|
Ron Paul Atreides posted:That article is interesting, Sarah makes it sound like the gov is deliberately side stepping how they managed to get DPR not because of any conspiracy bullshit but because it would be a huge tip to any future darkweb services about how law enforcement operates and attacks these problems. Which is a reasonable idea, that kind of stuff going public could let alot of illegal services cover the tracks they may not realize they are leaving right now. I just assumed it was blatantly illegal parallel construction
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 17:52 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 10:26 |
|
Ron Paul Atreides posted:That article is interesting, Sarah makes it sound like the gov is deliberately side stepping how they managed to get DPR not because of any conspiracy bullshit but because it would be a huge tip to any future darkweb services about how law enforcement operates and attacks these problems. Which is a reasonable idea, that kind of stuff going public could let alot of illegal services cover the tracks they may not realize they are leaving right now. i think the fbi explicitly said that what they were doing when they did that big pedo sweep a few months ago
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:19 |
|
sarah and other reporters keep linking to an article claiming that the captcha thing is bullshit. was that article's opinion ever confirmed by other security people
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:21 |
|
ruby idiot railed posted:well depends, the "no loving way that config leaked the IP" crowd was actually wrong, the config syntax and requirements are subtly different than DPR/their assumptions oh ok that's what i thought
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:22 |
|
if you've got a source on that go ahead and send it to @sarahjeong, she seems pretty receptive on twitter and it'd be nice to see journalists acknowledge it
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:23 |
|
As a Millennial I posted:if you've got a source on that go ahead and send it to @sarahjeong, she seems pretty receptive on twitter and it'd be nice to see journalists acknowledge it we could probably just post it here and she'd see it
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:24 |
|
ryde posted:Probably. His tag saying "owned by 3 mini humans" probably means that he's a parent in non-sperg language. he's definitely got some sperg going on, but i don't think he's a villain
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:25 |
|
pseudorandom name posted:I just assumed it was blatantly illegal parallel construction buttcoin covered previous times the IP address was revealed despite what tech reporters say "view, source" is not illegal hacking
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:26 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:buttcoin covered previous times the IP address was revealed yeah, you have to modify a url parameter before you get convicted for hacking
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:33 |
|
vOv posted:yeah, you have to modify a url parameter before you get convicted for hacking local felon discovers one weird trick to beat a rap, the federal district court of new jersey hates him!
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:38 |
|
weev is a literal american hero
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 18:42 |
|
also a literal nazi
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 19:01 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:edward snowden is a literal american hero ftfy weev is a white trash racist fucker
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 19:02 |
|
weev went to prison for some really heinous bullshit. it was a show trial in a kangaroo court but weev is also a terrible human being. i'm not gonna say he deserves to be in prison, but i am gonna say that the rest of the world is probably a happier place without him in it
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 19:07 |
|
pseudorandom name posted:I just assumed it was blatantly illegal parallel construction parallel construction is the only move in the fed's playbook source: /r/darknetmarkets, /r/onions
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 19:07 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:weev went to prison for some really heinous bullshit. it was a show trial in a kangaroo court isn't he out now?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 19:13 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:weev went to prison for some really heinous bullshit. it was a show trial in a kangaroo court yeah, just because someone has lovely opinions doesn't mean they should be in prison
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 19:19 |
|
Cold on a Cob posted:isn't he out now? yes. the USAs in all the logical jurisdictions turned down the case, the USA that pursued it was a completely illogical jurisdiction and the appeals court said the conviction invalid because of that i guess trial courts don't like saying that they don't have jurisdiction?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 19:24 |
|
text editor posted:parallel construction is the only move in the fed's playbook This but unironically, government surveillance is the only actual threat to freedom in the west.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 19:27 |
|
MORE CURLY FRIES posted:i think he hops across from point to point in his head but can only keep one point in his head at a time this has to be it because his statement makes sense in that context 'bitcoin is completely anonymous' because senders don't need auth verification or anything to send and can trivially make new addresses 'most donations go to he just doesn't actually ever put the puzzle pieces together and realize how easy it is for people to track the coins themselves or how retarded he sounds computer toucher posted:$ sftp -P 22 ross@frostylaptop.silkroad.org
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 20:08 |
|
well, if your audience is always people who agree with you, do you really need to worry about the strength of your arguments? friendly reminder that he said he'd never debate Paul Krugman or anyone else he perceives as anti Bitcoin.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 20:38 |
|
TVarmy posted:anti Bitcoin. http://www.reddit.com/r/AntiBitcoinWatch/
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 20:55 |
|
lol this owns
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 21:11 |
|
Summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbxaJqfAI6g
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 21:16 |
|
5
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 21:17 |
|
from the wall of text a few pages backSynthOrange posted:in the time that now we've had to do this and talk to Mr.Ant no louse about it and others, that there's no indication that it's actually 700,000 bitcoins, that it could be many of the same bitcoins going back and forth. Mr.Ant no louse
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 21:36 |
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2ungby/fuck_i_just_got_scammed/ gently caress, I just got scammed. (self.Bitcoin) отправлено 4 hours ago, изменено * автор JohnSpivey I received an email from what I thought was Coinbase letting me know that there is a new Service Agreement. I followed the link, which took me to Coinbase. I had a verification code texted to my phone and I logged in. Upon logging in, it said that ALL of my bitcoin had been transferred to a new wallet that I didn't recognize. Am I totally hosed? This is the wallet address that it was sent to: 132Hzc6ZSwGGzoKYjMNfD8i4kQL2v2Gena After I realized I had been scammed, I went back to my email to check that email that I clicked through to and it was sent from this link. posteconferma894470@postel.it This was REALLY stupid of me as I should have checked and I have NEVER fallen for something like this in the past, but it looked so legit and I remember a post that someone made here recently about Coinbase having a new service agreement so I blindly followed through. gently caress. Edit 1: I am in touch with Coinbase and they have disabled the thieves API. They are still looking through the matter. Thanks for all the posts. JohnSpivey [S] 21 очко 3 hours ago If anyone is curious what the email looks like, I have taken a screen shot and uploaded to Imgur. apparently it was actually an app using their api: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2uo8wb/a_message_from_the_coinbase_security_team/
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 21:53 |
|
Ron Paul Atreides posted:That article is interesting, Sarah makes it sound like the gov is deliberately side stepping how they managed to get DPR not because of any conspiracy bullshit but because it would be a huge tip to any future darkweb services about how law enforcement operates and attacks these problems. Which is a reasonable idea, that kind of stuff going public could let alot of illegal services cover the tracks they may not realize they are leaving right now. Don't DPR's own chat logs, diary entries, etc mention that the server was leaking it's IP a bunch of times?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 21:54 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:apparently it was actually an app using their api: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2uo8wb/a_message_from_the_coinbase_security_team/ ahahaha an api that allows for phishing attempts that's loving priceless how much venture capital do these people have again
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 21:57 |
|
Stanley Pain posted:Don't DPR's own chat logs, diary entries, etc mention that the server was leaking it's IP a bunch of times? Those parts of the logs were planted there by the FBI via the open bittorrent port to aid their parallel construction.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 21:58 |
|
Stanley Pain posted:Don't DPR's own chat logs, diary entries, etc mention that the server was leaking it's IP a bunch of times? ya i think he says the server is getting dosed outside of tor so that means someone is dosing the ip
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:05 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2ungby/fuck_i_just_got_scammed/ I'm the so-legit-lookin Aplication and Applicationi
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:06 |
|
http://www.reddit.com/r/butthurtcoin
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:06 |
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:ya i think he says the server is getting dosed outside of tor so that means someone is dosing the ip wouldn't it be funny if
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:08 |
|
i'm the free bitcoin
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:14 |
|
is the plural bitcoins or bitscoin?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:15 |
|
Poopy Palpy posted:Those parts of the logs were planted there by the FBI via the open bittorrent port to aid their parallel construction. they were obviously spontaneously generated by random noise in the ram when the fbi turned his computer off and on, duh
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:18 |
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:is the plural bitcoins or bitscoin? bitscon
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:23 |
|
kalensc posted:I'm the so-legit-lookin Aplication and Applicationi it's italian
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:30 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 10:26 |
|
duTrieux. posted:it's italian "If you still want to use our coinbase app will have to accept" is also fun and clearly professional
|
# ? Feb 3, 2015 22:37 |