|
best color is 'hearing aide' and I wish more cars offered it. Like Jeep for instance.
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 01:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 21:26 |
|
|
Keyser S0ze posted:That primer grey color owns. I think Scion has one as well. Agreed. Just generally, light non-metallic colors own.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 01:08
|
|
|
ilkhan posted:They have a good grey (magnetic), and very pretty blue (DIB), and that awesome green (Guard). The hot Orange has it's place.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
El Scotch posted:The hot Orange has it's place. And that place is on someone else's car. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
Powershift posted:New lincoln continental concept. I like it, except for those wheels and the chrome'd out interior, it looks pretty good, has that same understated luxury look that the oldschool 60's Lincolns had. I'm sure it'll end up being a rebadged Tarus when it comes out, if it even gets built, but It looks pretty nice. Needs suicide doors on the rear though. E. Though can someone who's got more car learnin' than me explain what the deal with this like quad-bulb headlights popping up everywhere are?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 04:36
|
|
|
Raluek posted:None of these colors are Grabber Blue so I don't get what all the commotion is about. I would have totally got my '15 in Grabber Blue if it was offered, had to settle with Deep Impact Blue.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 04:51
|
|
|
ExplodingSims posted:I like it, except for those wheels and the chrome'd out interior, it looks pretty good, has that same understated luxury look that the oldschool 60's Lincolns had. I'm sure it'll end up being a rebadged Tarus when it comes out, if it even gets built, but It looks pretty nice. Needs suicide doors on the rear though. Absolutely needs suicide rear doors. I dig it too, especially compared to their current stuff with those damned hideous grilles.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 04:52
|
|
|
Mange Mite posted:Are the projectors supposed to be tiny Lincoln logos?  anyone calling this car "understanded" is wrong as gently caress, it's literally oozing tacky plastichrome from its pores and chinese buyers will eat this thing up. here let me show those posters how wrong they are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIDg7EKSQKw
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 06:46
|
|
|
Maybe 'understated' isn't right but I think 'aggressively boring' was bang on.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 06:49
|
|
|
I'm more of the aggressively bad persuasion
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 07:35
|
|
|
It seems pretty terrible to me in the same way the Bentley CGT is pretty terrible, huge FWD front overhang etc, but people love the poo poo out of the CGT so 
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 07:54
|
|
|
dissss posted:Maybe 'understated' isn't right but I think 'aggressively boring' was bang on. "boringly aggressive" too
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 08:47
|
|
|
What is it with cars having huge loving centre dividers like that? I can understand on low slung sports cars with an FR layout but this?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 12:54
|
|
|
88h88 posted:What is it with cars having huge loving centre dividers like that? I can understand on low slung sports cars with an FR layout but this? People feel less safe in cars with large open spaces between the seats. Since front bench seats are gone away forever, when you design a car with a 5 foot gap between driver and passenger, you've gotta fit something in there.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 12:57
|
|
|
I dont know why people look at something like that and are like oh yes take my money 
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 13:21
|
|
|
Raluek posted:None of these colors are Grabber Blue so I don't get what all the commotion is about. Ford really hosed the dog when they didn't bring back Grabber Green.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 14:16
|
|
|
Sigma X posted:People feel less safe in cars with large open spaces between the seats. Since front bench seats are gone away forever, when you design a car with a 5 foot gap between driver and passenger, you've gotta fit something in there.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 15:29
|
|
|
ilkhan posted:I visit my ford dealer regularly (I think the sales dudes are sick of me) and when I hang out in an F150 all I can think is that they could reduce the size of the truck by a foot in all dimensions and not lose a damned thing. Its frustrating when what you want is a 2.7 or 3.5EB Ranger and you know they *could* offer one but don't. what you really want is a Mustang GT though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 15:56
|
|
|
ilkhan posted:I visit my ford dealer regularly (I think the sales dudes are sick of me) and when I hang out in an F150 all I can think is that they could reduce the size of the truck by a foot in all dimensions and not lose a damned thing. Its frustrating when what you want is a 2.7 or 3.5EB Ranger and you know they *could* offer one but don't. Nobody that buys new trucks off the lot wants a smaller truck. They all want lifted half tons with leather and a cow catcher.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 15:58
|
|
|
KillHour posted:Nobody that buys new trucks off the lot wants a smaller truck. They all want lifted half tons with leather and a cow catcher. ...And LED off road lights wired into the DRLs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 16:59
|
|
|
HEY VAPER posted:
Bentley designer already crying theft apparently.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 18:06
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:Bentley designer already crying theft apparently. It's not faaaaair we had the Chinese market on lock with a lovely looking overstyled FWD-biased faux-luxury car with ninety percent markup. Acura (looking up from its bagged lunch of purestrain goat poo poo): WHUH WHAT? ANOTHER $40K CIVIC? OK
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 18:19
|
|
|
Seat Safety Switch posted:lovely looking You take that back. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 19:16
|
|
|
It looks alright. It'll probably be decently roomy, and the chrome will probably lure in people that want a new Town Car.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 19:40
|
|
|
tijag posted:what you really want is a Mustang GT though. As far as truck sizing goes, it'd be nice to be able to park inside a single spot, or move around in a crowded parking garage. They could chop a foot off each in each dimension without losing anything but a little bit of payload width and towing stability. There is PLENTY of wasted space in the engine bay and width in the cabin to chop those dimensions out. Make it an F100 without a V8 option but just as much off-road/towing-payload ability. ilkhan fucked around with this message at 19:48 on Mar 31, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
KillHour posted:Nobody that buys new trucks off the lot wants a smaller truck. They all want lifted half tons with leather and a cow catcher. hey, there's like 0.1% of us that want cheap V8's, RWD only and a muscle car gearset
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 19:57
|
|
|
 Holden Sandman wagon First Kia shows their Optima wagon, now this. These won't ever come to America in any form, will they?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 20:21
|
|
|
davebo posted:
Basically the two best things about Australia right there.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 21:34
|
|
|
blk posted:Basically the two best things about Australia right there. I don't see any sharks.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 21:35
|
|
|
davebo posted:
no because you see PICKUPS VROOM VROOM
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 22:28
|
|
|
davebo posted:
Not a shagging wagon (panel van), shameful Holden
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2015 23:46
|
|
|
 According to jalopnik Hyundai has a test mule for a midengine veloster, like the cliov6 or Turbo 2. I would buy and drive the poo poo out of it, assuming it ever actually comes to the US. (it won't)
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
So this is the Cadillac CT6. I wish Caddy would go back to using real names.  KillHour posted:Nobody that buys new trucks off the lot wants a smaller truck. They all want lifted half tons with leather and a cow catcher. It's all about feeling like the biggest baddest motherfucker on the highway for some people. If I wanted to feel that way, I'd rather have the appropriate tool for the job: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2015 00:25
|
|
|
davebo posted:
Only if they lift it and make it AWD. That's the only way we take our wagons here. Network42 posted:
That's cool as poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2015 00:25
|
|
|
Tubesock Holocaust posted:It's all about feeling like the biggest baddest motherfucker on the highway for some people. If I wanted to feel that way, I'd rather have the appropriate tool for the job: The problem is that they want this feeling, but they also don't want any "discomfort" from the truck actually driving like a truck.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2015 00:27
|
|
|
fknlo posted:Only if they lift it and make it AWD. That's the only way we take our wagons here. Transverse AWD. Anything else is for rednecks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
Tubesock Holocaust posted:So this is the Cadillac CT6. Awww, it's crying. Why is it crying?
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
bull3964 posted:Awww, it's crying. Why is it crying? Because it knows it'll spend the first year on the showroom lot before being pushed out the door with $15k on the hood. Seriously, so many people really want Cadillac to be the luxury car brand that undercuts ze Germans in price, not match them dollar for dollar. But doing that risks slotting it in the same "premium near-luxury" class as Infiniti and Acura. Maybe that's precisely where Cadillac should be (but where would that put Buick? A slightly nicer Chevy a la GMC?)
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2015 01:04
|
|
|
bull3964 posted:Awww, it's crying. Why is it crying? Naw, they're teardrop tatoos. MrYenko posted:Transverse AWD. Anything else is for rednecks. Naturally.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2015 01:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 21:26 |
|
|
What's Caddy reliability like these days?
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2015 01:18
|
|