|
killhamster posted:this is beautiful and should be on buttcoin
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 21:03 |
|
|
killhamster posted:this is beautiful and should be on buttcoin
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:13
|
|
|
hey, a fun thing from grey threadFellatio del Toro posted:A friend of mine bought into bitcoin early and made like $70k which was cool because it meant I could talk poo poo about bitcoin and his spending several thousand dollars on mining equipment and not feel bad. That is, until he deposited $50k into a bank account while unemployed and it all got seized by the feds and he found out he's being charged with money laundering
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:13
|
|
|
Sir DonkeyPunch posted:jesus christ, this is fantastic i think i understood most of the parable, but i didn't understand what the adult burgers were 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:14
|
|
|
killhamster posted:this is beautiful and should be on buttcoin done
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:14
|
|
|
prefect posted:i think i understood most of the parable, but i didn't understand what the adult burgers were pretty sure that's the .7/.8 split, handling larger burgers
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:15
|
|
|
prefect posted:i think i understood most of the parable, but i didn't understand what the adult burgers were i think that's the .7/.8 fork? you want the cooks to change what their doing and they refuse
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:16
|
|
|
bitstamp thief has been identified
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:19
|
|
|
quote:Neal Palmquist wrote:
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:21
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:pretty sure that's the .7/.8 split, handling larger burgers Boxturret posted:i think that's the .7/.8 fork? aha, thanks 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:22
|
|
|
yess the meteors are on the mobile version
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:22
|
|
|
Is this a bobs burger reference. Someone explain to the non shameful
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:26
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:Is this a bobs burger reference. Someone explain to the non shameful HOW brought up some stupid burger comparison to bitcoins rjmccall wrote how a burger restaurant would work if it worked like bitcoins the end
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:29
|
|
|
Using Intel CPU and Motherboard ? Your Bitcoins may be in actual danger. Today at 11:09:09 AM #1 This is probably one of these "Elephant in the room" topics. Everybody knows it, but nobody talks about it. Most of new Intel chipsets have a deliberately built-in backdoor that allows : Remote access to your machine even when computer is turned off (but plugged to power & network socket). Intel's AMT is actually active when computer's power button is OFF. Hiding code of some apps & malware from the running system using sophisticated DRM scheme Installing a rootkit / trojan that cannot be removed even if the disk, RAM memory and BIOS are all wiped out clean. Run signed JAVA code outside of CPU ! What's more: It works outside of the control of CPU, system and BIOS It's closed source (obviously) Intel doesn't want to say how it works Intel (so NSA & US govt too) has secret keys, using which they can totally control your machine with totally no way of you detecting it It cannot be turned completely OFF (there is a BIOS switch, but as proven - it does not work fully)
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:31
|
|
|
DAT NIGGA HOW posted:i'll believe bitcoin will die when you actually can't use the network any more. until then, the network functioning is all the proof i need to be convinced that bitcoin is here to stay "thing exists now, therefore thing will always exist."
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:34
|
|
|
Cnidaria posted:it seems like the ultimate downfall of bitcoin is not its obvious technical flaws or the fact that it isn't really a currency and is instead more of an ivestment but that energy is not infinite and free the technical flaws will kill it first, but they'll be doing buttcoin 2.0 or whatever to address those specific problems and then either the rampant deflationary cycles or the energy costs from doing unnecessary redundant hashing will kill that and then they'll fix one of those two and buttcoin 3.0 will be born and it will die from whatever other latent issues they chose to not address because the whole thing is designed and run by myopic nerds
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:41
|
|
|
LongDarkNight posted:bitstamp thief has been identified 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:44
|
|
|
its ok bitcoin is decentralised so it has no single point of failure and if someone does take control of the network its ok because the bitcoin devs will just change the protocol to ignore those people
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:45
|
|
|
MORE CURLY FRIES posted:its ok bitcoin is decentralised so it has no single point of failure this is literally what antonopoulus says in his talks and is also what he told the canadian govt
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:45
|
|
|
FCKGW posted:Remote access to your machine even when computer is turned off (but plugged to power & network socket). basic bitcoin security guide step 37: "seal the power & network sockets of your motherboard with epoxy"
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:47
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:the technical flaws will kill it first, but they'll be doing buttcoin 2.0 or whatever to address those specific problems and then either the rampant deflationary cycles or the energy costs from doing unnecessary redundant hashing will kill that and then they'll fix one of those two and buttcoin 3.0 will be born and it will die from whatever other latent issues they chose to not address because the whole thing is designed and run by myopic nerds basically the thing that will kill bitcoin is bitcoiners being involved.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:49
|
|
|
FCKGW posted:Using Intel CPU and Motherboard ? Your Bitcoins may be in actual danger. badbios, but with bitcoin!
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:49
|
|
|
LongDarkNight posted:bitstamp thief has been identified  
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:51
|
|
|
MORE CURLY FRIES posted:this is literally what antonopoulus says in his talks and is also what he told the canadian govt*  *Canadian senate, or our pointless-nepotism club. The distinction is important. It's not like our actual government was paying attention to butts. I don't think I could stay here if anton o'poop was addressing our House of Commons and Ministers, that would just be damning of the whole country right there.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 17:55
|
|
|
I'm so sick of idiots freaking out about tpm chips they own stick your private keys and dilz in them
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 18:05
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:the technical flaws will kill it first, but they'll be doing buttcoin 2.0 or whatever to address those specific problems and then either the rampant deflationary cycles or the energy costs from doing unnecessary redundant hashing will kill that and then they'll fix one of those two and buttcoin 3.0 will be born and it will die from whatever other latent issues they chose to not address because the whole thing is designed and run by myopic nerds yeah exactly, no matter what the details of the protocol, the fundamental economic planks of bitcoin (deflationary, no central bank) absolutely destroy it as a meaningful currency. the very, very best they can hope for is what they currently have - a commodity/service that is a
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 18:30
|
|
|
karpeles stole the stamp bucks to pay back the people he goxxed. a modern day robinhood, but with bitcoin
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 18:35
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:I'm so sick of idiots freaking out about tpm chips they own stick your private keys and dilz in them getting intel amt to work legit is a ton of work on its own but nope it already comes preconfigured perfectly to let the nsa take your bitcoins
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
sweet, a published author at last minor typo (from the original), "before figured out" should be "before we figured out", thanks
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 18:45
|
|
|
rjmccall posted:also, doesn't the ceiling seem lower? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
satoshi cooked alone
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:satoshi cooked alone GILRL
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
FCKGW posted:Using Intel CPU and Motherboard ? Your Bitcoins may be in actual danger. quote:but plugged
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 21:24
|
|
|
okay i'm going to pbf this until I hurt myself is the ceiling lower because they're standing on rejected hamburgers or because there's less market volume?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 21:30
|
|
|
Krinkle posted:okay i'm going to pbf this until I hurt myself is the ceiling lower because they're standing on rejected hamburgers or because there's less market volume? depends, are you pro skub or anti skub?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:I'm so sick of idiots freaking out about tpm chips they own stick your private keys and dilz in them It's not even a tpm, it's just lovely proprietary desktop-class IPMI. it's almost like the people freaking out about it know nothing about their computers
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 21:48
|
|
|
I guess they can always buy an i3 processor that doesn't support those features if they are so worried about it
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
no but the NSA! it's always on!
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 21:59
|
|
|
Krinkle posted:okay i'm going to pbf this until I hurt myself is the ceiling lower because they're standing on rejected hamburgers or because there's less market volume? it's strangely squishy, meaning meat patties, meaning they're standing on rejected burgers.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 21:03 |
|
|
McGlockenshire posted:it's almost like the people freaking out about it know nothing
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2015 22:13
|
|