Cojawfee posted:

You can't even get your lame jokes right. The watch is called G-Shock. Which would have even opened you up for an electrocution joke.

The g force things are just stickers you attach to things and they break when subjected to the rated g-force.

Cojawfee posted:

You can't even get your lame jokes right. The watch is called G-Shock. Which would have even opened you up for an electrocution joke.

The g force things are just stickers you attach to things and they break when subjected to the rated g-force.

Eb posted:

Coincidence???

Alain Post posted:

I like Japanese watches but Casios are, uh, divisive looking


and honestly if I wanted a more traditional looking Japanese watch I'd get a Seiko

nsaP posted:

If Alonso died he would be new Senna T/F????

Eb posted:

thegasman2000 posted:

Turns out alonso didn't have a smashin test. It's was loving shocking.

In serious news where did the electrocution rumour come from?

Wirth1000 posted:

Awesome helmet for an awesome driver.



I would suck the cum out of Massa's dick.

HJB posted:

HJB posted:

NtotheTC posted:

The only rational explanation is that this is the culmination of Ron Dennis' 7 year plot to kill Alonso in revenge for grassing him up.

Payndz posted:

First thing I saw. Like a smiling version of

quote:

“His car ran wide at the entry to Turn Three – which is a fast uphill right-hander – allowing it to run onto the Astroturf that lines the outside of the track. A consequent loss of traction caused a degree of instability, spitting it back towards the inside of the circuit, where it regained traction and struck the wall side-on.

“Our findings indicate that the accident was caused by the unpredictably gusty winds at that part of the circuit at that time, and which had affected other drivers similarly (eg, Carlos Sainz Jnr).

“We can categorically state that there is no evidence that indicates that Fernando’s car suffered mechanical failure of any kind. We can also confirm that absolutely no loss of aerodynamic pressure was recorded, which fact indicates that the car did not suffer any aerodynamic loss, despite the fact that it was subjected to a significant level of g-force. Finally, we can also disclose that no electrical discharge or irregularity of any kind occurred in the car’s ERS system, either before, during or after the incident.

“That last point refutes the erroneous rumours that have spread recently to the effect that Fernando was rendered unconscious by an electrical fault. That is simply not true. Our data clearly shows that he was downshifting while applying full brake pressure right up to the moment of the first impact – something that clearly would not have been possible had he been unconscious at the time.

“Our data also confirms that Fernando’s car struck the inside concrete wall, first with its front-right wheel and then with its rear-right. It was a significant lateral impact, resulting in damage to the front upright and axle.

“After the initial impact, the car slid down the wall for about 15 seconds before coming to a halt. All four wheels remained attached to the car, but no damage was sustained by the bodywork or crash structure between the front and rear wheels

Wirth1000 posted:

McLaren released a statement about Alonso and the crash.


So, basically, driver error but that's impossible because Alonso does not make errors.

Brainwrong posted:

It was a stupid crash and I don't care about it like some people on the internet seem to

Brainwrong posted:

It was a stupid crash and I don't care about it like some people on the internet seem to

Wirth1000 posted:

The 2nd shooter in the grassy knoll

Wirth1000 posted:

The 2nd shooter in the grassy knoll

Ghost of Mussolini posted:

Senna was shot directly from the front

Wirth1000 posted:

Is this a reference to the actual conspiracy theory that Senna was assassinated?

El Hefe posted:

McLaren tried to kill Alonso and now they are trying to cover it up, disgusting, but they won't fool me.