|
I think it might be Rascyc.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 21:07 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 21:21 |
|
I'm leaning strongly on Rascyc now.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 21:12 |
|
fits posted:I don't have much to add. Has anyone not full claimed? CCKeane posted:I'm leaning strongly on Rascyc now.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 21:23 |
|
Rascyc posted:All claims are out as vanilla at this point. Why couldn't instead be convinced it is you?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 21:26 |
|
I don't know. All I have really going for me is that I pegged Chic early and my casing, at least outside of the TNL fiasco. If you look further back than that, when Somber decided to randomly pressure me for my Chic read, saying I had been erratic near hammer but seemingly missed the entire early day. Diqnol brought up a defense of me that I hadn't even realized had happened:Somberbrero posted:I dunno, I could vote Rascyc tomorrow. His play has seemed reserved and conservative this game. His back and forth near deadline with Chic reads like distancing. There's something off about the way he pushes her, it feels like he's being too familiar and conversational with her. EccoRaven posted:Chic (11): merk, -merk, merk, Rasc, Asiina, wins, -merk, EP, merk, fiery, Somberbrero, Ninth, fits, TT, Amoeba102 True and Real posted:Looking at that votecount makes your theory even less likely, Somber. Rasc was the first vote and Asiina was the second. A double hard bus?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 21:37 |
|
Rascyc posted:I don't know. All I have really going for me is that I pegged Chic early and my casing, at least outside of the TNL fiasco. If you look further back than that, when Somber decided to randomly pressure me for my Chic read, saying I had been erratic near hammer but seemingly missed the entire early day. Diqnol brought up a defense of me that I hadn't even realized had happened: drat it, I was hoping you'd slip up. This is some TENSE STUFF.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 21:39 |
|
I could honestly concoct theories why it's anyone at this point, especially if it's really a 2 vs 2 scenario. If we look for an SK, it could very well be yuming for laying a bit low but also scum hunting, it would fit an SK modus operandi. It could be fits for also laying low and not doing much the second half of the game with most of the scum team dead.. It could be you for giving neutral reads most of the game and laying low. However if we look for a scum, then I subtract yuming for the Asiina/Chic interaction. It still leaves you + fits for laying low this entire time, especially after we clobbered 3 scum on d2/d3/d4. The wrinkle in that one is that you seem to believe it's 1 scum left and nothing else, so I think you would normally push for a no lynch in that circumstance because then we're in 4 player mylo. If you are convinced it's not yuming and have a toss up between me/fits, then it should be an easy no lynch vote from your perspective I think. From mine, I am not convinced it's a 1v3 scenario. I need to think more about the numbers though and how a scum might approach this. If I go purely off tone then I am left with fits. It's a mess, I want to think about it some more. I don't want to become the new GODDAMNIT RASCYC also
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 21:42 |
|
Rascyc posted:I could honestly concoct theories why it's anyone at this point, especially if it's really a 2 vs 2 scenario. If we look for an SK, it could very well be yuming for laying a bit low but also scum hunting, it would fit an SK modus operandi. It could be fits for also laying low and not doing much the second half of the game with most of the scum team dead.. It could be you for giving neutral reads most of the game and laying low. I'm not pushing for a no vote since there were two kills last night and that could easily be a losing move. I'm kinda of with you. It could easily be anybody.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 21:45 |
|
Rascyc posted:I don't want to become the new gosh golly molly IT RASCYC also love my word filter I am instituting a soft deadline for Monday, ~11PM EDT. After that, every post made must include either a vote or an unvote. Note that ##vote no-hang is an acceptable vote. Good luck!
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 21:45 |
|
Hey Ras, you around?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 22:03 |
|
No lynch is only helpful if there's only one scum left, I feel. Which there might well be. There might not be an SK at all, just booby trapped items
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 22:32 |
|
fits posted:No lynch is only helpful if there's only one scum left, I feel. Which there might well be. There might not be an SK at all, just booby trapped items Why did your stance change from last night?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 22:35 |
|
INSPECTOR KEANE IS ON THE CASE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqecdQyTFvM
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 22:36 |
|
EVERYBODY NEEDS TO YELL MORE
|
# ? Feb 21, 2015 23:15 |
|
CCKeane posted:Why did your stance change from last night? The stance of what? SK + scum? There's clearly a lot of item fuckery and cursed items could be a stand in for a sk, under the "people will be dumb enough to kill themselves given the button to push" rule of mafia
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 00:03 |
|
I trend towards thinking there's only scum this game. That's my gut feels and my preference here: try and find a scum and vote them today. I'm going to look back at post histories now.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 01:58 |
|
CCKeane posted:I'm leaning strongly on Rascyc now.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:17 |
|
yuming posted:Tell me more about this! I largely wanted to provoke a response, but his actions around the night kills today and some of his speculation seems strange and off, so I thought I'd press him and see what his reaction was. I was hoping for a slip. I'm still up in the air. At the moment, GUN TO MY HEAD, I'd try to distract and then wrestle the gun out of the hands of my attackers, but for my next option I think I'd still go Rascyc. Merk was on and off him yesterday, and was between, largely, fits, Rascyc, and myself (He was super duper on top of me until the very end of the day). I've got nothing.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:27 |
|
I'm starting by reading back on f_v and merk the previous game day. In one of fiery's posts, she quoted this--Rascyc posted:I can't even begin to parse this post. What does this even mean? Having a "magical unexplained" read isn't inherently scummy. But it becomes so when you're accusing someone of ~knowing too much~ I've very unsure at this point, but mostly between Keane and Rascyc. I'm looking for evidence and find this point interesting.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:29 |
|
Rascyc posted:I don't really need the discussion thread meta to vote TT. He's been openly anti-town for ~3 game days now but people seem to ignore him or won't compromise. This speaks from the perspective of a player who knows bussing is part of the scum team's ~gameplan~
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:38 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:You hadn't posted for 8 hours. You were clearly around, because you did hammer, but you never came into the thread and commented. I'm trying to weigh the scales between these two... hmm...
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:39 |
|
merk posted:...or is it higher? #gambit merk posted:There is about a thirty-forty second pause between when Keane makes that first message and the WAIT message. It pinged me in different ways over the last couple of hours, and I thought I'd share it with the thread. I can't claim I know what happened with the kill last night. But my working theory is that scum have killing items, and saved a juicy one for lategame. If scum made the previous kill, it makes sense Keane did it.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:46 |
|
Even though I haven't always been present, I want to say I've had a lot of fun playing this game. It makes me hopeful that our community will continue to produce fun times yay~
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:47 |
|
yuming posted:hehe merk's posts are amusing me Pretty much all I can say on merk is that we spoke quite a bit and he spent the last couple of hours of the last day talking to me before deciding that I wasn't scum. I know that's not much to give in terms of defense, but I don't think merk's read on me would end up worse because we were able to have a one on one chat.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:48 |
|
Yea, that makes a difference. What are your thoughts on last nights kill? If we're looking at a SK here I feel like it is a shot in the dark. I'd be fine losing to a SK here. But I don't feel this scum team deserves a win and want to do my best to find them if they're still around.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:53 |
|
yuming posted:Yea, that makes a difference. I really doubt there is an SK. We simply haven't had enough kills throughout the game for that to make sense. F_V and merk both had powers, F_V as a thief and merk claimed he had some tracking powers, although toward the end that was failing more and more. Especially since Opop and his cop ate it earlier, it could be more of a culling of PRs then opinion based. Although on that note, F_V and merk were both pretty drat townie, so there's that too. They'd make sense for any of us to kill, for the most part.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 02:57 |
|
I think I'm ready to go all in on Rascyc.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 03:01 |
|
What do you think about the points I made on Rasc? I can't decide if I've actually found something or if I'm just excited about my latest theory. Reading fits v. Keane v. Rasc now.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 03:02 |
|
I don't think they're particularly strong. I'm voting Rascyc more on gut than anything else at this point. *fires pistols into the air*
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 03:08 |
|
I want to talk about Rascyc and his items.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 03:09 |
|
Because he made a PGO claim earlier which I find interesting.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 03:09 |
|
I don't have time to read posts in true context. Still, looking at Rasc during TT's lynch he seems to be offering support but hoping it doesn't go through, which is scummy.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 03:20 |
|
Rascyc posted:I think they just wanted to bus TT that day. I also think Keane juked you with the candles/masonry. Scum were bussing TT-- well-- Amoeba was. But I wouldn't say anyone else was tilting that way. I had forgotten he was still alive I think Rasc's awareness here is scummy somehow. Again he speaks from a perspective of what the scum are doing. Hmm.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 03:29 |
|
yuming posted:I'm starting by reading back on f_v and merk the previous game day. In one of fiery's posts, she quoted this-- By itself I might not call it scummy but if you look at the context during that post Chic was dancing around not posting any committed reads on people who had content. To cautious read those people but have a read on someone who skipped d1 didn't line up.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 03:56 |
|
yuming posted:Here it is again-- Rasc appears to be using Amoeba tunneling as evidence to vote TT. I don't know what part of a scum team decides their gameplan is to bus the entire scum team from start to finish, especially with replacements. It wasn't even a singular bus IIRC, weren't they bussing each other? I honestly lost track at this point. I do remember Amoeba straight up absconded, so I don't think bussing was really part of their "gameplan" but that's a speculative guess. TT openly started trolling towards the end so .... yeah. I don't know.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 03:59 |
|
yuming posted:I don't have time to read posts in true context. merk posted:Can we all step back and see how ridiculous or scummy Tt's plan of taking all the items is when he can only identify one item per night? I'll go back and re-read what exactly I posted when TT was getting lynched but I was in full support of that one for like 3 game days. It was very difficult to get much of anything done with Merk starting every day off with a gambit.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 04:04 |
|
CCKeane posted:I don't think they're particularly strong. I'm voting Rascyc more on gut than anything else at this point. *fires pistols into the air* CCKeane posted:Because he made a PGO claim earlier which I find interesting. I haven't used any items since given that I've gotten all of them off either voting scum inventors off or grabbing them off scum after their lynch. The PGO one was enough to scare me from using them ever again.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 04:07 |
|
Hmmm. Just finished reading Rascyc. I'm p stumped here.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 04:09 |
|
yuming posted:I don't have time to read posts in true context. True and Real posted:Did you not read the god drat game? True and Real posted:I wasn't upset with you until I realized you just didn't even realize you should have done it. yuming posted:I don't care for the perspective here either.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 04:12 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 21:21 |
|
fits posted:I feel marginally better about lynching chic than somb. did either of them claim anything?
|
# ? Feb 22, 2015 04:17 |