|
omgomgomg posted:Yeah but, why didn't they ever invest in anyone as much as taker? Because nobody has the talent of Mark Calaway to make the character work. If any other wrestler had been given that gimmick, it would have faded away as the other cartoon villain fodder of the time. Bray may be the spiritual successor of Taker, but he will never have the same aura because his character started as a human.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 14:06 |
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2024 09:24 |
|
Charles Gnarwin posted:Because nobody has the talent of Mark Calaway to make the character work. If any other wrestler had been given that gimmick, it would have faded away as the other cartoon villain fodder of the time. Taker talked about this in an interview once, but apparently "The Undertaker" was a character Vince wanted to do for a long time, since he was a fan of westerns. But Vince was so fond of the idea, he wasn't going to give it to just anyone. He wanted to find the right person to play it, so he waited and waited until he finally saw Mean Mark Callous. Also, Taker was originally supposed to wear a stove pipe hat like undertakers in westerns wore, but since Callous is already almost seven feet, he couldn't get through the entrance ways without ducking, so they quickly switched to the rounded hat he was famous for before his debut.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 14:24 |
|
Mordecai was another undertaker type character
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 15:29 |
|
Did Taker have any more heel runs after his "Mah Yard" phase? I can't imagine any fans were interested in booing him once he went back to being the Deadman but my 2004-13 watching was sporadic at best
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 15:35 |
|
Nah
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 15:52 |
|
Who is the best WCW/WWF-era wrestler to never be heavyweight champion? Ricky Steamboat?
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 18:57 |
|
Blast Fantasto posted:Who is the best WCW/WWF-era wrestler to never be heavyweight champion? Ricky Steamboat? Steamboat was definitely the heavyweight champion at some point in his feud with Flair.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:00 |
|
Steamboat won it at Chi-Town Rumble. His one solitary NWA World Heavyweight title reign. I might be biased but my pick is Scott Hall.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:04 |
|
Blast Fantasto posted:Who is the best WCW/WWF-era wrestler to never be heavyweight champion? Ricky Steamboat? Dean Malenko, Jake Roberts, Scott Hall, William Regal
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:04 |
|
Jake Roberts.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:04 |
|
Goldust
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:06 |
|
How could I have forgotten him?!
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:12 |
|
Dibiase
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:13 |
|
Junkyard Dog and Greg Valentine as well
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:14 |
|
Aside from the piledriver, what are some other banned moves in the WWE? I was going to ask for reasons, but they'd all end up being just "too dangerous" so never mind that.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:32 |
|
Hennig if you're only counting the WWF/WCW titles
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:34 |
|
OldTennisCourt posted:Aside from the piledriver, what are some other banned moves in the WWE? I was going to ask for reasons, but they'd all end up being just "too dangerous" so never mind that. I think brainbusters and some variations of a powerbomb are banned.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:46 |
|
Probably most moves where the guy taking it has no way to protect himself. Like the Vertebreaker/Copkilla.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:50 |
|
Helms's Vertebreaker too. Basically straight head drops that aren't tombstones, as a rule.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:50 |
|
Is there a reason why the tombstone was exempt from the piledriver ban? I'm not as adept at spotting moves as most as I'm just getting back into wrestling so is it just because Taker's a really trustworthy dude or is the tombstone different enough?
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:52 |
|
OldTennisCourt posted:Is there a reason why the tombstone was exempt from the piledriver ban? I'm not as adept at spotting moves as most as I'm just getting back into wrestling so is it just because Taker's a really trustworthy dude or is the tombstone different enough? Nobody does it except Taker and Kane because they're both enormous and strong enough to do it consistently without dropping anyone. Kane holds guys 6 inches off the mat but they're good at hiding it with the camera angle.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:53 |
|
OldTennisCourt posted:Is there a reason why the tombstone was exempt from the piledriver ban? I'm not as adept at spotting moves as most as I'm just getting back into wrestling so is it just because Taker's a really trustworthy dude or is the tombstone different enough? It's because Taker is super trustworthy. Also, he's so good at the tombstone that it's basically impossible for him to hurt you
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:53 |
|
OldTennisCourt posted:Is there a reason why the tombstone was exempt from the piledriver ban? I'm not as adept at spotting moves as most as I'm just getting back into wrestling so is it just because Taker's a really trustworthy dude or is the tombstone different enough? The way Taker (and Kane) do the tombstone they basically just drives the guys head into their thighs. There's always a pretty good clearance between head and mat. They still need some pretty good strength to keep them safe while doing that, but that's why they're allowed to do it.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:54 |
|
Smoking Crow posted:It's because Taker is super trustworthy. Also, he's so good at the tombstone that it's basically impossible for him to hurt you Tell that to the Hulkster brother! Taker almost ended his career he was so reckless
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:56 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Nobody does it except Taker and Kane because they're both enormous and strong enough to do it consistently without dropping anyone. Kane holds guys 6 inches off the mat but they're good at hiding it with the camera angle. Tell that to Hogan exit: goddamnit
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:58 |
|
I figure if they let you do a move on Linda onto steel steps, they probably trust you to do that move implicitly, which is why Kane has Tombstone rights.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 19:58 |
|
Hey, it's not his fault Hogan has 24 inch pythons, brother
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 20:10 |
|
I haven't been keeping up with WWE; has Orton used the Punt Kick again?
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 20:29 |
|
Smoking Crow posted:It's because Taker is super trustworthy. Also, he's so good at the tombstone that it's basically impossible for him to hurt you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwHgqQYlGWQ Except for this first guy . . .
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 20:31 |
|
Halloween Jack posted:I haven't been keeping up with WWE; has Orton used the Punt Kick again? He's teased it a lot more this year but hasn't connected it in a while.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 20:33 |
|
Halloween Jack posted:I haven't been keeping up with WWE; has Orton used the Punt Kick again? That one was banned I think in 09 after Randy nearly punted Vince's head off.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 21:34 |
|
Halloween Jack posted:I haven't been keeping up with WWE; has Orton used the Punt Kick again? He punted Big Show at last year's Survivor Series. It's way more rare though.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 21:39 |
|
bradzilla posted:That one was banned I think in 09 after Randy nearly punted Vince's head off. And Vince was still happy with the segment, even if he did get concussed.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 21:46 |
|
Smoking Crow posted:Greg Valentine Please dont troll
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 22:00 |
|
I think the crucifix powerbomb / Razor's Edge is banned too, right? That's why Sheamus randomly stopped doing it.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 22:37 |
|
Piper never won either heavyweight belt either.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 23:19 |
|
I don't think they do running powerbombs much anymore either.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 23:21 |
|
Also the front suplex whip is banned by most wrestling companies because it's one of if not the most dangerous moves you can do. Basically you stand front to front with the other guy, do a double arm lift and throw them over your head backwards. If you do it right they land in a sort of somersault position and take the hit on their upper back, if you do it wrong they land on their shoulders/neck and shatter their spine. It's a loving awesome looking move but very few people can pull it off. Gangrel did a modified tiger suplex sometimes, but the tiger is basically a safer version of the whip since the whip requires you to throw the other guy and the toss is where you get that career ending botch.
El Estrago Bonito fucked around with this message at 23:37 on Nov 21, 2014 |
# ? Nov 21, 2014 23:34 |
|
Smoking Crow posted:Junkyard Dog and Greg Valentine as well This is the weirdest post ever posted.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 23:40 |
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2024 09:24 |
|
El Estrago Bonito posted:Also the front suplex whip is banned by most wrestling companies because it's one of if not the most dangerous moves you can do. Basically you stand front to front with the other guy, do a double arm lift and throw them over your head backwards. If you do it right they land in a sort of somersault position and take the hit on their upper back, if you do it wrong they land on their shoulders/neck and shatter their spine. It's a loving awesome looking move but very few people can pull it off. Gangrel did a modified tiger suplex sometimes, but the tiger is basically a safer version of the whip since the whip requires you to throw the other guy and the toss is where you get that career ending botch.
|
# ? Nov 21, 2014 23:42 |