|
Byers2142 posted:I said I would, yeah. Asiina I'm not saying things about because it's all bad vibes but still would vote. I think it's kinda dumb that he's not seriousposting but it's also correct to say that he rarely seriousposts in games. Let's vote Asiina. Let's start this beautiful partnership.
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 00:33 |
|
|
I'm not for/against voting for Asiina but can someone explain why you guys think he's scum?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:51
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:I'm not saying he's accurate. I'm saying that he's got the right thought process for Mafia. I'm encouraging the newbie, get off my sack. Chill, I thought you were agreeing with the case. AnonymousNarcotics posted:If "I don't care if I live" is scummy then let's all vote Chili. I just don't see it that way. If he was scum, why would he basically vote to sacrifice himself. Doesn't make sense. Because "Why would he be willing to vote himself if he were scum? So if he's willing to lay down, he must be town" is the reaction some scum look for in making that play. EccoRaven posted:I think it's kinda dumb that he's not seriousposting but it's also correct to say that he rarely seriousposts in games. ##vote Asiina You're still scum, sorry.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I'm not for/against voting for Asiina but can someone explain why you guys think he's scum? She. And for me, it's gut and vibes. I can't point to any post and say, "That's why." But when I read her, it just feels off.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
Yes yes, ignore me for now and vote Asiina, a grand plan indeed. ##vote asiina
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:But when I read her, it just feels off. Pretty much this. Sorry Asiina!! ##unvote ##vote asiina
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Yes yes, ignore me for now and vote Asiina, a grand plan indeed. This is why we vote you, CPig. This.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:56
|
|
|
Chili posted:I seriously don't mind being lynched. I like early day 1 the most, and after that, I start trailing off a bit so it's no biggy. I am assuming I'm getting lynched as of now because of the vote count and the fact that I won't be around to redirect the lynch later. So, if I must go down, the best thing I can do for the town is provide as many connections (like I'm doing with you now, sport) to other players so they have information to go off of once I'm gone. There's still... 4+ hours, which is prime posting time for a lot of people. So it's not really a foregone conclusion. Still think Byers is the best scum candidate. I agree that there are likely scum hiding with their vote on you, though. Your posts have been all over the place but I don't think that's a strong enough case to warrant the number of votes that have glommed on. Especially since none of them are from particularly high content posters: Chili posted:The last thing Fiery Valkyrie did was agree with me, his vote is currently on me. (Abyssal is definitely not the best and after his recent posts I'd still be totally down with lynching him.)
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:56
|
|
|
Gabriel Pope posted:Still think Byers is the best scum candidate. I agree that there are likely scum hiding with their vote on you, though. Your posts have been all over the place but I don't think that's a strong enough case to warrant the number of votes that have glommed on. Especially since none of them are from particularly high content posters: I'm still not sure I get your case. In essence, you're agreeing with Ecco that I'm running a gambit where I hide in plain site while chasing a bad case on Ecco, yeah?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:57
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:She. And for me, it's gut and vibes. I can't point to any post and say, "That's why." But when I read her, it just feels off. I guess when you guys play together often you kind of have an advantage. It would be easy to just along with you all and vote for her but I have a hard time voting for anyone with zero reason behind it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 21:57
|
|
|
Yeah, there's isn't any reason behind it. There are plenty of people out there with real cases and all anyone has said about me is that "something feels off". I want to see some real cases here, people.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:00
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  Chili (6): Meinberg, fiery_valkyrie, Abyssal Squid, Good Sir, ShadowGlass, Epsilon Plus, CapitalistPig, Asiina (4): CapitalistPig, CapitalistPig (2): Rarity, Chili, Byers2142, Rarity (1): EccoRaven, CapitalistPig, Sandwolf, Chili, Abyssal Squid (0): Glockenapfel, Epsilon Plus, Sandwolf (0): CapitalistPig, Byers2142 (0): Asiina, Glockenapfel, EccoRaven (0): CapitalistPig, Opopanax (0): CapitalistPig, Meinberg (0): EccoRaven, Gabriel Pope (0): Chili, Epsilon Plus (0): CapitalistPig, Not Voting (6): AnonymousNarcotics, Asiina, AXE COP, Chic Trombone, Gabriel Pope, OpopanaxWith 19 alive, it's 10 votes to lynch. The current deadline is February 18th, 2015 at 8 p.m. EST -- that's in about 3 hours, 58 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:Hey Byers forget Pig, let's all vote Asiina. Like I really hope this is you trying to be cute/funny, cause these are all some seriously lovely reasons.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
I'm not feeling Asiina. Just gave her a reread; still think Chili is the choice for a dragon-free Skyrim or whatever the gently caress we're supposed to be getting up to here.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:02
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:I'm still not sure I get your case. In essence, you're agreeing with Ecco that I'm running a gambit where I hide in plain site while chasing a bad case on Ecco, yeah? Not a bad case per se, just an inconclusive one.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:02
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I guess when you guys play together often you kind of have an advantage. It would be easy to just along with you all and vote for her but I have a hard time voting for anyone with zero reason behind it. As you should! I don't really like doing it either, and I just went back to reread her posts. She really does come off as standing a bit on the sidelines, making comments here and there, but not wanting to get her hands dirty. She'll dismiss all the cases as bad cases, but then not make her own cases or try to shore up the least bad cases to something voteable. It's not much. I'd be fine going back to Rarity (since she's been a non-entity this game so far), but I feel like Asiina "has legs."
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:02
|
|
|
#vote Asiina
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:02
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:This is why we vote you, CPig. This. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQkCL5xuy5Y
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:I'm not feeling Asiina. Just gave her a reread; still think Chili is the choice for a dragon-free Skyrim or whatever the gently caress we're supposed to be getting up to here. There's something really insidious about this post..
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Like I really hope this is you trying to be cute/funny, cause these are all some seriously lovely reasons. I am always cute and funny, but, I also have weird feelings about you sorry! If you want me to vote for someone else though I am all ears.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
ahahahahaha
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:04
|
|
|
oh gosh she didn't even get the rhyme right. loser loser double loser as if what ever get the picture duh
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:05
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:I am always cute and funny, but, I also have weird feelings about you sorry! If you want me to vote for someone else though I am all ears. Are these your real reasons yes or no.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Are these your real reasons yes or no. The reasons you quoted in the post from you I quoted, no. The reasons I posted a few posts above, yes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Are these your real reasons yes or no. Asiina, you are scum, just get over it already jeez!
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:10
|
|
|
Reminder that this is the sum total of Rarity's contributions to the game so far: - Claiming her flavor in her first post - Talking about how she claims flavor in her first posts - Making a case against Pig that amounts to "you're being unhelpful and distracting" That's pretty much it. I mean even if you don't like my fakeclaim-case on her, her lack of participation should be telling too right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:14
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:Reminder that this is the sum total of Rarity's contributions to the game so far: What I think is especially telling is that she disappeared once it became Ecco v. Byers instead of having any real focus be on her.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:unhelpful and distracting" This was on all my school report cards from kindergarten - 6th grade
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:As you should! I don't really like doing it either, and I just went back to reread her posts. She really does come off as standing a bit on the sidelines, making comments here and there, but not wanting to get her hands dirty. She'll dismiss all the cases as bad cases, but then not make her own cases or try to shore up the least bad cases to something voteable. Okay let's go over this then. I have been participating in the conversation the entire day. I have the 5th highest postcount all day. Yes some was skyrim chat, but I've also been engaged. I have not been standing on the sidelines. I have not dismissed all cases, just yours and Byers because I think they're both dumb. I've agreed with Gabriel's case on Squid and still feel it's a good one. I am making my own cases. I've made cases on AnonymousNarcotic and Glockenapfel, however both are new and I don't want to vote for them today. As for other thoughts I think that when you were tunneling on Rarity it was scummy as hell, but I appreciate that you've backed off and are willing to look at other cases, so it's not my strongest read. Byers I find hard to read cause he comes in guns blazing every game. I think his argument is dumb as hell, but he's making an effort to explain it in a way that doesn't ping me like yours against Rarity does. Sandwolf's temper tantrum is par for the course, but he's being really snipey which I do not like. And his conversation with Chili a little while ago feels very fake. Sandwolf is mad nobody is engaging with him. Sandwolf posted:Like if anyone else said this, I'd prolly vote them. But I know it could mean literally anything. Chili posted:Yes. I see that you said them. If people aren't listening you need to say it again, and in a different way. It's not like you put down some big grandiose case or anything. Mafia dadding out of nowhere. Sandwolf posted:I didn't put down a grandiose case because not every case needs to be grandiose and furthermore, it's hard to make a D1 damning case. Instead, I'm posting my feelings as they come, if someone feels scummy I say so and vice versa. Chili posted:Sure, but can you get mad at us for not remembering those things when: Sandwolf posted:I wrote a response and then deleted it because I agree I don't think this is headed anywhere constructive unless someone thinks I'm scum. This whole "lol nevermind" sits wrong with me. Chili agrees to engage in conversation with Sandwolf because Sandwolf is feeling ignored, but then decides that Sandwolf isn't scummy so they both spontaneously drop it? That wasn't the point of why they started talking in the first place and neither should be satisfied with this outcome.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:28
|
|
|
Hey I have a vig, who should I kill?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:31
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Hey I have a vig, who should I kill? Urself
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:32
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Urself ^^
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:36
|
|
|
Asiina posted:That wasn't the point of why they started talking in the first place and neither should be satisfied with this outcome. Yeah but you're phrasing it like they coordinated it, which doesn't make sense. It was weird but things being weird isn't the end of the world. I would be fine voting for Rarity instead of you, even if you think it's tunneling. ##vote Rarity
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:38
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:Yeah but you're phrasing it like they coordinated it, which doesn't make sense. It was weird but things being weird isn't the end of the world. I think it might be coordinated. Why wouldn't that make sense?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:40
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I think it might be coordinated. Why wouldn't that make sense? I dropped it because I didn't think it was constructive and didn't want to make the content leading up to hammer me and Chili arguing about semantics.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:43
|
|
|
Back for a little. Opop, if you do have a vig, I implore you, use it on CPIG. He is, the perfect kind of player to vig. I'll self inflict a bard post restriction on myself whereby I post songs of your good deeds if you kill him.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
Chili posted:Back for a little. holy poo poo do this
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
I've got the same sort of "off" feelings, but not much more than that with regards to Asiina. There are better options out there, but to save myself I'd lynch her.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:45
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I think it might be coordinated. Why wouldn't that make sense? How does a bunch of weird meta emoposting advance any scum agenda? You're presuming they're undertaking a lot of effort and coordination for something that doesn't actually make either of them look any better.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 00:33 |
|
|
I'd hold off on a vig until day 2 or 3 at least, or if it's clear that we're not going to lynch.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 22:51
|
|