on Ernie based on his first couple of posts? A few things wrong with this post. 1) When I made the post criticizing the Ixt case, it was still the first day of Day 1. When I made the post commenting on my Ernie case, it was the last day of Day 1. Comparing the two isn't particularly fair, since with the former, very little had actually been said, while in the latter, an entire day's discussion had happened. 2) I said my case on Ernie was a B-, meaning, I wasn't super confident in it, but it wasn't terrible. It's a B-. If you get a B- in a class you kick yourself for not studying harder or whatever and you move on, it's not good, but it's not the end of the world. Which when taken together leads to: 3) Somber is arguing, albeit indirectly, that I as scum must have believed Ixt was also scum (otherwise, why would it be scummy of me to be reluctant to vote for Ixt? He said it was a sign of dishonesty, that is, that I didn't want to vote Ixt because of dubious intentions). But in order for him to make that argument, he has to believe that I, in the first posts of Day 1 (not before an entire day's discussion had occurred), believed Ixt to be a scumbuddy, and therefore felt like I had to protect him. That kind of confidence means I would have had an A reading on Ixt - that feeling when you go into the exam and the only question is something you studied and know like the back of your hand. I hope you see now that you are a little mistaken by what actually happened! I suggest in the future you withhold snarky one-liners until you make absolutely sure you have a good grasp of what people are saying. I say this as your friend, since I'm so friendly!
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 03:46
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:Words Yawn, try harder. Oh no, was I snarky again? Sorry friend!!!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 04:22
|
|
|
Be nice, f_v. Also, I liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive. The cow's out of the bag, and evil will be udderly destroyed and rent apart in my four stomachs of doooooooooooooom.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 04:23
|
|
|
Ixtlilton posted:Be nice, f_v. Also, I liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive. The cow's out of the bag, and evil will be udderly destroyed and rent apart in my four stomachs of doooooooooooooom. Fine, but only since you asked Ixt. Nice puns, btw
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 04:50
|
|
|
PETA Replaces MOTLEY
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 05:09
|
|
|
Daddy's home.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 05:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 09:19 |
|
|
Hi Peta
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 05:13
|
|