|
rhel 5
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 00:45 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 16:17 |
|
pram posted:PC-BSD this sounds like the solution for me. thank
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 00:56 |
|
triple sulk posted:this sounds like the solution for me. thank god i hope this is a riff on pram's joke
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 01:17 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:god i hope this is a riff on pram's joke If not, can't help idiocy. Lol, PC-BSD != Linux PC-BSD != good BSD It's just poo poo. Install FreeBSD.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 01:26 |
|
nosl posted:If not, can't help idiocy. goddamn @ this dude laying down the ownage
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 01:26 |
|
netcraft died for freebsd's sins
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 01:31 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:netcraft died for freebsd's sins then who confirmed it???
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 01:52 |
|
ahmeni posted:then who confirmed it???
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 01:56 |
|
my stepdads beer posted:they did something weird to the window decorations. firefox and terminal look different from epiphany and nautilis and most things for some reason. see attachment. looks awesome to me tbqh I even mentioned when I upgraded to fedora 21 how I thought the dark windows looked very fitting for stuff like terminal windows
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 02:04 |
|
my stepdads beer posted:they did something weird to the window decorations. firefox and terminal look different from epiphany and nautilis and most things for some reason. see attachment. does Firefox not draw its own window decorations for unified tab/title?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 02:08 |
|
Subjunctive posted:does Firefox not draw its own window decorations for unified tab/title? no, they stupidly draw under the titlebar. chrome does it properly
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 02:12 |
|
bobbilljim posted:no, they stupidly draw under the titlebar. chrome does it properly my bet is that they succumbed to calls to do the Right Linux Thing, which IME was usually people dogmatically defending whatever the GNOME list came up with that week at the expense of usability.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 02:15 |
|
so true it hurts
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 02:17 |
|
Subjunctive posted:my bet is that they succumbed to calls to do the Right Linux Thing, which IME was usually people dogmatically defending whatever the GNOME list came up with that week at the expense of usability. They used to do the tabs-on-top thing and then /r/linux complained a lot so they reverted that code. We didn't have a hand in that decision at all.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 02:42 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:They used to do the tabs-on-top thing and then /r/linux complained a lot so they reverted that code. We didn't have a hand in that decision at all. same song, different key
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 02:49 |
|
linux users are their own worst enemy
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:11 |
|
I feel compelled to post this: http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/300b3w/the_amount_of_bullshit_about_linux_being_spewed/
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:14 |
|
pseudorandom name posted:the future is apps drawing their own window borders like it's Windows 3.1 the 1980s called they said welcome to X-Windows
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:36 |
|
people unmounting flash drives from the file browser UI triggers me greatly
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:36 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:I feel compelled to post this: I just like turning the lights off, switching to a white on black terminal and pretending like I am doing something useful as the text scrolls past. For some reason it makes me feel good. The world was a simpler place in 1995. Linux is the last place I can bury my head against the ever quickening passage of time.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:37 |
|
Also gently caress, how did it get to be late march already.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:38 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:OS X has had custom decoration controls since day 1. Starting with Snow Leopard, they allowed you to edit the titlebar to rename documents. there's a world of difference between "the window controls are rendered in-process by system frameworks, which allow you a controlled level of access for customization" and what you see on X-Windows systems if someone shipped a Linux that included a single build of Gtk as an app framework (no Xt, no Qt, etc.), and apps didn't have any APIs to talk to the window system but through that build of Gtk, that Linux would be more akin to OS X.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:41 |
|
bobbilljim posted:linux users are their own worst enemy
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:55 |
|
eschaton posted:if someone shipped a Linux that included a single build of Gtk as an app framework (no Xt, no Qt, etc.), and apps didn't have any APIs to talk to the window system but through that build of Gtk, that Linux would be more akin to OS X. i.e. totally loving broken
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 04:05 |
|
Soricidus posted:mandrake 5
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 04:15 |
|
I dug this up for the ms office thread, but this is peak linux:
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:23 |
|
Optimus_Rhyme posted:I dug this up for the ms office thread, but this is peak linux:
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:24 |
|
Optimus_Rhyme posted:I dug this up for the ms office thread, but this is peak linux: this, but unironically. kde2 had a lot of good poo poo going. kde3 exceeded it but took so long to achieve its goals, nobody noticed
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:25 |
|
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:28 |
|
man i forgot all about noatun
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:28 |
|
look at that relatively consistent look and feel yeah the gui theme is poo poo but all the icons match, they correctly use bitmap fonts for small point sizes... all lost, like tears in rain
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:29 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:look at that relatively consistent look and feel
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 07:15 |
|
bobbilljim posted:custom titlebars are good, just look at chrome on linux VS knockoff chrome (firefox) yeah I wish the firefox dudes would finish up the gtk3 port so they can do the same
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 07:52 |
|
Symbolic Butt posted:looks awesome to me tbqh i like the dark. i am commenting on the height of the titlebar.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 07:53 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:I feel compelled to post this: quote:[–]Valvar 24 points 15 hours ago
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 09:10 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:man i forgot all about noatun
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 09:26 |
|
Zom Aur posted:remember when amarok was considered good? amarok has always been terrible trash for idiots
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 11:14 |
|
Optimus_Rhyme posted:I dug this up for the ms office thread, but this is peak linux: i'm Corel® File Manager e: i mean Corel® Update
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 11:25 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:They used to do the tabs-on-top thing and then /r/linux complained a lot so they reverted that code. We didn't have a hand in that decision at all. well they could of done it like chrome which you can disable it (right click top bar > use system borders )
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 11:27 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 16:17 |
|
nosl posted:If not, can't help idiocy. This is an amusing post, as if you read the handbook today at a number of points it'll say 'oh btw, if you're interested in running a desktop, you might be interested in PC-BSD which automatically takes care of all this for you if you don't feel like compulsively janitoring your system'. It's run by core members of FreeBSD. When you run uname, it'll show FreeBSD 10.1 release. You can transparently switch between the two just by changing the repository and a few config files. They are in effect the same base system, with PC-BSD giving you a few minor additions to make it nicer for desktop use, and somewhat hardened security, like having up fail2ban and pf preconfigured for you. Also it has some really nice graphical applications for managing things like the ZFS volume manager, that thing is really neat. Tell us more about your bike shed though. I don't get why people running other systems rip on BSD over poo poo that's not even accurate, I mean why do you even care are you secretly afraid you might be missing out I don't care what system do you run does it work for you that's great, how's the diet are you getting enough vegetables, they say you should eat all the colors of the rainbow you know
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 11:44 |