|
Oh gently caress off about the rope. And nothing about the quality of the sink. Go on Katie, nail him.
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 15:56 |
|
|
Just when you're wondering "Can Dan go any lower?" he pulls out the heavy earth movers.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:49
|
|
|
Felipe is keeping Felipe's mouth shut.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:49
|
|
|
Was the other team's rope exactly 100cm? To the millimetre?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:50
|
|
|
Man oh man they are really banging on that skeleton
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:51
|
|
|
Steve2911 posted:Was the other team's rope exactly 100cm? To the millimetre? Yeah, that's loving bullshit, too Who rejects rope because it's too long? Really pissed for them - they should have won this. They did nothing wrong whatsoever IMHO.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:52
|
|
|
Suralan getting called out on his bullshit
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:52
|
|
|
hermand posted:Yeah, that's loving bullshit, too Who rejects rope because it's too long? Pretty much, first time I've actually been slightly annoyed at this stupid show.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:53
|
|
|
 Boardroom trolling
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
hermand posted:Yeah, that's loving bullshit, too Who rejects rope because it's too long? Very much this. Feels like crafty playing of the rules by the production team for drama.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
Please double firing!! That was mean to do to Katie 
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
Double firing??
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
Double? C'mon.....
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
Awwwwww
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:56
|
|
|
Woah. He got another chance.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:56
|
|
|
Whaaaaaaat?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:56
|
|
|
Felipe was going to go eventually, but this is insane circumstances. Sanjay needs to go loving now
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:56
|
|
|
What a crock of poo poo, seriously, wrong loving team in the board room.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:57
|
|
|
This is not the end of Felipe.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:57
|
|
|
This is the biggest load of poo poo since Alexa was fired because Syed was useless.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:58
|
|
|
Next time: Someone gets creamed  Tonight's conclusion: Right result for completely the wrong reasons.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:58
|
|
|
Lol do you guys seriously think that Skeleton was acceptable
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:59
|
|
|
Boycott Amstrad!
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 22:59
|
|
|
The Big Taff Man posted:Lol do you guys seriously think that Skeleton was acceptable It followed all the rules provided. Nowhere was it said that the skeleton had to be solid or assembled. Sugar got caught out, plain and simple
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:01
|
|
|
The Big Taff Man posted:Lol do you guys seriously think that Skeleton was acceptable It was a full height anatomical skeleton, as per the requested spec. How can it NOT be?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:01
|
|
|
I mean if you think about it both teams turned up with four complete full-sized anatomical skeletons.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:03
|
|
|
Vague spec leads to contractor taking the quickest, easiest and (above all) cheapest route. That's business!
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:03
|
|
|
180 meters high... No wonder he rejected it. Haha, that kit is suddenly out of stock on Amazon. Nettle Soup fucked around with this message at 23:06 on Dec 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:04
|
|
|
Devol_Tettran posted:Vague spec leads to contractor taking the quickest, easiest and (above all) cheapest route. Can tell that Sugar has been previously screwed in a legal battle by a lawyer in exactly that situation. Felipe's mistake was thinking too much about the wording of what was written down rather than how it would be taken.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:06
|
|
|
That old chestnut 'unwritten and uncommunicated client expectations'.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:08
|
|
|
I think the other thing, though, is that in real life you have a context which gives a clearer expectation. Order a non specific wall for your garden from a builder and you won't get Lego bricks because the wall has to meet other guidelines and spec beyond yours and the courts will back you. Phone around the shops asking for an undefined brick or block for an unspecified purpose and you'll get offered everything from Duplo to breeze blocks. None of them will be wrong because how they gently caress do they know it's for your garden?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:10
|
|
|
hermand posted:I think the other thing, though, is that in real life you have a context which gives a clearer expectation. Normally I would agree with this, but the items don't have any clear use. It doesn't matter what the skeleton is made of, as long as it fill the brief.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:13
|
|
|
He's saying on Twitter that there was another page that says 'fully assembled' that we never saw. I don't believe the charlatan.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:15
|
|
|
Professor Grumpy posted:Normally I would agree with this, but the items don't have any clear use. It doesn't matter what the skeleton is made of, as long as it fill the brief. I know - that was the point I was making. Without context all they had was the spec!
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:16
|
|
|
Felipe seems like an actual genuine nice person!
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:16
|
|
|
Suralan literally just said he would only accept a real skeleton.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:20
|
|
|
Thom12255 posted:Suralan literally just said he would only accept a real skeleton. Wait, you mean you're not made of cheap Chinese plastic?
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:24
|
|
|
Ones plastic, ones paper, neither are real skeletons. Between this one, and the other weeks 'whoever the hot-tub manufacturer likes the most wins' I think I am getting more annoyed at this series than any previous one. Suralan is getting more and more ridiculous. As he said on You're Fired, "his problem was he didn't do what I said." I thought that would be a good thing in a business partner. Rant over. I don't know who the favourite is this series, I think all bets are off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:28
|
|
|
"Anatomical" presumably means "anatomically correct" which a skeleton with flat bones and an angular skull isn't.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 15:56 |
|
|
Khablam posted:presumably No.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2014 23:30
|
|