|
Keane if you can come up with a real legitimate argument about why I'm scum, I'll vote myself.
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2015 23:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 16:31 |
|
|
Players who have claimed not-town and have the ability to communicate OOT have a history of lies and clumsy stories that don't add up, including a cop claim on a guy who was already headed towards a dunk. "Masons" and the rest implies you belive them at face value. We don't know that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2015 23:55
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Keane if you can come up with a real legitimate argument about why I'm scum, I'll vote myself. You lied, I know you lied, and I suspect you are lying about much, much more. That's enough for me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2015 23:57
|
|
|
Keane is scum. He's not scum-hunting; he's lynch-hunting by going after the easiest targets in the thread for terrible reasons. The cop claim lie he's upset about is something that town players shouldn't have a problem with, as misdirection to protect a town power role is one of the few good examples of town dishonesty. When I asked how this lie makes the masons scum his response is gut, aka he can't explain his position with an argument. It's bullshit. Yesterday his play was to vote numerik for having an extra win condition and then vote the masons for not being town-aligned. Keane didn't vote for Jedit even to seal a lynch and the sum of his content is "the masons are scum!"
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2015 23:58
|
|
|
Oh he did vote Jedit how did I miss that one 
|
|
#
?
Mar 29, 2015 23:59
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:Oh he did vote Jedit how did I miss that one I WAS GOING TO SAY. I stand by my play.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:01
|
|
|
a worthy uhh posted:Players who have claimed not-town and have the ability to communicate OOT have a history of lies and clumsy stories that don't add up, including a cop claim on a guy who was already headed towards a dunk. They also have a history of being town players who have an extra win condition such as "kill all the scum and have one surviving member" or "kill all scum and keep a VIP alive."
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:04
|
|
|
##vote Quandary
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:05
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:They also have a history of being town players who have an extra win condition such as "kill all the scum and have one surviving member" or "kill all scum and keep a VIP alive." What? How do 'they have a history of being town players...' Do you mean that those roles existed in other games?
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:06
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:What are you implying here? I'm not implying anything, I'm saying TNL seems super defensive and worried about what you guys are going to flip
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:08
|
|
|
a worthy uhh posted:What? How do 'they have a history of being town players...' Yeah, isn't that what you're talking about? Every time I've seen players claim town+ masons with a separate faction name they've turned out to be telling the truth. I can think of one exception in an Ecco game but that involved an alignment change.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:09
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I'm not implying anything, I'm saying TNL seems super defensive and worried about what you guys are going to flip You're obviously implying something about me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:09
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I'm not implying anything, I'm saying TNL seems super defensive and worried about what you guys are going to flip Yes, you're implying something. Speculate on why TNL might be defensive, please.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
No, you're not 3 years old, you can make the logical leaps yourself. I don't want to tie two unflipped players together yet, I'm just saying if Narco flips anything other than we've been told I am absolutely coming for TNL
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:23
|
|
|
Are you "not implying anything" or are you saying that your thought process is so obvious that you shouldn't have to spell it out? Don't poo poo and run. If you have a read, you should explain it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
What more can I possibly say about it? You're grasping at straws here.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:31
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:Yeah, isn't that what you're talking about? Your phrasing is really awkward. "They" in my post was PMom and Narco. So you said, basically, "PMom and Narco have a history of being town players with blah blah".
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 00:59
|
|
|
a worthy uhh posted:Your phrasing is really awkward. WAS IT A SCUMSLIP I am racking my brain here
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 01:03
|
|
|
I'll claim since I'm at minus a couple and deadline is tomorrow. My flavor name is Quales Respueta, I'm a town aligned hider. I can choose to hide at night, but can't hide consecutive nights, and while hiding not only do night actions not affect me, but also I'm told for what purpose I was visited (but unfortunately not who visited). This is why I know the mason crew is lying - I received only one visit last night and it was a roleblock attempt, not a cop attempt as they've claimed. Moreover, the flavor I was given was creepy as poo poo and sounded extremely anti-town- whoever tried to roleblock me went outside of my house and started chanting, making me feel compelled to stay indoors for the night. Mason crew is straight up lying about their night actions - I was not targeted with a cop last night, if any of them targeted me at all it was to roleblock me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 05:56
|
|
|
AnonNarco, P-Mom, and Merk have been lying all drat game about their roles and are undoubtedly anti-town.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
Hmmm. Yep. Gonna need to sleep on that one. ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 06:17
|
|
|
 You're claiming hider/pseudo-cop pseudo-self-watcher?
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 08:19
|
|
|
Here's my issue. For as much as I do not believe PMom/Narc, something feels off about that claim. Maybe it's differing playstyles, but if I had a night result which countered the cop claim on me, I'd be screaming it from the mountaintops, not "Oh I'll post later" and fullclaiming in one shot. ##unvote I want everyone to get on the record with an opinion on PMom/Narc and Quandary. I think it'd be useful information long term.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 11:38
|
|
|
That unvote was not because I do not want Q lynched but more to prevent a hammer too soon. I will revote.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 11:38
|
|
|
And I just realized I was voting Narc not Q, but whatever.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 11:45
|
|
|
I'm inclined to believe that PMom and Narc are 3P but I don't believe them when they say they're benign and I don't think they're actions have proven them to be benign either, why would the be covering for themselves so much if they were sincere? Merk is right though, Quandary's flip would prove their innocence. At this point I feel Quandary is the scummiest player. I don't think they've been following along because we've all pretty much refrained from voting them to hear their defense and what we got in response was a bit lacking. We didn't get one and again the brief communication feels like what Ernie mentioned earlier about OOT communication, it feels like they're getting quick re-caps of the game from other players. The claim itself is all sorts of strange, but it seems that's not all that uncommon in an Ecco game. I don't like their use of a flavor defense either because that really amounts to very little. I'd be satisfied with one execution today be and I probably won't look for more until after the flip barring some extraordinary circumstances. I think Quandary's back at -2. If there's a general consensus to move on I'd be fine laying down my vote.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 12:22
|
|
|
Current vote count Quandary (8): Ernie, imgay, LM, MiR, PMom, Cpig, QPQ, merk, Anonarco , -PMom, -MiR, -imgay, Amoeba, PMom, -CPig, chaoslord, TNL, -chaoslord AnonymousNarcotics (4): Somber, -Somber, Keane, MiR, Opopanax, Quandary, CPig -MiR a worthy uhh/Me in Reverse (1): PMom, -PMom, imgay Somberbrero (0): PMom, -PMom
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 13:36
|
|
|
Something that has been bothering me that I want to explicitly ask right now. Pinterest Mom, when you were defending Ernie's 3p claim early on, and you posted that 3P was not necessarily anti-town, are you now claiming (like you did back then) that you thought you were 100% town, no 3P, nothing, at that point?
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 13:45
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I'm not implying anything, I'm saying TNL seems super defensive and worried about what you guys are going to flip I think TNL really doesn't want them lynched but I am not sure that I believe he's "worried about what they are going to flip"
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 13:47
|
|
|
a worthy uhh posted:Something that has been bothering me that I want to explicitly ask right now. Yeah, I learned I'm 3p at the same time the thread did.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 13:53
|
|
|
Quandary is lying. I'm not going to claim to explain why.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:02
|
|
|
merk posted:Quandary is lying. I'm not going to claim to explain why. I think Narc did that for you 
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:06
|
|
|
a worthy uhh posted:I think Narc did that for you Nope
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
Also, what a scummy post
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:15
|
|
|
##vote Quandary We need to get a move on and nothing new is coming up.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:18
|
|
|
a worthy uhh posted:Something that has been bothering me that I want to explicitly ask right now. Actually, why did you ask this? It was pretty obvious what the answer would be. Why has it been "bothering" you?
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:19
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Actually, why did you ask this? It was pretty obvious what the answer would be. Why has it been "bothering" you? Because you have lied more than once, and never addressed my callout after you eventually claimed 3P
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:23
|
|
|
merk posted:Also, what a scummy post Yeah, definitely scummy, not sarcastic or mocking your stupid scumbuddies
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:23
|
|
|
a worthy uhh posted:Because you have lied more than once, and never addressed my callout after you eventually claimed 3P And basically, me not believing that you haven't always known you were 3P is a very important part of my beliefs RE: you so I wanted to get actual explicit confirmation of your claim
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 16:31 |
|
|
I'm going to vote out Keane and a worthy uhh in lights out, probably starting with a worthy uhh.
|
|
#
?
Mar 30, 2015 14:26
|
|