|
That's a lot of words to say absolutely nothing.
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 05:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 05:18 |
|
|
it's okay, baby, i'll just put the tip in just the tip
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 05:27
|
|
|
AlbieQuirky posted:it's okay, baby, i'll just put the tip in oh poo poo my tip has fallen beneath the surface of the earthhhh
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
AlbieQuirky posted:it's okay, baby, i'll just put the tip in man i cant tell you how uncomfortable this phrase makes me feel i guess thats the point so gj
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:man i cant tell you how uncomfortable this phrase makes me feel i guess thats the point so gj https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xffrgR1o4xM JFairfax fucked around with this message at 05:46 on Jan 4, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 05:43
|
|
|
What about a trustless child custody protocol. (self.Bitcoin) submitted 5 minutes ago by BitcoinLibertarian I'm not currently a programmer. But, because of my recent, personal, experiences, I thought that the trustless proof of work system might provide some value in the legal world of child custody.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 06:26
|
|
|
surebet posted:What about a trustless child custody protocol. (self.Bitcoin) another child saved from a buttcoiner
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
surebet posted:What about a trustless child custody protocol. (self.Bitcoin) amazing it's like the old hemingway baby shoes story, it says so little and yet you know exactly what's happened
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
hnnngh i think thats it, my brain just broke
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 06:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 06:43
|
|
|
has anyone said pooppostcoin yet?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 06:44
|
|
|
Itchy_Craphole > Semen-Thrower
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 06:53
|
|
|
[–]WellsHunter 0 points 4 months ago The way the charts are looking, and the prices have been acting, I would say "Try to be a bit more patient". The prices are going to pop within the next few days here, and if you must exit, you should see a good opportunity within the next couple of months. Try to hold out another 90 days, and if you must exit, then so be it. I wouldn't be surprised if we saw bitcoin sitting north of $2500 within the next 90 days.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 07:11
|
|
|
personally I would be very surprised by that
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 07:22
|
|
|
JFairfax posted:personally I would be very surprised by that look at this looser that will be left behind when
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 07:24
|
|
|
/u/changetip 5 D0LL4R Edit: bisticles posted:has that guy posted HODL yet today? maybe that would help I dunno Has anyone said "this is gentlemen, it was knowning you" yet?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 07:33
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:Itchy_Craphole > Semen-Thrower a very high percentage of the posters on r/bitcoin have really, really sexually explicit names its all "the trolls will never make me feel sad" - marpetCuncher47 "when this goes to the MOON, i will be so rich" - grassonthefieldplayball3 "pssshhhh what does warren buffet know" - i_enjoy_eating_ass_gapes
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 07:33
|
|
|
Price drops make me happy (self.Bitcoin) submitted 18 hours ago * by Nooku I now realize the full potential of Bitcoin and I simply can't invest any more of the USDs I've got left. But there is one exception, and that's when the price drops. If it drops hard enough, it does makes it worthwhile again ( percentually ) to buy some more. That's why I really like seeing lower prices. It simply means that I can get more pieces of the technology I believe in. So please keep selling, my next buy-target is $200.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 07:49
|
|
|
[–]dellintelbitcoin 0 points 3 hours ago Would you really complain about cheap bitcoin? [–]diglig[S] 7 points 3 hours ago Of-course not. I never complained when I purchased at $950, then $800, $700, $600, $500, $300. So why would I complain at $200
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 07:53
|
|
|
JaysonAych posted:[–]dellintelbitcoin 0 points 3 hours ago
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 08:00
|
|
|
so I came to the conclusion that Bitcoin is only as valuable as its network and brand recognition, as any one wanting to get into cryptocurrency could start their own coin if the Bitcoin network proved to not be feasible. so how much would it cost to start your own network (with the same throughput as the current one)? if you take out mining as a network asset (knowing that most mining is just waste heat created to win block rewards and not actual transaction processing bandwidth), the Bitcoin node network consists of 6000 "servers" (many are just PCs that are shut off at night lol) each uploading about ten gigs a day. that's (generously) $5k of bandwidth per day. so if chase wanted to start their own crypto network for some dumb loving reason, it would require virtually no major investment, and even that could be shunted off if nodes collected some sort of transaction fee. so Bitcoin as a network has basically no fundamental value, not that that ever stopped bubbles before, but any competitor wanting to get skin in the coin game could displace the entire Bitcoin network overnight
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 08:21
|
|
|
seriouspost, if it drops under a hundred I'll buy one as a souvenir. bitcoin has given me so much laffs I feel like I have to give back. also if it reaches 2500 I WILL BE RICH hmm maybe I'll buy five. maybe I'll buy them now! to the Miata, I'm off to talk to a banker about a loan!
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 08:23
|
|
|
guys I lost everything 
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 08:24
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:so I came to the conclusion that Bitcoin is only as valuable as its network and brand recognition, as any one wanting to get into cryptocurrency could start their own coin if the Bitcoin network proved to not be feasible. so how much would it cost to start your own network (with the same throughput as the current one)? if you take out mining as a network asset (knowing that most mining is just waste heat created to win block rewards and not actual transaction processing bandwidth), the Bitcoin node network consists of 6000 "servers" (many are just PCs that are shut off at night lol) each uploading about ten gigs a day. that's (generously) $5k of bandwidth per day. so if chase wanted to start their own crypto network for some dumb loving reason, it would require virtually no major investment, and even that could be shunted off if nodes collected some sort of transaction fee. so Bitcoin as a network has basically no fundamental value, not that that ever stopped bubbles before, but any competitor wanting to get skin in the coin game could displace the entire Bitcoin network overnight i dont get your logic here. you could run a network with the same thoroughput as the current one off of a couple 4-year-old desktops but if the block reward ever got valuable then other people would start mining on it and then the same arms race would happen all over again. the point of the block reward is that it incentivizes people to contribute to the security of the network (because the cost to attack it is proportional to the amount of investment in it). so if chase starts chasecoin then other people will start mining chasecoins and depending on how valuable they are you could end up with the same amount of mining being done as with bitcoins
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 08:30
|
|
|
computer toucher posted:seriouspost, if it drops under a hundred I'll buy one as a souvenir. bitcoin has given me so much laffs I feel like I have to give back. computer toucher posted:guys I lost everything computer toucher's miata goes 1500 to 0 in 60 seconds 
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 08:44
|
|
|
oh poo poo I didn't consider that reducing hashing reduces network security. either way, the barriers to entry are low and financial institutions are in better position to provide financial services.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 08:45
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:oh poo poo I didn't consider 
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 08:57
|
|
|
that part isn't insurmountable, miners/nodes check the validity of a block before they pass it on, you could just have part of that check be "did it come from a whitelist of chase_ip_addresses.txt" which would make it as secure from an attack as the individual servers are and then you're just left with "but why would we bother?"
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 09:01
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:so I came to the conclusion that Bitcoin is only as valuable as its network and brand recognition, as any one wanting to get into cryptocurrency could start their own coin if the Bitcoin network proved to not be feasible. so how much would it cost to start your own network (with the same throughput as the current one)? if you take out mining as a network asset (knowing that most mining is just waste heat created to win block rewards and not actual transaction processing bandwidth), the Bitcoin node network consists of 6000 "servers" (many are just PCs that are shut off at night lol) each uploading about ten gigs a day. that's (generously) $5k of bandwidth per day. so if chase wanted to start their own crypto network for some dumb loving reason, it would require virtually no major investment, and even that could be shunted off if nodes collected some sort of transaction fee. so Bitcoin as a network has basically no fundamental value, not that that ever stopped bubbles before, but any competitor wanting to get skin in the coin game could displace the entire Bitcoin network overnight I think that you're forgetting ~~~BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY~~~ in your analysis
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 09:11
|
|
|
what if the blockchain would be on just one computer, but that computer would be super secure?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 09:41
|
|
|
computer toucher posted:what if the blockchain would be on just one computer, but that computer would be super secure?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 09:46
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:well, first you'd need to seal the ethernet port, Sham bam bamina! posted:well, first you'd need to seal the ethernet port, airgapped bitcoins.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 09:59
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:well, first you'd need to seal the ethernet port, But how will it run unprotected TeamViewer?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 10:13
|
|
|
Buttcoin purse posted:But how will it run unprotected TeamViewer? usb wifi dongle connected to an unsecured wireless router duh
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 10:26
|
|
|
wpa2 is like slavery for bits you know information wants to be free
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 10:28
|
|
|
Buttcoin purse posted:But how will it run unprotected TeamViewer? V E R Y C A R E F U L L Y !
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 11:18
|
|
|
surebet posted:
 i want to believe
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 11:19
|
|
|
go marinecoin
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 11:28
|
|
|
Why is that happening? (no not marinecoin)
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 11:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 05:18 |
|
|
people lowering their sell prices while other people forget they left their trading boys on to buy
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2015 11:41
|
|